Federal government says it will move open banking forward at 'earliest opportunity'
OTTAWA — The federal government says it will introduce legislation to implement open banking at its "earliest opportunity" as some advocates warn the project's momentum may have stalled.
Open banking — or consumer-driven banking, as Ottawa calls it — is about allowing Canadians and businesses to securely share their financial data with third parties other than their banks.
Open banking could let Canadians with multiple accounts across different banks see their entire financial picture on one convenient dashboard. It also could help renters build their credit scores just by paying their rent on time every month.
Other nations have implemented open banking systems and the federal Liberals passed initial legislation last year to break ground on open banking in Canada.
But getting to that point — and keeping up the pressure to get the second half of that legislation tabled — has been "a slog," said Fintechs Canada executive director Alex Vronces.
"I don't think the government at first understood really what consumer-driven banking was," he said.
After years of study, Ottawa got the ball rolling on open banking through the legislation to implement the 2024 federal budget roughly a year ago.
That bill gave the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada a mandate to head up the country's open banking framework. Legislation is still required to implement a plan to accredit service providers and set the common rules that financial institutions will have to follow.
The Liberal government said in the 2024 fall economic statement that it's looking at early 2026 for implementation of open banking.
But Canada has gone through a federal election since those plans were made — and while the Liberals were returned to power with another minority government, references to consumer-driven banking were absent from the party's election platform.
And the government of Prime Minister Mark Carney did not table a spring budget, which it normally would use to outline its legislative priorities.
Natacha Boudrias, leader of the National Bank of Canada's open banking strategy, said the industry lacks "clarity" on the future shape of consumer-driven banking. She said the spring election likely stalled movement on the file.
"We're certainly hoping that the government is going to kick-start the effort sooner rather than later so that we don't get stuck in a loop of consultation," she said.
A Finance Canada official said in a media statement that the government is still committed to consumer-driven banking.
"The remaining elements of the consumer-driven banking framework will be introduced at the earliest opportunity, to ensure that Canadian consumers and business can securely benefit from tools that help them reduce costs and improve their financial outcomes," the statement says.
Instead of waiting on Ottawa, the National Bank has moved forward on its own open-banking framework that lets fintechs — financial technology firms that develop apps for Canadians and businesses — essentially plug into their databases to share information securely when users give their permission.
The status quo for financial data sharing is "screen scraping," a process that usually sees an individual share banking credentials with a third party to access the information an app needs to run.
But Boudrias said there's no control over how much or how little data is shared through screen scraping — it's all or nothing, making it a potential privacy nightmare.
Open banking ideally takes that firehose of data and narrows it, giving users control over the information a fintech sees and how long it can access it.
"It's about putting the rails of trust in place," Boudrias said.
Financial Consumer Agency of Canada commissioner Shereen Benzvy Miller addressed the risks of screen scraping in notes for her keynote address at the Open Banking Expo in Toronto on Tuesday.
Benzvy Miller said Canadians are already sharing data widely with fintechs but they may not know much about the privacy risks involved. She said part of the agency's task will be to drive consumer awareness of open banking to build trust.
"We envision a future — not far off — where consumers can securely share their financial data with trusted providers at the tap of a button," she said in a copy of the speech shared with The Canadian Press.
The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada will be in charge of building and vetting a public registry of fintechs that Canadians and financial service providers can trust to handle data securely. These fintechs will be granted a handy visual logo to mark their accreditation.
Benzvy Miller said the agency is also working with Finance Canada on setting out common rules for the system and the agency is looking forward to seeing legislative amendments from the finance minister.
But if that final legislation isn't tabled soon, Vronces said, the agency will be stuck in "regulatory purgatory."
"They'll have a mandate but they won't be able to do anything with it," he said.
Getting to this point has been a long haul for Vronces, who has been lobbying on behalf of Canadian fintechs for roughly seven years.
He said he has reasons to believe Carney will be a champion of consumer-driven banking. Carney was governor of the Bank of England when the United Kingdom introduced such a system in 2017.
The opportunity to implement open banking comes as a pivotal time, Vronces said, as Carney looks to overhaul the Canadian economy and improve productivity in the face of global trade upheaval.
Open banking could light a fire under Canada's financial sector, he said, because big banks would be forced to diversify their services and compete with the wider fintech industry.
Vronces said early conversations with the federal government give him hope that the second half of the legislation will be tabled soon, possibly alongside the federal budget in the fall.
He compared the open banking file to a magazine that's already had the articles written and the layout set, with just a few finishing touches remaining.
"It's really not a lot of work for the government to complete its promise," he said. "It just needs to hit print."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 17, 2025.
Craig Lord, The Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Beloved American toy company sends harsh message to workers
Beloved American toy company sends harsh message to workers originally appeared on TheStreet. There's been considerable debate this year over tariffs. Proponents argue they're the best way to reinvigorate US manufacturing activity, while opponents say they're a costly tax that will push inflation higher and crimp profits, leading to job losses. The reality may wind up somewhere in the middle, but for increasingly more workers the tariff fallout is already taking a toll. The toymaker Hasbro, one of the largest U.S. toy companies, has announced it will lay off 150 workers in a cost-cutting move designed to offset some of the bite associated with increased import costs. Hasbro's decision continues an alarming trend of layoffs. Through May this year, over 696,000 people have been laid off, up 80% from last year. The move is the latest by Hasbro to keep its business in the black amid a host of challenges associated with tariffs impacting its bottom line. Many companies pulled some imports forward this year to avoid President Trump's tariff announcements. Still, that inventory is expected to have been mostly sold to customers soon, increasing the likelihood of layoffs and price increases. The President enacted 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico in February, but the tariffs placed on China have dealt the biggest blow to the toy industry in February, a 10% tariff was imposed on Chinese imports, which increased to 20% in March. In April, an additional 34% tariff was levied on China, kickstarting a trade war that, at its peak, lifted US-China tariffs to 145% and China tariffs on US goods to 125%; essentially shutting down trade between the two countries. In May, the tit-for-tat tariff tussle de-escalated to allow for trade negotiations. However, 30% tariffs remain on China, and coupled with tariffs enacted during Donald Trump's first term, Chinese tariffs exceed 50%. The tariffs will likely push costs higher on many items, given that the US has increasingly turned to low-cost China as a source of goods since China's admission into the World Trade Organization in 2001. Many industries, from clothing to car parts and electronics, have been hard hit, but toymakers are among those businesses that have suffered the most significant blow. According to S&P Global, Mattel and Hasbro source 50% and 40% of their toys from mainland China, despite moves in recent years to shift production elsewhere. Unsurprisingly, Hasbro discussed the impact of tariffs during their recent first-quarter earnings conference calls with shareholders.'Ultimately, tariffs translate into higher consumer prices, potential job losses as we adjust to absorb increased costs and reduced profits for our shareholders,' said Hasbro CEO Chris Cocks in April. S&P Global doesn't expect the toy industry to grow this year, so demand isn't likely to insulate Hasbro from the hit to its profit margin delivered by tariffs. Most companies have said that mitigating higher import taxes will require three major moves: supplier concessions, higher customer prices, and lower Q1, Hasbro said tariff impacts would range between $100 million and $300 million in 2025, with most of the effects felt during the final two quarters of 2025. After accounting for efforts to offset tariffs, Hasbro expects them to ding profits by $60 million to $180 million. Hasbro plans to shave $1 billion in costs over the next few years, including via job cuts. Since 2023, Hasbro has reduced its headcount by 1,900 workers. The latest round of cuts involves 150 workers, or roughly 3% of Hasbro's employees. However, the job losses aren't likely to fully absorb the tariffs hit. 'Targeted pricing actions remain likely,' said CEO Chris Cocks on Hasbro's conference call. 'Even with Hasbro's relative strength and flexibility, logistics are becoming more complex…Ultimately, tariffs translate into higher consumer prices, potential job losses as we adjust to absorb increased costs and reduced profits for our shareholders.' The layoff decision comes after Hasbro's consumer products revenue decreased 4% year over year to $398 million in the first quarter. The segment's adjusted operating loss totaled $31 million during the quarter. Among the bright spots helping Hasbro navigate the challenges are Magic: The Gathering, which saw sales soar 45% year over year in the quarter, and digital games. Most of Hasbro's Wizards products are produced in North Carolina and Texas, with the remainder from Kyoto, Japan. Monopoly Go! strength helped its Digital Gaming segment grow 56% in Q1. Net revenue in the first quarter was $887 million, up 17% from the prior year, while adjusted earnings per diluted share rose 70% to $ American toy company sends harsh message to workers first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 18, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 18, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The battle over Utah's collective bargaining ban: How Utahns say they would vote
Over the last few months there's been a lot of discussion and controversy over Utah's law banning public sector collective bargaining and the referendum to repeal it. But how do Utahns actually feel about the law? The Deseret News recently ran a poll with HarrisX asking over 800 Utahns what they think of the labor unions referendum movement happening in Utah, here's a look at what the response was. The law, HB267, was passed through the Utah Legislature this year and shortly after a group of public unions filed for a referendum against it. Respondents to the poll were asked: 'The referendum to repeal the law that bans public employee unions in Utah from collective bargaining recently qualified for the 2026 ballot. If the election were held today, would you vote in favor or against the referendum?' Out of 805 registered voters, 36% said they would vote in favor of the referendum, 32% said they'd vote against and 31% said they don't know. 'This shows that while the referendum supporters gathered historic numbers of signatures, that's not necessarily translating directly to support for the referendum overall,' wrote Kevin Greene, the state director of Americans for Prosperity Utah, who is in favor of HB267. When it comes to party affiliation, Republicans were split almost perfectly into thirds, with 33% saying they'd vote in favor, 33% against and 34% saying they don't know. 'The recent poll confirms what we already know: Utahns stand with public workers, no matter their political affiliation. Support for the referendum is strong and we see a significant opportunity to grow that support further,' according to a statement from the Protect Utah Workers coalition. Democrats had a stronger lean toward the referendum, with 50% saying they'd vote in favor, 27% saying they'd vote against and 23% saying they don't know. 'I think these results show that there's a lot of room to educate the public on what HB267 actually did and why it's good policy for Utah,' Greene said. 'We're already doing that through conversations at the grassroots level, and we're seeing support grow in favor of this new law when people get fully connected to it.' This survey was conducted online from May 16-21 among 805 registered voters in Utah by HarrisX. Respondents are recruited through opt-in, web-panel recruitment sampling. Recruitment occurs through a broad variety of professional, validated respondent panels to expand the sampling frame as wide as possible and minimize the impact of any given panel on recruiting methods. The results reflect a representative sample of registered voters in the state. Results for voters were weighted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, political party, education, and congressional district. The margin of error for the sample is +/- 3.5 percentage points. 'It appears that every side, regardless of your position, has a lot of ground to cover, for, for or against,' said Jason Perry, Director of the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah. 'I expect, given these numbers, all, whatever side people are on, there will be a renewed effort to reframe the arguments for and against.' David Osborne, the senior director of Labor Policy with the Commonwealth Foundation, shared what the different provisions of the bill are. The first thing it does is prohibits collective bargaining for public labor union, which is what has drawn the most controversy. Collective bargaining is when an employer and a union come together to negotiate a contract for employees. It also has a provision called paycheck protection 'in Utah, that means that there's only so much union dues that can be collected via payroll deduction,' Osborne said. There is also a ban on government support for union activities, which includes 'giving union employees paid leave to participate in union activities,' as well as allowing unions to use certain spaces for free. The law also puts an end to involving public sector unions in the state retirement system. It also would provide liability insurance for teachers, which was previously only available through the unions. 'So that would take away the impulse for someone who doesn't want to be part of the union to join anyway,' Osborne said. There is also a transparency aspect to HB267, which would require unions to report to the labor commission their membership numbers and where they're spending their money. This law only deals with public sector labor unions and has nothing to do with the private sector. Under HB267 unions would still have the right to exist and operate, they just would no longer be able to participate in collective bargaining. While the law would impact all public sector unions in the state, teachers have been the focus of a lot of the arguments over HB267. There have been multiple organizations that openly support HB267, one of these is Utah Parents United, which supports the law because they want schools to focus more on students and parents. 'It will take the focus off the politics in school, right, and then start putting the focus back on student success and our kids. And that's what education should be about. It should really be about our kids the end of the day and and that's why we love this bill,' said Corinne Johnson, the founder and president of Utah Parents United. Osborne said that part of HB267 is protecting public employees who don't want to be a part of the union. 'Usually in America, we think individualistically about individual rights, civil rights, one of which would be to choose who represents you and who doesn't speak for you, but exclusive representation and unionism is a collective enterprise. It's sort of the opposite of what we might think of as a individual liberties in another context.' But with the paycheck protection and retirement system provisions, its more than just about employees. 'This is a lot more than just protecting an individual public employee, this seems to also be about the taxpayer,' he added. One argument in favor of the law is that it will decrease the political power of the unions. Osborne shared that in Chicago the teacher's union got one of their union officials elected as mayor. 'They get him in place, and then come negotiation time, they're like, 'Alright, let's do a deal.' He has basically drawn up plans to bankrupt the city for the benefit of the teachers unions,' he said. He also added that the law will help governments 'actually run things,' instead of focusing on negotiating with the unions. 'This law, again, takes away our voice. It takes away the autonomy of our employers to recognize a bargaining agent,' said Renee Pinkney, the president of the Utah Education Association. The Protect Utah Workers Coalition has been leading the charge in the fight against HB267. The coalition is made up of 19 different unions in the state including the UEA, Teamsters Local 222, American Federation of Government Employees and Professional Firefighters of Utah. 'It's about our voice. It's about our ability to make positive improvements in our schools, and it's about democracy, because we believe the people should be able to weigh in on this particular decision,' Pinkney said. Pinkney said that the ability to collective bargain doesn't just help when it comes to compensation packages, but also with working conditions, safety and their students' learning conditions. But she added that being able to collective bargain for compensation allows districts to stay competitive. Harrison Long, a firefighter who is a part of the Salt Lake City Local 81 union, helped with the signature gathering effort and shared why he is against HB267. He agreed that collective bargaining helps firefighters not just with wages but with safety. One thing firefighters in Salt Lake City have been able to negotiate for is four-handed staffing, which makes it so each fire engine has to have four firefighters, making it easier for them to do their job and safer for the public. 'We believe that firefighters should have a voice in firefighting,' Long said. 'It is important for public workers, for educators, to be able to collaborate with our districts to improve working conditions, to make sure that we have healthy and safe schools for our students, for our educators, that we are working to help our students and educators thrive,' Pinkney added. One other point Pinkney made is that some districts and organizations use collective bargaining and others don't, based on their needs and situation. 'One size doesn't fit all,' she said. HB267, sponsored by Rep. Jordan Teuscher, R- South Jordan, was one of the most controversial bills of this year's legislative session and after it was passed by lawmakers, it was signed by Gov. Spencer Cox. As soon as the session ended, the public unions against the law came together to form the protect Utah workers coalition and filed an application for a referendum against the law. The next few weeks were engulfed by a signature gathering campaign by the coalition, which included volunteers and paid signature gatherers. After the coalition turned in over 300,000 signatures, signature verification was completed on May 8. At the end of the verification process conducted by county clerks offices around the state, 251,590 signatures had been verified and 73,136 signatures had been rejected. In Utah a referendum requires 140,748 signatures to qualify for the ballot. The law was originally supposed to go into effect on July 1 but on May 6, Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson issued a temporary stay of HB267, meaning it will not go into effect when originally planned. Under the temporary stay, the ban on public sector collective bargaining will stay paused until the lieutenant governor declares the referendum petition insufficient or the governor issues a proclamation putting the law into effect. Even though the signature verification process has been finished, signatures can still be removed, Pinkney said she believes the deadline for signature removal is June 23. The amount of signatures gathered qualifies the referendum for the ballot and it is assumed that the referendum will be on the ballot during the November 2026 general election in Utah, but nothing is confirmed. There are a few other options as to what could happen, for example a special election could be called by the governor. As soon as it is confirmed that the referendum will be on the ballot and when that will be, it is expected that both sides will be launching campaigns to encourage Utahns on how to vote. 'We're confident that when voters have the final say, they will reject HB267 and stand with the people who serve our communities every day. Public workers are united, momentum is on our side, and we will win,' according to a statement from the Protected Utah Workers Coalition. Pinkney said that the campaign for the referendum would look similar to the UEA's campaign against Constitutional Amendment A. 'We'll keep doing what we've been doing — talking to the public about why the law is great policy for Utah. It protects taxpayers and ensures accountability. We're ready to continue our push to rally support for the law if it ends up on the ballot,' Greene wrote.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OCEU/CUPE 1750 President to Join Barrie Picket Line as WSIB Strike Enters Fourth Week
BARRIE, Ontario, June 18, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--As the strike by Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) workers stretches into its fourth week, Harry Goslin, President of the Ontario Compensation Employees Union (OCEU/CUPE 1750), will join the picket line in Barrie on Wednesday, June 18 at 10:00 a.m., to support members in their fight for a fair contract, safer working conditions, and respect on the job. Goslin will speak directly with striking workers and deliver remarks, highlighting the urgent need for the employer to stop blocking the path to resolution. Where: Attorney General of Ontario – MPP Doug Downey's Office20 Bell Farm Rd, Barrie Time: 10:00 a.m. "WSIB has the tools to end this, but it's refusing to use them," said Harry Goslin, President of OCEU/CUPE 1750. "The agency won't improve its offer and won't even let workers vote on it. This is employer obstruction, plain and simple." WSIB is actively blocking a path to resolution, refusing even a government-supervised vote on their own final offer. After a full weekend and Monday of intensive mediation, the employer had the opportunity to allow workers to vote, but instead, WSIB shut that option down. "If they truly believed in their offer, why won't they let their own workers vote on it?" Goslin added. "This is a blatant delay tactic that deepens the crisis and leaves injured workers across Ontario in limbo." Over 3,600 workers across Ontario have been on strike since May 21, fighting back against chronic understaffing, outsourcing of Ontario jobs to U.S.-based companies, and wages that haven't kept up with the cost of living. This marks the first strike in WSIB's 110-year history. mb/cope491 View source version on Contacts For more information, please contact: Bill ChalupiakCUPE Communications Representativewchalupiak@ 416-707-1401 Sign in to access your portfolio