I fled to the UK for safety. So why are your leaders cosying up to the brutal despots in Beijing who've put a £100,000 bounty on my head?
It is the same when she's on her frequent visits to London. Cheung, a slender, fragile figure, is 20 years old. But despite her childlike appearance, she has a £100,000 bounty on her head.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Ten-foot drone came so close to Heathrow passenger jet that pilot and first officer SAW it pass windshield
A ten-foot drone came so close to colliding with a passenger jet that it covered the plane's windscreen. The Airbus A320 had just taken off from London 's Heathrow Airport back in May and was at 9,000 ft when the near-miss occurred, The Sun reports. A report into the incident by investigation bod UK Airpox Board said: 'Both the Captain and First Officer saw a bright white object pass overhead from the opposite direction. 'It appeared to be approximately 2-3 metres in size at the very least.' The report added: 'It may have been larger as it filled a good proportion of the windshield.' The report added that the aircraft was spotted on radar by air traffic controllers. The in-flight incident investigation body was told a suspected drone had been spotted near London's City Airport prior to the incident. 'The Captain only saw the object for a second or two in peripheral vision so could not reliably comment on the shape. No markings were identified.' The pilot stated that the object 'went over us, probably within about 10m'. It is not clear which airline was operating the aircraft. It comes after a drone came within 10 to 20 metres of colliding with a Boeing 737 airliner as it approached Gatwick Airport in April. In a separate incident, a suspected drone came within 10ft of crashing into a British Airways passenger jet flying over London. The plane, operated by the airline's regional carrier BA Cityflyer, was travelling at 3,000ft four nautical miles north west of London City Airport, when pilots noticed an object with lights. The crew of the Embraer 190, which can carry up to 98 passengers, reported spotting the object at 6.10pm on October 31 after climbing out of the east London airport on a route used for domestic services to Edinburgh and Glasgow. While the incident was reported to police, the nature of the object was never formally identified. According to a report filed by the UK Airprox Board, which monitors and analyses near misses, said that both pilots 'instinctively flinched' as the object came 'extremely close' to the aircraft. The report concluded the incident meant there was a 'definite risk of collision' and or required 'providence', an instinctive pilot judgement in response to an emergency situation. In recent years, pilots have warned of the risk of drones causing potentially catastrophic damage if sucked into a jet engine or smashing into a windscreen.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Samuel Pepys the sex addict and RAPIST: Great Fire of London diarist's shocking deeds revealed... by the man himself
We have always known Samuel Pepys liked the occasional bit of nooky with a prostitute in an alley off Fleet Street, on his way home to his wife Elizabeth in Seething Lane. But if like me you have always brushed off that behaviour as 'that was just how things were in the 1660s, and I don't think he did it too often', it is time to think again. Unfortunately, as a new edition of his famous diaries illustrates all too vividly, we now have to add Pepys to the list of formerly respected famous figures who turn out to have fallen catastrophically short of acceptable sexual behaviour, to the point where their names are now mud. Most of us treasure Pepys as an essentially sound family-minded man, who buried his Parmesan during the Great Fire of London, made merry music round his table in the evenings, picked 'sparagus' from his garden, and sat up in bed late into the night talking and bickering with his dear wife. His diaries are close to our hearts because they give us a uniquely detailed glimpse into how one man's daily life was lived in those days: boats up and down the Thames, busy days in the Naval Office, fretting about over-expenditure on his wife's clothes, a hearty supper, and so to bed. All that will all change once you read historian Guy de la Bédoyère's newly transcribed selected extracts from the diaries. 'Selected' is the key word. De la Bédoyère has sifted the 1.25 million words of the diaries (written in shorthand between January 1660 and May 1669) down to 40,000 or 50,000 words of wall-to-wall filth and sleaze. He has left out all the charming, cosy stuff, and left in all the vile, predatory behaviour. When you read the diaries in this light, you'll see that Pepys was, in fact, a serial adulterer, a sex addict, a coercive predator, and a rapist. Pepys was so adept at hiding his behaviour that it wasn't till October 25, 1668, that Elizabeth caught him at it. She came downstairs one evening and saw him with one hand under the coats of their pretty 16-year-old servant girl Deb Willet, his other hand touching her genitals, or her 'cony' as he called them in the slang of the day. Elizabeth was distraught, and furious. In bed that evening, she ranted and raved, 'calling me a dog and a rogue', and threatened to publish his shame. Pepys minded desperately about his reputation. He was appalled that his bourgeois wife should think of going public with his dalliance. He wished she were more like the Queen, who was stoical about Charles II's flaunting of his mistresses. Elizabeth didn't go public, but she would not let the matter rest. Poor Deb, in tears, was sacked. Pepys, though sorry for her, still wanted 'to have the maidenhead of this girl which I should not doubt to have if I could get time to be with her'. In deepest secrecy he stalked Deb to the lane lined with brothels near Lincoln's Inn where she'd moved to. He tracked her down, forced her to pleasure him. With outrageous hypocrisy, 'gave her the best counsel I could to have a care of her honour', in other words advised her how to steer clear of predatory men. That sexual encounter with Deb is about the hundredth such encounter with women you'll have read about once you get to October 1668 in this shocking, sometimes exhausting chronicle of non-stop adulterous sex. Elizabeth didn't know the half of it. Her husband craved and achieved an illicit sexual encounter once every few days. De la Bédoyère writes, 'it's too glib to dismiss him as a 'sex pest' or a 'sex offender'. His behaviour is consistent with the neuropsychological disorder of addiction'. As well as the constant clandestine feeling-up of the maids who dressed him, he had a string of reliable women dotted about London, from Westminster to Deptford, who gave him sex on demand. Betty Martin (nee Lane) and her sister Doll were regulars. 'I f****d her under the chair two times,' he proudly writes of Betty, only afterwards worrying that he might have hurt her. Some of the women Pepys was seeing, such as Mrs Bagwell, were wives whose husbands wanted a promotion in the Navy. Mrs Bagwell's husband and in-laws may even have encouraged her to offer her body to Pepys, who as Clerk of the Acts to the Navy Board had a lot of influence when it came to promotions. There was a destitute naval widow, Mrs Burrows, who relied on Pepys for a widow's pension. He groomed her to accept that the way to get it was to let him have his wicked way with her. You know he's about to describe the details of the sex when he goes into 'polyglot': his own weird mixture of foreign languages interspersed with English. 'Did also tocar [touch] la thigh de su landlady'. 'I did what I would con ella' is a frequent one. 'Tocanda sa cosa con mi cosa' (touching her thing with my thing), 'hazer me hazer' (made me have an orgasm) . . . On and on it goes. Why did the secretive Pepys write it all down? You get the sense that he had an urge to 'chalk up' his sexual 'successes', and by doing so in shorthand, which itself was half in a foreign language, he doubly disguised them. When he was at his most predatory, he added extra consonants to English words, making them even harder (he hoped) for any future transcriber to decode. De la Bédoyère surmises that he recorded his encounters partly to expiate the guilt. Quite often, the women protested. Pepys clearly got a kick out of his sexual conquers under duress – which were essentially rapes. 'Many hard looks and sighs the poor wretch did give me,' he writes of Mrs Bagwell, 'and I think verily was troubled at what I did, but at last after many protestings I did arrive at what I would, with great pleasure.' This happened a few more times; once, he was so violent towards her that he injured his own hand while holding her down. 'Nevertheless in the end I had my will.' Add to this the way he domestically abused his wife, once giving her a black eye, and how he beat his servants with broomsticks and shut them in the cellar all night, and you get a new, deeply unattractive picture of the controlling Pepys beneath the surface of his cheerful bustle. I'm sure lots of men were at it, in those far less enlightened days, but that does not excuse him. He suffered from aching remorse – but that doesn't let him off the hook either. The scales have fallen from my eyes.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Officers at Notting Hill Carnival fear being attacked, sexually assaulted or trampled in a deadly crowd crush, their policing association reveals
Police officers fear being attacked, sexually assaulted or trampled in a deadly crowd crush at Notting Hill Carnival as fears mount over another weekend of violence. Some 7,000 Metropolitan Police officers and staff will be trying to keep up to two million revellers safe as they descend on the packed streets of west London. But officers are concerned about becoming isolated and being 'at the mercy of the crowd' after 61 of them were assaulted in just two days at last year's festival. Police were kicked, punched, pushed, spat at, headbutted and had glass bottles thrown at them in 2024 when 349 arrests were made - the highest total since 2019. Residents and business owners were this week photographed boarding up properties along the carnival route in an attempt to reduce the risk of damage this weekend. Simon Hill, Deputy General Secretary of the Metropolitan Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers, told the Daily Mail in an interview this week that the two biggest concerns for officers were being assaulted and crowd crushing. He said: 'Officers are concerned about the crowd density. It is physically possible to be six feet away from a colleague and for you to not be seen or to not see them. 'Officers are very much isolated due to density. In those isolated moments, then really they are at the mercy of the crowd - if you have people in there intent on causing harm to officers. 'I'm especially concerned about some of our female colleagues who report being sexually assaulted. It's just not acceptable. They don't go to work to be sexually assaulted. 'It must be dreadful for them. Some of our female colleagues are slight in build - they cannot defend themselves against a dense crowd.' Mr Hill said officers worried about their 'inability to protect the public' in the event of a crowd crush, given video evidence from previous festivals shows the crowd 'moving almost as a wave... of water'. He continued: 'It's physically possible to lift your feet and be carried with the crowd in certain points. It's a feeling of helplessness, that they are unable to protect and prevent that. There's also the fear that they'll actually be caught up in it.' Mr Hill said officers were 'very much at a risk of being victims of any crushing, as well as the public'. Susan Hall, a Conservative member of the London Assembly, said in a bombshell report published earlier this month that the carnival in recent years had only narrowly 'avoided a mass crush on the scale of the Hillsborough disaster'. London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan has warned of the risk of a 'crowd crush' at the carnival, saying at a meeting last month that he had 'seen images of some of the crowds at some parts' of the event and 'watching them made me frightened'. The growing popularity of Europe's biggest street party which celebrates Caribbean heritage, arts and culture has led to politicians raising their concerns over potential crushes at the non-ticketed event, with some suggesting a move to Hyde Park. Mr Hill backed the festival being moved to a park where it could be ticketed, although he said he accepted the 'geographical importance of the event' in its current location. He pointed out that the current road layout in Notting Hill has various trip hazards such as kerbs and drains, but a park would not have as many uneven surfaces. Mr Hill also suggested a park would have better refreshment and sanitary facilities, adding: 'The residents come back to their front gardens being used as toilets, and that's not acceptable.' He said: 'I would be surprised if there's any event in the UK that attracts a similar number of people confined to such a small geographical space.' The annual celebration has been running since 1966, and arrest totals have been on a rising curve since the start of the millennium. The total over the past 20 years between 2005 and 2024 is now well over the 5,000 mark. The Met has faced increasing pressure to ensure the safety of revellers after Cher Maximen, 32, was stabbed to death by Shakeil Thibou, 20, in front of her three-year-old daughter last year, while chef Mussie Imnetu, 41, was murdered in the street. This year, police want to identify 'violent gangs' planning to attend and urged anyone with information of individuals intending to engage in violence to come forward. But Mr Hill raised concerns that thousands of officers were being removed from their day-to-day jobs to police the carnival by the Met, which currently has a £260million hole in its budget. He said: 'The rest of London is being deprived of officers and resources and money for one event. Could the deployment of those officers be made better? Could the use of the money spent on the event be made better? I would suggest it probably could.' Since 2019, police have been banned from dancing with revellers amid concerns about public perception when they are trying to deal with serious violence. The Met confirmed this week that the ban would remain in place this year - and Mr Hill said he supports the policy despite the Met and officers being in a 'no-win situation'. He told the Mail: 'If we engage with communities and people that attend the carnival, try to make it a festival spirit and hopefully keep tensions down and dancing happens to be part of that, then we get criticised for looking unprofessional. 'If we don't engage with the communities in that way and we don't dance, then we get accused of being standoffish, unapproachable and not wanting to engage with the community. The Met is in an impossible position on this.' He said the stance to not dance is 'probably the best, because it doesn't distract from people's duties, the ability to stay alert and vigilant to any threats or any dangers, or any risks to the public or themselves'. Asked about the dancing policy, a Met spokesman told the Mail: 'Carnival is an iconic and spectacular event which attracts hundreds of thousands of people every year to party and celebrate Caribbean culture. But it is also an event where there have been numerous concerns about crowd safety and crime. 'As a consequence, almost 7,000 officers will be deployed to this year's event. They are there to keep revellers safe, not to join in the revelling. People walk past boarded-up properties in Notting Hill this week before the weekend's carnival 'We want officers to positively engage with the carnival-goers while staying vigilant at all times and remaining able to respond and intervene swiftly as necessary. They can't do this if they are dancing. 'The standards of behaviour expected as part of the policing operation will be communicated clearly before the event, just as they have been in recent years.' Live facial recognition (LFR) cameras will be on the approach to and from the festival to spot suspects before the streets get crowded, with the Met confirming it still intends to deploy the technology despite campaigners claiming it is subject to 'racial bias'. Mr Hill said officers support the cameras because they provide an 'additional layer of safety and security' and could deter wrongdoers from attending the carnival by acting as a deterrent. He added: 'I do understand the civil liberties and the inaccuracies that potentially arise with facial recognition, but we are running out of things to try and this is the next thing to try that hasn't previously been tried because I don't think the technology was particular good. 'If it makes it safer then we're supportive of it, and I don't see how it would make it unsafe. But I think it will make it safer, in which case, yes, we're supportive of it.' Responding to the claims raised by Mr Hill, Ian Comfort, chair of organisers Notting Hill Carnival Limited, told the Mail: 'Notting Hill Carnival deplores all forms of violence. Assaults on police, who are our partners in organising this great event, are unacceptable. 'Operationally, we listened carefully to Metropolitan Police concerns and commissioned an independent report alongside them. 'We're strengthening every operational element of an already extensive, multi-agency event liaison team: more trained stewards, expanded CCTV coverage, better parade coordination, faster response systems and enhanced crowd management infrastructure.' Mr Comfort added that he met with Mr Hill and Federation General Secretary Matt Cane at Scotland Yard on December 16 last year, at his request. He said: 'At that meeting they accepted that Hyde Park was not a viable option. We discussed stewarding and training. I gave them my details and made it clear that I would welcome an ongoing dialogue where we could discuss and resolve concerns. 'Despite this, they have not contacted us since, or sought any information on any organisational issues that they say their officers are concerned about.' The Mail put this claim to the Federation but officials did not issue a further statement, although it is understood that they deny saying that Hyde Park was not a viable option. The Mail also contacted the Met for a response on the points raised by Mr Hill, and a spokesman provided a statement on officer assaults. It said: 'Notting Hill Carnival is an iconic event in London's cultural calendar which is celebrated by many from across the capital, the UK and beyond. 'Regrettably, amongst the millions of people who have attended over many years there has been a minority intent on causing serious harm to others, including violent crime and sexual offences. 'Last year 61 officers were assaulted who were simply doing their best to keep people safe in a challenging policing environment. This is totally unacceptable. 'This year we will take decisive action against anyone who targets officers and where such incidents do happen we will ensure officers are fully supported.' The Met also issued a response on crowd safety concerns, saying: 'The Met fully supported the event organisers' decision to commission an independent review into crowd safety after the number of situations in recent years where crowd density reached dangerous levels. 'It was welcome news that some additional funding was secured to allow the organisers to implement a number of the review's recommendations, but they have only had a limited time to do so meaning it's inevitable not all the risks will have been mitigated. 'Crowd safety remains a serious concern that must be carefully monitored and managed this year.' Amid escalating levels of violence Deputy Assistant Commissioner Matt Ward, police commander for this year's event, said the carnival's size creates 'unique challenges'. Mr Ward said 'there has been a tiny minority of individuals intent on causing serious harm to others' and LFR cameras, which will be outside the carnival's boundaries, may also help revellers get home safely. A link-up with the Elba Hope Foundation, the youth organisation led by actor Idris Elba and his wife Sabrina, aimed at helping tackle knife crime is among the measures being introduced. LFR cameras will be used by police at the carnival to search for people who are marked as being wanted on the Police National Computer. They will also be used to spot those who are shown as missing – including young people who may also be at risk of either criminal or sexual exploitation – and people who have sexual harm prevention orders against them because of the risk they pose, particularly to women and girls. The cameras capture live footage of people passing by and compare their faces against a watchlist of wanted offenders. The system generates an alert if a match is detected, prompting an officer to review it and decide if they need to speak to the individual. Further checks, such as reviewing court orders or other relevant information, are also carried out to see if the person is a suspect. The force said that if a member of the public walks past an LFR camera and is not wanted by the police, their biometrics are immediately and permanently deleted. But 11 civil liberty and anti-racist groups urged Met commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to scrap plans to use the cameras, arguing the equipment 'is less accurate for women and people of colour'. The Runnymede Trust, Liberty, Race on the Agenda and Human Rights Watch were among those demanding the plans be scrapped. It followed a High Court challenge launched earlier this month by an anti-knife campaigner who was wrongly identified as a criminal by LFR. Shaun Thompson was held by police who demanded to record his fingerprints last year. The Met has said it will only use the cameras at settings that demonstrate no racial bias when looking for people wanted for serious offences, such as sexual assault and knife crime. So far this year 512 arrests have been made using the technology. The Home Office also recently announced that more LFR vans would be rolled out across the country. The Met is also working with the Crimestoppers charity as part of a plan to keep this year's carnival free from knife crime, serious violence and violence against women and girls. The focus will be on deterring or preventing people who pose the greatest threat to public safety and the security of the event, the force said. Police added that they will be using stop and search powers to prevent knives and other deadly weapons being carried at carnival. It means that intelligence on violent gangs who are planning to attend the carnival is being shared with forces across the country and banning orders are being sought against those who have a history of violence or sexual offending at the event. A number of 'pre-emptive intelligence-led arrests and searches' are being used against suspects believed to be in possession of weapons or involved in the supply of drugs. There were 160 such arrests before last year's carnival prior to the event for offences including possession of firearms, drugs supply, rape and other serious sexual assaults. Visitors may also have to go through screening arches which are being set up at some of the busiest entry points. Mr Ward said: 'Regrettably, amongst the millions of carnivalists who have attended over many years there has been a tiny minority of individuals intent on causing serious harm to others, including violent crime and sexual offences. 'Their actions stand in stark contrast to the traditions and values of Carnival and I welcome those voices in the community who have stood up to condemn violence and serious criminality at the event. 'I fully support the organisers' recent announcement of a new, innovative partnership with the Elba Hope Foundation to divert young people away from crime and particularly knife crime.' He said that the 'carnival's growing popularity and size creates unique challenges' and the priority for police officers and staff working across the long weekend will be to keep people safe, including 'preventing serious violence, such as knife crime and violence against women and girls'. A series of 31 anti-terror concrete barriers were installed on Portobello Road last month by Kensington and Chelsea Council to help deter vehicle attacks in the popular market area of Notting Hill following counter-terrorism guidance issued by the Met. But the council said these 'hostile vehicle mitigation measures' will be removed for two weeks from today to ensure 'people can move freely and safely during the event'. Last month the carnival's chief executive said the event was not the cause of knife crime. Matthew Phillip said money raised from the local council and Sir Sadiq would be put towards security measures at the event. Mr Phillip urged people not to scapegoat the carnival, adding: 'Knife crime is not a carnival issue. Youth violence is not a carnival issue. 'These are serious national issues, and while some statistics have improved, the roots remain poverty, isolation, racial inequality, disconnection and the absence of hope, especially for young people. 'Carnival does not cause these problems. It doesn't create violence. In fact, for many, it offers relief from it.' Concerns over safety at the carnival have also contributed to insecurity about its future, and the festival's organisers wrote to the Government earlier this year to ask for urgent funding. Carnival chairman Mr Comfort requested more funding from the Government to steward the event and address safety concerns, amid ongoing warnings from police that there could be a tragedy. Eventually City Hall, the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea council and Westminster city council provided money, allowing this year's event to take place. Mr Phillip said: 'What began as a small gathering of courage on the streets of Notting Hill has grown into one of the largest cultural events in the world. That growth brings joy, but it also brings a huge responsibility. Each year, over a million people walk through these streets. 'We are strengthening every element of our operational infrastructure: more trained stewards, expanded CCTV coverage and parade co-ordination, faster response systems for stewards and safety teams, and expanded crowd management infrastructure and personnel, to give an example of a few of the initiatives we're embarking on. 'These are not tick boxes. They're a real commitment to care, to precision and to the protection of the community.' The Mail understands that carnival organisers believe crime statistics are in line with or lower than other events proportionally, and compare favourably in terms of policing costs and overall economic contribution. They also believe arrest totals have been largely stable over recent years, despite consistent rising attendances - with last year's arrest total making up around 0.035 per cent of the estimated one million revellers. This is compared to an arrest rate of 0.042 per cent for fans attending professional football matches in England and Wales last season. Last year's arrests at the carnival resulted in 191 charges, cautions, fixed penalty notices or community resolutions, with 40 people de-arrested. Most of the offences related to drugs offences and theft. Carnival is said to contribute around £400million annually to the economy – which is set against the most recently-released policing cost of £11.7million in 2023. The carnival features parades, steelpan costumes, bands, sound systems and stages. People will be invited to join a 72-second silence at 3pm on Sunday and Monday to honour people who died in the Grenfell Tower fire and Kelso Cochrane, who was murdered in a racially motivated attack in Notting Hill in 1959. Last December, the Federation published the results of a survey which asked officers about the carnival – with police saying it is a 'war zone' and they would rather 'crawl naked through broken glass than be on duty at it. Nearly 90 per cent of Met officers who responded to a survey said they had felt unsafe while working at the annual festival, while 29 per cent had been assaulted. Asked to describe how they feel about working there, they said it was 'Hell. It's a war zone we are sent into year after year' and 'Dangerous. Officers are treated as lambs to slaughter'. One officer said the police operation was 'overstretched, ineffective and an exercise in self-torture', while another claimed they 'would rather crawl naked through broken glass'. But organisers Notting Hill Carnival Limited said the survey was 'driven by unsubstantiated quotes and little solid data, designed to create negative headlines'.
