logo
One year from the Butler assassination attempt: How it changed the 2024 race, the MAGA movement and Trump himself

One year from the Butler assassination attempt: How it changed the 2024 race, the MAGA movement and Trump himself

CNN — A year ago today, I
A year ago today, I watched as an attempted assassin opened fire on then-candidate Donald Trump.
During the chaos and fear that unfolded — unlike anything I had previously experienced — I questioned not only if he was safe, but also if his ambitions of becoming president yet again would be forever impacted by the events of that day.
The answer to both of those questions was yes.
July 13, 2024, ultimately became the one of the most pivotal moments of Trump's entire campaign. And the days that followed changed the entirety of the general election and MAGA movement.
Less than 48 hours after the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, Trump named then-Sen. JD Vance as his vice presidential running mate. Three days after that, Trump took the stage triumphantly at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, wearing a bandage over an ear that had been hit by a bullet. That Sunday, then-President Joe Biden announced he was withdrawing from the race after his disastrous debate performance in June.
Butler made the final stretch of the race far more personal for the president and his team, a White House official who also worked on the Trump 2024 campaign told CNN. The Trump team deliberately chose to ramp up the former president's schedule after that, ensuring he 'never missed a beat' on the trail, the official added. The goal was to show Trump was more committed than ever to winning the race.
'If people were going to try to do this, we were going to go even harder,' the official said. 'It became bigger than the election.'
'Fight, fight, fight!' is born
After a bullet grazed Trump's ear, I watched as he dropped to the ground behind his podium and Secret Service rushed the stage to form a circle around him. After the spray of gunshots finally ceased, and the officers began escorting the former president off the stage, Trump slowly rose up as blood dripped down his face and lifted his fist in the air.
'Fight, fight, fight!' an angry Trump shouted to the crowd. In conversations with multiple Trump campaign officials and advisers in the following weeks, I learned that the president later remarked to his close allies that he knew in that moment he needed to leave his supporters with a potent image.
Trump, who has long fixated on projecting a portrait of strength, did not want the assassination attempt to leave him looking weak, they said.
'He has better political instincts than anyone I know,' a then-Trump campaign adviser told me at the time.
The photo of a defiant Trump raising his fist high, with blood on his cheek and his clothing rumpled, quickly became a critically defining image of the 2024 race — and 'fight, fight, fight!' became a call to arms for the MAGA movement.
Within days, that image and the 'fight!' slogan was printed on t-shirts, mugs, signs and more. At nearly every one of the dozens of rallies I attended following July 13, that picture and phrase were prominently displayed — on the clothing his supporters wore, the merchandise being sold and the screens that served as the backdrop for Trump's speeches.
The photo is now proudly hung in both the West and East Wings of the White House. And the 'fight!' slogan continues to be displayed prominently at many of the president's private events.
Divine intervention
The events that unfolded in Butler had an immediate impact on the president. Trump, who had long feared that he would one day face an assassination attempt, argued in the days that followed that he believed God intervened on July 13 to save him. In public speeches, he frequently remarked that the shooter might have been successful if Trump had not turned his head at the right moment.
In conversations with his close allies and advisers, they said Trump admitted he was lucky to be alive.
Trump wears a bandage on his right ear at the 2024 Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, days following the assassination attempt.
Bernadette Tuazon/CNN
In recent conversations with those close to the president, they say that day made Trump believe that God had a hand in his 2024 victory — adding to his conviction that he has a mandate to rule the country, they told me.
Trump has also continued to recount the details of what happened on July 13 in vivid detail, whether it's during speeches or at private events. In the weeks that followed the Butler rally, he repeatedly talked about a chart that detailed US-Mexico border crossings from his first administration that he referenced when the gunfire began, crediting the graphic for saving his life.
Trump had his head turned to look at the graphic as one of those bullets made contact.
The chart 'probably saved my life,' he later told his supporters at one campaign event, arguing that he would 'sleep with that chart for the rest of my life.'
The graphic became a recurring campaign prop, and one Trump continues to reflect back on fondly.
And while the president is still affected by the attempt on his life, advisers said he can still strike a lighthearted tone on the subject. During a July 3, 2025, speech in Iowa, while doing a victory lap for the passage of his landmark congressional agenda bill, he paused when a sound in the distance went off.
'Did I hear what I think I heard?' Trump said, after a loud boom caught the attention of the crowd at the Iowa State Fairgrounds. 'Don't worry, it's only fireworks, I hope! Famous last words.'
As the president continued his speech, he turned his attention back to the noise, telling his supporters: 'You always have to think positive, I didn't like that sound either.'
Trump delivered those remarks behind a full frame of bulletproof glass, something that became standard for any outdoor speech he delivered as a candidate, and later as president, after the Butler rally.
'If he could come back, I could come back'
On July 13, 2024, I interviewed multiple rally attendees who, like me, had been evacuated from the rally site shortly after the shooting.
Emotions were high, chaos was rampant, and everyone I spoke to was scared.
Some people were angry. They said the media and Democrats had fanned the flames of animosity toward Trump. Others were saddened, telling me how deeply disappointed they were that the US had become so violent.
'I'm sad that we've come to this in America. Really sad,' rally attendee Joan Rimenschneirder told me. She went on to say she was 'fearful of what's going to happen now,' adding that she was scared Trump supporters could be targeted for wearing MAGA apparel.
However, she said if Trump could stand up and shout 'fight' after being hit by a bullet, then she would be 'brave' too.
A Trump campaign staffer points as people below him take cover on the day of the assassination attempt in Butler.That sentiment was conveyed by many of the people I interviewed that day. Trump's supporters were shaken, but more determined than ever that they must continue to back him.
Months later, Trump returned to Butler to deliver the speech he never had the opportunity to give in July, describing his second visit as unfinished business.
'I said that day when I was shot, I said, 'We're coming back. We're going to come back.' And I'm fulfilling a promise,' Trump said in an interview with NewsNation the week of his return. 'I'm fulfilling, really, an obligation.'
I also returned to Butler that day, as did many of the people who had stood in that same field a few months prior.
I spoke again with many of Trump's supporters, and was surprised to learn that every single one of them told me they weren't afraid to return to the scene. Instead, they were glad to have an opportunity to show their support once more.
Teresa Boyd, who had attended the first Butler rally in addition to his second, put it this way: 'If he could come back, I could come back to support him.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The UN's 80th anniversary: A call for urgent reform
The UN's 80th anniversary: A call for urgent reform

Egypt Independent

timean hour ago

  • Egypt Independent

The UN's 80th anniversary: A call for urgent reform

This year, the UN celebrates its 80th anniversary, amidst a backdrop of escalating global geopolitical tensions and conflicts. This includes a massive military conflict between Russia and the West in Ukraine, deteriorating relations between the US and Russia, and a freeze on all arms control negotiations. Furthermore, relations between the US, the West in general, and China have moved beyond competition over trade and technology, shifting strongly towards strategic confrontation. War has spread across the Middle East, particularly in Libya, Sudan, Yemen, and Syria, compounded by Israel's inhumane genocide in Gaza. Israel also attacked Iran, igniting a dangerous new strategic conflict, and the United States exacerbated the situation by launching a highly sophisticated military raid on at least three Iranian nuclear sites. The United Nations, specifically established to prevent a third world war and the recurrence of massive human losses, was supposed to be the arena for resolving these issues. Blatant use of force Disturbingly, there has been a blatant and repeated use of force across the globe, directly contradicting the principles and provisions of the United Nations Charter. This aggression is often carried out by permanent members of the UN Security Council or their close allies, such as Israel, who appear to be immune from accountability. A prime example is America's vetoing of a draft resolution calling for a permanent and unconditional ceasefire in Gaza, the release of hostages, and the lifting of humanitarian restrictions. The credibility of the UN's political committees, especially the Security Council, has been severely damaged. It seemingly responds only when it serves the interests of the world's two most powerful nations. As the UN General Assembly convenes in the fall of 2025, it is anticipated that US President Donald Trump will deliver a fiery speech against the organization, accusing it of excessive spending and corruption, and demanding fundamental reforms. Despite its current struggles, I remain a strong supporter of the UN. Although clearly strained, it represents the best available platform for multilateralism in our current world. The UN currently boasts 193 members, with Palestine striving to become the 194th, signaling its ongoing relevance. It's clear that the vast majority of the international community currently prefers to reform relations between states within the UN platform rather than outside of it. However, many are simultaneously dissatisfied with the organization's current performance, strongly advocating for serious steps towards reform to enhance, not weaken, its effectiveness. Three key demands for reform Three core demands lie at the heart of calls for reform, both within the UN itself and its specialized agencies, as well as the Bretton Woods institutions: Expanding Membership : Increasing the number of members in various councils, such as the Security Council, to roughly 24 to 25 members, with the addition of at least two permanent seats for Africa. : Increasing the number of members in various councils, such as the Security Council, to roughly 24 to 25 members, with the addition of at least two permanent seats for Africa. Curbing Veto Abuse : Establishing arrangements to limit the misuse or overuse of the veto power, and implementing appropriate measures to prevent potential overreach by the General Assembly. : Establishing arrangements to limit the misuse or overuse of the veto power, and implementing appropriate measures to prevent potential overreach by the General Assembly. Fairer Decision-Making: Organizing decision-making processes more equitably by reducing the weighted votes of more developed nations, particularly within multilateral financial institutions. While attempts to curb the absolute power of the UN's permanent members might seem unrealistic, especially given the US stance, this overlooks the fact that the United States was actually a pioneer in proposing reforms in the past. In 1950, it put forward General Assembly Resolution 377, titled 'Uniting for Peace,' in an effort to bypass the Soviet veto, which was then obstructing the Security Council's efforts to defend South Korea against North Korea. The core of that resolution stipulates that the General Assembly has the right to convene an emergency special session if the Security Council fails to exercise its responsibilities. Indeed, over the past 80 years, the Security Council has repeatedly failed to make appropriate and fair decisions when its permanent members or their close allies are the subject of a resolution. As a result, both permanent and non-permanent members have suffered from the resulting deadlock. It is in everyone's interest to push forward the three reform demands mentioned above to revitalize these bodies and enhance their performance. The 'UN80 Initiative,' launched in March 2025, and the 'Pact for the Future and UN 2.0' aim to modernize the organization's work, priorities, and operations by directly responding to the financial crisis. This includes relocating some bodies from New York to less costly locations, such as Nairobi. The non-permanent members of the UN (the 'middle powers' from around the world) must form a coalition willing to adopt political, economic, and administrative reforms for intergovernmental organizations without bias or favoritism. They should firmly assert that working to reform and rectify multilateralism is essential to ensure its credibility. Therefore, the opportunity of the UN's 80th anniversary should be seized to take constructive steps toward achieving genuine reforms. Otherwise, future generations might view this anniversary as an ominous turning point where the organization descended into the abyss of lost credibility and political irrelevance. About the author: Nabil Fahmy is a distinguished Egyptian diplomat who previously served as the nation's Minister of Foreign Affairs. His extensive career includes a significant tenure as Egypt's Ambassador to the United States. In August 2009, he was appointed Dean of the School of Public Affairs at the American University in Cairo.

EU warns that its trade with the US could be effectively wiped out if Trump follows through on his threat
EU warns that its trade with the US could be effectively wiped out if Trump follows through on his threat

Egypt Independent

time3 hours ago

  • Egypt Independent

EU warns that its trade with the US could be effectively wiped out if Trump follows through on his threat

London CNN — The European Union has warned that its trade with the United States could be effectively wiped out if Washington makes good on its threat to slap a 30 percent tariff on goods imported from the bloc. A tariff of '30 percent, or anything above 30 percent… has more or less the same effect. So, practically it prohibits the trade,' Maroš Šefčovič, the EU's trade commissioner, said as he arrived ahead of an EU ministerial meeting in Brussels on Monday. Šefčovič said it will 'be almost impossible' for the bloc to continue its current level of trade with America if that new tariff rate is implemented on August 1 – the date stipulated by US President Donald Trump in his letter to the EU on Saturday. 'If (the tariff) stays 30 (percent) plus, simply trading as we know it will not continue, with huge negative effects on both sides of the Atlantic,' he added. 'I will definitely do everything I can to prevent this super-negative scenario.' The EU-US trade relationship is mighty. According to the European Council, EU-US bilateral trade in goods and services was worth €1.68 trillion ($1.96 trillion) last year. Together, the partners represent nearly 30 percent of global goods and services trade, per the Council. But Trump has repeatedly rebuked the EU for what he sees as unfair trading practices, saying in April that the 27-nation bloc was 'formed to screw' America. He has pointed to EU tariffs on US goods as well as several 'non-tariff barriers' such as taxes on digital services to support that view. EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic speaks to reporters ahead of an EU Foreign Affairs Council meeting to discuss EU-US trade relations, in Brussels, Belgium on July 14. Yves Herman/Reuters Since re-taking office in January, Trump has hiked – and threatened to hike – tariffs on countries around the world to help eliminate the US' trade deficit, bring manufacturing jobs back to America and bring foreign nations to heel on key disputes. Trump said on Monday that America has given countries a 'free ride' for many years. 'The United States of America has been ripped off on TRADE (and MILITARY!), by friend and foe, alike, for DECADES,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'It has come at a cost of TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, and it is just not sustainable any longer – And never was!' For months, EU trade officials have been negotiating with their US counterparts to avoid Trump's tariffs, or to limit their damage. But after the US president threatened in May to jack up the rate of his so-called 'reciprocal' levy on EU goods from 20 percent to 50 percent, the bloc accelerated talks. Šefčovič reiterated on Monday that the EU seeks a negotiated solution as well as his belief that one had been within touching distance before Trump's latest tariff salvo. 'The feeling on our side was that we are very close to an agreement,' he said, noting that the bloc is demonstrating 'enormous' levels of patience and creativity to secure a deal. On Sunday, the EU said it will delay the implementation of planned countermeasures on €21 billion ($25 billion) worth of US exports from Monday until early August to allow more time to negotiate an agreement. Those countermeasures are in retaliation for the 25 percent tariff Washington has slapped on all steel and aluminium imports. Lars Løkke Rasmussen, Denmark's foreign minister, said the bloc wants a fair deal and that it should prepare to retaliate. 'If you want peace, you have to prepare for war, and I think that's where we are. So, of course, we shouldn't impose countermeasures (at) this stage, but we should prepare to be ready to use all the tool in the toolbox,' Rasmussen said before the meeting of EU trade ministers on Monday. European stocks were falling Monday in the first day of trade since Trump issued his new tariff threat over the weekend. The Stoxx Europe 600, the region's benchmark index, was trading 0.33 percent lower by early afternoon CET.

Trump's UK state visit schedule avoids possibility of him addressing parliament
Trump's UK state visit schedule avoids possibility of him addressing parliament

Egypt Independent

time3 hours ago

  • Egypt Independent

Trump's UK state visit schedule avoids possibility of him addressing parliament

London CNN — US President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump will travel to the United Kingdom in September for an 'unprecedented' second state visit at the invitation of King Charles, which is unlikely to have any public-facing events. The visit is scheduled for September 17-19, the palace announced Sunday, coinciding with a recess in the House of Commons. That removes the possibility of Trump addressing a joint session of parliament – a prospect that some MPs had urged the Speaker of the House to refuse. King Charles will host Trump at Windsor Castle, about an hour from central London, the palace said in a statement. The usual venue for state visits, Buckingham Palace, is undergoing significant renovations this year. Windsor was also the site of French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit last week, before Macron traveled to London to attend a summit at Downing Street and deliver a speech to parliament. Typically, second-term US presidents are not invited for a second state visit. In keeping with tradition, former presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush were offered lunch or tea with the monarch during their second administrations. But the 'unprecedented' offer was extended on the king's behalf by Prime Minister Keir Starmer during his trip to the White House earlier this year, which Trump enthusiastically accepted. A formal invitation was then sent in June, but the two leaders were unable to meet during the summer due to scheduling conflicts. CNN has reached out to the White House for comment. President Donald Trump was greeted by then-Prince Charles at Buckingham Palace in London on June 3, 2019. Jeff'His Majesty has known President Trump for many years and looks forward to hosting him and the First Lady later this year,' a palace aide told CNN in June. More specifics about the state visit will be released in the future, the palace statement said. As with every state visit, it will include a full ceremonial welcome and state banquet. All senior members of the Royal Family are expected to take part. During his first formal state visit in 2019, Trump was hosted by the late Queen Elizabeth at Buckingham Palace. But due to security concerns, there was no public procession along The Mall in London, and the president arrived by helicopter. CNN's Mitchell McCluskey contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store