BBC defends its Gaza coverage against White House claim
The BBC rejected White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt's claims that the news outlet took 'the word of Hamas' when reporting on casualties in Gaza.
During Tuesday's press briefing, Leavitt claimed the BBC retracted a story that featured statistics on deaths caused by Israeli forces in a story.
'The claim the BBC took down a story after reviewing footage is completely wrong. We did not remove any story and we stand by our journalism. Karoline Leavitt criticised the BBC for changing the number of casualties in the story's headline. The corporation said its coverage was updated with new figures throughout the day, which is 'totally normal practice on any fast-moving news story,'' the BBC said in a statement.
The media company said the number of deaths reported was 'always clearly attributed, from the first figure of 15 from medics, through the 31 killed from the Hamas-run health ministry to the final Red Cross statement of 'at least 21' at their field hospital,' the statement added.
BBC noted there were conflicting reports describing a violent attack on individuals seeking aid at a distribution center in Rafah on Sunday.
'The administration is aware of those reports and we are currently looking into the veracity of them because unfortunately unlike some of those in the media we don't take the word of Hamas with total truth, we like to look into it, unlike the BBC,' Leavitt said Tuesday.
Since November, experts have warned that the population in northern Gaza is at 'imminent risk' of starvation. Israel blocked aid from entering Gaza in March with support from the White House after Hamas's refusal to agree to a second ceasefire deal.
The BBC said Israel does not allow international news organizations into Gaza, making it difficult to verify what is happening in the territory. But BBC maintained that it continues to adhere to journalistic standards.
The Washington Post issued a correction to its story regarding the incident in Rafah on social platforms, explaining its article did not meet the Post's fairness standards and lacked proper attribution.
'We told you we'd hold the Fake News accountable,' Leavitt wrote in response to the post.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Musk Hit a Nerve by Saying Trump Is in the Epstein Files
Why is Elon Musk so sure President Donald Trump is in the so-called 'Epstein Files?' In a bombshell X post Thursday, Musk levied accusations against the president claiming that his name could be found in files pertaining to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk wrote Thursday. 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Epstein was accused of sex trafficking minors and conspiracy to engage in the sex trafficking of minors, which he pleaded not guilty to, in 2019. A month after his arrest, he died by suicide in his jail cell, according to authorities. For years, right-wing circles have called on authorities to release all documents related to Epstein's investigation, including flight logs of his private plane, client names, and inquiries into his suicide. Though the Trump administration has consistently promised to declassify the Epstein files, they have yet to divulge any new details on Epstein's case, as pointed out by Musk. In a statement to CNN, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt weighed in on Musk's accusations and said: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted. The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again.' The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Beast's request for comment on Musk's accusations. Though Trump has spent the past decade fiercely distancing himself from Epstein, the two had a documented relationship during the late 1980s to early 2000s. In 1992, for example, they were filmed speaking and laughing together at a party in Mar-a-Lago. Years later, in 1997, they were pictured together again at a Victoria's Secret Angels party. In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, Trump even praised Epstein as a 'terrific guy.' 'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,' Trump said at the time. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it—Jeffrey enjoys his social life.' Flight logs released in 2021 as part of the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's accomplice, also indicated that Trump flew on Epstein's plane seven times throughout their friendship. 'I was never on Epstein's Plane, or at his 'stupid' Island,' Trump said in a 2024 Truth Social post. Whatever relationship the two seemed to have, however, came to a halt in 2004 following a real estate feud, according to The Washington Post. At the time, the two men were both eyeing a Palm Beach property, Maison de L'Amitié, for different reasons and subsequently went head-to-head in a bidding war over it. In the years to follow, Trump grew to become an outspoken critic of Epstein's, both in public and behind closed doors. Bradley Edwards, an attorney who represented a number of Epstein's alleged victims, told The Conscious Resistance Network in 2018 that Trump was the 'only person' who agreed to talk to him when he was serving subpoenas during an Epstein investigation in 2009 and that he was 'very helpful in the information he gave.' 'He is the only person who picked up the phone and said 'Let's just talk, I'll give you as much time as you want, I'll tell you what you need to know,'' Edwards said, adding that Trump 'gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward.' One of the president's former 2016 campaign aides, Sam Nunberg, also told The Washington Post that Trump had once called Epstein a 'real creep' and that he had barred him from Mar-a-Lago as a result. When probed on Epstein following his arrest in July 2019, Trump told a reporter: 'Well I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him… I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan… That I can tell you. I was not a fan of his.' A few days later, he reiterated that he 'had no idea' about Epstein's alleged crimes and added 'Jeffrey Epstein was not somebody that I respected. I threw him out.' Trump more recently addressed Epstein during a September 2024 interview with Lex Fridman where he said: '[Epstein] had some nice assets that he'd throw around like islands, but a lot of big people went to that island. But fortunately, I was not one of them.' The president has notably not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. Epstein, however, had a different version of events. In 2017, the financier spoke at length with author Michael Wolff as part of his research for his 2018 bestselling book Fire and Fury. In tape recordings of their conversation, shared by Wolff to the Daily Beast in November, Epstein described himself as Trump's 'closest friend for 10 years' and alleged that the two enjoyed going to 'Atlantic City to try to find girls in the casino.' 'He's a horrible human being,' Epstein, a convicted sex offender, said of Trump in the tapes. 'He does nasty things to his best friends, best friends' wives, anyone who he first tries to gain their trust and uses it to do bad things to them.' At the time, Trump's representatives referred to the tapes as 'false smears' and 'election interference' as they were published days before the November 2024 election. Trump's team further told the Daily Beast that Wolff is 'a disgraced writer who routinely fabricates lies in order to sell fiction books because he clearly has no morals or ethics.' 'He waited until days before the election to make outlandish false smears all in an effort to engage in blatant election interference on behalf of Kamala Harris. He's a failed journalist that is resorting to lying for attention,' they continued.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
BBC blamed Israel for aid massacre on word of single Palestinian source
A BBC report claiming Israeli troops killed Palestinians at an aid distribution centre was based on the accounts of a single Palestinian journalist and a Hamas spokesman, it has emerged. The White House has attacked the BBC's coverage of the incident, accusing the broadcaster of taking Hamas's word as 'total truth'. The BBC's first report on the June 1 incident said that at least 15 Palestinians had been killed by 'Israeli tank shelling and gunfire', according to 'medics and local residents'. But the 'local residents' amounted to one Palestinian journalist, Mohammed Ghareeb, who told the broadcaster that Israeli tanks had approached and opened fire on the crowd queuing for food. No medics in the article spoke of tank shelling or gunfire, only reporting the number of dead and injured. The BBC also included a quote from Mahmud Bassal, a civil defence spokesman, claiming that victims were killed and wounded 'due to gunfire from Israeli vehicles towards thousands of citizens'. The broadcaster did not mention that civil defence in Gaza is run by Hamas. As highlighted by the White House, the story was altered several times during the day. The first report was published on the BBC News website at 5.15am. The story was updated two hours later to increase the claimed number of fatalities from at least 15 to 26. The death toll was increased to 31 in a third version of the story, published at 2.12pm. That story was updated to include denials from the Israel Defense Forces, and from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which runs the aid distribution centre. Another update, at 4.23pm, included a denial from an IDF soldier in Rafah, who contacted the BBC to say that Israeli soldiers fired near the crowd but not at them, and nobody was hit. Finally, at 8.34pm, the headline and opening paragraph were changed to remove references to Israeli tanks and gunfire, instead admitting that the incident was the subject of 'disputed reports'. The BBC Verify unit – billed by the corporation as experts in fact-checking and rooting out disinformation – also looked into the incident, and concluded the following day that 'it's extremely complicated because we have conflicting reports from multiple sources'. Israel does not allow international journalists to enter Gaza. On Tuesday, the contentious reporting was held up for ridicule by Karoline Leavitt, Donald Trump's press secretary. She brandished a print-out of the changing headlines on the BBC story, saying: 'Unlike some in the media, we don't take the word of Hamas as total truth. We like to look into it when they speak… unlike the BBC.' The BBC has rejected the claims. Danny Cohen, the BBC's former director of television, said he expected the corporation to dismiss the White House criticism. Speaking to the Daily T podcast, he said: 'They will take on an uber-defensive posture in response to this, because it has come from the Trump administration, rather than actually look at what they've said.' Mr Cohen claimed that there was 'anti-Israel bias in the newsroom' and condemned the BBC's rush to put out stories without first checking their validity. 'The BBC should no longer be using this approach, which is 'report first and ask questions later' because it leads to dangerous misinformation from a genocidal terrorist group into the mainstream,' he said. Mr Cohen added of BBC Verify: 'If it wasn't so serious, it would be a really bad joke. First of all, there is an absolute obsession with Israel. And second of all, it often doesn't verify anything. It just does a report and doesn't prove anything.' Verify is the brainchild of Deborah Turness, the chief executive of BBC news and current affairs. A day after the offending report, she announced the launch of BBC Verify Live, in which the team will share its work throughout the day in a rolling news feed on the corporation's website. Ms Turness described it as 'a new way of working, and an exciting step towards even greater transparency'. Asked about the Gaza story, a BBC spokesman said: 'As we made clear already, we stand by our journalism, including the accurate attribution of sources throughout our coverage. We continue to press for international independent journalists to be able to report from inside Gaza.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Rubio sanctions 4 ICC judges for "targeting" U.S. and Israel
The Trump administration announced sanctions on four International Criminal Court judges on Thursday over what Secretary of State Marco Rubio called "illegitimate actions" that he said targeted the U.S. and Israel. The big picture: The sanctions are in response to the ICC issuing arrest warrants in November for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant and the court's investigation into alleged U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan. The action is "pursuant to" an executive order President Trump issued in February sanctioning the ICC following warrants it issued for the Israeli officials for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. Neither the U.S. nor Israel recognize the jurisdiction of the ICC, which has also issued an arrest warrant for a Hamas leader for alleged war crimes in Gaza. The ICC in a statement Thursday said the measures were "a clear attempt to undermine the independence" of the court. Driving the news: Rubio announced the measures against Judges Solomy Balungi Bossa, of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza, of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou, of Benin, and Beti Hohler, of Slovenia. He said in a statement they were "directly engaged in" ICC efforts "to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without consent from the United States or Israel," he said. "As ICC judges, these four individuals have actively engaged in the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America or our close ally, Israel." The action means that all property and interests that the judges own in the U.S. "are blocked and must be reported" to the Treasury Department, per a Treasury statement.
