logo
Bonds, debt swaps among finance solutions to adapt to climate change

Bonds, debt swaps among finance solutions to adapt to climate change

News2407-05-2025

There are several barriers to attracting private capital to fund climate adaptation measures, but collaboration by the private sector, governments, climate funds and multilateral development banks could plug finance gaps, writes Nigel Beck.
For climate change news and analysis, go to News24 Climate Future.
As the world grapples with escalating climate risks and impact, South Africa stands at a pivotal juncture.
The nation's economic, social and environmental vulnerabilities underscore an urgent need for climate 'adaptation'.
Defined as the process of adjusting to current and future climate impacts to reduce harm and seize opportunities, adaptation is not just a theoretical exercise; it's a socioeconomic imperative for South Africa and the broader African continent.
Amid discussions at the G20 and COP29, adaptation finance emerges as a critical lever to build resilience; yet, significant obstacles hinder its implementation. But what does adaptation mean for South Africa and why is it so important? We consider the barriers to private sector financing, and how global frameworks can catalyse progress.
What is climate adaptation?
Climate adaptation involves proactive measures to mitigate the impacts of climate change - such as drought-resistant crops, flood-resistant infrastructure, or water reclamation projects.
Unlike mitigation, which focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, adaptation prepares communities and economies for inevitable changes.
In South Africa, this translates to safeguarding water security, bolstering food systems, and fortifying cities against extreme weather. The Presidential Climate Commission's March 2025 report highlights key programmatic areas: resilient water, agriculture, cities, and transport, estimating a financing need of R866 billion by 2030 (1.37% of GDP).
Globally, the UNEP's 2024 Adaptation Gap Report pegs developing countries' needs at $387 billion (about R7 billion) annually through 2030, with Africa alone requiring $579.2 billion (about R11 billion) from 2020-2030 per its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).
Why adaptation matters to South Africa and Africa
South Africa's climate challenge is stark.
Temperature anomalies have risen over the past century, and economic damages from floods, heatwaves, and droughts are projected to intensify, with losses potentially reaching R1.4 trillion annually by 2050 if unaddressed. For a country already battling unemployment, inequality, and energy insecurity, these risks threaten to unravel developmental gains.
Africa, meanwhile, faces a disproportionate burden. Despite contributing less than 4% of global emissions, it requires vast adaptation investments to counter rising climate-induced disruptions to agriculture, water, and infrastructure.
Adaptation is a smart investment. Projects like eMalahleni Water Reclamation Plant, which treats acid mine drainage to supply potable water, or the Working for Water Programme, which removes invasive plants to restore river flows, demonstrate tangible benefits: job creation, resource security, and economic stability.
For South Africa, a leader in the region, scaling and replicating such initiatives could position it as a model for Africa, where adaptation finance flows remain woefully inadequate.
Obstacles to private sector financing
Despite its promise, adaptation struggles to attract private capital.
Several barriers stand out. First, perception casts adaptation as a public sector duty, deterring private investment. This is compounded by information asymmetry - private players lack reliable climate risk data, unlike the quantifiable CO₂ reductions of mitigation projects. Measuring the effectiveness of a drought-resistant crop, for instance, is far trickier than tallying carbon emissions avoided by a solar farm.
Second, nomenclature and frameworks confuse investors. Terms like 'green,' 'blue,' and 'adaptation' are used interchangeably.
Third, shallow capital markets in Africa limit bond mandates not just for adaptation, with investors chasing risk adjusted returns elsewhere. High borrowing costs, driven by real or perceived risks and long-term investment horizons, further deter engagement.
Finally, adaptation's benefits - environmental, social, and economic - are hard to capture fully. The Adaptation Fund mobilised $133 million (about R2 billion) at COP29, yet such commitments often stall in translation to on-the-ground projects. In South Africa, R18 billion in domestic public funding and R113 billion internationally flowed to climate finance in 2023, but private sector contributions remain underreported and unscaled due to tracking difficulties and a focus on insurance over broader resilience.
The role of innovative finance and global frameworks
Innovative financial instruments offer hope.
Climate adaptation bonds - direct funds to resilience projects while spreading costs over time and attracting diverse investors. Outcome-based instruments tie funding to measurable results, enhancing accountability and investor confidence.
Debt-for-adaptation swaps, as seen in Seychelles' $30 million (about R550 million) debt reduction for climate resilience, free up resources for vulnerable, debt-laden nations. Blended finance, combining public concessional funds with private capital, mitigates risk, as demonstrated by Acumen's Resilient Agriculture Fund.
Yet, these tools alone cannot compensate for underdeveloped markets or macro risks like political instability. South Africa's currency volatility and Africa's hard-currency dependency highlight the need for deeper structural reforms.
READ | International Partners Group | Backing SA's green future with over R2bn for just transition projects
Here, the G20 and COP29 provide critical platforms. The G20's focus on country-led adaptation platforms aligns with South Africa's emerging Climate Adaptation Platform, which seeks to coordinate government, private sector, and community efforts.
COP29's Baku Adaptation Road Map and $133 million in pledges underscore global momentum, building on the UAE Framework for Global Climate Resilience from COP28. With National Adaptation Plans due in 2025 and COP30 set to prioritise adaptation finance, these forums can drive standardised taxonomies, de-risking mechanisms, and data improvements -80% globally interoperable, 20% locally tailored, as suggested in financing discussions.
The path forward
South Africa must bridge the technical-finance divide.
A Presidential Climate Commission-style platform, backed by interministerial leadership and early funding from philanthropies, can operationalise strategies. Key steps include regulatory reforms (tax incentives, climate disclosure mandates), enhanced climate risk data via AI and satellites, and a narrative shift - adaptation as a profit-and-loss opportunity, not a cost sink.
Collaboration is non-negotiable: governments, Multilateral Development Banks, climate funds, and private players must co-create bankable projects.
The stakes are high.
With Africa's adaptation gap widening and South Africa's resilience hanging in the balance, adaptation finance is a lifeline. By leveraging G20 and COP29 momentum, South Africa can not only protect its future but also lead Africa toward a just, climate-resilient transition. The time to act is now - before the next flood, drought, or economic shock makes the case even clearer.
Nigel Beck, head of sustainable finance and ESG advisory at RMB.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Altron's (JSE:AEL) Solid Earnings Have Been Accounted For Conservatively
Altron's (JSE:AEL) Solid Earnings Have Been Accounted For Conservatively

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Altron's (JSE:AEL) Solid Earnings Have Been Accounted For Conservatively

Altron Limited's (JSE:AEL) recent earnings report didn't offer any surprises, with the shares unchanged over the last week. We did some digging, and we think that investors are missing some encouraging factors in the underlying numbers. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Importantly, our data indicates that Altron's profit was reduced by R119m, due to unusual items, over the last year. While deductions due to unusual items are disappointing in the first instance, there is a silver lining. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. If Altron doesn't see those unusual expenses repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to increase over the coming year. That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates. Unusual items (expenses) detracted from Altron's earnings over the last year, but we might see an improvement next year. Because of this, we think Altron's earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! And on top of that, its earnings per share have grown at an extremely impressive rate over the last three years. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. So if you'd like to dive deeper into this stock, it's crucial to consider any risks it's facing. While conducting our analysis, we found that Altron has 1 warning sign and it would be unwise to ignore this. This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Altron's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

South Africa Farm Exports Surge 10% as US Shipments Climb
South Africa Farm Exports Surge 10% as US Shipments Climb

Bloomberg

time34 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

South Africa Farm Exports Surge 10% as US Shipments Climb

South African agricultural exports rose 10% in the first quarter to $3.36 billion from a year earlier as port performance improved and shipments to the US climbed, an industry body said. The 14% increase in trade to the US, which totaled $202 million, comes as South Africa braces for the imposition of a 30% tariff on exports to the country by the Trump administration when a 90-day grace period expires in July.

Commentary: South Africa's visit to the US shows how diplomacy has changed
Commentary: South Africa's visit to the US shows how diplomacy has changed

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Commentary: South Africa's visit to the US shows how diplomacy has changed

Diplomacy is an art that has often most effectively been practiced behind closed doors. But the 47th president of the United States of America, Donald Trump, has changed that. Diplomacy is now practiced in the full glare of the world's TV cameras and media, leaving very little room to wriggle — but an ocean of opportunity for disaster. The net effect has been a total recalibration of the practice of diplomacy, with May 21 being a perfect case in point when South African President Cyril Ramaphosa led his entourage to the White House. The fact that the meeting even took place was a triumph of old-school diplomacy given the unprecedented depths that the historic relationship between the two nations has plunged, especially since the advent of the 47th administration in January this year. There was massive trepidation back home in South Africa about just how this meeting would evolve, especially after the public dressing down that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was forced to endure in February. This time, the tactics were the same: The White House presented unvarnished beliefs about the situation in South Africa, which Trump has held very firmly, this time via a video pastiche. Ramaphosa's party was astutely selected, blending key political leaders, including organized labor, with officials, business leaders and golf champions, who were neither politicians nor administrators. It was an example once again of how much has changed in the last six months — and even beyond — in Africa and in the world. South Africa has moved from declaring itself neutral in the war in Ukraine to actively protecting Russia from censure to inviting Zelenskyy to a state visit in April. The U.S. has moved from actively, and sometimes unquestioningly, backing Kyiv and sanctioning Moscow to actively engaging with President Vladimir Putin rather than isolating him. Both countries' approaches seem poles apart and inherently contradictory — and yet they share very similar motivations and characteristics. Washington and Pretoria want the war to end, both are working hard to do just that and both are using nontraditional, sometimes disruptive, methods. The Black Sea Grain Initiative was the first seed in a bid to reap a harvest of peace. It was sown by an initiative under South Africa's leadership to get Ukraine and Russia — or their proxies — to a table. The first hoped-for outcome was to prevent Africans from starving after they were cut off from the breadbasket of Eastern Europe and the fertilizers produced there to grow their own crops. But the bigger prize was to forge swords into ploughshares because the geopolitical tensions of an increasingly volatile and multipolar world were playing out in African countries as they became substitute battlegrounds in the war for global influence. Private individuals, business leaders and philanthropists helped to bring the different parties together by leveraging their networks and stepping in where normal diplomatic channels had failed. The Black Sea Grain Initiative led to a previously unthinkable invitation: Pretoria offered to host Zelenskyy. Previously, Pretoria had earned Washington's ire for refusing to back a United Nations General Assembly resolution censuring Russia. The intervention of unorthodox players happened in Washington, too, as Ramaphosa sat in the Oval Office with Trump. It was no surprise that some at the meeting were golfers themselves, stepping in where diplomats and political leaders could not, to help drive through Pretoria's message. South Africa came to the U.S. to recalibrate a relationship that has been increasingly under threat for months; a growing ideological gulf in the majority party of its unity government has been a contributor. Coming to America forced a timely reappraisal of South Africa's issues, and in the process, the South African delegation did much to disabuse the U.S. administration of some of its most firmly held views. South Africa does have serious societal issues to contend with, including high levels of violent crime — and no one shied away from this problem, but white South Africans are not disproportionately affected by it. To properly address the issue is not a matter of being a supplicant who begs for international aid, but rather of building the economy, creating jobs and instilling hope in new generations of South Africans. To achieve that, the U.S. must be an active trade partner with South Africa — continuing with the current trade agreements and even boosting investment in the country, to everyone's benefit. There is no doubt that the recent meeting between U.S. and South African officials was an inflection point in Washington-Pretoria relations. Taking a cue from Trump, it was akin to sinking a 3-foot putt in the full glare of the cameras, which isn't an easy thing to do — and yet, I think the South Africans, together, might just have done it. _____ Ivor Ichikowitz is a South African-born global industrialist and African philanthropist. He chairs the Ichikowitz Family Foundation, which played a leading role in facilitating the talks that led to the Black Sea Grain Initiative. _____

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store