Goa govt challenges high court order on Sec 17(2) of TCP Act in Supreme Court
Panaji:
Two months after the high court of Bombay at Goa struck down the rules and guidelines of the controversial Section 17 (2) of the
Town and Country Planning Act
, 1974, in 'public interest', state govt challenged the high court order in
Supreme Court
.
'After being entirely unclear of its proposed actions against the 17(2) judgment of the HC, Goa govt filed its SLP against the judgment this week,' Goa Foundation director Claude Alvares said. He said that as per govt's initial statements, the judgment was in its favour and there was no need to appeal. 'Now govt has once again changed its mind.'
On May 2,
TOI
reported that the high court judgment became effective after the expiry of six weeks from the date of the verdict on March 13.
After TCP minister Vishwajit Rane announced that state govt would not approach Supreme Court in the matter, all eyes were on govt's next move.
The affected land developers were hopeful of some relief from the TCP department within the framework of the TCP Act. However, the greens are firm on fighting another legal battle to protect the environment. After the judgment was delivered on March 13, govt had sought a stay on the operation of the judgment for six weeks, which was accepted by the court.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
빠진 치아 있다면? 1개도 10개도 개당 33만원에 임플란트 해드려요
플란치과
더 알아보기
Undo
'Almost all the conversions are from paddy fields, natural cover, no-development zone, and orchard to settlement zones,' the HC said, adding that according to the state, 353 approvals under Section 17(2) were granted, affecting 26.5 lakh sqm. 'The 2023 rules confer unfettered and unguided authority on the executive to interpret what is meant by an inadvertent error or what is an inconsistent/incoherent zoning proposal,' the HC stated.
'There is no guidance in the 2023 rules themselves as to what is an 'inadvertent error or incoherent or inconsistent zoning proposal'. The power is open-ended.'
Such 'plot-by-plot conversion, creating a zone within a zone virtually has the effect of mutilating the Regional Plan prepared after such an elaborate exercise,' the high court said.
Two days after the HC struck down the rules and guidelines, Rane had said that govt would tweak the rules and guidelines in line with the HC directions and make Section 17(2) operational. Rane made a U-turn over his statement to challenge the HC order in Supreme Court and said that he would not do so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Banke Bihari temple priests threaten to 'relocate Thakurji' over corridor redevelopment plan
AGRA: Priests of the centuries-old Banke Bihari temple in Mathura, who are opposed to the proposed 'redevelopment plan for the Banke Bihari corridor in Vrindavan', alleged on Monday, that if govt does not heed their concerns, they will relocate the Banke Bihari deity to another site. The latest development came after a series of protests by the Goswami community members and locals against the proposed corridor and the creation of the Banke Bihari temple trust by the state govt. Ghanshyam Goswami, 60, a member of the management committee, said, "The problem is that the govt wants to turn this place of faith into a picnic spot. The Banke Bihari Trust was formed without consulting us. We're open to suggestions for improving the management of the temple but if this situation continues, we'll not hesitate to move Thakurji out of the temple. This temple was founded by our forefathers, and the customs and traditions here date back to the 19th century. " The Supreme Court, in its May 15 verdict, permitted the UP govt to continue with the 'Rs 500 cr redevelopment plan for the Shri Banke Bihari temple corridor in Vrindavan'. The project, approved by the bench of Justice Bela M Trivedi and Justice SC Sharma, enables the state to utilise temple funds to acquire about 5 acres of land near the shrine. Calls for redevelopment intensified after a stampede-like incident took place during the Janmashtami celebrations in 2022, which resulted in two fatalities. In Sept 2023, Allahabad high court directed the state govt to implement a corridor plan to manage crowds and ensure safety. Although the state said it engaged with all stakeholders, Shebaits and local residents have claimed they were excluded from discussions. On Monday, Agra's divisional commissioner Shailendra Kumar Singh, Mathura DM Chandra Prakesh Singh, Agra range DIG Shailesh Kumar Pandey and additional officials held a meeting with the stakeholders to seek a resolution. Shailendra Kumar Singh said, "The proposed corridor has been cleared by the SC. The locals have raised some issues, and we have reached out to them. In the issues related to the temple, we ensured that no change will be there to the customs and traditions of the temple. Shopkeepers had doubts related to compensation, and we cleared them. The streets in and around the temple are narrow and unsuitable for the influx of people who visit the temple daily, so this corridor will be beneficial for all the stakeholders. "
Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Mother's whereabouts ‘unknown' after detention by Assam police, son knocks on Supreme Court door
Monowara Bewa, whose son's Habeas Corpus petition the Supreme Court has agreed to hear next week, lives in Khagrabari village in Dhubri district with her family and is among several people who the Assam police have detained since May 23 in a crackdown against people declared foreigners by the state's Foreigners' Tribunals. Her son, 26-year-old Iunuch (Yunus) Ali, has alleged that she has been picked up for deportation, and her whereabouts since then are not known. Bewa was declared a foreigner by an FT in 2016 and placed in detention in Assam's Kokrajhar. She was released on bail in 2019 following the Supreme Court's directions to this effect for those who had completed three years in detention. The Gauhati High Court had upheld the FT order in 2017, and the family approached the Supreme Court through a Special Leave Petition the same year. While the Supreme Court has agreed to hear her son's petition, back in Dhubri, her family remains in the dark about her whereabouts since she was detained on May 24. 'That day, she got a call from the Gauripur police station asking her to report with her documents. Since she goes every month because of her bail conditions, we thought they needed her for something related to that. She and her son went around 5 pm. They were made to wait there until late at night, when a senior official came to take her away, saying he was following instructions from higher authorities. The next day, we went to the office of the border police SP in Dhubri, but the in-charge there said he did not know anything. It has been eight days, and we still don't know where she is,' said her nephew, Maminur Hussain (37). Bewa's neighbour, Jahanara Hussain (55), who is also a local women's leader who has been helping the family with the case, said that on Sunday, she received the link to a Facebook video that purportedly showed Bewa in Bangladesh alongside four others. 'It was circulated among people in the area on Sunday night. It is her in the video, but we still do not have any idea where she could be right now,' she said.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court defers Batla House plea, declines stay on demolition
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the impending demolition of homes and shops in Delhi's Batla House area, observing that its earlier order of May 7 – directing action against unauthorised construction, did not warrant any interference at this stage. A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma, hearing a plea filed by over 40 residents, declined interim protection against the demolition drive being undertaken by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Uttar Pradesh Irrigation Department, but agreed to list the matter in July, once the court resumes full functioning after the summer vacation. 'It is our order and we have seen it… You take instructions if you would want us to simply adjourn this,' the bench told senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing for the residents, while referring to the earlier direction of the apex court from May 7. 'We are telling you that we have seen the papers. We can adjourn it. That is all we can do,' said the bench, making it clear that the court was not inclined to examine the issue substantively during the summer vacation. Hegde urged the bench to at least clarify that no demolitions should be carried out in the interim. 'Let nothing happen in the meantime,' he said. But the court stood firm. 'You will be taking a risk if you want to argue this,' the bench warned, reiterating that it would not hear the matter during the vacation and asking Hegde to 'take instructions.' After consulting his clients, Hegde asked that the matter be listed in the week after the summer recess. The court agreed. The partial working schedule of the Supreme Court ends on July 13, after which regular hearings resume. Hegde informed the bench that the petitioners would approach the appropriate appellate authority to challenge the demolition notices. The dispute stems from a May 7 ruling by another bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, which directed that unauthorised constructions outside the boundaries of colonies regularised under the 2019 Pradhan Mantri-Unauthorized Colonies in Delhi Awas Adhikar Yojana (PM-UDAY) be demolished. The order said residents should be given 'at least 15 days' notice' and allowed to 'adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.' Acting on the order, DDA issued eviction notices dated May 26, which were pasted on several buildings in Batla House. The notices, marked by large red Xs, stated: 'This building/structure has been found to be an illegal/unauthorised structure falling in khasra number 279, village Okhla, outside PMA-UDAY colony boundary… occupants are hereby directed to vacate the premises within 15 days… the demolition programme shall be carried out from 11-06-2025 without any further notice.' With the demolition set to begin just days before Eid-ul-Adha, anxiety has spread through the predominantly Muslim neighbourhood. Many residents, in their plea, said they have lived in the area for decades and view the notices as arbitrary and unjust. In their plea before the top court, residents argue that the 15-day notice was not meaningfully served. Instead of individual communication or clear deadlines, the notices were simply pasted on buildings, offering no scope for redress. They claim the demolition drive is arbitrary, illegal, and in breach of the protections under the PM-UDAY scheme. While DDA and the UP Irrigation Department claim the affected area lies outside the scheme's boundary, residents insist they qualify for regularisation or at the very least deserve a chance to be heard. The petitioners say they are legitimate homeowners with long-standing possession, and that no individualised assessment of legality was made before marking homes for demolition. The residents had first approached the Supreme Court on May 29. At the time, the court advised them to move Delhi High Court. But the petitioners pointed out that the authorities were relying on the Supreme Court's May 7 order to justify the imminent demolitions, leaving them with no choice but to return to the top court. The bench then directed the registry to list the matter this week. Batla House, part of the Jamia Nagar locality, has long been a densely populated working-class enclave. It first drew national attention in 2008 after a controversial police encounter resulted in the deaths of two alleged terrorists and a Delhi Police inspector. Now, the looming demolition has brought it back into the spotlight. With Monday's development, the matter now rests in limbo until July. Meanwhile, the 15-day notice period, expiring on June 10, leaves affected families facing an uncertain and anxious wait, coinciding with one of the year's biggest religious festivals.
