logo
Australian woman says she was deported after visiting her U.S. Army officer husband at Hawaii base

Australian woman says she was deported after visiting her U.S. Army officer husband at Hawaii base

Independent5 days ago

An Australian woman who was deported from the U.S. after visiting her American husband stationed in Hawaii says she was detained in prison overnight alongside murderers before getting sent home.
Nicolle Saroukos, 25, of Sydney, says she was held in federal prison overnight after trying to enter the country with her mother so the two could visit her husband, Matt, a U.S. Army lieutenant stationed on Oahu, Hawaii News Now reported.
Saroukos, who has visited three times since getting married last December, said things quickly turned chaotic after border officials at Daniel K. Inouye International Airport flagged her for extra screening.
The officer checking passports 'went from completely composed to just yelling at the top of his lungs, telling my mother to go stand at the back of the line and to excuse my language, 'shut up,'' Saroukos recalled.
'So I automatically started crying because that was my first response,' she said.
After Saroukos and her mother were taken to a holding room where their bags and phones were searched, she was bombarded with questions, including about her former work as a police officer and whether her tattoos were gang-related to her marriage to an American.
'When I did say that I was married to somebody in the U.S. Army, the officers laughed at me. They thought it was quite comical. I don't know whether they thought I was telling the truth or not,' she said.
Officers also allegedly told Saroukos, who was only planning on staying for a three-week visit, that she had too many clothes in her suitcase.
'So because of that, they assumed I was going to overstay my visa,' she said.
Saroukos was held for more screening, including fingerprints and a DNA swab, while her mother was allowed to go. She was then denied entry to the U.S. and told she would be deported back to Australia after spending the night in prison, she said.
'[The officer] said 'so basically what is going to happen is we're going to send you to a prison overnight where you will stay,'' she said. 'Not detention center, he said prison, and I automatically just, I started crying again.'
'Because when you think prison, you think, big time criminals. I don't know who I'm being housed with,' she said.
According to Saroukos, border officials told her they would let her husband know she was being deported – but they never did.
She was then put through a body cavity search before being paraded through the airport in handcuffs and taken to the Federal Detection Center.
'They stated, 'No, you're not under arrest. You haven't done anything wrong, and you'll be facing no criminal charges.' So I was very confused as to why this was all happening,' she said.
After arriving at the prison, Saroukos was strip-searched and detained with women who had been convicted of murder and drug offenses, according to the report.
She shared a cell with a woman from Fiji who was also denied entry and awaiting deportation. She was also not allowed to make a phone call to her husband or mother to let them know what happened.
Saroukos said that the following morning, she was brought back to the airport and received a call from the Australian Consulate General in Hawaii, who had been contacted by her mother when they were separated and helped get the two on the same returning flight home.
Eventually, she was able to connect with her husband over the phone.
'I think we were both just very emotional. We hadn't spoken to each other in 24 hours. He didn't know where I was or whether I was safe,' she said.
'It's not only myself, it's my mother and my husband that also had to endure that pain, my husband being a current serving member, to serve his country and to be treated in that way I find very disgusting,' she said.
Saroukos' husband is now on leave with her in Sydney after waiting hours for her at the airport and receiving no answers.
She said the horrifying experience 'made it physically impossible for me to even ever enter the United States ever again.'
'I felt like my world came crashing down. I felt like my marriage was over when they told me that,' she added. 'That's something that they've taken away from me as well.'
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesperson told Hawaii News Now that entry decisions are complex and taken very seriously, with many factors considered in each decision.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration continues to target international students. What to know and what could be next.
Trump administration continues to target international students. What to know and what could be next.

NBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Trump administration continues to target international students. What to know and what could be next.

Lawsuits, next-day countersuits, backtracking and mass confusion. International students find themselves at the center of a dizzying legal landscape as the Trump administration continues to crack down on immigration. Here's what to know as the Trump administration keeps attempting to put up legal barriers to international students' ability to study in the U.S. What's the latest? Just Wednesday, a judge granted Harvard an extension on an injunction that blocked the administration's attempt last week to stop the Ivy League school from enrolling foreign-born students. An estimated 4,700 or more foreign-born students have been impacted since the Trump administration began revoking visas and terminating legal statuses in March. A few have also been detained in high-profile cases. In just the past two weeks, students across the country were granted a nationwide injunction against the administration. Some scholars have been released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement as well. Meanwhile the State Department announced that it is 'aggressively' targeting an additional group of Chinese scholars out of national security concerns. But in spite of its legal losses, the federal government has doubled down on its efforts to target international students. On Tuesday, the Trump administration stopped scheduling new student visa interviews for those looking to study in the U.S., according to an internal cable seen by NBC News. Meanwhile, the State Department is preparing to expand its social media screening of applicants, the cable said. The next day, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the government would be looking to revoke the visas of Chinese students 'with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' It's still unclear what 'critical fields' the administration will be looking into and what types of connections to the CCP are under scrutiny. The State Department referred NBC News to comments by spokesperson Tammy Bruce during a news briefing Thursday in which Bruce said the department does not discuss the details of its visa process due to privacy concerns. 'We use every tool that we have to vet and to make sure we know who's coming in,' Bruce said. 'In this particular case, the United States is putting America first by beginning to revoke visas of Chinese students as warranted.' How did the Trump administration revoke the visas and statuses of international students? For months, there was mass confusion among schools and international students about the criteria the government used to abruptly terminate visas and statuses, with little to no notice to students. But in late April, the Department of Homeland Security revealed at a hearing that it used the National Crime Information Center, an FBI-run computerized index that includes criminal history information. The agency said fewer than two dozen employees ran the names of 1.3 million foreign-born students through the index, populating 6,400 'hits.' And from there, many students experienced terminations of their records in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS), which maintains information about nonimmigrant students and exchange visitors. The method was sharply criticized by legal and policy experts, who pointed out that the database relies on cities, counties, states and other sources to voluntarily report their data. This means that it may not have the final dispositions of cases, potentially leading to errors in identifying students. At another hearing in April, Elizabeth D. Kurlan, an attorney for the Justice Department, said that going forward, Immigration and Customs Enforcement will not be terminating statuses based solely on findings in the crime information center. She also told the court that ICE would be restoring the legal status of international students who had their records terminated until the agency developed a new framework for revocations. Shortly afterward, an internal memo to all Student and Exchange Visitor Program personnel, which is under ICE jurisdiction, showed an expanded list of criteria for the agency to terminate foreign-born students' legal status in the U.S., including a 'U.S. Department of State Visa Revocation (Effective Immediately).' Though students would typically have the right to due process and defend themselves before their status is terminated, visa revocation itself is now grounds for the termination of status, according to the memo. The administration has also taken aim at students who have been active in pro-Palestine protests, including Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil and Tufts University student Rümeysa Öztürk, who were both detained in March. Öztürk has since been released from ICE custody. 'Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visas,' Rubio said at a news conference in March. Has anyone been successful in challenging the Trump administration? Students across the U.S. from Georgia to South Dakota have been winning their lawsuits against the Trump administration, with judges siding with plaintiffs and allowing them to stay in the U.S. Last week, a judge issued an injunction blocking the Trump administration from terminating the legal statuses of international students at universities across the U.S. It's the first to provide relief to students nationwide. The day after the Trump administration terminated Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification — a move that would force the university's foreign students, roughly a fourth of its student body, to either transfer or lose their legal status — the Ivy League school sued the administration. And hours later, a judge issued an injunction. In addition to Öztürk, others who were detained are no longer in ICE custody, including Georgetown scholar Badar Khan Suri and Mohsen Mahdawi, a U.S. permanent resident who was born and raised in a refugee camp in the occupied West Bank. The judge in Khan Suri's case ruled that his detention was in violation of the First Amendment, which protects the right to free speech, and the Fifth Amendment, which protects the right to due process. What might be next for international students? Though the recent nationwide injunction provides some relief, students can still be vulnerable to visa revocation. Legal experts say the temporary restraining order blocks the government from arresting or detaining students, or terminating their legal statuses. But it's possible that visas can still be revoked. And many expect the Trump administration to hit back. 'This is a federal district court decision. It is not a final decision, and it seems likely that the executive branch will appeal this decision,' Elora Mukherjee, director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School. Mukherjee also added that the Chinese international students referred to in Rubio's new statement are likely not protected by the injunction either. 'What they're likely to claim in court in defense of this policy is that the secretary of state and the executive branch deserves deference with regard to quote, unquote, foreign affairs,' Mukherjee said. However, with backlash already brewing, Mukherjee said she expects that the policy will be challenged legally, with immigration attorneys and activists arguing that it is unconstitutional. Legal experts said that with many decisions surrounding international students' fate far from decided, foreign-born scholars should first and foremost remain in the country. She also said it's important to seek legal counsel in the event that students are also eligible for other forms of relief, including asylum or other humanitarian visas. Razeen Zaman, director of immigrant rights at the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, said it's particularly important for American citizens to speak out against the immigration policies on behalf of foreign-born students, as many of these students may not be able to push back themselves. 'You have to have a certain amount of resources to be able to do that. You have to have a certain amount of connections. There's even some people who are too afraid to seek counsel,' Zaman said. 'U.S. citizens have the most protections. … And the reality is, even if you're stopped at the border, they do have to still let you in as a U.S. citizen.' And given how the Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to revoke the temporary legal status of more than 500,000 immigrants from four Latin American countries, Zaman said, it's likely that even more groups will be targeted without fierce advocacy and protest. 'This is about the First Amendment today. It's Chinese people, the CCP, whoever they decide is tied to the Chinese government,' Zaman said.

Spanish Grand Prix: Formula One
Spanish Grand Prix: Formula One

The Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Spanish Grand Prix: Formula One

Update: Date: 2025-06-01T12:04:30.000Z Title: I've heard little else … Content: Update: Date: 2025-06-01T12:00:13.000Z Title: Preamble Content: This feels significant! Oscar Piastri is on pole after a composed qualifying session. The Australian is leading the Championship and will be looking to open up the gap at the top on his teammate Lando Norris, who won last time out in Monaco. Here is how the grid lines up: 1) Oscar Piastri - McLaren 2) Lando Norris - McLaren 3) Max Verstappen - Red Bull 4) George Russell - Mercedes 5) Lewis Hamilton - Ferrari 6) Kimi Antonelli - Mercedes 7) Charles Leclerc - Ferrari 8) Pierre Gasly - Alpine 9) Isack Hadjar - Racing Bulls 10) Fernando Alonso - Aston Martin 11) Alex Albon - Williams 12) Gabriel Bortoleto - Kick Sauber 13) Liam Lawson - Racing Bulls 14) Ollie Bearman - Haas 15) Nico Hulkenberg - Kick Sauber 16) Esteban Ocon - Haas 17) Carlos Sainz - Williams 18) Franco Colapinto - Alpine 19) Yuki Tsunoda - Red Bull Lights out 2pm BST.

Deeply disturbing question a cop asked an Indigenous teen detained at an ACT watch house sparks furious backlash
Deeply disturbing question a cop asked an Indigenous teen detained at an ACT watch house sparks furious backlash

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Deeply disturbing question a cop asked an Indigenous teen detained at an ACT watch house sparks furious backlash

Concerning footage has emerged of a watch house officer grilling an Indigenous teen and his disturbing comments that have sparked outrage and prompted an investigation. The early morning exchange took place at an ACT watch house after the Indigenous boy was arrested in June 2024. Footage played during an ACT Supreme Court hearing earlier this year, the officer, who was off-camera, was heard asking the boy a series of questions, including whether he was thinking of taking his own life. 'Are you thinking of necking yourself?' he asked the teen. When the boy replied no, the officer was heard muttering: 'You wouldn't have the guts to do it anyway.' The watch house CCTV also showed several officers standing behind the teen – none of whom made the offensive comments – who appeared to smirk during the exchange. The same sergeant later asked the teen, who was living in foster care, if he had any parents. 'Nah,' the teen replied. 'No parents? You just magically appeared on the face of the Earth?' the sergeant mocked. The court was also played a series of other clips from the vision, including the moment the teen was later tasered and violently pinned down in a watch house cell. The judge referred the vision to the territory's Chief Police Officer Scott Lee, the Canberra Times reported. Indigenous leader Jordan Hindmarsh-Keevil recently took to social media to express outrage about the incident. 'I hate making videos about negative things, but this is f***ing very important because I bet you didn't hear about it,' he said in a video reshared by 'Although this video might make you angry, I do not mean to divide anyone. All I want from this is for people who believe that Australia is not a racist country – those people say so because it doesn't say it legally anywhere. Mr Hindmarsh-Keevil claimed the 'treatment is not a one-off', saying 'this happens all the time'. 'This officer looked at a 17-year-old boy and he said 'are you thinking about necking yourself?' Two of the other coppers who were standing next to this man started smirking and smiling. And this officer had already mocked this kid for not having parents because he was in foster care,' he claimed. 'I am angry at the police that did this, but I'm angry that this type of hatred towards other people exists.' The ACT's Chief Police Officer, Scott Lee described the officer's actions in the footage as said the officer's actions as 'are unacceptable and will not be tolerated'. 'I hold everyone in ACT Policing to high standards of professionalism and integrity, as do our officers, and this is in line with community expectations,' Mr Lee said. 'The comments of the officer during a Watch House intake in 2024 are unacceptable and will not be tolerated. 'It falls well below the standards expected of our officers and was dealt with swiftly after the incident occurred with the matter currently being investigated by AFP Professional Standards.' He added that the investigation into the incident is ongoing. Daily Mail Australia has contacted ACT Policing for further comment. Venessa Turnbull-Roberts, Commissioner for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children said the incident was 'abhorrent misconduct'. 'In the context of the horrifying and ongoing epidemic of Aboriginal deaths in custody in this jurisdiction and across Australia, this comment can be seen as a deliberate incitement to an Aboriginal child to end his life,' she claimed. 'What is even more horrific is the young person is a survivor of forcible removal … the police interrogation used against this young person by police is shameful.' Suicide rates have been on the incline over the past decade to 2023, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics' (ABS) mortality report. Between 2019 and 2023, suicide was the leading cause of death for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, according to that same report. It

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store