
Columbia will pay $9 million to settle lawsuit over US News ranking
The proposed settlement, which was filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on Monday, did not require Columbia to formally admit wrongdoing. But the university said in a statement Tuesday that it 'deeply regrets deficiencies in prior reporting.'
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The settlement agreement covers some 22,000 former undergraduate students who attended Columbia College, Columbia Engineering, or Columbia's School of General Studies between 2016 and 2022 and will be eligible to apply for a slice of the award. If all the students applied, taking into account likely lawyers' fees, they would each receive about $273.
The lawsuit claimed that Columbia had artificially inflated its ranking by consistently reporting false data, including that 83% of its classes had fewer than 20 students.
Advertisement
Michael Thaddeus, the mathematician who first revealed the flaws in the data, said Tuesday that he found the settlement gratifying 'because it amounts to an admission that the students' complaint has merit.'
'Columbia did report false data over many years, and it reported false data about several things, not just class sizes,' he said.
He added that it would have been even better if Columbia had made an 'honest attempt to explain its actions,' perhaps with an independent investigation addressing questions like why and how the false data were reported in the first place.
'The discovery stage of this lawsuit might have illuminated those questions,' he said.
The scandal had a broader impact, leading to skepticism in how people view the U.S. News & World Report rankings, which largely rely on data self-reported by universities. At Columbia, it also prompted improvements in how the university reports its own data. Since 2022, the university has published 'Common Data Sets,' which 'are reviewed by a well-established, independent advisory firm to ensure reporting accuracy,' a spokesperson said.
The lawsuit was first filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in July 2022 by Ravi Campbell, a student who claimed he had overpaid based on false advertising. Several other students then sued, and the suits were combined to create a class action.
The motion to settle the case must still be approved by a judge. A Columbia official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly, said that while the university denied the allegations of misreporting and other misconduct, it was entering into the settlement agreement to avoid protracted and costly litigation.
Advertisement
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
Chinese national in NYC tries to smuggle $1.4M worth of protected turtles to Hong Kong — by labeling them ‘toys'
U.S. District Court for the Western District of NY A Chinese national living in Brooklyn tried to smuggle $1.4 million worth of protected turtles out of the United States — by passing them off as 'plastic animal toys,' prosecutors said Monday. Wei Qiang Lin worked to ship 222 packages of about 850 turtles to Hong Kong for more than a year leading up to November 2024 before his clandestine operation was brought to a halt, the Department of Justice said. A man in Brooklyn tried to smuggle protected turtles out of the country by claiming they were 'toys,' authorities said. U.S. District Court for the Western District of NY Advertisement Lin mostly shipped eastern box turtles and three-toed turtles, which both have colorful markings that make them attractive on the domestic and foreign pet markets but are protected species by international trade rules, according to prosecutors. Law enforcement at JFK Airport in Queens found 106 of the turtles bound and taped inside knotted socks, and some were even wrapped in diapers, between August 2023 and October 2023, according to a criminal complaint. Some of the turtles were wrapped in tape and then stuffed into socks. U.S. District Court for the Western District of NY Advertisement Over the next year, another 608 of turtles, as well as seven venomous snakes and 28 lizards, being smuggled by Lin were also intercepted by authorities at the Big Apple airport, the feds said. The parcels were falsely labeled 'plastic animal toys,' according to prosecutors. Only a handful of the illicit packages from Lin snuck through to Hong Kong during his 15-month scheme, which ended after authorities conducted undercover sales, according to the complaint. He copped the scheme and is expected to be sentenced Dec. 23. He could face as much as five years in prison and a fine as high as $250,000.


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Truck-makers sue California, in bid to abandon zero-emissions agreements
A group of truck manufacturers have filed a lawsuit against California regulators, contending that the Golden State lacks the authority to enforce its stricter-than-federal heavy-duty vehicle emissions standards. The complaint, submitted on Monday to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, maintained that truck-makers should not have to comply with the state's emissions rules, after the federal government rendered them 'unlawful' in June. Filed by Daimler Truck North America, International Motors, Paccar and Volvo Group North America, the lawsuit requested a declaratory judgement against Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and the California Air Resources Board. as well as injunctive relief. The complainants argued that recent federal government resolutions 'statutorily preempted California's emissions standards governing heavy-duty vehicles and engines.' 'Notwithstanding that new legislation, California continues to demand compliance with its heavy-duty emissions standards,' the case stated. The legislation, signed by President Trump in June, included three congressional resolutions that upended California's rules on gas-fueled vehicle phaseouts. One of the three resolutions targeted the Advanced Clean Trucks rule — a regulation aimed at accelerating the state's transition to less-polluting trucks that would have required 7.5 percent of these vehicles to be emissions-free by 2035. A second was the state's Omnibus Regulation, which aimed to slash heavy-duty nitrogen oxide emissions by 90 percent, update engine testing protocols and further extend engine warranties. In signing the resolutions, Trump revoked the Biden administration's previous authorization of California's emissions standards via the Congressional Review Act, which allows the repeal of recent such approvals with a simple majority. California had been able to acquire the Biden-era Environmental Protection Agency's authorization via a 1970 Clean Air Act clause that allows the state to set stronger-than-federal emissions rules. Immediately after Trump signed the resolutions in June, California officials filed a lawsuit against the administration with 10 other states, accusing the president of illegal interference. In Monday's complaint, the truck-makers — also called original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) — argued that California's continued demands for compliance has 'threatened' their ability to 'design, develop, manufacture and sell heavy-duty vehicles and engines.' The lawsuit noted that the U.S. Department of Justice has issued letters instructing the manufacturers 'to immediately cease and desist compliance with California's preempted and unlawful mandates,' noting that the state's insistence 'is contrary to federal law.' 'Plaintiffs are caught in the crossfire: California demands that OEMs follow preempted laws; the United States maintains such laws are illegal and orders OEMs to disregard them,' the complaint stated. 'This situation is not tenable.' Describing the regulatory requirements as 'inconsistent' and responsible for an 'unstable' manufacturing landscape, the truck-makers said that 'the misaligned federal and California emissions standards provided plaintiff OEMs with barely two years of lead time to comply with California's aggressive emissions standards.' The manufacturers characterized that period as 'a woefully inadequate compliance window,' referring to the Clean Air Act's four-year lead time requirement for new heavy-duty vehicle pollution standards. The lawsuit also slammed a July 2023 Clean Truck Partnership, in which the manufacturers voluntarily agreed to abide by California's emissions rules in exchange for certain concessions. In response to the lawsuit, environmental groups and policymakers issued a collective statement alleging that the complaint 'paints wealthy truck manufacturers as victims.' Craig Segall, former deputy executive officer and assistant chief counsel of CARB, questioned whether the companies 'have any idea how to sell their products.' Noting that the partnership would have promoted electric truck sales and financed related infrastructure in one of the world's biggest economies, Segall accused the companies of 'burning' regulators and 'destroying shareholder value by blowing up that agreement.' 'Red flags abound,' he added. Guillermo Ortiz, senior clean vehicles advocate for the Natural Resources Defense Council, characterized the lawsuit as 'a cynical reversal of course' and accused the plaintiffs of acting in 'bad faith.' 'These companies helped negotiate the Clean Truck Partnership to secure regulatory certainty,' Ortiz said in a statement. 'Now they're trying to dismantle the very deal they shaped — injecting instability into a market they claim to lead.'


NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Man faces jail for smuggling turtles worth $1.4 million in socks to Hong Kong
A Chinese man has admitted to smuggling around 850 protected turtles and other animals worth an estimated $1.4 million from the U.S. to Hong Kong, the Justice Department said. The man, Wei Qiang Lin, 'labeled the boxes as containing 'plastic animal toys,' among other things,' the DOJ said Monday in a statement. 'Law enforcement intercepted the turtles during a border inspection and observed them bound and taped inside knotted socks within the shipping boxes,' it added. 'Lin also exported 11 other parcels filled with reptiles including venomous snakes,' the department said. Lin pleaded guilty at the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York "for falsely labeling live turtles as fake toys prior to exporting them in delivery boxes on a weeks-long journey to Hong Kong," the DOJ said. It added that he 'primarily shipped eastern box turtles and three-toed box turtles, native U.S. species which feature colorful markings — a prized feature in the domestic and foreign pet market, particularly in China and Hong Kong.' The creatures are also in high demand in Asian markets like mainland China and Thailand, where people consider turtles from other countries and continents as desirable exotic pets, according to the Association for Asian Studies. Both are protected by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). The animals Lin smuggled from mid-2023 to late 2024 were valued at $1.4 million, the Department of Justice said. Lin is facing a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a fine up to $250,000 or twice the gain or loss from the illegal activity when he is sentenced on Dec. 23, according to the DOJ. 'As part of his plea, Lin also agreed to abandon any property interest in the reptiles seized during the investigation,' the department said. In a similar case in March, another Chinese national, Sai Keung Tin, also known as Ricky Tin, was sentenced to 30 months in prison for smuggling more than 2,100 eastern box turtles, the DOJ said at the time. The animals were also hidden in socks and packed in boxes labeled as almonds and chocolate cookies. Authorities estimated at the time that each turtle could have been sold for $2,000, bringing the total value of the smuggled reptiles to $4.2 million.