Best AP Computer Science books
Which AP computer science book is best?
Almost everything in the world, from our careers to our health to our entertainment, depends on computers and technology, so a career in computer science will definitely provide you with security and stability. The best AP computer science books take your understanding from basic to more complicated topics in a fun and engaging way. It's crucial to understand the features you should look for in AP computer science books, as well as the general pricing and the best options out there. A top book to start with is Computer Science Distilled: Learning the Art of Solving Computational Problems.
What to know before you buy an AP computer science book
Book level
If you are brand new to the world of computer science, then you need to select an AP computer science book that is meant for beginners. You certainly wouldn't want to buy a book that assumes you are an expert if you know nothing about computer science. On the flip side, you probably don't want a book for beginners if you already know a great deal about computer science.
Language
Consider the language you need to learn. You would need to learn Italian if you were planning on taking a trip to Rome. And if you are planning on working with C++, then you need a computer science book that focuses on C++ rather than other programming languages.
Test prep books
You might need a beginner computer science book or two, but if you are planning on taking the AP Computer Science exam, then you definitely need an AP Computer Science test prep guide. This type of guide is meant to help you pass the AP Computer Science exam and usually features several different practice exams both online and in the book.
What to look for in a quality AP computer science book
Accessibility
It's crucial to find a book that is accessible and simple to read and understand on the first try. If you find a book that is full of complicated language that is difficult to understand, you might give up on computer science before you really get into it.
Binding
Keep in mind that paperbacks are usually the most inexpensive option, but hardcover books tend to be more durable. You should consider both your budget and your usage needs when deciding whether to go with a paperback or hardcover edition. You can also purchase a digital version of the book if you prefer reading on a computer, phone or tablet.
Additional content
Most computer science books link to free online materials. It's important to seek out these books that provide free additional content, because the more resources you have, the more likely you are to understand the material.
How much you can expect to spend on an AP computer science book
Basic computer science books will vary in price from about $7-$12, while mid-range books that go into more detail range from $12-$25. More expensive computer science guides that give you an in-depth understanding of the principles range from $25-$40, and premium, college-level textbooks can go for as much as $100 or more.
AP computer science book FAQ
How do you know if computer science is right for you?
A. Computers allow us to do so many amazing things, from sharing pictures to gaming. That being said, just because you enjoy what you are able to do with a computer doesn't necessarily mean you will like computer science. Think about whether you prefer creating or if you prefer simply using a computer. If you prefer creating, then computer science might be right for you.
Which skills or interests do you need to excel in computer science?
A. You need to enjoy and excel in mathematics if you want to excel in computer science. You also need to be able to communicate well with both computer code and words. The computer science industry will require you to create clear outlines and give instructions to both machines and people so that they will know how to use what you have developed. The most important skill you need is being able to think creatively and solve puzzles. Computer science is often about solving problems or puzzles in creative ways, so this skill and interest is crucial.
What's the best AP computer science book to buy?
Computer Science Distilled: Learning the Art of Solving Computational Problems
What you need to know: This accessible computer science book can help any programmer learn more about the fundamentals.
What you'll love: This fun and easily digestible computer science guide explains the concepts well and gives readers a broad overview in an entertaining way. There are also helpful illustrations and a few chapters about mathematics.
What you should consider: This book is not a good resource for computer science beginners, and some customers don't like that the examples are given in pseudocode.
Top AP computer science book for the money
Computer Science Principles: The Foundational Concepts of Computer Science – For AP Computer Science Principles (5th Edition)
What you need to know: This affordable computer science guide is an excellent option for anyone who wants to learn more about computer science, particularly AP Computer Science students.
What you'll love: This budget-friendly computer science book is a wonderful reference for computer science exams and classes and helps students better understand more complicated ideas, like coding.
What you should consider: This book only provides basic information about programming and is not recommended for more experienced coders.
Worth checking out
AP Computer Science Principles Premium, 2025: Prep Book with 6 Practice Tests + Comprehensive Review + Online Practice
What you need to know: This AP Computer Science A test prep book is perfect for high school students who want to get a perfect score on their AP exam.
What you'll love: The test prep book features access to three full-length tests online, three full-length practice tests in the book, one being a diagnostic test to assist students in identifying both their weaknesses and their strengths.
What you should consider: Keep in mind that this test prep book is not for beginners in the world of computer science.
Prices listed reflect time and date of publication and are subject to change.
BestReviews spends thousands of hours researching, analyzing and testing products to recommend the best picks for most consumers. BestReviews and its newspaper partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Speak a new language before your suitcase hits the carousel
Discover startups, services, products and more from our partner StackCommerce. New York Post edits this content, and may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you buy through our links. TL;DR: Get lifetime access to Babbel's expertly designed lessons in 14 languages for $129.99 (reg. $599)—on desktop or mobile, online or offline—with StackSocial's exclusive code LEARN40. Whether you're ordering dinner in Rome or asking for directions on the 7 train in Queens, knowing a second (or third) language can make life a whole lot smoother. With this exclusive offer from StackSocial, you can get lifetime access to Babbel—the language learning platform trusted by millions worldwide. You'll get access to all 14 languages, including Spanish, French, German, Italian, and even Norwegian, with over 10,000 hours of content designed by linguists. These lessons aren't filled with silly vocab you'll never use—they're built around real-life conversations like ordering food, chatting with locals, or navigating airports without pulling out Google Translate. Lessons are bite-sized (10–15 minutes) and sync seamlessly across your devices. Whether you're grinding on your desktop or squeezing in a few phrases on your phone before takeoff, Babbel was made to fit into your schedule. No Wi-Fi? No problem. Simply download your lessons and take them with you on the go. With built-in speech recognition technology and an AI conversation partner, Babbel helps you actually speak the language, not just memorize it. And if you're the kind of person who starts learning with full enthusiasm but forgets by week two (we see you), Babbel's personalized review system has your back. It tracks what you've learned and refreshes it at just the right time, so lessons actually stick. Whether you're brushing up on your high school Spanish or diving into German before your big summer trip, Babbel adapts to you, not the other way around. So if you're serious about learning, this is your passport to real progress. Use StackSocial's exclusive code, LEARN40, at checkout through June 30 to unlock the full, lifetime Babbel experience for just $129.99 (reg. $599). StackSocial prices subject to change.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Newspaper That Hired ChatGPT
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. For more than 20 years, print media has been a bit of a punching bag for digital-technology companies. Craigslist killed the paid classifieds, free websites led people to think newspapers and magazines were committing robbery when they charged for subscriptions, and the smartphone and social media turned reading full-length articles into a chore. Now generative AI is in the mix—and many publishers, desperate to avoid being left behind once more, are rushing to harness the technology themselves. Several major publications, including The Atlantic, have entered into corporate partnerships with OpenAI and other AI firms. Any number of experiments have ensued—publishers have used the software to help translate work into different languages, draft headlines, and write summaries or even articles. But perhaps no publication has gone further than the Italian newspaper Il Foglio. For one month, beginning in late March, Il Foglio printed a daily insert consisting of four pages of AI-written articles and headlines. Each day, Il Foglio's top editor, Claudio Cerasa, asked ChatGPT Pro to write articles on various topics—Italian politics, J. D. Vance, AI itself. Two humans reviewed the outputs for mistakes, sometimes deciding to leave in minor errors as evidence of AI's fallibility and, at other times, asking ChatGPT to rewrite an article. The insert, titled Il Foglio AI, was almost immediately covered by newspapers around the world. 'It's impossible to hide AI,' Cerasa told me recently. 'And you have to understand that it's like the wind; you have to manage it.' Now the paper—which circulates about 29,000 copies each day, in addition to serving its online readership—plans to embrace AI-written content permanently, issuing a weekly AI section and, on occasion, using ChatGPT to write articles for the standard paper. (These articles will always be labeled.) Cerasa has already used the technology to generate fictional debates, such as an imagined conversation between a conservative and a progressive cardinal on selecting a new pope; a review of the columnist Beppe Severgnini's latest book, accompanied by Severgnini's AI-written retort; the chatbot's advice on what to do if you suspect you're falling in love with a chatbot ('Do not fall in love with me'); and an interview with Cerasa himself, conducted by ChatGPT. Il Foglio's AI work is full-fledged and transparently so: natural and artificial articles, clearly divided. Meanwhile, other publications provide limited, or sometimes no, insight into their usage of the technology, and some have even mixed AI and human writing without disclosure. As if to demonstrate how easily the commingling of AI and journalism can go sideways, just days after Cerasa and I first spoke, at least two major regional American papers published a spread of more than 50 pages titled 'Heat Index,' which was riddled with errors and fabrications; a freelancer who'd contributed to the project admitted to using ChatGPT to generate at least some portions of the text, resulting in made-up book titles and expert sources who didn't actually exist. The result was an embarrassing example of what can result when the technology is used to cut corners. [Read: At least two newspapers syndicated AI garbage] With so many obvious pitfalls to using AI, I wanted to speak with Cerasa to understand more about his experiment. Over Zoom, he painted an unsettling, if optimistic, portrait of his experience with AI in journalism. Sure, the technology is flawed. It's prone to fabrications; his staff has caught plenty of them, and has been taken to task for publishing some of those errors. But when used correctly, it writes well—at times more naturally, Cerasa told me, than even his human staff. Still, there are limits. 'Anyone who tries to use artificial intelligence to replace human intelligence ends up failing,' he told me when I asked about the 'Heat Index' disaster. 'AI is meant to integrate, not replace.' The technology can benefit journalism, he said, 'only if it's treated like a new colleague—one that needs to be looked after.' The problem, perhaps, stems from using AI to substitute rather than augment. In journalism, 'anyone who thinks AI is a way to save money is getting it wrong,' Cerasa said. But economic anxiety has become the norm for the field. A new robot colleague could mean one, or three, or 10 fewer human ones. What, if anything, can the rest of the media learn from Il Foglio's approach? Our conversation has been edited for length and clarity. Matteo Wong: In your first experiment with AI, you hid AI-written articles in your paper for a month and asked readers if they could detect them. How did that go? What did you learn? Claudio Cerasa: A year ago, for one month, every day we put in our newspaper an article written with AI, and we asked our readers to guess which article was AI-generated, offering the prize of a one-year subscription and a bottle of champagne. The experiment helped us create better prompts for the AI to write an article, and helped us humans write better articles as well. Sometimes an article written by people was seen as an article written by AI: for instance, when an article is written with numbered points—first, second, third. So we changed something in how we write too. Wong: Did anybody win? Cerasa: Yes, we offered a lot of subscriptions and champagne. More than that, we realized we needed to speak about AI not just in our newspaper, but all over the world. We created this thing that is important not only because it is journalism with AI, but because it combines the oldest way to do information, the newspaper, and the newest, artificial intelligence. Wong: How did your experience of using ChatGPT change when you moved from that original experiment to a daily imprint entirely written with AI? Cerasa: The biggest thing that has changed is our prompt. At the beginning, my prompt was very long, because I had to explain a lot of things: You have to write an article with this style, with this number of words, with these ideas. Now, after a lot of use of ChatGPT, it knows better what I want to do. When you start to use, in a transparent way, artificial intelligence, you have a personal assistant: a new person that works in the newspaper. It's like having another brain. It's a new way to do journalism. Wong: What are the tasks and topics you've found that ChatGPT is good at and for which you'd want to use it? And conversely, where are the areas where it falls short? Cerasa: In general, it is good at three things: research, summarizing long documents, and, in some cases, writing. I'm sure in the future, and maybe in the present, many editors will try to think of ways AI can erase journalists. That could be possible, because if you are not a journalist with enough creativity, enough reporting, enough ideas, maybe you are worse than a machine. But in that case, the problem is not the machine. The technology can also recall and synthesize far more information than a human can. The first article we put in the normal newspaper written with AI was about the discovery of a key ingredient for life on a distant planet. We asked the AI to write a piece on great authors of the past and how they imagined the day scientists would make such a discovery. A normal person would not be able to remember all these things. Wong: And what can't the AI do? Cerasa: AI cannot find the news; it cannot develop sources or interview the prime minister. AI also doesn't have interesting ideas about the world—that's where natural intelligence comes in. AI is not able to draw connections in the same way as intelligent human journalists. I don't think an AI would be able to come up with and fully produce a newspaper generated by AI. Wong: You mentioned before that there may be some articles or tasks at a newspaper that AI can already write or perform better than humans, but if so, the problem is an insufficiently skilled person. Don't you think young journalists have to build up those skills over time? I started at The Atlantic as an assistant editor, not a writer, and my primary job was fact-checking. Doesn't AI threaten the talent pipeline, and thus the media ecosystem more broadly? Cerasa: It's a bit terrifying, because we've come to understand how many creative things AI can do. For our children to use AI to write something in school, to do their homework, is really terrifying. But AI isn't going away—you have to educate people to use it in the correct way, and without hiding it. In our newspaper, there is no fear about AI, because our newspaper is very particular and written in a special way. We know, in a snobby way, that our skills are unique, so we are not scared. But I'm sure that a lot of newspapers could be scared, because normal articles written about the things that happened the day before, with the agency news—that kind of article, and also that kind of journalism, might be the past. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Medscape
13 hours ago
- Medscape
BMI & Nutrition Support Predict Weight Loss in Liver Disease
In patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), higher BMI, nutritionist support, and liver stiffness measurement ≥ 10 kPa were significant predictors of at least 7% weight reduction. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective study to identify clinical factors that predict successful and sustained weight loss in 897 patients with MASLD (mean age, 61.6 years; 57.1% men; mean BMI, 30.3). They were referred between January 2019 and December 2021, with follow-up occurring between 18 and 24 months at four Italian tertiary centres. The diagnosis of MASLD was confirmed if patients had hepatic steatosis on ultrasound and at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, such as a BMI ≥ 25 or high waist circumference, fasting glucose levels ≥ 100 mg/dL or type 2 diabetes, blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mm Hg, triglyceride levels ≥ 150 mg/dL, or low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Baseline and follow‐up data, including demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical parameters, as well as liver stiffness measurements, were collected from medical records. Details on lifestyle interventions such as Mediterranean diet recommendations, physical activity, and support from a nutritionist were also noted. TAKEAWAY: Over a median duration of 21 months, 18.3% of patients achieved at least 7% weight loss, with 8.5% losing 7%-10% and 9.8% losing more than 10% of their baseline weight. Higher baseline BMI was associated with increased odds of weight loss, with BMI 30-34.9 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.30-2.95) and BMI ≥ 35 (aOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.21-3.57) associated with at least 7% weight loss. Nutritionist support (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.12-3.71), liver stiffness measurement ≥ 10 kPa (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.07-2.70), and bilirubin levels ≥ 1.2 mg/dL (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.29-3.51) were independent predictors of achieving at least 7% weight loss. The use of GLP-1 agonists was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of losing at least 7% weight (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.19-3.80). IN PRACTICE: "Our findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive approach to MASLD management, encompassing medical, nutritional and lifestyle interventions," the authors of the study wrote. "Lifestyle intervention remains crucial for all patients, but for those without predictive factors, close follow-up and early consideration of additional treatments are warranted to maximize therapeutic benefit," they added. SOURCE: This study was led by Nicola Pugliese, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. It was published online on June 04, 2025, in United European Gastroenterology Journal . LIMITATIONS: This study was retrospective in nature with varying observation periods among the patients. A standardised intervention protocol was lacking across centres, potentially leading to varying management. The absence of systematic data collection from intermediate visits and self-reported data also presented a limitation. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by funding from the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research and other projects to an author. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.
