China's $10 Sodium-Ion Battery May Reshape U.S. EV Industry and Supply Chains
China's breakthrough sodium-ion battery — priced at $10/kWh (Bloomberg NEF, 2025) — is a technical marvel. It's a direct challenge to America's lithium-dependent auto industry. For context, today's cheapest lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries cost $75/kWh, while Tesla's 4680 cells hover near $100/kWh. At one-tenth the price, sodium-ion tech could make budget EVs like the $25,000 Tesla Model 2 financially viable overnight. American potential EV buyers hesitant because of cost will be comforted by this. When it comes.
Chinese engineers at CATL (the world's largest EV battery maker) have begun mass-producing sodium-ion cells at their new 30GWh facility in Fujian province, with plans to supply automakers like Chery and BYD by late 2025. This isn't lab hype: CATL's first-gen sodium batteries already power 250,000 urban delivery vans across China, offering 120-160Wh/kg energy density.
For cars, more needs to be done about range. But a 10,000 life cycle, to Tesla's 1500, lifespan speaks volumes. Best for grid storage and city cars, the economics are transformative. Sodium-ion production costs 70% less than lithium packs because of:
Abundant materials: Sodium carbonate costs $200/ton vs. lithium carbonate's $15,000/ton (2025 prices)
Simplified mining: Extractable from seawater or Wyoming's Green River Basin (90% of global reserves)
No cobalt/nickel: Skips conflict minerals tied to Congo's mines
Extortion free: Cannot be held to ransom by anyone on lithium supply.
Implication for US Buyers: If adopted domestically, sodium batteries could slash entry-level EV prices by $8,000–$12,000, making models like the Chevrolet Bolt 2.0 or Ford E-Transit van accessible to millions.
America's automakers are repeating history. Just as GM clung to gas-guzzling V8s during the 1970s oil crisis, today's EV strategies rely entirely on lithium—a mineral with 1,400% price volatility since 2020. If lithium supplies tighten again (e.g., Bolivia nationalizes reserves or Australia's mines strike), the fallout would be catastrophic:
EV price spikes: A $100/kWh lithium battery adds $6,500 to a 65kWh pack
Production halts: Ford's $3.5B Michigan plant depends on Chilean lithium
Geopolitical blackmail: China controls 65% of lithium refining (according to the U.S. Geological Survey)
Sodium-ion batteries offer an escape hatch. According to statements by CATL executives, the company can switch chemistries like changing shoes—lithium today, sodium tomorrow. US automakers, shackled by IRA domestic sourcing rules, lack this flexibility. That must change. And fast.
BloombergNEF predicts sodium-ion will capture 12% of the global storage market by 2030, but China's head start is alarming. While the US has its first sodium battery factory (Natron Energy's Michigan plant), its 600MWh annual output is a fraction of CATL's 30GWh.
What Washington Must Do:
Fast-track permits for sodium carbonate mining (Wyoming holds 47B tons)
Expand IRA tax credits to include sodium-ion R&D
Mandate dual-chemistry EVs by 2030
Without these steps, America risks ceding the next-gen EV race to Chinese automakers already testing 310-mile sodium-powered sedans.
The $10 battery isn't really about the chemistry. It's really a story about survival. For US buyers, sodium-ion could mean affordable EVs immune to lithium's rollercoaster. For Detroit, it's a wake-up call: innovate or watch your factories become relics, like Flint's shuttered V8 plants. The question isn't whether sodium batteries will disrupt the market, but whether America will lead, or follow, this salty revolution.
Read the full article here: BYD's Sodium Bomb Just Blew Up the Lithium Cartel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Institutions own 29% of Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd (KLSE:KOSSAN) shares but private companies control 36% of the company
The considerable ownership by private companies in Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy 53% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders Insiders own 14% of Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Every investor in Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd (KLSE:KOSSAN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 36% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Meanwhile, institutions make up 29% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. See our latest analysis for Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Kossan Holdings (M) Sdn Bhd is the largest shareholder with 35% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.7% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Kuang Sia Lim directly holds 2.8% of the total shares outstanding. Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 53% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful RM608m stake in this RM4.3b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. We can see that Private Companies own 36%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morning Bid: So, it's a framework for a deal, maybe?
(Reuters) -A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Wayne Cole. So, apparently, they have the concept of a plan for a proposal on a framework for a deal to break the latest U.S.-China trade impasse. Which was only needed because President Trump sent that tweet claiming Beijing had broken the old deal. This deal now needs to be approved by Trump and Chairman Xi, and then implemented. At least the Chinese side thought the talks were "rational", which was a step forward. Details were scant, though the U.S. team did claim that it would resolve China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets. What Beijing got in return was not yet clear. Neither was it clear whether this truce would last any longer than the last one, which might be why the early market response was less than enthusiastic. U.S. and European stock futures were all down between 0.2% and 0.6%, and Asian shares modestly firmer. There is still the small matter of whether the April 2 levies are actually legal, with a federal appeals court allowing the tariffs to remain in effect while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them. The dollar and Treasuries were little changed as the U.S. CPI looms later in the day and any upside surprise would fan stagflationary fears, to the detriment of both markets. Analysts assume lower energy prices will keep the headline rise to 0.2%, while the core is seen up 0.3%. Attention will be on whether tariffs show up in goods prices, though the full impact is likely to appear from June onwards. Measures of volatility suggest investors really aren't prepared for a high number, so anything in line will be a relief. Treasuries also have a 10-year auction to weather, with the focus on the share taken by indirect bidders which include foreign central banks. The latter took a hefty 71% of the May sale, while primary dealers got just 8.9%. A repeat performance would be warmly welcomed. Key developments that could influence markets on Wednesday: * ECB wage tracker. Appearances by ECB council membersGabriel Makhlouf; Piero Cipollone; Philip Lane and Claudia Buch;policymaker Yiannis Stournaras * British finance minister Rachel Reeves releases spendingreview * U.S. CPI data for May (By Wayne Cole; Editing by Christopher Cushing) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Temu, Shein pivot to Europe to bypass US tariffs
Chinese-founded budget e-commerce platforms Temu and Shein have been increasing their presence in European markets as their sales decline sharply in the United States. Consumer spending on Temu in the US fell by approximately 36% in May compared to the previous year, while Shein's spending dropped by 13%, according to data from Consumer Edge. Despite this growth opportunity in Europe, experts warn that both companies face mounting regulatory scrutiny similar to that encountered in the US. As US tariffs and trade policies have taken effect—such as the May end to a small-package tariff exemption and new duties as high as 54%—Temu and Shein have shifted their strategy towards European countries. Consumer Edge's data indicates that consumer spending on these platforms grew significantly in Europe in May, with Temu's sales rising by 63% in the EU and 38% in the UK year-over-year. Shein also saw increases of 19% in the EU and 42% in the UK. France, Europe's second-largest economy, emerged as a key market, especially for Temu. This European growth has been accompanied by increased advertising investments and efforts to expand warehouse capacity. Both companies are experimenting with localised business models to better adapt to the region's consumer preferences. However, Europe enforces stricter regulations on product safety, consumer protection, and competition, which require additional compliance and transparency efforts. Despite their expansion, Temu and Shein face intensifying regulatory challenges in Europe. The European Union is preparing to introduce a two-euro flat customs fee on low-value packages from online marketplaces, which previously entered duty-free. Industry experts describe this move as a strategic effort to regulate the rapid growth of ultra-cheap cross-border e-commerce and foresee significant impacts on the platforms' operations over the coming years. Further regulatory pressure comes from consumer advocacy groups and government bodies. The pan-European organisation BEUC has filed complaints against both companies, accusing them of employing deceptive marketing tactics known as 'dark patterns' that encourage overconsumption. The European Commission is also investigating Shein's adherence to EU consumer protection laws. Meanwhile, France is considering legislation specifically targeting ultra-cheap fast fashion products for their environmental impact. Beyond commercial regulations, Temu and Shein face scrutiny over labour practices and human rights compliance. US authorities have challenged Temu over alleged breaches of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which bans imports made with forced labour from China's Xinjiang region. Europe is advancing stricter oversight through the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, requiring companies to address human rights abuses and environmental impacts within their supply chains. Analysts highlight that the rising global protectionism and differing standards on labour and sustainability are significant factors behind the growing regulatory hurdles. While Europe presents valuable growth opportunities, compliance with these evolving legal frameworks will be crucial for Temu and Shein's continued expansion in the region. Navigate the shifting tariff landscape with real-time data and market-leading analysis. Request a free demo for GlobalData's Strategic Intelligence . "Temu, Shein pivot to Europe to bypass US tariffs" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
