Should you diversify your portfolio by adding mutual funds focused on quality strategy?
Several mutual funds have filed with the Securities and Exchange Board of India for quality strategy funds. Quality strategy involves investing in companies that have strong fundamentals and robust balance sheets. It prioritises stocks with high profitability, high return on equity and low levels of debt.
Should those looking at diversifying their portfolios with a different investment style consider the quality theme now?
With the markets going through a phase of uncertainty, past performance suggests that the quality theme tends to do well during such times.
In 2013, when the US Federal Reserve started to unwind the huge
liquid
ity surplus it had maintained to stimulate the economy, the benchmark Nifty 50 Index gained 6%, while the Nifty 200 Quality 30 Index advanced 17%. It outperformed other strategies — with the Nifty 200 Value 30 Index losing 15%, the Nifty 200 Alpha 30 Index adding 14% and the Nifty 200 Momentum 30 Index rising 10%.
Value strategy focuses on stocks trading at cheaper valuations than their earnings and intrinsic value. The alpha strategy calls for investing in stocks that have widely outperformed market benchmarks in recent periods, and the momentum strategy looks for stocks with recent price up-moves.
In 2018, when the markets faced pressure from the impact of the IL&FS crisis, the Nifty 50 Index was up 4%, while most other strategies yielded negative returns. However, the Nifty 200 Quality 30 Index delivered 7% returns.
"In today's environment of economic uncertainty and moderating growth, businesses with sound financials and sustainable profitability stand out," said S Naren, executive director and chief investment officer of ICICI Mutual Fund, which recently launched the ICICI Prudential Quality Fund. 'A quality strategy-oriented fund aims to tap into this potential by selecting high quality companies available at reasonable valuations, thereby aiming to build a resilient portfolio designed to perform across market cycles. With attractive valuations in the quality segment, we believe this is an opportune time for investors to adopt a quality-focused strategy."
While most funds in this segment are passively managed – tracking the performance of the quality index – ICICI MF's quality fund is an actively managed fund. Experts expect quality as a theme to do well going ahead, as it has underperformed other strategies from FY21 to FY24.
"The volatility induced in the market over the last few months (GDP slowdown, tariffonomics, Indo-Pak situation) has poked the bubble of a pure liquidity and deep value driven rally in stocks and sectors," said Sunil Subramaniam, a market expert and former mutual fund CEO. 'So now companies with sound financials, deep moats and entry barriers, high corporate governance and relative stability and predictability of earnings are the ones which will withstand the test of facing up to the uncertain local and global environment over the next few months. In effect, it's the time for 'quality' to dominate allocations by both foreign institutional investors and domestic institutional investors."
Strategy-based investing can be considered more of a tactical allocation than part of one's long-term core portfolio. Investors can complement the quality strategy with other strategies.
'By itself, quality may not always work but combining it with momentum can give a better investor experience," pointed out Kavitha Menon, founder of Probitus Wealth.
Quality can also be combined with value because when value does well, quality underperforms and vice-versa. However, investors who are at the beginning of their investment journey should stick to regular diversified equity funds to build up their core investment portfolio before looking at tactical investment calls.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
44 minutes ago
- Mint
The Reserve Bank's leap of faith: A big rate cut is very hard to justify
It's a study in contrasts. About a month to the day, the US Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged in a wait-and-watch response to the uncertainty about how President Donald Trump's tariffs will raise inflation and/or slow growth, the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) saw no merit in waiting for the fog to lift. It cut rates for the third time in a row and by a larger-than-expected 50 basis points to 5.5%. Not content with that, it went in for what many might term an 'overkill,' lowering the cash reserve ratio (CRR), or the amount of bank deposits impounded with RBI, by 100 basis points, which will over the course of this year release an additional ₹2.5 trillion of liquidity into a system already flush with funds. RBI's leap of faith in support of growth, when many would argue that growth is doing quite well by its own projections, is hard to justify. At a time when it is impossible to know for sure whether the price or growth effects of US tariffs will dominate, front-loading action could well be a two-edged sword. The belief (mistaken?) that lower interest rates and surplus liquidity alone will raise growth without reigniting inflation beats logic. And past experience too. Also Read: RBI's policy review: Why this time is truly different So, what has changed since the last meeting in April 2025 that could possibly justify the sea-change to a looser-than-expected (warranted?) monetary policy? The governor's argument is that growth needs support, hence the need to front-load action. Except that the data does not support that view. On the contrary, not only has growth done better than expected, with fourth-quarter (January-March 2025) growth at 7.4% better than RBI's December projection of 7.2%, but the growth projection for 2025-26 has also been left unchanged at 6.5%. The dilemma for the MPC was how it should frame policy when growth is faring better than expected and also inflation (which retail numbers for April suggest is under control). But there is a cloud hanging over both. Sure, the India Meteorological Department's prediction of a good monsoon suggests agriculture will do well. But summer months invariably see an uptick in food inflation. Moreover, it is the temporal and spatial distribution of the rains that affect food prices, not overall precipitation. We have already seen prices of onion and tomato—two of the treacherous TOP (tomato, onion and potato) sub-group that plays havoc with food inflation—edge up. Core inflation (excluding food and fuel) is also up at 4.2%, the highest since September 2023. Also Read: Ajit Ranade: RBI's increasing fiscal support deserves a closer look Meanwhile, the impediments to growth are mainly external—tariff induced—over which RBI has no control. In such a scenario, it might have been better had RBI borrowed one of the principal precepts of bioethics,Primum non nocere, a Latin phrase that means 'first do no harm.' This fundamental principle in healthcare (not out of place when covid is again among us) basically says: 'Given an existing problem, it may be better not to do something, or even to do nothing, than to risk causing more harm than good.' It reminds healthcare personnel to consider the possible harm any intervention might do. And is invoked when debating the use of an intervention that carries an obvious risk of harm but a less certain chance of benefit. Also Read: RBI's ₹2.7 trillion: Many benefits arise from one big beautiful surplus Remember, US gross domestic product (GDP) growth contracted 0.2% during the January-March quarter, even as our GDP grew 7.4%. Despite this hit to US growth and constant bluster from President Trump, who has made his displeasure with Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell known in no uncertain terms, the Fed opted to bide its time. Wisely so. Powell's statement after the last meeting of the rate-setting Federal Open Markets Committee sets out the logic very clearly. 'We may find ourselves in the challenging scenario in which our dual mandate goals are in tension. If that were to occur, we would consider how far the economy is from each goal and the potentially different time horizons over which those respective gaps would be anticipated to close." The MPC resolution does not offer any such reasoning. In the absence of a convincing argument, it is tempting to attribute Friday's policy-rate change to the panel's changed composition. The MPC's newly-inducted deputy governor in charge of monetary policy, unlike her career-central-banker predecessor, is perhaps not an inflation hawk. But then, that would go against the veryraison d'être of entrusting rate decision-making to a committee rather than an individual. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | An inflation dip enlarges RBI's policy space 'Policy levers," said Governor Sanjay Malhotra, 'are needed to step up the growth momentum." The 'changed growth-inflation dynamic calls for not only continuing with the policy easing but also front-loading the rate cuts to support growth." A bit of a hard sell, given that we claim to be among the world's fastest-growing major economies, with 2025-26 growth projected at 6.5%. Sure, growth remains lower than our aspirations amid a challenging global environment and heightened uncertainty. But aspirations are not to be confused with potential. Wise central banks know the difference. As for uncertainty, in the words of former Fed chair Alan Greenspan, 'Uncertainty is not just a pervasive feature of the monetary policy landscape; it is the defining characteristic of that landscape." All the more reason then not to jump the gun, but to cross the river by feeling the stones. There is no great sanctity in timing rate decisions with MPC meetings. For central banks, the motto must always be, 'Better safe than sorry.' The author is a senior journalist and a former central banker.
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
Gold price cools, silver stays firm at 1.04L/kg in Ahmedabad
Ahmedabad: After breaching the Rs 1 lakh mark, cooled off on Saturday to settle at Rs 99,200 per 10 grams, down by Rs 700 in a single trading session. Silver, however, continued to stay firm at Rs 1.04 lakh per kg. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Bullion traders and analysts attributed the correction in gold to easing geopolitical tensions and profit booking by investors after a sharp rally. "Some cooling was expected as gold touched record highs recently. However, overall sentiment remains bullish in the medium term," said a bullion dealer from the city. Silver, on the other hand, maintained its upward trajectory, buoyed by strong industrial demand and global market trends. Traders anticipate volatility in both metals in the coming days, hinging on international cues, inflation data, and interest rate signals from the US Federal Reserve. Despite the dip, jewellers have hopes pinned on muhurats and the festival season for demand to regain some momentum.
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
NDTV Exclusive: India Should Not Do Somersaults To Please Trump Says, Top Economist On Tariffs
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Economist Jeffrey Sachs criticised Trump's trade policies, labelling the US a "Mickey Mouse country." He argues that trade deficits stem from fiscal mismanagement and warns India against making concessions in trade negotiations with the US. Renowned economist and public policy analyst Jeffrey Sachs has strongly criticised US President Donald Trump's tariff-driven trade policies, calling them emblematic of a 'Mickey Mouse country.' In an exclusive interview with NDTV, Mr Sachs dissected the President's approach to trade deficits, fiscal policy, and its global repercussions. He emphasised that trade deficits occur when a country, in aggregate, spends more than it produces. He lambasted Mr Trump's understanding of the issue, saying, 'It is dramatically wrong and oversimplified to the point of being ridiculous.' According to Mr Sachs, the United States is spending beyond its means, largely due to what he termed a 'chronic large budget deficit.' He argued that reducing the trade deficit requires addressing the fiscal imbalance. 'If [Trump] wants to get the trade deficits down, he has to get the budget deficit down,' he said, 'but he seems intent on not doing that.' Referring to the much-publicised 'Big Beautiful Bill,' Mr Sachs said the legislation includes more tax cuts for favoured recipients, increased military spending, and larger budget deficits — all of which will only exacerbate the trade deficit problem. Mr Trump has claimed that the trade deficit stems from other countries taking advantage of the US, and in response, imposed a range of tariffs to create what he calls a 'level playing field.' However, the economist warned that such an approach is misguided and potentially harmful for international partners, including India. India is currently attempting to negotiate a bilateral trade agreement with the US, but Mr Sachs cautioned against making disproportionate concessions. 'I think India has other alternatives and should not do somersaults to try to satisfy the United States in particular,' he said. 'It should not discriminate against its other trade partners. It should not make concessions to the United States that undermine the most favoured nation principle of international trade.' He added pointedly, 'India should watch itself so that it doesn't get sucked into the US game.' Meanwhile, recent minutes from the US Federal Reserve signal rising concerns about a possible recession. Mr Sachs echoed this sentiment, stating that while the US economy had not been on track for a downturn, it is now facing a 'self-inflicted recession or economic crisis,' brought on by policy missteps and increasing economic uncertainty. Tensions surrounding Mr Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' have also caused a fallout between the president and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, who has called the bill a 'monstrosity.' Commenting on the situation, Mr Sachs remarked, 'Here you have the richest economy in the world, but it just can't behave in a rational way.' The controversial bill is projected to add at least $2.4 trillion to the US national debt over the next decade, further deepening concerns about the long-term sustainability of its economic policy.
