
Over 100,000 children living in poverty across Ireland
Spiralling rents and high prices are being cited as the main reasons.
The Child Poverty Monitor from the Children's Rights Alliance found a scarcity of housing has led thousands of families into homelessness, with countless more living on top of each other in seriously cramped and inappropriate conditions.
Speaking about the report, Tanya Ward, Chief Executive of the Children's Rights Alliance said:
'A childhood in poverty is one spent in cold, dark and damp housing, travelling hours just to get to school or knowing that there will not be a hot dinner for the rest of the week.
Advertisement
"Thousands of families are being forced to live on such tight margins that they live in constant fear of their child needing a hospital visit or getting a letter home about the next school trip.'
'What is deeply concerning is the number of children in consistent poverty - who are living in these conditions perpetually–which rose by a staggering 45,107 in 2024 to 102,977.
"These are children for whom a decent standard of living and aspirations of a better future diminish day by day. This poverty is not inevitable. Policy decisions and budget investments determine the fate of these children and young people.'
She said there is plenty of progress to report in 2025. Free school books, hot school meals and free GP care for children under eight are now guaranteed supports that all children benefit from, but particularly those experiencing poverty.
Advertisement
Universal measures have advanced, many quicker than expected such as the historic billion-euro investments in childcare.
These have come at the expense of the targeted measures and strategic investment that are critical to break the cycle of intergenerational poverty our children are inheriting. Budget 2026 has to focus on breaking the cycle.
In terms of housing she said we only need to look at last month's figures that show an additional 100 children made homeless to know that the current policy is not working and inflicting untold trauma on the now 4,775 children without a home to call their own.
"The rise in homeless figures is nothing new.
Advertisement
"We have seen a year on a year increase every time we publish the Child Poverty Monitor. The combination of rising rents (latest average reaching over €2,000 a month nationally) and a scarcity of supply has resulted in thousands of families being made homeless but also, countless more living on top of each other or in seriously cramped and inappropriate conditions,' Tanya Ward said.
'Overcrowding is a major issue for children living on the lowest incomes. Almost one in four children at risk of poverty are growing up in overcrowded households, completely unsuitable to meet their needs or their families.
"While the trend is more common across Europe, the rate of overcrowding for children has effectively doubled in Ireland from 2021 to 2024, and we are only scratching the surface on what impact these conditions are having on children.
Child protection services
"From ESRI research, we know that this can have detrimental impacts such as poorer wellbeing, greater conflict and disrupted family relationships and a knock-on effect on educational outcomes. We are also likely to see increases in the number of children referred to Tusla. The Government needs to look at the impact of overcrowding on children and young people.'
Advertisement
She said without access to critical child protection and welfare services and family support in their community, families are pushed further to breaking point.
Referrals to Tusla have increased by 70 per cent since 2019. The Daniel McAnaspie Inquest called for a review of child protection and welfare services to ensure that Tusla has sufficient resourcing to keep children safe.
'Last year's budget allocation to Tusla was mostly to maintain existing levels of care, failing to acknowledge the spike in referrals and the increased complexity of cases. Budget 2026 cannot leave these children behind. We are calling for direct investment of €50 million to ensure our core child protection and welfare services are supported to help children most vulnerable in society," she said.
Ms Ward said poverty and income are inextricably linked. As rent and the cost of living eat away at available income, families are left without enough money in their pockets, going to extraordinary lengths and debts just to get through the week.
Advertisement
"Positively, Budget 2025 acknowledged the higher cost of older children by raising the Child Support Payment, but the incremental increases of a few euro are barely enough to buy the bottle of milk and shampoo that week,"
"This targeted income support is designed to help children in families already relying on social welfare to level the playing field. The cumulative impact of continued rising costs has created a landslide effect for low-income families, meaning ensuring the very basic necessities such as nutritious food or keeping your home warm become increasingly difficult," she said.
She said the single most effective action the Government can take in breaking the intergenerational cycle of child poverty is to invest in children in their early years. Infants and small children living in poverty need wraparound early years support.
The Government has taken the first step in addressing these issues through the development of Equal Start that aims to deliver universal and targeted supports to families and early years settings grappling with the impact of poverty and social exclusion.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
The five-figure windfall families could get if Labour change key benefit
Tens of thousands of families with multiple children could receive thousands of pounds more in annual payments if the two-child benefit cap is abolished. Official figures show over 70,000 households, including 71,580 families with five or more children, would be entitled to over £18,000 a year, with some gaining over £20,000. The cap, introduced under Conservative welfare reforms, blocks parents from claiming £292.81 a month for a third or subsequent child born after April 2017. Labour MPs are pressing Sir Keir Starmer to scrap the cap, arguing it punishes children in poverty, with estimates suggesting it could lift half a million children out of hardship. Conservatives defend the cap as fair to taxpayers, preventing benefit packages from exceeding the minimum wage, while its abolition would cost the Prime Minister around £3.5 billion.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
'Generous' refugee policy backfires as Glasgow City Council now faces £110m budget crisis
Officials at a cash-strapped council have warned that unless there is a pause in asylum seekers being sent to the city, it will push homelessness spending almost £110million over-budget in two years. The SNP-led Glasgow City Council report said that the overspend would be £43million this year and £66million next year because of large numbers of people attracted by Scotland's most generous rules. But a pause could slash costs by £60million. Almost half the homelessness applications by refugees in the city are now made by people granted leave to remain in other parts of the UK who travelled north. Council leader Susan Aitken said she was proud of Glasgow's key role in supporting asylum seekers and refugees but called for support from Whitehall to be 'transformed'. The Scottish Conservatives said the budget crisis was of the SNP 's own making. Glasgow Tory MSP Annie Wells said: 'Savage SNP cuts have resulted in Glasgow facing a housing emergency, yet the Nationalists running the city council have remained wedded to this generous policy. 'At a time when the city's roads are pothole-ridden and bins cannot be collected on time, hard-pressed Glaswegians will be wondering how this will be paid for even if isn't paused. 'It is time for the SNP-led council to ensure their housing policies are always delivering fairness and value for taxpayers, rather than costs spiralling out of control.' Glasgow is the largest dispersal area in Scotland for asylum seekers, with around 4,500 in privately run accommodation while their claims are processed. Once a claim is granted and a person allowed to stay in the UK, they have 56 days to find their own roof or present as homeless to the local council. Besides dealing with those sent by the Home Office to Glasgow, the city has become a magnet for people granted refugee status south of the Border. Councils in England only need to house those in 'priority need', such as families with children, but Scottish rules cover all the unintentionally homeless, including single men and women. It has led to homeless refugees travelling to Glasgow from Belfast, Birmingham, London, Manchester and Liverpool. Since 2022, when the last UK Government introduced a looser 'streamlined asylum process' to help clear the asylum claims backlog, the figures have shot up. In 2023-24, Glasgow received 694 homelessness applications from newly approved refugees granted leave to remain outwith the city. It increased more than 50 per cent the following year to 1,050 applications. Since streamlining began, Glasgow has provided temporary digs to 2,127 households granted leave to remain elsewhere at a cost of £40.2million. Last year the use of B&B accommodation doubled in the city, which declared a housing emergency in November 2023. A report by finance chiefs being discussed by councillors on Thursday says homelessness is now the biggest strain on the city's £2.1billion budget after inflation. It says the overspend on homelessness caused by 'those granted leave to remain' was £27million last year. It added: 'Unless there is a change in policy, projections are that this will rise to £43 million in 2025/26 and £66 million in 2026/27. 'A pause in both dispersal to Glasgow and the requirement to house applicants from outwith Scotland would, if implemented from October 2025, reduce estimated costs to £36million in 2025/26 and then to £13million in 2026/27.' Ms Aitken told the Herald newspaper: 'There has been a huge rise in the number of households that have gone through the asylum process elsewhere in the UK, only to find themselves homeless. 'Increasingly these new citizens are then drawn to Scotland and Glasgow by dint of the fact our homeless legislation is more robust than what is in place across the rest of the UK. 'I am proud of Glasgow's record in supporting refugees and I believe that migration has enhanced its 850-year story. 'However, the support the city gets from Whitehall must be transformed.' With growing protests around the country over asylum seeker accommodation, including a former hotel in Falkirk on Saturday, she said the Home Office would be on a 'dangerous path' if it failed to 'step in and support councils on the frontline of this emergency'. A UK Government spokeswoman said: 'Despite inheriting huge pressures on the asylum system, we are working to make sure individuals have the support they need following an asylum decision to help local authorities better plan their assistance with homelessness. 'Although homelessness is a devolved matter, we are working right across the UK to give councils as much notice as possible of newly recognised refugees, have doubled the move on period to 56 days and have mobilised liaison officers to support asylum seekers in Glasgow City Council area.'


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sally Rooney could be arrested under Terrorism Act after pledging royalties to Palestine Action
Irish novelist Sally Rooney could be arrested under the Terrorism Act after saying she intends to use proceeds from her work to support Palestine Action, which was proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK last month, a legal expert has warned. Earlier, No 10 said that supporting the group was an offence under the act, after Rooney had made her pledge. Royalties from Rooney's books, including Normal People and Conversations with Friends, and BBC adaptations of them would be used to support Palestine Action, she wrote in the Irish Times over the weekend. The legal expert also said that the bestselling writer could face prosecution if she were to express her views at, for example, a UK book festival, underscoring the proscription's 'gross disproportionality'. While the prime minister's spokesperson would not respond to the author's comments specifically, they said that there was 'a difference between showing support for a proscribed organisation, which is an offence under the Terrorism Act, and legitimate protest in support of a cause', according to the Press Association. Asked what message No 10 would give to people considering donating money to Palestine Action, the spokesperson said: 'Support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act and obviously the police will, as they have set out, implement the law as you'd expect.' More than 700 people have been arrested under the Terrorism Act in relation to the group since it was proscribed in early July, many of whom were detained at a peaceful protest on 9 August in Parliament Square, London. 'My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets,' wrote Rooney on Saturday. 'In recent years the UK's state broadcaster has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees. I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can.' Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organisation after activists broke into an RAF base in Oxfordshire and spray painted two planes. They 'knew, of course, that their actions were illegal,' Rooney wrote in the Guardian in June. 'From the suffragettes to the gay rights movement to the anti-apartheid struggle, genuine political resistance has always involved intentional law-breaking.' In her Irish Times article last weekend, Rooney said that she 'would happily publish this statement in a UK newspaper – but that would now be illegal'. Rooney's books also include Beautiful World, Where Are You and, most recently, Intermezzo. Lawyer and writer Sadakat Kadri said: 'Receiving money with the intention of using it to support terrorism is an offence under section 15 of the 2000 act.. That means Rooney could be arrested without a warrant as a 'terrorist'.' He added that 'the absurdities don't end there', and said the decision of the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, to bracket Palestine Action with groups such as Islamic State meant the BBC would also be criminally liable if it continued to pay royalties to Rooney. in view of her stated intentions. 'Authoritarian governments routinely threaten writers and intimidate broadcasters, but I find it quite extraordinary that Labour under Keir Starmer has now chosen to go down the same path.' Asked whether Rooney could face legal repercussions if she, for example, spoke at a book festival in the UK, Kadri said that 'there's certainly a risk she'd fall foul' of the law. If Rooney expressed 'her views in terms of condemning the war crimes being committed in Gaza, an arguable case for prosecution could be made out'. 'Saying that isn't for one moment an attempt to justify the statute,' said Kadri, which he described as 'a shameful attack' on free speech. 'It's just a particularly stark illustration of the measure's gross disproportionality.' Mike Schwarz, head of the public inquiry team at the legal firm Hodge Jones & Allen, said that 'anyone providing money which might, in the state's eyes, fund 'terrorism' and, separately, anyone supporting an organisation proscribed under terrorism legislation runs a very real risk of serious police interest and prosecution for grave offences in the UK. This seems particularly the case in the current febrile political climate surrounding Palestine Action.'