Subaru Outback Owner Crashes Into CarMax After Disappointing Appraisal, Injures 8
If you've ever sold a car, then you likely know what it feels like to get lowballed. Yes it sucks, but does it suck enough for you to feel compelled to use your car as a battering ram? Well, one Subaru Outback owner did just that on March 8 when he felt that a CarMax store in Inglewood, California lowballed him. Witnesses say the customer got his vehicle appraised at CarMax, snapped, went out to his car, repeatedly rammed his Subaru Outback into the front door of the dealership until he could drive through it, then drove through the showroom and out a set of doors at the other end. At least eight people were injured; two CarMax employees were transported to a hospital with critical though non-life-threatening injuries, and the other six people were treated for minor injuries at the scene according to the Los Angeles County Fire Department.
NBC Los Angeles identified the driver as 25-year-old Andrew Arroyo, who reportedly fled the scene before turning himself in at the LAPD Academy. He was reportedly on probation at the time of the incident for a wet reckless charge last year, which is a reduced plea arrangement in lieu of a DUI charge. ABC 7 reported,
"The video showed the customer reversing into the entrance of the showroom as panicked employees and customers scattered.
The driver then drove through the rear of the building over broken glass and past overturned desks and chairs.
Miguel Hernandez, who shot the video, was there looking to buy a car when he first heard a loud argument.
"Employees were just running, screaming 'get out the way, get out the way!'" said Hernandez."
Read more: Subaru Had It Right All Along
This is a tragedy for every victim who was involved, and there is no excuse for this kind of reckless, abhorrent behavior that shows no respect for the lives of others. I know times are tough and all, but isn't it common knowledge that CarMax will not pay you much for your car since it turns around and sells it again to make a profit? Yes it sucks that this giant corporation won't pay you what you think your car is worth, but if you wanted to know what to expect from the experience you could have just Googled it. CarMax offers online appraisals too, so the Outback driver could have found out about the low offer online without leaving his house. There have been other examples of angry customers taking issue with car dealerships, but these situations never end well. Selling your car sucks, but it's never worth hurting people over.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
CarMax (KMX) Earnings Expected to Grow: Should You Buy?
The market expects CarMax (KMX) to deliver a year-over-year increase in earnings on higher revenues when it reports results for the quarter ended May 2025. This widely-known consensus outlook is important in assessing the company's earnings picture, but a powerful factor that might influence its near-term stock price is how the actual results compare to these estimates. The stock might move higher if these key numbers top expectations in the upcoming earnings report, which is expected to be released on June 20. On the other hand, if they miss, the stock may move lower. While the sustainability of the immediate price change and future earnings expectations will mostly depend on management's discussion of business conditions on the earnings call, it's worth handicapping the probability of a positive EPS surprise. This used car dealership chain is expected to post quarterly earnings of $1.22 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +25.8%. Revenues are expected to be $7.56 billion, up 6.3% from the year-ago quarter. The consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised 0.94% higher over the last 30 days to the current level. This is essentially a reflection of how the covering analysts have collectively reassessed their initial estimates over this period. Investors should keep in mind that the direction of estimate revisions by each of the covering analysts may not always get reflected in the aggregate change. Estimate revisions ahead of a company's earnings release offer clues to the business conditions for the period whose results are coming out. This insight is at the core of our proprietary surprise prediction model -- the Zacks Earnings ESP (Expected Surprise Prediction). The Zacks Earnings ESP compares the Most Accurate Estimate to the Zacks Consensus Estimate for the quarter; the Most Accurate Estimate is a more recent version of the Zacks Consensus EPS estimate. The idea here is that analysts revising their estimates right before an earnings release have the latest information, which could potentially be more accurate than what they and others contributing to the consensus had predicted earlier. Thus, a positive or negative Earnings ESP reading theoretically indicates the likely deviation of the actual earnings from the consensus estimate. However, the model's predictive power is significant for positive ESP readings only. A positive Earnings ESP is a strong predictor of an earnings beat, particularly when combined with a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold). Our research shows that stocks with this combination produce a positive surprise nearly 70% of the time, and a solid Zacks Rank actually increases the predictive power of Earnings ESP. Please note that a negative Earnings ESP reading is not indicative of an earnings miss. Our research shows that it is difficult to predict an earnings beat with any degree of confidence for stocks with negative Earnings ESP readings and/or Zacks Rank of 4 (Sell) or 5 (Strong Sell). For CarMax, the Most Accurate Estimate is higher than the Zacks Consensus Estimate, suggesting that analysts have recently become bullish on the company's earnings prospects. This has resulted in an Earnings ESP of +0.41%. On the other hand, the stock currently carries a Zacks Rank of #3. So, this combination indicates that CarMax will most likely beat the consensus EPS estimate. While calculating estimates for a company's future earnings, analysts often consider to what extent it has been able to match past consensus estimates. So, it's worth taking a look at the surprise history for gauging its influence on the upcoming number. For the last reported quarter, it was expected that CarMax would post earnings of $0.64 per share when it actually produced earnings of $0.64, delivering no surprise. Over the last four quarters, the company has beaten consensus EPS estimates just once. An earnings beat or miss may not be the sole basis for a stock moving higher or lower. Many stocks end up losing ground despite an earnings beat due to other factors that disappoint investors. Similarly, unforeseen catalysts help a number of stocks gain despite an earnings miss. That said, betting on stocks that are expected to beat earnings expectations does increase the odds of success. This is why it's worth checking a company's Earnings ESP and Zacks Rank ahead of its quarterly release. Make sure to utilize our Earnings ESP Filter to uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they've reported. CarMax appears a compelling earnings-beat candidate. However, investors should pay attention to other factors too for betting on this stock or staying away from it ahead of its earnings release. Stay on top of upcoming earnings announcements with the Zacks Earnings Calendar. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report CarMax, Inc. (KMX) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Predator Drones Are Being Flown Over Protesters In Los Angeles
As part of the massive deployment of federal law enforcement and even active duty troops to Los Angeles, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Air and Marine Operations (AMO) department has been flying MQ-9 Predator B drones over the city. CBP has been flying these unmanned aircraft since 2005 in service of their mission of detecting illegal border crossings. Now, they are being used to conduct aerial surveillance of the protests against raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. LA is a fair distance from the border, and the protestors are not crossing it anyway, meaning the drones are getting used outside of their main mission. This isn't the first time they've been pulled into domestic surveillance duty. During the protests sparked by the murder of George Floyd in 2020, CBP flew them over Minneapolis to keep eye on the protestors there. This drew swift criticism at the time, including by Democratic members of Congress, and Predators do not appear to have been used for this purpose again until now. That said, aerial surveillance of protests, notably by helicopters, is a common practice. The question now is whether unmanned platforms will start being used more regularly, particularly under an aggressive Trump administration. Read more: The Best-Looking Pickup Trucks Ever Sold, According To Our Readers The Predator B drones (which are called "Reapers" in their military variation) used by CBP are strictly surveillance aircraft; they are not armed with any ordnance. While they do have radar systems, those are mostly useful for detecting vehicles; what's relevant here is their electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) sensors, basically cameras capable of seeing into both visible and infrared spectrums. Eyes in the sky, in other words. The Department of Homeland Security has released some footage captured by the Predators on X, cut with some intimidating music in a clear effort to push a specific narrative (the post's text, "California politicians must call off their rioting mob," is not exactly subtle or, for that matter, accurate). Low-rent movie trailer music aside, the footage does demonstrate the drone's ability to capture wide-angle shots of the situation. For what it's worth, CBP told The War Zone that the drones are specifically "providing officer safety surveillance" and are "not engaged in the surveillance of First Amendment activities." Given that clashes with protestors is what's at issue, though, that's functionally not much of a distinction. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
‘I killed two people': Witness reports abrupt confession from woman who crashed into trooper, causing serious injuries
CHICOPEE — The Springfield woman who allegedly plowed into a trooper conducting a traffic stop Tuesday morning told her employer and the police that she had been attacked at a convenience store by several women and that her car was stolen. This is according to court records associated with the arrest of Naisha L. Rodriguez, 32, of Springfield. She was arraigned in Chicopee District Court Wednesday morning after being charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol causing serious injury, intimidating a witness, leaving the scene of a crash and falsely reporting a stolen vehicle. She pleaded not guilty to the charges and was held on $500,000 cash bail. The parking lot of the courthouse was filled with state police cruisers; troopers packed the courtroom in support of their injured comrade. Investigators say Rodriguez was driving her work-issued Subaru in the westbound lane of the Massachusetts Turnpike around 2:20 a.m. near Chicopee, and veered into the trooper, who had a tractor trailer pulled over in the breakdown lane. A witness called 911, and colleagues of the trooper came to his aid. 'Troopers arrived on scene and located (the injured trooper) severely wounded and bleeding extensively from his arm in front of the tractor trailer,' a police narrative reads. While Rodriguez fled the scene, state police detectives gathered video footage from around the region to track Rodriguez's movements before and after the crash, according to the report. Her cover story about the alleged attack and car theft was quickly debunked, the records say. Video footage showed Rodriguez went to Baystate Wing Hospital in Palmer around 1:15 a.m., leaving 20 minutes later. The Subaru did not appear to have any body damage. Less than an hour later, the footage told a different story. The trooper's dash-cam video shows him walking along the driver's side of the tractor trailer. 'Once out of view, a white Subaru ... is seen moments later driving in the right lane before a witness, who was standing on the passenger side of (the cruiser), is seen running toward the direction of (the trooper),' records say. Footage from the city of Chicopee then showed the Subaru exiting I-90 with 'extensive' passenger side damage, then idling in a nearby Walmart parking lot and heading toward Springfield a few minutes later. The vehicle was registered to LabCorp in Holyoke, investigators found. Troopers spoke with a manager there, who confirmed that the Subaru was assigned to Rodriguez exclusively. He also said Rodriguez called him at 4:30 a.m. to report five women had cut her off at a 'Cumbies,' pulled her from the car and stole it. The manager said Rodriguez had been an employee only for 10 months and had already been involved in two motor vehicle incidents. 'One of which occurred on May 29, 2025, when she also stated she was attacked and had her vehicle stolen. She was given the Subaru Outback after the incident,' the police narrative states. Rodriguez doubled down on the stolen car story by also making a report to the Springfield Police Department, records show. She told a responding officer a woman named 'Dixie' attacked her but she did not know why. 'I observed multiple injuries to Ms. Rodriguez for this incident. She suffered a black eye on her left side, bleeding from her lower lip and scratches on both sides of her arms,' a Springfield police report says. Rodriguez refused an ambulance. A witness told police that Rodriguez called her six times between midnight and 6 a.m. that morning. 'After Witness 1 returned her call, Rodriguez stated she just killed two people and hung up. Rodriguez is known to drink excessively,' a trooper recounted in the police report. Investigators ultimately found the Subaru on Windemere Street in Springfield. The windshield was marked with pieces of a high visibility patrol jacket and had pieces of flesh clinging to the underside of the side quarter panel, which was torn back, according to the report. Briefing reporters on Monday outside Baystate Medical Center on Tuesday, Col. Geoffrey Noble of the Massachusetts State Police said the injured trooper will have a long road to recovery but was in good spirits. Investigators later arrived at Rodriguez's Tulsa Street home and spoke with her, the report says. 'Investigators immediately observed a strong odor of alcohol emanating from Rodriguez's breath as she spoke with a very slurred voice,' the report says. 'Rodriguez incoherently repeated over and over a story about being beat up and having her car stolen.' There was an empty nip bottle on the floor of her living room, which she quickly swatted away, the report adds. Rodriguez refused to go to the state police office at Tower Square in downtown Springfield and asked troopers to leave. They later returned with an arrest warrant. A pretrial hearing in the case is set for July 10. Read the original article on MassLive.
