Goa govt challenges high court order on Sec 17(2) of TCP Act in Supreme Court
Two months after the high court of Bombay at Goa struck down the rules and guidelines of the controversial Section 17 (2) of the
Town and Country Planning Act
, 1974, in 'public interest', state govt challenged the high court order in
Supreme Court
.
'After being entirely unclear of its proposed actions against the 17(2) judgment of the HC, Goa govt filed its SLP against the judgment this week,' Goa Foundation director Claude Alvares said. He said that as per govt's initial statements, the judgment was in its favour and there was no need to appeal. 'Now govt has once again changed its mind.'
On May 2,
TOI
reported that the high court judgment became effective after the expiry of six weeks from the date of the verdict on March 13.
After TCP minister Vishwajit Rane announced that state govt would not approach Supreme Court in the matter, all eyes were on govt's next move.
The affected land developers were hopeful of some relief from the TCP department within the framework of the TCP Act. However, the greens are firm on fighting another legal battle to protect the environment. After the judgment was delivered on March 13, govt had sought a stay on the operation of the judgment for six weeks, which was accepted by the court.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
빠진 치아 있다면? 1개도 10개도 개당 33만원에 임플란트 해드려요
플란치과
더 알아보기
Undo
'Almost all the conversions are from paddy fields, natural cover, no-development zone, and orchard to settlement zones,' the HC said, adding that according to the state, 353 approvals under Section 17(2) were granted, affecting 26.5 lakh sqm. 'The 2023 rules confer unfettered and unguided authority on the executive to interpret what is meant by an inadvertent error or what is an inconsistent/incoherent zoning proposal,' the HC stated.
'There is no guidance in the 2023 rules themselves as to what is an 'inadvertent error or incoherent or inconsistent zoning proposal'. The power is open-ended.'
Such 'plot-by-plot conversion, creating a zone within a zone virtually has the effect of mutilating the Regional Plan prepared after such an elaborate exercise,' the high court said.
Two days after the HC struck down the rules and guidelines, Rane had said that govt would tweak the rules and guidelines in line with the HC directions and make Section 17(2) operational. Rane made a U-turn over his statement to challenge the HC order in Supreme Court and said that he would not do so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Toll on citizens' purse and patience': Supreme Court slams NHAI, upholds Kerala HC order suspending toll
The Supreme Court Monday upheld the Kerala High Court's view that the public cannot be forced to pay user fee for roads which are in a state of disrepair, and pointed out that citizens bear the brunt of such roads, which also affects the environment and leads to a wastage of fuel. A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, K Vinod Chandran, and N V Anjaria said this while dismissing the appeal filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) against the Kerala High Court's August 6 judgement. In the judgment, the high court suspended the toll collection for four weeks at Paliyekkara in Thrissur district along the stretch of the National Highway 544, where the roads are in a poor condition. 'We cannot but agree with the reasoning of the High Court that the 'obligation of the public to pay a user fee under statutory provisions is premised on the assurance that their use of the road will be free from hindrances',' the bench said, citing the HC order. The bench added from the August 6 order, which also said, 'When the public is legally bound to pay a user fee, they simultaneously acquire a corresponding right to demand unhindered, safe, and regulated access to the road. Any failure on the part of the National Highways Authority or its agents to ensure such access constitutes a breach of the public's legitimate expectations and undermines the very basis of the toll regime'. The bench said the cost of constructing roads under the Build, Operate, Transfer (BOT) model is collected from people using it, despite having already paid motor vehicle tax. 'In a democracy, roads are laid on Build Operate and Transfer contracts to ensure that the cost is collected from the users, when motor vehicle tax is remitted for their use on roads, it is a sad reflection of the free market. That the successful bidder extracts much more than what is spent on construction and maintenance is a comedy of errors,' Justice Chandran said, writing for the bench. 'That the roads fall into disrepair due to vagaries of nature and often rank neglect, is the stark reality. That the toll collectors at the booths, often due to understaffing and overwork, behave like satraps, is a fact of life. That the poor citizen is bound to wait for hours, in a queue, and in a cramped space, with the engine running but hardly moving, is a tragedy. That the toll is really on the purse and the patience of the citizen, as also the environment, is the downside,' said Justice Chandran. On the condition of the said stretch of National Highway 544, the bench said, 'We are also surprised that the further constructions on the road, constructed on BOT basis is entrusted to another Contractor, when the obligation to maintain the entire stretch is on the Concessionaire under the BOT agreement; on which we speak no further, since it is the commercial wisdom of the NHAI.' Refusing to interfere with the Kerala HC order, the top court said, 'We are convinced not only that the order be sustained, but the Division Bench also be requested to monitor the situation to ensure ease of traffic' It asked the high court's division bench to also implead the contractor who is carrying out the work on the black spots. The Supreme Court noted that NHAI had assured that the maintenance work on the service roads is proceeding on a war footing and smooth traffic would be ensured soon. 'The minute smooth traffic is resumed, the NHAI or the Concessionaire would be entitled to pray for lifting the prohibitory order, even before the four weeks as ordered by the High Court.'
India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
Top court questions Governors' powers, federal harmony in handling state bills
The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned whether the country has lived up to the expectations of the Constitution's framers regarding harmony between the governor and the state government, as well as consultation on various issues between the two power observation came from a five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai, during the hearing of a Presidential Reference seeking clarity on the powers and discretion of governors and the president in dealing with Bills passed by state General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, referred to the Constituent Assembly debates on the appointment and powers of governors. He argued that the post is not a political refuge for retired politicians but carries significant responsibilities under the Constitution. "Governors are not just postmen. They represent the Union of India. An individual who is not directly elected is no less than those who are," he told the emphasised that governors are expected to act with discretion, including options to pass, withhold, or refer a bill, but within the constitutional framework. He clarified that withholding a bill does not mean killing it bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha, and AS Chandurkar, engaged in a detailed discussion on Articles 200 and 201 and the federal structure envisaged by the Constitution. Justice Narsimha asked the Solicitor General to consider the constitutional use of the word "withhold", noting that it appears in multiple places in the court also explored whether governors, despite disagreeing with a bill, are obligated to exercise discretion in the first instance, or whether they have other options, with Mehta emphasising that governors have several courses of action but discretion must be exercised according to constitutional Solicitor General referred the court to Constituent Assembly debates, including remarks by Jawaharlal Nehru, highlighting that governors were envisioned as eminent individuals, sometimes from outside active politics, who could cooperate with the government while remaining slightly above party an arrangement, Mehta argued, would ensure smoother functioning of democratic machinery than if governors were entirely partisan. The court noted the influence of the American system in these debates and the ongoing litigation that has arisen from ambiguity in gubernatorial top court also addressed the long pendency of bills with governors, noting that some legislation has remained pending since 2020. Mehta submitted that imposing fixed timelines on governors and the president would amount to one organ of government assuming powers not granted by the Constitution, potentially leading to "constitutional disorder".He clarified that the government does not seek to confer absolute discretion on governors to reject bills, but rather to interpret their constitutional powers the hearing, the bench observed that the Presidential Reference would be considered in advisory jurisdiction and not appellate jurisdiction. President Droupadi Murmu had invoked Article 143(1) to seek clarity on whether judicial orders could impose timelines for the exercise of discretion by the president on bills reserved by reference followed an April 8 ruling on Bills from the Tamil Nadu Assembly, which had prescribed a three-month timeline for presidential action on Bills reserved by also walked the court through the drafting of the office of governor in the Draft Constitution, noting proposals that initially considered direct election by the highlighted the historical significance and sanctity of the governor's office, clarifying that it is not an asylum for retired politicians. He also noted that debates on provincial versus central supremacy aimed to ensure a balanced federal framework and harmonious relations between governors and elected state bench probed the practical impact of gubernatorial discretion, asking whether a government elected with a majority would be at the whims of a governor. Mehta responded that all powers are granted by the Constitution and that discretion must be exercised within legal cited examples during the COVID-19 pandemic when, irrespective of the party in power at the Centre, state governments and the PM coordinated effectively, showing how democratic functioning accommodates differing power centres while maintaining cooperation.- Ends advertisement
India Today
42 minutes ago
- India Today
Attacker pushed Rekha Gupta, pulled her hair: How 1-minute chaos unfolded
A minute-long chaos unfolded at Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta's official residence on Wednesday when she was assaulted during a weekly public attacker, identified as Rajesh Bhai Khimji Bhai Sakariya (41), a resident of Gujarat's Rajkot, was swiftly rounded up and taken into custody. An attempt to murder case has been filed against Today has pieced together the sequence of the events that happened at the Chief Minister's new Civil Lines residence shortly after 8 am. advertisement The incident happened when the Chief Minister was attending the usual weekly public hearing (Jan Sunwai) at the camp outside her has been holding these camps ever since she assumed the top post. In these camps, people from across the city can present their complaints to the Chief Minister the public hearing starts at 8 am, entry is given at 7 am after a security check-up of the complainants. The Chief Minister then reaches out to all the complainants one by THE CHAOS UNFOLDED AT CHIEF MINISTER'S RESIDENCEThe attacker was spotted reaching the Chief Minister's camp office in a rickshaw. Sources said the attacker entered her camp office posing as a complainant. He came with a petition seeking the release of one of his relatives who was in Gupta came to him, Sakariya handed her some papers before shouting at her. Sources said he first slapped the Chief Minister and then lunged forward and pushed lost control due to the impact but did not fall as there was a wall behind her. The next moment, the attacker grabbed the Chief Minister by the hair. The security personnel quickly intervened and hit Sakariya's hand first to force him to release his grip on her attacker, who has a criminal record, was then overpowered and taken to the Civil Lines police station. Meanwhile, Gupta was taken for a medical MOVEMENTS BEFORE THE INCIDENTA day before the assault, on Tuesday morning between 11 and 11.30 am, Sakariya had visited Rekha Gupta's private residence in Shalimar Bagh. Since the Chief Minister was not available there, her staff handed him a slip with details of the public hearing and the Civil Lines Shalimar Bagh, Sakariya returned to the Gujarati Samaj Bhawan where he had been staying. The next morning, around 8 am on Wednesday, he reached the Chief Minister's Civil Lines residence and carried out the 'MENTALLY ILL', DOG LOVERHowever, Sakariya's mother has claimed that her son was mentally ill and an ardent animal lover who was upset over the Supreme Court's recent order on stray dogs in the Supreme Court ordered civic bodies to round up all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR and put them in shelters to tackle the issue of dog bites."He has a mental illness, but he never takes any medicine. He loves animals. He was upset when the news about the dogs came. He used to beat everyone at home. He has even beaten me," Sakariya's mother police sources have dismissed claims that Sakariya's action stemmed from his love for police sources further said the accused, who posed as a complainant, had no relative lodged in jail, nor did he carry any application with him. Investigating agencies are now trying to determine his real motive behind the police registered a case against Sakariya under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) — Section 132 (assaulting a public servant), Section 221 (obstructing a public servant in duty), and Section 109 (attempt to murder).ATTACKER'S BACKGROUND AND CRIMINAL RECORDSakariya works as an autorickshaw driver and is married. He already has five cases registered against him in Gujarat — three related to liquor smuggling and two of assault. In some of these cases, he was later EndsMust Watch
