logo
PM to deliver rousing call to MPs armed with majority

PM to deliver rousing call to MPs armed with majority

Perth Now2 days ago
Flexing his political muscles with a historic landslide win to extend his governing mandate for a second term, Anthony Albanese will extol the virtues of a vibrant democracy ahead of the resumption of parliament.
Among the new class will be some two dozen fresh-faced Labor MPs who will be entering the 48th parliament as it begins sitting on Tuesday, after a decisive trouncing of the coalition at the federal election in May.
"Forty-eight might not sound like a whole lot at first but consider all that Australian democracy has lived through since 1901. It has survived two world wars and a Cold War," the prime minister will say on Sunday.
"It has outlived empires. It has endured challenges, crises, disasters and pandemics. It has stood tall through the evolution of economies, communications and borders."
He will emphasise how Australia's stable democracy as a political system is to be cherished amid rising geopolitical tensions and ongoing lethal wars.
"Each of you is about to proudly take your place in this great continuum.
"It's not something we can take for granted. Around the world now, we see examples of democracy under pressure."
Labor secured 94 out of 150 seats in the House of Representatives making it the highest number of seats ever won by a single political party in an Australian election and extended its bloc in the Senate.
In his address to parliamentarians, the prime minister will note how more Australians cast their vote than at any previous election, delivering Labor a resounding majority.
"At the heart of it is the task we all share to uphold our democracy. To protect it. To strengthen it. To improve it."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia poised to pass a million refugee intake milestone
Australia poised to pass a million refugee intake milestone

Sydney Morning Herald

time11 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Australia poised to pass a million refugee intake milestone

Australia's handling of refugees this century has been problematic to some, shameful to others, but next November we will reach a milestone that is not only cause for celebration but a reflection of our best selves. Refugee Council of Australia chief executive Paul Power says the 1 million mark is expected to be reached in November after the Department of Home Affairs' declaration in June that Australia had accepted more than 985,000 refugees since World War II. It is an achievement that would make many countries proud, but Australia has accepted refugees from the earliest days of European settlement as people fled homelands with the aim of finding a better life. The first refugees, Lutherans fleeing religious intolerance in Prussia, arrived in South Australia in 1839, just a handful of years after it became the first colony established specifically as a free settlement. Others from the Continent followed and after Federation, refugees continued to arrive as unassisted migrants, provided they met restrictions imposed by the Immigration (Restriction) Act 1901, the cornerstone of the White Australia Policy. Between 1933 and 1939, more than 7000 Jews fleeing Nazi Germany were settled. World War II wrecked Europe and raised our awareness of vulnerability, and the Labor government in 1947 brought both issues together with an immigration program to meet labour shortages that eventually welcomed more than 170,000 refugees, the largest groups from Poland, Yugoslavia, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Ukraine, Czechoslovakia and Hungary. Next came refugees fleeing persecution in Soviet bloc nations, Asians expelled from Uganda and then Chileans, Cypriots and East Timorese, before the fall of Saigon in 1975 saw resettlement of more than 100,000 Vietnamese. For years few questioned the refugee status of new arrivals. But an Indonesian fishing boat carrying 433 Afghans stranded off Christmas Island in August 2021 changed all that. Then prime minister John Howard sent the SAS to stop their rescue ship, Tampa, from landing and declared, 'we will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come'. These were not refugees, they were asylum seekers who had 'queue jumped'. They became a political rallying cry and three months later the Coalition was re-elected with a 3 per cent swing. Offshore detention was introduced, then abolished by Labor, and re-established by Labor. It continues: last month 112 asylum seekers were still in Nauru and 104 in Papua New Guinea, while 850 people remain in Australia without any resettlement pathway.

Booted from party, Greens co-founder vows to fight on
Booted from party, Greens co-founder vows to fight on

Sydney Morning Herald

time11 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Booted from party, Greens co-founder vows to fight on

The Greens co-founder booted from the party on the weekend has hit back, accusing the organisation of becoming 'too weird and unlikeable' for electoral success and urging the federal leader to intervene. Drew Hutton, who helped found the Greens in 1991, was expelled from the party on Sunday in part for refusing to delete comments made by others on his Facebook page deemed to be transphobic. Hutton, 78, told this masthead he was considering his legal options and urged new federal party leader Larissa Waters to intervene. 'She should be using her stature to say to the Australian Greens, no more expulsions, no more bullying of green people who have given sometimes decades to the party over this gender issue,' he said. 'And secondly, she should be calling for inquiry into all of the processes of the Greens and to ensure that the principle of democracy is embedded in them. Loading 'Now she's got to show that she's got the character and the courage to do that – if she doesn't do it, the Greens risk becoming, in the view of most Australian electors, just weird and unlikable.' Waters backed her party's processes, which she said showed 'nobody is above the rules'. 'Good governance means that people can put their case forward, including the right to appeal a decision. In this case the appeal was unsuccessful,' she said.

The 151 ballots that the NSW Liberals say should overturn the Bradfield result
The 151 ballots that the NSW Liberals say should overturn the Bradfield result

Sydney Morning Herald

time11 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

The 151 ballots that the NSW Liberals say should overturn the Bradfield result

Gisele Kapterian, the unsuccessful Liberal candidate for Bradfield, says at least 56 ballot papers were wrongly rejected in the final recount of the ultra-marginal seat, while 95 were incorrectly allowed, prompting her to ask the High Court to overturn the result and declare her the winner. Kapterian last week ended weeks of speculation and lodged a petition with the High Court, which sits as the Court of Dispute Returns to hear election challenges, in a bid to be declared victorious in Bradfield instead of teal MP-elect Nicolette Boele. Boele, who will give her inaugural speech to federal parliament on July 28, won the once blue-ribbon Liberal seat after a recount of the northern Sydney seat in which she finished 26 votes ahead of Kapterian. In her petition, Kapterian says the Australian electoral officer (AEO) – who is the electoral commission's manager in each state – 'wrongly rejected at least 56 of the reserved ballot papers, where those ballot papers indicated a preference, by the voter, for the petitioner ahead of the first respondent'. Boele is listed as the first respondent. 'In each such case the ballot paper was not informal and should not have been rejected,' the petition says, referencing examples such as the officer 'not being satisfied that the figure 1 in one square was distinguishable from the figure in another square'. Kapterian has not seen the ballot papers, and her legal team will be provided with them once the AEC hands them to the court. However, her concerns were formed based on feedback and notes taken by scrutineers overseeing the final recount. The AEO was tasked with reviewing and making rulings on 795 reserved ballot papers. As well as the rejected ballots, Kapterian's petition says the AEO 'wrongly admitted at least 95 of the reserved ballot papers, where those ballot papers indicated a preference, by the voter, for the first respondent ahead of the petitioner'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store