Algerian Foreign Ministry Official Responds to the French Interior Minister
The source was keen to recall, first, that granting these passports is a right for Algerian citizens and that issuing them is a duty incumbent upon the sovereign Algerian state. Therefore, recognising these passports is a duty imposed upon the French state.
The same source considered the French minister's statement to be arbitrary, discriminatory, and an abuse of power, as it explicitly contravenes French law itself. As far as its author is concerned, this statement has a clear political dimension, is also legally unfounded, and is not based on any rule in French law itself.
In the same context, the official explained that the passports in question are issued at the request of the French prefectures themselves, as they are indispensable reference documents in applications for residence permits.
On this basis, the failure to recognise these passports, as stated by the French Interior Minister, constitutes a violation of individual rights and a further breach of France's bilateral and international obligations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
El Chorouk
19 hours ago
- El Chorouk
French Right Demands EU Halt Negotiations With Algeria!
European MP and second-in-command of France's right-wing 'Les Républicains' party, François-Xavier Bellamy, revealed that the silence surrounding Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau for weeks, as he stopped attacking Algeria, was a result of a request from French authorities, hoping for Sansal's release. He also revealed that Retailleau would meet with French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday to clarify matters regarding the management of the crisis with Algeria. François-Xavier Bellamy stated: 'The Interior Minister, and generally in the European Parliament (…), were asked to remain silent (regarding Algeria), otherwise the fate of Boualem Sansal's release would be risked, which we were informed was imminent.' This is the second such statement in less than a week from 'Les Républicains,' following the tense statements made by party leader Bruno Retailleau last weekend. The French Interior Minister had announced the end of the undeclared truce with Algeria last Friday, when he said in press statements: 'The diplomacy of good intentions has failed… We must change our tone and rely on the balance of power chosen by the Algerian government itself,' he claimed. As symbols of the French right freed themselves from the political constraints imposed on them in dealing with Algeria, the threads of the conspiracy against Algeria from within the European Parliament began to unravel. On Monday evening, the vice-president of 'Les Républicains' demanded, in a statement to Agence France-Presse (AFP), that the European Union make the release of French-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal a 'fundamental condition' for the negotiations expected to begin soon between Algeria and Brussels. Like his party leader, the European MP strongly criticized his country's stance in dealing with the escalating crisis with Algeria, considering it 'negative,' noting that: 'What we are witnessing are the consequences of a form of submission (of France to Algeria),' while commenting on the positions of the Élysée Palace and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, saying that they preferred to return to 'a position of surrender and negativity, which will contribute to tarnishing France's reputation, not only before Algeria, but on the international stage in general.' It is known that Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot did not delay much in responding to Bruno Retailleau's demands. He expressed his complete rejection of what his government colleague said in a tweet on the 'X' platform, which read: 'There is no diplomacy of good feelings, nor diplomacy of resentment. There is only diplomacy.' Although he did not target Retailleau by name, the response was clear to the phrase 'the diplomacy of good intentions has failed.' Based on the statement by the European MP from 'Les Républicains,' Retailleau will meet with French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday to discuss the position the French government should adopt, given the Algerian side's adherence to the sovereignty of judicial decisions in Sansal's case, and thus its rejection of repeated French demands in this regard. The leader of 'Les Républicains,' who also holds the portfolio of the Ministry of Interior, demands the use of a balance of power logic with Algeria, due to the issue of migrants and the cancellation or revision of the 1968 agreement. These demands are rejected by the French President and the Foreign Minister, who consider them outside the Interior Minister's powers, which puts Retailleau's future in François Bayrou's government at a real test.
El Chorouk
2 days ago
- El Chorouk
Algerian Foreign Ministry Official Responds to the French Interior Minister
An official source at the Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs was inquired about the recent statement by French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau to Le Figaro newspaper, in which he announced his intention to instruct French prefectures 'not to recognise passports issued by Algerian consulates to Algerian citizens to obtain residence permits.' The source was keen to recall, first, that granting these passports is a right for Algerian citizens and that issuing them is a duty incumbent upon the sovereign Algerian state. Therefore, recognising these passports is a duty imposed upon the French state. The same source considered the French minister's statement to be arbitrary, discriminatory, and an abuse of power, as it explicitly contravenes French law itself. As far as its author is concerned, this statement has a clear political dimension, is also legally unfounded, and is not based on any rule in French law itself. In the same context, the official explained that the passports in question are issued at the request of the French prefectures themselves, as they are indispensable reference documents in applications for residence permits. On this basis, the failure to recognise these passports, as stated by the French Interior Minister, constitutes a violation of individual rights and a further breach of France's bilateral and international obligations.
El Chorouk
3 days ago
- El Chorouk
A new book reveals Macron's exploitation of memory in the relationship with Algeria
A new book published in France, titled 'The Poisonous President,' shed light on Emmanuel Macron's attempt to exploit the sensitive memory file with Algeria as a lever in his political project, which he began in 2016, and after only one year, he managed to ascend to the Élysée throne. The book, published by 'Robert Laffont' publishing house, is an 'investigation into the real President Emmanuel Macron,' authored by Étienne Campion. In it, the author introduces the early beginnings of the Élysée Palace master's thinking on dealing with the Algerian file, and at the forefront of its dimensions is the memory dimension, which is considered the most sensitive among all other files. The author says: 'Macron's story with Algeria began in 2016. Where did it come from? What motivated him to focus his efforts on the memory file with Algeria?' The author answers this question by attributing the reason to the turbulent political relationship between Paris and Algeria, which has extended for decades. 'Because the Algerian issue is not considered by the French due to the wounds left by memory and repressed memories.' Étienne Campion believes that the file of France's colonial past in Algeria posed a challenge that all of Macron's predecessors faced, such as Nicolas Sarkozy (2007 / 2012), and François Hollande (2012 / 2017) also did not deal with the file for various reasons. Therefore, Macron tried to embody the desire for reconciliation between Algeria and Paris, crediting the historian Benjamin Stora, Algerian-born (born in Constantine in 1950), for this. According to the book, Benjamin Stora was the first to confirm that 'the issue of France's colonial past in Algeria directly or indirectly affects everyone on both sides: descendants of immigrants, Pieds-Noirs, Harkis, Jews, conscripts… an unimaginable collective memory.' Here, Étienne Campion pointed out that the historian Benjamin Stora met Emmanuel Macron in 2014, and according to the same source, the credit for this goes to Paul Jean-Ortiz, the diplomatic advisor to the former French President, François Hollande, knowing that Jean-Ortiz was an old friend of historian Stora. Despite Jean-Ortiz's death in the same year, the relationship between the historian and the future president of France at the time remained. They met in 2016, and Macron was a prospective presidential candidate. During the meeting, the French president showed an overwhelming desire to tackle this sensitive file, unlike his predecessor François Hollande, who was cautious about taking it too far. Benjamin Stora was not aware of what Macron, the presidential candidate, was thinking, says Étienne Campion, when he visited Algeria in February 2017, where he issued a statement that turned many expectations upside down when he described colonialism as a 'crime against humanity' and acknowledged that 'we must face it and apologize to those against whom we committed these acts.' The author asks: 'Why did he do that? Was it to position himself among progressives? And was it to make a sharp turn to the left?' He answers: 'Benjamin Stora has nothing to do with it, but he believes that his excessive will to act is shown through this initiative. Can this statement lead to anything? Stora, optimistic despite everything, believes that this young president, who, if he addresses him informally, may have the same vision and boldness that previous generations did not have.' The author also spoke about a meeting between Macron and former Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika in December 2017, during an official visit to Algeria, at his therapeutic residence. The French president tried to get an approach from his Algerian counterpart on the 'Harkis' issue, telling him: 'Mr. President, I am a young president, and I am well aware that I did not live through that period. Isn't this the right time for forgiveness?' However, the former president responded firmly. 'These are traitors… Never.'
