
Dow rebounds as investors shrug off Trump threats of unilateral tariffs
Stocks staged a late rebound Thursday despite renewed trade tensions after President Trump threatened to impose unilateral tariffs on key US trading partners.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 230 points, before finishing up 101 points, or 0.2% as investors reacted favorably to more tame inflation data. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Nasdaq climbed 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively .
The small-cap Russell 2000 declined, losing 0.4%.
3 President Donald Trump said he plans to unilaterally impose tariffs on dozens of trading partners, reviving concerns about a global trade war and sending a jolt through financial markets.
Shutterstock
Meanwhile, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), Wall Street's 'fear gauge,' spiked more than 5%, signaling rising investor unease.
The market downturn came hours after Trump, speaking Wednesday evening at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, confirmed that his administration intends to send letters to US trade partners in the coming weeks to formally establish new tariff terms.
'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is,' Trump said.
'At a certain point, we're just going to send letters out. And I think you understand that, saying this is the deal, you can take it or leave it.'
Trump's remarks come ahead of a July 9 deadline, when the White House is expected to move forward with increased tariffs on a wide range of imports unless new trade agreements are secured.
3 The S&P 500 is less than 2% off its record.
AP
The president has previously floated similar timeframes, sometimes delaying or altering plans, but Thursday's selloff suggests investors are bracing for concrete action.
In April, Trump proposed across-the-board tariff hikes but put them on hold for 90 days following a steep market decline. Since then, the administration has finalized only a narrow trade framework with the United Kingdom and a temporary tariff truce with China.
That truce is now under pressure. Officials from Washington and Beijing met in London earlier this week for high-stakes negotiations after each side accused the other of breaching terms.
Trump said Thursday that the US–China framework would include rare earth and magnet exports from China, in exchange for the US loosening restrictions on Chinese student visas.
3 In April, Trump proposed across-the-board tariff hikes but put them on hold for 90 days following a steep market decline.
JOHN G MABANGLO/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
When asked whether he might extend the July 9 deadline to allow more time for deals, Trump said, 'But I don't think we're gonna have that necessity.'
Trump has shifted his strategy away from blanket multilateral negotiations and is now focused on bilateral deals with countries such as India, Japan, South Korea and members of the European Union.
Still, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick noted Thursday that negotiations with the EU have been difficult, pointing to the complexity of dealing with a 27-nation bloc. 'It's frustrating,' he said.
With Trump reaffirming his tariff plans and few trade deals finalized, Thursday's sharp losses suggest markets are now pricing in the real possibility of a broader economic confrontation in the weeks ahead.
The Post has sought comment from the White House.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

E&E News
12 minutes ago
- E&E News
WTO chief ‘won't keep quiet' to appease Trump
LONDON — Donald Trump wants World Trade Organization chief Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala to play by his rules. She's defying his wishes. A week before Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement, the United States began circulating a communication among World Trade Organization members. Obtained by POLITICO, the note accuses the WTO's Secretariat — the staff body tasked with keeping the organization running — of overstepping its bounds and attempting to 'reinvent itself into a resource to be provided to the public.' Advertisement But speaking at the London School of Economics this week, the WTO director-general made it clear she has no plans to retreat from the global stage.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP's Tim Scott takes aim at the CBO but makes himself look bad accidentally
In recent weeks, congressional Republicans and the White House have repeatedly gone after the Congressional Budget Office, not because the nonpartisan analysts did something wrong, but because the CBO has provided the public with facts that Donald Trump and his allies don't like. Indeed, the offensive couldn't be any more straightforward: The budget office produced objective data that makes the Republican Party's domestic policy megabill — the inaptly named 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' — look like a far-right disaster, so the president and GOP officials have scrambled to discredit the source of independent information. Some of these efforts have been more embarrassing than others. The Washington Post reported: Like many congressional Republicans and members of the Trump administration already have, Sen. Tim Scott (R-South Carolina) on Thursday attacked the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office for its scoring of the GOP's massive tax and immigration bill, arguing that the CBO's estimates are inaccurate. In a video shared on X, Scott accused the office ... of being wrong in its scoring of tax cuts implemented in the 1930s and the 1960s. There was, however, a rather glaring problem with the senator's pitch: The Congressional Budget Office wasn't created until 1974. When Scott said, 'Wrong then. Wrong Now,' he was, unfortunately, wrong. And it'd be an unfortunate example of a senator taking aim at the budget office, but stumbling over inconvenient facts, if we were to stop there. But as it turns out, that wasn't the only problem with his pitch. Scott claimed, for example, 'In 2017, the CBO said the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would increase the deficit and the debt by trillions of dollars. What happened? They were wrong.' Actually, no, the CBO was right: The Republicans' 2017 package of tax breaks for the wealthy and big corporations really did increase the deficit and the debt by trillions of dollars. That's not a matter of opinion; it's simply what happened. Moments later, in the same video, the senator said CBO analysts 'were wrong on the Mellon tax cuts in the 1930s.' The obvious problem with this is the fact that the CBO didn't exist in the 1930s. However, the less obvious problem is that the Mellon tax cuts were approved in the 1920s, not the 1930s, shortly before the Great Depression. But wait, there's more. Also in the minute-long video, Scott said the CBO was also 'wrong on the Reagan tax cuts in the 1980s,' which is sort of true, but not in the way the South Carolinian meant. As the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget's Marc Goldwein noted, the CBO 'actually overestimated revenue collection in the 1980s,' which was the opposite of the point the senator was trying to make. In his next breath, Scott said of the CBO, 'When have they been right? I don't know either.' Actually, I do know: The office's track record on forecasting future budget deficits has been pretty impressive in recent years, whether or not the senator is aware of this. For good measure, let's not skip past the fact that Scott went on to say, 'The Laffer Curve is right. ... It has always worked; I think it always will work.' The Laffer Curve is a creation of Art Laffer, arguably the nation's preeminent cheerleader for a ridiculous idea: Tax cuts are self-financing. He's spent decades telling policymakers they can slash tax rates, especially for the wealthy, and the tax breaks necessarily pay for themselves through stronger economic growth and increased revenue. Republicans have repeatedly tried to govern with this idea in mind, and they've always failed. Critics of the Laffer Curve have consistently been proven right, and proponents of the discredited idea have consistently been proven wrong. Scott really ought to know all of this. He is, after all, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee and a member of the Senate Finance Committee. But despite these many glaring, factual errors, the Republican senator not only put this video online, he left it online even after its errors were exposed. It reflects an indifference toward reality that has become a staple of the GOP's offensive against the Congressional Budget Office. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Are Palantir (PLTR) Shares Jumping Today
June 13 - Defense stocks, including Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR), climbed on Friday after Israel launched missile strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, missile facilities and senior military targets, stoking concerns of a broader Middle East clash. PLTR is 3% up on Friday afternoon trading as the defense sector drew investor interest amid escalating geopolitical tensions. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu indicated further operations may follow as the country seeks to disrupt Iran's nuclear capabilities, while former President Trump urged Tehran to embrace a U.S.-brokered nuclear deal before it is too late. The unfolding military and intelligence action raised the specter of all-out war and intensified regional volatility. Investors moved toward safety, monitoring developments that could weigh on global markets and risk appetite. Oil futures surged about 13% on fears of supply disruptions, reflecting the heightened tension. Energy shares saw gains as traders assessed possible impacts on crude flows through key chokepoints. Market participants noted that defense-related stocks may attract attention if governments boost spending amid rising security risks. Observers will watch statements from officials and any shifts in diplomatic efforts. The situation remains fluid, with investors bracing for updates on potential retaliation and wider geopolitical fallout. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data