Report on Commissioner Théberge's interventions before the courts from 2018 to 2025: The importance of building a foundation for language rights
GATINEAU, QC, Jan. 27, 2025 /CNW/ - Commissioner of Official Languages of Canada Raymond Théberge today published his report called Protecting Language Rights: Report on the Commissioner's Interventions Before the Courts (2018–2025).
The report highlights 13 interventions in which the Commissioner participated, including two appeals concerning Canada's Official Languages Act that he himself initiated. Also of note are his five interventions before the Supreme Court of Canada to put forth innovative arguments regarding the right to minority‑language education.
The document enables readers to fully appreciate the need for the Commissioner to take a position before the courts in order to contribute to the protection of language rights and the advancement of case law in this field.
Specifically, Commissioner Théberge has defended fundamental rights such as access to the courts in the language of one's choice, the public's right to receive services and communications in the language of their choice and the right to work in the official language of one's choice in the public service. In this way, the Commissioner has directly contributed to the rich heritage of case law that Canadians can rely on to ensure that their language rights are respected.
Significant effort and resources are required to file proceedings or appeal a decision. While the Commissioner's interventions have helped advance the language rights of Canadians, it is important to note that it would be better to prevent violations rather than try to resolve them once the damage has been done. Decision makers must take concrete measures and propose long-lasting solutions to ensure the protection of language rights in Canada.
Quote
'The decisions obtained during my interventions before the courts have been favourable to the protection of language rights in Canada. Each decision has helped enrich the case law that is the very foundation Canadians stand on to claim their language rights when it comes to accessing justice, education and even the vitality of official language minority communities.
Nevertheless, the progress achieved during my mandate is not immutable. We must all stay vigilant against anything that would erode our language rights.'
- Raymond Théberge, Commissioner of Official Languages of Canada
Highlights
Seven cases in which the Commissioner intervened under Canada's Official Languages Act (the Act)
2018
Mazraani v Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc., 2018 SCC 50, in regard to Part III of the Act
2019
Thibodeau v Air Canada, 2019 FC 1102, in regard to Part IV of the Act
Thibodeau v Halifax International Airport Authority, 2019 FC 1149, in regard to Part IV of the Act
Dionne v Canada (Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions), 2019 FC 879, in regard to Part V of the Act
2020
Thibodeau v St. John's International Airport Authority, 2022 FC 563, in regard Part IV of the Act
Thibodeau v Greater Toronto Airports Authority, 2024 FC 274, in regard to Part IV of the Act
2022
St. John's International Airport Authority v Thibodeau, 2024 FCA 197, in regard to Part IV of the Act
Two cases in which the Commissioner intervened under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
2020
Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie-Britannique v British Columbia, 2020 SCC 13, in regard to Section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
2023
Commission scolaire francophone des Territoires du Nord-Ouest v Northwest Territories (Education, Culture and Employment), 2023 SCC 31, in regard to Section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Two cases in which the Commissioner intervened under the Criminal Code
2019
Bessette v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2019 SCC 31, in regard to Section 530 of the Criminal Code and section 133 of the Offence Act, RSBC 1996, c 338
2023
R v Tayo Tompouba, 2024 SCC 16, in regard to Subsection 530(3) of the Criminal Code
Two appeals initiated by the Commissioner under the Act
2018
Canada (Commissioner of Official Languages) v Canada (Employment and Social Development), 2022 FCA 14, in regard toParts IV and VII of the Act
2021
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada, India agree to re-establish high commissioners after G7 meeting
In a sign that Canada-India relations are defrosting, the two countries have agreed to reinstate their high commissioners and are eyeing renewed visa services to each other's citizens and businesses. Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the move following his bilateral meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G7 summit in Alberta. The two countries expelled each other's high commissioners, senior diplomats who are similar to ambassadors, last fall after the RCMP accused the Indian government of playing a role in a network of violence in Canada, including homicides and extortion. Then prime minister Justin Trudeau, backed by security officials, alleged Indian diplomats were collecting information about Canadians and passing it on to organized crime members to attack Canadians. Trudeau also said two years ago that Canada had evidence linking Indian agents to the 2023 killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar in B.C. According to the prime minister's readout, Carney raised priorities on the G7 agenda, "including transnational crime and repression, security and the rules-based order" with Modi. Asked by a journalist what he said to Modi about Nijjar's murder on Canadian soil, Carney did not directly answer. "We have had a discussion, the prime minister and I, about the importance of having the law enforcement-to-law enforcement dialogue, not just dialogue, but co-operation," he said during Tuesday's closing news conference, adding that he also talked about the importance of addressing transnational repression. "Obviously there is a judicial process underway and I need to be careful about further commentary." The two leaders also discussed "significant commercial links," including supply chains and energy, said the statement.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pull plug on gas engine ban, Tories urge government
OTTAWA — It's time to put the government's planned gas engine ban in neutral. That was the message from the Conservatives during Tuesday's question period, as the Tories urged the Carney Liberals to end a planned ban on the sale of gas-powered passenger vehicles. 'Workers and families across Canada, especially in rural and northern communities, can't afford this dangerous Liberal experiment,' said Grande Prairie MP Chris Warkentin. 'It's simple, Mr. Speaker, Canadians don't want this shoved down their throat.' Indeed, polling conducted earlier this year suggests the majority of Canadians aren't a fan of this keystone policy of the Justin Trudeau Liberals, which calls for a total ban on the sale of new gas and diesel vehicles by 2035. Transport Canada abruptly ended its Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (iZEV) program earlier this year after it ran out of money. That came just 12 months before the start of the multi-year EV sales mandate, where 20% of all new Canadian car sales must be zero-emission — gradually increasing to 100% within a decade. Auto industry calls for end to 'complete fantasy' zero-emission vehicle mandates Canadians oppose Liberal 2035 prohibition of new gas, diesel vehicles In response, Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin accused the Tories of taking unfair aim at Canada's auto industry. 'Leave it to the Conservatives to hit one of the most major industries that we have in our country, exactly the same time it's being hit with unjustified tariffs in the United States,' she said, to jeers from the opposition benches. 'We stand with our auto workers, we've been investing in our auto industry, and we will keep making sure that we have strong union jobs.' Canada's auto industry have gone on record in their opposition to the Liberals' plan, with Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association (CVMA) president Brian Kingston describing the Liberal policy earlier this year as 'complete fantasy.' 'There is no pathway to 100% zero-emission vehicle sales in the next 10 years with the supports being provided to Canadians,' he said during a January 2025 news conference. 'Dictating what vehicles Canadians can and cannot buy, without providing them with the supports necessary to switch to electric is a made-in-Canada policy failure.' bpassifiume@ X: @bryanpassifiume
Hamilton Spectator
16 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
‘It's up to them': Donald Trump says Canada will get a ‘much better deal' if it becomes the 51st American state
KANANASKIS, ALTA. — The hustle is on. U.S. President Donald Trump says Canada will soon pay a lot of money in tariffs if it cannot reach a speedy trade deal, and faces a $71 billion entry fee to join the 'Golden Dome' missile defence project as he claimed Prime Minister Mark Carney wants — or it could choose the no-cost option of becoming his country's 51st state. Trump touted American statehood for Canada after he left the country, and the leaders had tasked their negotiating teams with a mandate to strike a deal quickly on punitive tariffs he's slapped on Canadian products. Trump has a long list of what he calls unfair Canadian trading practices, ranging from dairy quotas, banking rules and digital services taxes that hit U.S.-based big tech companies to sales taxes and even bilingual labelling laws. Sources who spoke to the Star on the condition that they not be named, because they were not authorized to speak publicly, say he pressed some of those concerns again with Carney when they met behind closed doors Monday. Trump described their one-on-one meeting as 'good,' but he repeated his assertion Monday that Carney's team is looking for something more 'complex' than he is, without elaborating. 'Well, they get too complex with the deals and they never get done, and we need speed,' Trump said. The Canadians say they will try to stick a landing on a deal with Trump in the next 30 days. Trump left the G7 summit in Kananaskis late Monday, telling reporters aboard Air Force One that Canada would have a 'much better deal' if it became part of the United States — 'but you know it's up to them.' 'They're going to have to pay a lot of tariffs and things, they're going to have to pay a lot of money for the dome, for the iron (sic) dome,' he said. 'They want to be a part of it. We may make a separate deal on that by the way,' suggesting tariffs and a deal on the Golden Dome would be two different agreements. 'They want to be in: $71 billion,' Trump said, using a number higher than the $61 billion he has previously pegged as the price tag of Canada's participation in ballistic missile shield. Trump said he left the G7 summit early so he could be 'more well versed' and not have to 'use telephones' to get briefed in Washington. The White House said he left to deal with the escalating Iran-Israel crisis. While Trump departed before a scheduled meeting Tuesday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his delegation, G7 sources said he stayed until after a dinner with the G7 leaders on Monday evening precisely to discuss Iran and Ukraine and matters of global security. Canadian officials in Alberta said they wouldn't comment because Trump had said nothing new. Carney is scheduled to hold a closing news conference later Tuesday. The only comment was from Industry Minister Mélanie Joly, who spoke to reporters from Paris, and said that she won't 'negotiate in public' about whether Canada will join Trump's Golden Dome. She also declined to discuss the possibility of additional counter-tariffs against American imports in response to Trump doubling tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. Calling the American tariffs 'not only illegal and unjustified' but 'outrageous,' Joly reiterated comments that Canada is striving for 'free trade in the real sense of the term.' Carney's starting position is that Trump must drop all tariffs and adhere to the Canada-U.S.-Mexico free trade deal the president signed in 2018. Since Trump returned to the White House in January, he's slapped so-called border tariffs, 50 per cent steel and aluminum tariffs, and 25 per cent auto tariffs on Canada, and levied a baseline 10 per cent tariff on U.S. trading partners globally while he negotiates 'deals' to reduce additional 'reciprocal' surcharges in exchange for concessions the U.S. wants. 'You know, we're dealing with, really if you think about it, probably 175 countries, and most of them are just going to be sent a letter saying it would be an honour to trade with you and here's what you have to pay to do it,' Trump said during his return flight to Washington. Carney was set to meet Tuesday with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on the sidelines of the summit. Trump said his tariff policy — the objective of which is to repatriate manufacturing to the U.S. and act as a revenue-generator to deal with the U.S debt — is a success, and claimed it has already generated $88 billion in revenue. At the G7, Trump signed a new deal with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that nevertheless retains a 10 per cent tariff on most British goods. He said there is a 'chance' of a deal with Japan, but 'they're 'tough,' while he said the European Union leaders were not 'offering a fair deal yet.' Trump also vowed new tariffs on the pharmaceutical sector are coming soon. With files from Alex Ballingall
