Hospitals to get £2.6m for infrastructure upgrades
Work will include improving fire safety systems, water infrastructure and electrical and energy systems at Rampton Hospital, The Wells Road Centre, Wathwood Hospital, Thorneywood Mount and Arnold Lodge Hospital.
The improvements at the sites, which offer mental health and community services across the Midlands and South Yorkshire, are due to start in the summer with the aim of completing next spring.
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, which runs the hospitals, said the funding would support urgent projects and create a better environment for patients.
The £2,595,000 grant is part of a national project to improve NHS buildings and infrastructure in England.
At Rampton High Secure Hospital and several others, it is hoped the money will allow a full upgrade of fire safety systems - including alarms, fire compartmentation and suppression technology.
The Wells Road Centre in Mapperley, Nottingham, will benefit from the replacement of ageing machinery.
While at Arnold Lodge, in Leicester, a specialist secure unit, the money will deliver electrical and energy system improvements.
The trust said planning work was under way to ensure the disruption was minimal.
Chief executive at the trust Ifti Majid said the funding was "fantastic news", adding: "It allows us to fast-track improvements that make our hospitals safer, greener and more welcoming places to receive care and to work."
Alison Wyld, executive director of finance and estates, added: "By tackling our highest-risk infrastructure now, we're not only reducing future maintenance costs but also supporting the trust's net zero ambitions."
Follow BBC Nottingham on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
High-security hospital 'still needs to improve'
Work begins on £12m endoscopy unit at city hospital
Construction under way on new hospital theatre suite
Photos show 'crumbling', abandoned hospital rooms
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Midwife brings claim against trust after ‘Prevent referral over Palestine posts'
A midwife is bringing an employment claim against a hospital trust she worked for after it lodged a Prevent referral with police over her online support for Palestine and criticism of Zionism, her lawyers have said. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust made the referral to the Home Office's early intervention counter-terrorism programme, along with one to the Nursing and Midwifery Council regulator, a year after Fatimah Mohamied had resigned from her employment and following a complaint about her online activity from UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI), according to law firm Leigh Day. The mother-of-two, who lives in London, alleges the referrals breach her rights under the Equality Act 2010 and constitute post-employment harassment and/or discrimination. She said: 'I have been subjected to a concerted and targeted effort to intimidate, harass and punish me into silence for my Palestinian advocacy and criticism of Zionism. 'I am taking legal action against my former employer to finally seek accountability for a campaign of harassment against me in the midst of a live genocide perpetrated by the Israeli state – I will not accept the attempts to silence me and those like me. 'Healthcare workers in the NHS have the right to critique a colonial political ideology that has upheld an illegal occupation for decades and is responsible for violating universal values of health.' A complaint was lodged on October 8 2023 about Ms Mohamied's social media posts in which she voiced her support for Palestinian people and her opposition to Zionism in the wake of the October 7 attacks in Israel, according to Leigh Day. Her line manager asked her to consider deleting the posts or her account but she refused to do so. Three further complaints were made about the midwife's social media posts and on December 20 2023 the trust received a letter from UKLFI accusing Ms Mohamied of expressing support for Hamas. In early January the following year, the trust's director of maternity told Ms Mohamied that if they received 'more emails or letters of concern' her actions could be considered misconduct. Ms Mohamied, who was employed as a 'cultural safety lead' midwife and who had worked at the trust since June 2019, resigned in March last year. In March of this year, the trust received a second letter from UKLFI which launched further complaints about further social media posts and accused Ms Mohamied of anti-semitism, bullying and harassment and of stirring up racial hatred against Jews and Israelis. Towards the end of the month, the trust referred Ms Mohamied to the Nursing and Midwifery Council and then to the Metropolitan Police under Prevent over her online activity. Both referrals were dismissed, and Leigh Day said in a letter to the trust that the regulator and police each assessed Ms Mohamied's posts 'amounted to lawful expression of her beliefs and did not present cause for concern'. Liana Wood, partner at the law firm, said: 'We say the trust's referrals against Fatimah, made a year after she had stopped working for them, were an entirely disproportionate response to her lawful expressions of belief on her personal blog and social media accounts. 'Fatimah's case, which has parallels with other cases we have seen recently in the NHS, highlights the need for employers to resist pressure from lobby groups in such cases, and to carefully consider any potential infringement on an individual's rights before taking action against them.' The hospital trust has been contacted for comment.
Medscape
4 hours ago
- Medscape
Behavioral Activation Therapy Cuts Perinatal Suicide Risk
TOPLINE: In a study of 1117 perinatal adults receiving behavioral activation therapy, the odds of endorsing suicide ideation decreased by 25% with each treatment session and by 80% at 3 months post-randomization, with specialist and nonspecialist providers showing equal effectiveness. METHODOLOGY: A multisite, noninferiority, four-arm randomized clinical trial called the Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) compared clinicians (nonspecialist vs specialist) and modalities (telemedicine vs in-person) in delivering behavioral activation therapy. Research was conducted at university-affiliated networks in Chicago, Illinois; Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants included pregnant (≤ 36 weeks) and postpartum (4-30 weeks) adults with depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score ≥ 10). A total of 1117 participants who completed at least one treatment session and provided ≥ 1 week of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale data were included in the analysis. Treatment consisted of a manualized 6- to 8-session perinatal behavioral activation intervention delivered weekly. TAKEAWAY: Among 1230 enrolled pregnant and postpartum adults, 1117 completed at least one treatment session, with 264 (23.6%) endorsing suicide ideation during treatment. The odds of endorsing suicide ideation decreased by 25% with each additional treatment session (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96; P = .03). At 3 months post-randomization, the odds of endorsing suicide ideation decreased by 80% compared with any time during treatment (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.14-0.27; P < .001). No significant differences were found in the odds of endorsing suicide ideation between clinician types (nonspecialist vs specialist) or delivery modalities (telemedicine vs in person). IN PRACTICE: 'Behavioral activation is a first-line recommended treatment for perinatal depression and may reduce postpartum suicide risk by increasing values-consistent living and awareness of ineffective behaviors,' wrote the authors of the study. SOURCE: The study was led by Parisa Kaliush, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Daisy Singla, PhD, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto. It was published online in JAMA Psychiatry. LIMITATIONS: High suicide risk prompted exclusion from SUMMIT trial, and the final sample was highly educated, suggesting some limitations in generalizability. However, the prevalence of suicide ideation at baseline (15.0%) was higher than previously cited rates. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Bradley Gaynes, PhD, disclosed receiving compensation for authorship/review of UpToDate chapters on depression. Samantha Meltzer-Brody, MD, MPH, reported receiving research funding to the University of North Carolina for clinical trials sponsored by Sage Therapeutics, Electromedical Products International, and Sirtsei Pharmaceuticals, serving as a clinical advisor and professional corporation owner for Modern Health, and serving as a scientific advisor to EmbarkNeuro and Seaport Therapeutics. Simone Vigod, MD, disclosed receiving royalties from UpToDate for authorship of materials on depression and pregnancy. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Do Phones Really Wreck Kids' Lives?
I am addicted! To my phone. I check an email and before I realize it, I'm watching TikTok videos: lions fight hyenas, military dads reunite with kids, athletes do amazing things. I look up, and an hour has passed. I've wasted time, ignored my family and friends, and accomplished nothing. But who cares? I'm old. I've already achieved what I'm likely to achieve. Still, what about kids? "Attention spans are declining," says psychologist Jonathan Haidt. "Levels of anxiety, depression, self-harm were pretty stable…all of a sudden, the rates go way up, especially for girls." His bestselling book (on bestseller lists for more than a year!) blames smartphones. "Once they get a smartphone…time with friends plunges. One of the best things you can do as a kid is hang out with friends, joke around, have adventures. If your kids went through puberty on a smartphone with social media, they came out different than human beings before that." My son, Max, once worked for social media companies. Now he makes his living speaking to students about how phones hook them. He compares smartphones to casino slot machines. "All the things we love about social media, those are the reward in the slot machine…we get that 'hit' once in a while….That's there to keep us scrolling for hours." Haidt agrees, calling smartphones a "gambling machine." They say some apps are worse than others. "Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok. Those really shatter attention spans. In terms of exposure to things that are really dangerous, Snap is the worst," says Haidt. "In terms of destroying your ability to pay attention, TikTok is the worst. In terms of destroying a teenage girl's sense of confidence, self-esteem, body image, Instagram is the worst." He says social media affects boys and girls differently. "Check in on the kids at age 14, girls are doing worse. They're more depressed and anxious, more messed up." But a few years later, he says, "Girls are more likely to have gone to college, gotten a job, and moved out of their parents' home. Boys are more likely to still be in their parents' basement playing video games. They never grew up. Real life is incredibly boring compared to a video game or porn." Teachers say phone addiction makes it harder to teach. "When you and I were in school," says Haidt, "suppose they let you take your TV into class. You couldn't possibly learn." These are big problems, but I'm a skeptic. Do phones really wreck kids' lives? We don't know that, say researchers like psychologist Chris Ferguson. "Correlation does not equal causation." "But teen depression is skyrocketing," I push back, "up 145 percent for girls since 2010!" "Teen suicide was actually very high in the early 1990s," he replies, "then it decreased…way before social media….Dr. Haidt has cherry-picked a lot of data and presented only the data that support his narrative." "I am not cherry-picking!" Haidt replies. "I'm the only one in this debate who has picked all of the cherries and laid them out on a blanket." He does lay out alternative possibilities, like teen marijuana use and the decline of marriage. "My theory is the only plausible one out there," he says. "No one's even proposed one that will work across so many countries. When you ask people to get off of social media for more than a week, their levels of depression, anxiety, go down." His book suggests that parents ban phones until high school. I push back. Kids will complain, "All my friends have one!" "But what if it was only most of your friends?" he replies. "Then it's much easier." He wants schools to ban phones, and many have. I ask Ferguson, "What's the cost of banning it in schools?" "Unintended negative consequences," he replies. "Are we suspending kids for cellphone use? A lot of schools are, and that can cause real harm to the kids." Haidt insists, "When schools ban phones, the results are overwhelmingly positive….Kids know that life would be better if they didn't spend five or six hours a day on social media. They know that, but they can't help it." COPYRIGHT 2025 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC. The post Do Phones Really Wreck Kids' Lives? appeared first on Solve the daily Crossword
