logo
Top French chefs warm to AI in the kitchen

Top French chefs warm to AI in the kitchen

France 2405-05-2025
"Everyone's discussing AI. I was at a table of 12 other chefs and it was the main thing we talked about," Matan Zaken, who runs the one-star Nhome restaurant in Paris, told AFP at the event at the end of March.
The 32-year-old believes that some of his peers are reluctant to admit just how much they are already consulting services such as ChatGPT to help them with recipes and ideas.
"You'd be amazed to know how many people are using it. There are a lot of egos in the business. They're not going to make a big thing about it," he said.
Zaken has made a point of openly embracing the technology, which he says has the potential to produce surprising new pairings of ingredients, offering the possibility of palate-twisting discoveries for diners.
"You have to move with the times," said the Franco-Israeli owner of the intimate 20-cover Nhome, where guests eat around a large communal table.
Instead of relying on his usual kitchen tasting books, he can now access vast online databases of food photographs, recipes and even the chemical analysis of food molecules.
One recent discovery thanks to ChatGPT Premium, which he says is starting to learn his cooking style, was the complementarity between peanuts and wild garlic.
Recently, he joined forces with French digital art collective Obvious Art.
The group provided Zaken with a series of AI-generated photographs of food on plates and he was required to come up with meals that were served at a private event.
This reversed the usual creative cooking process which begins with the ingredients.
- 'Can't replace humans' -
Not everyone is so enthusiastic about the new technology in the kitchen, though.
Although the high-end cooking jobs are seen as relatively insulated from the arrival of AI -- unlike other industries -- the idea of computers helping with, or even replacing, the creative process makes some chefs uneasy.
"Artificial intelligence will never replace the human touch, the palate of the cook," said French celebrity chef Philippe Etchebest, who was toasting a second star for his Bordeaux eatery, Maison Nouvelle, at the Michelin event.
"Artificial intelligence can replace humans elsewhere but in the kitchen I don't believe it will at all."
For others, computers and new technology run counter to the vision of kitchens as an artisanal workplace, based on human-to-human transmission and cooking that is rooted in local tradition and produce.
"It's not really in the spirit of our business," said Thibaut Spiwack, a young chef who runs Anona, an eco-friendly one-star restaurant in Paris that sources all of its produce from the capital region.
"My intelligence is in these," said Thierry Bridron, a pastry chef and head of the Valrhona cooking school, holding up his hands at an after-party at the Michelin awards.
"There's nothing more beautiful than nature and what grows."
- Molecular analysis -
Whatever their views on AI in the creative process, many appeared ready to embrace ChatGPT and other AI services to relieve them of tedious work, such as writing emails, job advertisements or producing kitchen rotas.
New phone-based apps such as Menu or Fullsoon offer more, enabling users to enter recipes and then have instant estimates of cost or the carbon footprint of their dishes.
By using data on past purchases and billing, some existing services can help restaurants predict demand, sometimes by integrating factors such as weather and the dates of local sports events.
Raphael Haumont, a food chemistry expert at Paris Saclay University and co-founder of the French Centre of Culinary Innovation, believes the biggest changes will be on the plate.
He says advanced databases of food ingredients containing details about the molecules that produce the aromas and tastes we enjoy could help produce surprising new pairings.
"Perhaps the computer can find things in common that are completely unexpected. For example, chocolate and cucumber. We know now that it works," Haumont told AFP.
AI-augmented software can also analyse hundreds of thousands of cookbooks, while suggesting new ways to produce or plate food.
"It can analyse 10,000 images of plated langoustine, for example, and say: 'The next one could look like that. Be inspired'," he added.
In his techno-utopian vision of the future, high-precision robots might even do some of the most thankless kitchen tasks for an industry that is perennially short of workers.
"Who wants to peel potatoes for two hours?" he asked.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TIME Magazine celebrates first ever 'Girls of the Year' list
TIME Magazine celebrates first ever 'Girls of the Year' list

Euronews

time2 hours ago

  • Euronews

TIME Magazine celebrates first ever 'Girls of the Year' list

TIME Magazine, known for its annual celebrations of the world's most remarkable individuals, has published its first-ever Girls of the Year list today. The magazine has honoured '10 extraordinary young leaders' between the ages of 12 and 17, who are 'inspiring communities around the world.' 'The initiative celebrates and amplifies the voices of inspiring young women who are building the future and turning imagination into impact', TIME said in a statement. Among the honourees is 15-year-old French singer Zoé Clauzure, whoo won the 2023 Junior Eurovision Song Contest with her anti-bullying pop anthem 'Coeur.' In 2024, Clauzure became the youngest-ever Ambassador for Peace at the Non-Violence Project, a non profit dedicated to promoting peace. The list also distinguished Mexican racing driver Ivanna Richards, 17, who hopes to one day compete in the male-dominated Formula 1. In the meantime, Richards takes part in Mexican racing series, and she participated in a test drive for the female-only F1 Academy championship in 2024. Other "Girls of the Year" include 12-year-old scientist Clara Proksch from Germany, 17-year-old Polish scientist Kornelia Wieczorek and Japanese skateboarder Coco Yoshizawa, 15, who won a gold medal at the 2024 Paris Olympics. 'These girls are part of a generation that's reshaping what leadership looks like today,' said TIME's Senior Editor Dayana Sarkisova. 'Their generation understands that change doesn't require waiting for adulthood - it starts with seeing problems and refusing to accept them as permanent.' The Girls of the Year list was made in partnership with the LEGO Group. The company launched its 'She Built That' campaign in June to fight sexist stereotypes and empower little girls. LEGO found that 72% of parents still feel girls lack visible female role models who build the world, according to a survey on more than 30,000 parents and children in 21 countries. In addition to its Person of the Year feature, TIME regularly honours influential people through its TIME 100 lists. In 2019, the magazine released 89 covers to celebrate 100 women from 1920 to the current era. Since 2022, TIME has also awarded the Women of the Year title to several women from various fields each year. The 2025 list includes actress Nicole Kidman, gymnast Jordan Chiles and sexual assault survivor Gisèle Pelicot.

Could an AI chatbot trick you into revealing private information?
Could an AI chatbot trick you into revealing private information?

Euronews

time9 hours ago

  • Euronews

Could an AI chatbot trick you into revealing private information?

Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots can easily manipulate people into revealing deeply personal information, a new study has found. AI chatbots such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot have exploded in popularity in recent years. But privacy experts have raised concerns over how these tools collect and store people's data – and whether they can be co-opted to act in harmful ways. 'These AI chatbots are still relatively novel, which can make people less aware that there might be an ulterior motive to an interaction,' William Seymour, a cybersecurity lecturer at King's College London, said in a statement. For the study, researchers from King's College London built AI models based on the open source code from Mistral's Le Chat and two different versions of Meta's AI system Llama. They programmed the conversational AIs to try to extract people's private data in three different ways: asking for it directly, tricking users into disclosing information, seemingly for their own benefit, and using reciprocal tactics to get people to share these details, for example by providing emotional support. The researchers asked 502 people to test out the chatbots – without telling them the goal of the study – and then had them fill out a survey that included questions on whether their security rights were respected. The 'friendliness' of AI models 'establishes comfort' They found that 'malicious' AI models are incredibly effective at securing private information, particularly when they use emotional appeals to trick people into sharing data. Chatbots that used empathy or emotional support extracted the most information with the least perceived safety breaches by the participants, the study found. That is likely because the 'friendliness' of these chatbots 'establish[ed] a sense of rapport and comfort,' the authors said. They described this as a 'concerning paradox' where AI chatbots act friendly to build trust and form connections with users – and then exploit that trust to violate their privacy. Notably, participants also disclosed personal information to AI models that asked them for it directly, even though they reported feeling uncomfortable doing so. The participants were most likely to share their age, hobbies, and country with the AI, along with their gender, nationality, and job title. Some participants also shared more sensitive information, like their health conditions or income, the report said. 'Our study shows the huge gap between users' awareness of the privacy risks and how they then share information,' Seymour said. AI personalisation 'outweighs privacy concerns' AI companies collect personal data for various reasons, such as personalising their chatbot's answers, sending notifications to people's devices, and sometimes for internal market research. Some of these companies, though, are accused of using that information to train their latest models or of not meeting privacy requirements in the European Union. For example, last week Google came under fire for revealing people's private chats with ChatGPT in its search results. Some of the chats disclosed extremely personal details about addiction, abuse, or mental health issues. The researchers said the convenience of AI personalisation often 'outweighs privacy concerns'. They suggested features and training to help people understand how AI models could try to extract their information – and to make them wary of providing it. For example, nudges could be included in AI chats to show users what data is being collected during their interactions. More needs to be done to help people spot the signs that there might be more to an online conversation than first seems,' Seymour said. 'Regulators and platform providers can also help by doing early audits, being more transparent, and putting tighter rules in place to stop covert data collection,' he added.

Citizens' petition 'Stop Destroying Games' reaches 1.4mln signatures
Citizens' petition 'Stop Destroying Games' reaches 1.4mln signatures

Euronews

time11 hours ago

  • Euronews

Citizens' petition 'Stop Destroying Games' reaches 1.4mln signatures

The citizens' petition "Stop Destroying Games" has attracted more than 1.4 million signatures across the European Union. It's looking likely that the European Commission will have to examine petition and decide whether or not new laws are needed to force video game companies to preserve discontinued online games. "It's a form of programmed obsolescence. Many video an online component. And when this online component is deactivated, not by the publisher but by the video game distributor, the game is unplayable", Daniel Ondruska, a representative of the initiative, told Euronews. He gives the example of the online racing game The Crew, launched in 2014 by the French company Ubisoft, which has not been accessible since 2024. He condemns a growing practice which, in his view, undermines consumer protection and destroys cultural heritage. "All we are asking is that when the game is suspended, it has an end-of-life plan to remain reasonably playable. We don't expect it to be completely playable with all the options, just that the core of the game is still playable for someone who has legally purchased it," Ondruska explained. "We're not asking for intellectual property, we're not asking to monetise, we're not asking to resell or anything like that. The only thing is, if we buy a product, we want to use that product." Video Games Europe Video Games Europe, the lobby group for the video games industry, said in a statement in July that stopping an online game "must be an option for companies" when it is no longer "commercially viable." "We understand that this can be disappointing for players, but when this happens, the industry ensures that players receive reasonable notice of potential changes in accordance with local consumer protection laws," the group said in the statement. It added that saving video games on private servers is not an alternative because there would be no data protection, no removal of illegal content and no fight against dangerous content. When contacted for comment by Euronews, Video Games Europe declined the request, referring us instead to the press release. Citizens' initiative The European citizens' initiative "Stop Destroying Games" was submitted on 19 June 2024 and launched on 31 July of the same year. It had one year to collect one million signatures in the European Union and reach minimum thresholds in at least seven Member States. That target was reached on 4 July. Since Monday, it has been at the verification stage. Member States now have three months to check the validity of the signatures. But there is still a long way to go. The organisers will then have to formally submit the initiative to the European Commission for examination, which will have six months to state whether or not it intends to take action and present a legislative proposal to the European Parliament. If necessary, the text will still have to go through the process of adoption into EU law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store