‘Not the right fit': Children to be diverted from NDIS under scheme reboot
In a major address on the scheme's future, Butler said a new system called 'Thriving Kids' would be established to support families in schools, childcare centres and playgroups from July 2026, and fully roll out a year later.
The Albanese government will also seek to reduce annual NDIS growth from its current trajectory of 10.2 per cent to a maximum of 5 to 6 per cent, so that the scheme remains financially sustainable and keeps the support of the Australian public.
'We are at a fork in the road right now,' Butler told the National Press Club on Wednesday, in his first address on the NDIS since acquiring responsibility for the scheme in May.
'Children with mild to moderate levels of developmental delay and autism should not, in my view, be on a scheme set up for permanent disability. It is not the right fit.
Loading
'But I recognise it is the only port available to so many parents, tens and tens of thousands of parents, and I think we should treat as a matter of urgency the need to provide them with a more suitable system of broad-based mainstream support.'
The NDIS was intended to support about 410,000 people, but now serves almost 740,000 – a figure that grows each quarter. More than half of new participants are under nine, and seven in 10 people joining the scheme have autism as a primary diagnosis.
'I think most Australians would be alarmed to know that now, one out of every 10 six-year-olds are on the NDIS, including 16 per cent of 6-year-old boys. That's one in every six boys in the average grade 2 classroom,' Butler said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Treasurer Jim Chalmers and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien clash behind closed doors at Economic Reform Roundtable
Treasurer Jim Chalmers and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien have been caught in an intense exchange over fiscal restraint behind the closed doors of the economic reform round table. Treasurer Jim Chalmers and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien have clashed behind closed doors at the Economic Reform Roundtable, over the high level of government spending. According to insiders, the exchange was heated before NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey intervened. ACTU Secretary Sally McManus described the spat as 'a bit of a political exchange that went on that felt a bit like in question time'. 'The rest of us sort of said, oh, just, Ted and Jim… It was like, okay, guys, like you can do that in question-time. The rest of this here don't normally get to do that. 'So yeah, it was a of a backwards and forwards on that and two very different views about whether or not you need to have rules (about government spending).' Mr O'Brien had confronted the Treasurer about public spending, warning that the 'spree' needed to stop. 'I set a test for the Treasurer today to stop the spending spree, which starts with the introduction of quantifiable fiscal rules,' Mr O'Brien said outside the closed-door meeting. The debate sparked criticism from Nationals Senator Bridget McKenzie, who told Sky News she understood the shadow treasurer's frustration. 'I think it's pretty frustrating to sit and listen to the Treasurer talk about fixing the productivity decline, which is at 60-year lows right now,' she said. 'We're not allowed to talk about energy. We're not allowed to talked about significant tax reform. 'We're not allowed to talk about spending cuts and we're not allowed to talk about industrial relations. You know, the big kind of ticket items on how to get our economy going. The Albanese government limited discussions at the round table to a specific set of agreed upon topics. A leaked document to the ABC showed a number of recommended outcomes for the productivity round table before the event had even begun. — Jim Chalmers MP (@JEChalmers) August 20, 2025 Mr Chalmers and Mr O'Brien's confrontation occurred amid discussions on the pressures facing the budget, including spending on the care economy. Treasury forecasts released ahead of the roundtable indicated that government spending would hit 27 per cent of GDP in 2025–26. That would mark the highest level since 1986, outside of the COVID pandemic. Mr Chalmers, in his opening remarks on the final day of the roundtable, had emphasised collaboration and long-term reform. 'Tax reform isn't just about budget sustainability. That's part of it, a big part of it, but not the only part of it,' he said. 'It's also about how we incentivise work, how we incentivise investment, how we lift productivity, how we make the system simpler and more sustainable. The roundtable has focused on three key topics: developing economic resilience, productivity and exploring budget or tax reform. Independent economist Evan Lucas told Sky News the roundtable had underwhelmed due to stakeholders' lack of movement on entrenched positions. 'The actual event has been as boring as it could possibly be and I don't use that as lightly,' he said. 'For something that is so important, it has been so incredibly dull. And not only that there was still very clearly ingrained biases and ingrained views that aren't moving. 'If you listen to the business council, shock horror, they've come with the idea that company tax should be cut. They've been saying that for 30 years. No new ideas. 'It's the same with the unions as well. They haven't shifted since the Hawke-Keating era where they got involved with the reform required. They are not shifting their view.'
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Every number you just said is wrong': Chalmers, O'Brien brawl behind closed doors
Treasurer Jim Chalmers and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien have fought over government spending inside the high-powered economic roundtable on Thursday morning. At the opening of a session on fiscal management, the Coalition representative at the government-run summit made his major first intervention in the three-day event, accusing Chalmers of over-spending and baking in long-term deficits. A source familiar with the conversation, unauthorised to disclose it publicly, said the argument became 'heated'. NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, who was due to speak next, stepped in and encouraged the pair to move on from the debate. 'Jim [Chalmers] got very defensive and said, 'We're not in question time, Ted',' the source said. O'Brien claimed Labor's budget deficit would have been about $40 billion better and argued national debt would have been $100 billion lower if Labor had offset its new spending with savings. O'Brien also argued in favour of fiscal rules to mandate budget restraint – a Coalition policy before the election when the Dutton opposition eventually laid out a plan to spend more than Labor in the near-term. According to the source, Chalmers claimed: 'Every number you just said is wrong.' The reform roundtable, held around the federal cabinet table, has been a low-key affair until the bust-up on Thursday morning. But the sparring match reflects the political importance of debt and deficits to Australian politics. The summit will wrap up on Thursday afternoon, when Chalmers is expected to confirm that Labor intends to cut red and green tape to speed up housing and energy project approvals.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
‘Every number you just said is wrong': Chalmers, O'Brien brawl behind closed doors
Treasurer Jim Chalmers and shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien have fought over government spending inside the high-powered economic roundtable on Thursday morning. At the opening of a session on fiscal management, the Coalition representative at the government-run summit made his major first intervention in the three-day event, accusing Chalmers of over-spending and baking in long-term deficits. A source familiar with the conversation, unauthorised to disclose it publicly, said the argument became 'heated'. NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, who was due to speak next, stepped in and encouraged the pair to move on from the debate. 'Jim [Chalmers] got very defensive and said, 'We're not in question time, Ted',' the source said. O'Brien claimed Labor's budget deficit would have been about $40 billion better and argued national debt would have been $100 billion lower if Labor had offset its new spending with savings. O'Brien also argued in favour of fiscal rules to mandate budget restraint – a Coalition policy before the election when the Dutton opposition eventually laid out a plan to spend more than Labor in the near-term. According to the source, Chalmers claimed: 'Every number you just said is wrong.' The reform roundtable, held around the federal cabinet table, has been a low-key affair until the bust-up on Thursday morning. But the sparring match reflects the political importance of debt and deficits to Australian politics. The summit will wrap up on Thursday afternoon, when Chalmers is expected to confirm that Labor intends to cut red and green tape to speed up housing and energy project approvals.
