Who pays for cancelled rides? Maharashtra's new cab rules stir industry debate
While the policy introduces a penalty of
₹
100 or 10% of the fare (whichever is lower) to be credited to the rider, it is unclear whether the cost will be borne by the driver or the cab aggregator.
In addition to cancellation charges, two other provisions are also expected to spark further debate: the introduction of mandatory meter pricing and a surge pricing cap of 1.5 times the base fare, which could limit driver incentives during high-demand periods such as festivals, peak hours, or adverse weather conditions.
The Maharashtra government officially rolled out the Aggregator Cabs Policy 2025 on 1 May, aiming to regulate app-based cab services. The policy was developed following Supreme Court directives urging states to regulate the sector. The rules are expected to be notified later this week, Maharashtra's state officials said.
Here's an overview of the provisions that have raised concern among industry players.
Industry executives from the ride-hailing industry told Mint that the policy imposes an undue compliance burden on platforms that act purely as intermediaries. Since aggregators do not own vehicle fleets, they argue they lack the control necessary to manage driver behaviour around cancellations.
'Usually, it's the driver cancelling the ride—the platform has no incentive to do that. Aggregators don't own vehicles, so they cannot enforce the kind of control fleet operators can," said an executive from the industry close to the matter.
Driver-led unions have also raised concerns that the cancellation clause could shift the financial burden onto drivers.
'Cancellation will likely get pushed onto drivers, further making it difficult for them to sustain their livelihood," said Shaik Salauddin, national general secretary of the Indian Federation of App-Based Transport Workers (IFAT).
However, some experts said the policy introduces accountability and may be a step toward greater professionalism in the sector.
'These penalties are expected to go to the aggregators that should further pass on to the drivers, leading to more professionalism in the game. The ultimate beneficiary of this discipline-based structure is going to be the end consumer, which is a welcome move by the government," said Amit Kaushik, managing director at Urban Science, an automotive consultancy firm.
Still, concerns persist about implementation. Executives noted that drivers often reject rides informally, forcing users to cancel their trip.
'Drivers can game the system—delay pickups until the customer cancels, for instance. And if I'm a driver facing cancellation penalties, I'd rather switch to a platform that doesn't charge me," said an executive representing the companies, speaking on condition of anonymity.
'Even models like Namma Yatri and Sahakar Taxi should fall under the same compliance lens. You can't regulate one segment while letting others operate freely," they added.
While
Mint's
queries to Uber and Ola did not elicit a response, Rapido said it may remain partly unscathed.
Rapido functions as a software-as-a-service (SaaS) provider, charging drivers a one-time subscription fee and taking no commission from fares. As a result, it considers itself a technology provider, not a traditional aggregator.
It operates on a model where no commissions are charged from drivers, and 100% of the fare goes directly to the driver's account, 'with no intervention or settlement on the platform," a company spokesperson said.
Instead, it charges drivers a one-time software subscription fee, addressing the 'dissatisfaction with high commissions charged by other platforms," the company said.
'This is akin to digitisation of offline negotiation as to an app based negotiation," the company clarified, adding that, "we don't face the problem of ride cancellation from the drivers on Rapido." The model mirrors those of other platforms such as Namma Yatri and inDrive, which also bypass the conventional aggregator structure.
Also Read:
Uber's lifeline off the table for BluSmart as EV depreciation becomes key contention
Industry executives fear that despite the central government's Motor Vehicle Aggregators Guidelines, 2020, state-specific regulations will require aggregators to constantly adjust their software, resulting in a compliance nightmare and increased costs.
'Jurisdictionally, it will be a software nightmare. Each state-specific tweak increases the cost of compliance, which eventually makes the business model unviable. Compliance shouldn't increase to an extent where business models begin to look like charity," said an executive from the ride-hailing industry.
Industry players also pointed out that the current regulatory environment may incentivise both drivers and platforms to shift toward Saas-based formats, which are largely exempt from such regulation.
'You now have models like Namma Yatri, Sahakar Taxi, and Rapido. If these continue to grow, drivers will naturally be drawn to them. The question is: Are we unintentionally pushing all aggregators to adopt this format just to avoid compliance?" said another industry official.
Also Read:
Rapido takes on Ola, Uber with 'low-cost' guarantee airport cab service
The provision on surge cap of 1.5 times the base fare which could curb pricing flexibility during high-demand periods is also likely to backfire, experts said.
'Surge isn't just about profits—it's also how you incentivize drivers to respond to demand spikes. If the government itself uses surge pricing in other services, clearly the model has merit," said another executive, representing the companies, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Surge pricing, also known as dynamic fare pricing, is implemented by the state-owned Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) for train tickets during peak times. In regulated industries like airlines, this pricing strategy helps manage demand and optimize service availability.
The mandatory meter pricing may not be a feasible model, industry executives said, noting that customers switched to alternative platforms in the first place because traditional models were unreliable.
'Customers jumped to these platforms for two reasons: easier access to cabs and more predictable pricing. While meters are intended to make fares transparent, the lack of other technological innovations (like app-based fare estimates) still leaves consumers with an uncomfortable feeling of fare unpredictability and service availability," said an executive from the ride-hailing industry.
Maharashtra state officials maintained that this policy is essential to ensure fare transparency and curb exploitation of riders. They emphasised that these new rules aim to strike a balance between consumer protection and driver welfare, improving service reliability and safety in Maharashtra's fast-growing urban mobility sector.
As of now, there is no publicly announced formal feedback window for stakeholders or the public to submit comments on the policy. However, the state transport department has indicated that operational guidelines are being finalised and will be communicated to all stakeholders soon.
While Maharashtra's new policy attempts to bring greater accountability and protect consumer interests, the execution will be closely watched, particularly for its impact on driver earnings, platform viability, and the broader future of app-based mobility in India.
Also Read |
The curious case of Ola's scooter 'sales' without invoices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
GST relief to boost consumer spending, lift FMCG sector's growth
Mumbai: Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Independence Day announcement of long-awaited Goods and Services Tax (GST) reforms has raised hopes of consumer goods becoming cheaper, giving relief to households and packaged goods makers. There is a proposal to retain two major GST rates going ahead, eliminating the 12% and 28% slabs. Most of the products and services that currently attract a tax rate of 12% and 28% will be shifted to the 5% and 18% slabs, respectively. A few remaining items in the 28% bracket, currently the highest, will be moved to a new 40% slab, Mint reported earlier. This new slab will cover only a few 'sin goods' such as tobacco products, pan masala, and luxury cars. 'We expect the demand outlook for the FMCG sector to improve, supported by the Central government's focus on accelerating consumption in the economy," analysts at Emkay Securities said in a note dated 17 August. 'The government is now aiming to reduce the indirect tax burden by simplifying the Goods and Services Tax (GST) structure." The move will aid both consumers and producers, said Jayen Mehta, managing director at the Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd, which markets dairy products under the AMul brand. 'This will benefit farmers. While products such as curd are already taxed at 5%, products like ghee, butter, ice cream, and cheese will move down to the 5% slab," he said. Both ghee and butter currently attract a 12% tax. 'Ghee, in particular, is a very important product after milk. However, high tax rates have kept consumption restricted to the unorganized sector. The lower GST will help change that and give consumers access to better quality and branded ghee," he said. Overall, Mehta said the move would boost consumption and benefit local producers. Analysts at Emkay Securities said the move is likely to have limited price benefits for categories such as home and personal care due to their predominant classification under the 5% and 18% slabs. In contrast, food and beverage companies may see direct benefits from a decrease in rates. Food and beverages have varied products across the 5%, 12%, and 18% slabs. Many products currently in the 12% slab—ghee, savouries, bottled water, butter, cheese, paneer, juice, instant noodles, pasta, Chyawanprash, soya chunks, and wafers—are likely to see a reduction to the 5% slab, in our view, analysts said. "If the tax rate reduces to 5%, Bikaji (approx. 80% of revenue) and Gopal Snacks (approx. 85% of revenue) are likely to benefit; Nestlé will see a tax reduction in approximately 30% of its portfolio (instant noodles, pasta, and ketchup)," per the report. 'Further, Dabur will see a partial benefit in beverages and Chyawanprash, which make up approximately 23% of its India revenue. ITC's 11% revenue in the 'other FMCG' segment (noodles, juice, and dairy) may benefit. Britannia's dairy and wafers portfolio would benefit, which is less than 5% of its India revenue. Marico and HUL are likely to benefit, although their share of revenue is limited." Home and personal care In the home and personal care segment, most products are currently taxed at 18% GST. Exceptions include hand wash and toothbrushes (5%, likely to remain), sanitary pads (nil), baby care (12%, potentially moving to 5%), and mouthwash (12%, possibly moving to 18%). As such, direct benefits for for the category are expected to be minimal. Modi, in his speech, said the central government is working with states to reform GST and bring significant relief to people. 'In this Deepavali, you will be getting a double Deepavali," he said. 'Any step towards a more simplified and rational GST structure will provide much-needed relief to the FMCG sector, particularly for companies like ours in the packaged foods and snacks space where margins are under pressure," Manish Aggarwal, Director, Bikano, Bikanervala Foods Pvt Ltd. said. A predictable and streamlined tax regime not only eases compliance but also helps us pass on benefits to consumers, ensuring better affordability and growth of the category, Aggarwal added. However, the industry is awaiting further clarity on the revised rates. India's FMCG sector reported 13.9% growth in the June quarter, up from 3.3% in Q1FY25 driven primarily by price growth in food products. Volume growth remained steady at 6% year-on-year. 'The rationalization of GST rates could provide a strong tailwind to the FMCG sector. A large share of items currently in the 12% slab—milk-based products, dry fruits, processed and frozen foods, and daily-use essentials—are expected to shift into the 5% bracket. This reduction will improve affordability, lift consumption, and help an industry that has been struggling with a prolonged demand slowdown," said said Manoj Mishra, partner and tax controversy management leader, Grant Thornton Bharat. Mishra said the move, coming ahead of the festive season, is crucial and may translate into stronger volumes, better consumer sentiment, and a measurable push to overall economic growth.
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
Mint Explainer: Will fewer slabs in GST 2.0 finally fix India's tax maze?
While delivering his Independence Day address on 15 August, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the long-overdue goods and service tax (GST) reforms. He promised a "double Diwali' this year, indicating that a reformed GST system with lower rates for consumers would be in place before the festival of lights. Mint looks at the proposal, its implications and whether GST 2.0 will correct all the shortcomings of the earlier version. Why is GST India's biggest indirect tax reform? The idea of GST was first proposed in the year 2000 by the Kelkar Task Force on Indirect taxes. It took 17 long years for it to become a reality and was rolled out on 1 July 2017. By subsuming a wide variety of taxes such as excise duty, value-added tax and service tax, it created a uniform tax rate across the country. The simplified taxation system eliminated the cascading effect of taxes, reduced compliance and logistics costs, while improving the ease of doing business. GST collections have risen sharply in the last eight years. In July 2025, it was ₹1.96 trillion as against ₹0.92 trillion mopped up in July 2017. What were its shortcomings? There were many. To address the concerns of all the states and to bring them on board, after all, they were giving up their right to levy taxes, many compromises were made. This resulted in multiple tax rates. There were four major tax slabs (5%, 12%, 18% and 28%), two carve-out rates (0.25% for diamonds and 3% for precious metals like gold and silver) and a compensation cess. Also, multiple rates created inverted duty structure and the indirect tax was an implementation nightmare. The simplicity that GST promised was lost in the process. What is a compensation cess? While negotiating GST, many states were worried about losing revenue. To give them the confidence and get them to agree, the Centre committed to make good any loss in revenue on account of GST and to fund this, it levied a compensation cess on select items. If the GST collections fell short, the states were paid out of the funds collected through the cess. The commitment to compensate the states ended after five years on 30 June 2022 but was extended to repay loans that the Centre had borrowed during covid to compensate the states for revenue shortfall. Compensation Cess will come to an end by March 2026. What has the government proposed now? The government has said that there will be just two major GST rates. It will eliminate the 12% and 28% slabs. Most of the items in the 12% and 28% slab will move to 5% and 18% respectively. A 40% slab will be introduced for sin goods such as tobacco, and pan masala and luxury cars. Compensation cess will be phased out, and a health cess may be imposed for sin goods. The carve-out rates of 0.25% and 3% will continue. Will these measures simplify GST? Experts are divided. Purists among indirect tax experts say anything more than a single slab makes GST complex and less efficient. They suggest a 12% or 13% rate, which is slightly higher than the revenue- neutral rate. Three slabs (5%, 18% and 40%) plus two carve-out rates won't bring about much change. They also argue that a large chunk of the consumption basket, such as electricity, petroleum products, alcohol and stamp duty, is outside the GST. For an efficient taxation system, most of them should be brought within GST. They want the government to place the proposal in the public domain for discussion before undertaking the reforms. What do officials say? Government officials and other experts argue that the proposed reform is a 'gigantic' move. The government had originally talked about removing just the 18% slab. They say that most developed nations have two major slabs (merit and standard) with carveout rates for diamonds and precious metals. In India's case, the 40% slab will be another carveout rate. With lesser slabs, the inverted duty structure—the bane of GST 1.0—will be eliminated. Lower rates, they add, will trigger a consumption boom. Increased consumption will trigger private investment and accelerate economic growth at a time when Indian exports are facing headwinds from steep US tariffs. They expect only a temporary fiscal impact as higher consumption will compensate for lower rates.
The Hindu
10 hours ago
- The Hindu
'Planting food, not violence or hate': Brazil's Lula razzes Donald Trump over tariff-hit grapes
Brazil President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said on Saturday (August 17, 2025) he hopes U.S. President Donald Trump can come and get to know the real Brazil, as the South American powerhouse reels from Washington's 50% tariffs. In a video taken while he planted grapes — one of the tariff-hit goods — Brazil's leftist leader addressed Mr. Trump. Brazil's Lula says proposal to regulate social media platforms is ready "I hope you can visit someday so we can talk and you can get to know the true Brazil, the Brazil of people who love samba, carnival, soccer, the United States, China, Russia, Uruguay, and Venezuela. We love everyone," Mr. Lula said. The tariffs imposed on Brazil are among the steepest to hit a U.S. trading partner. And unlike with other countries, the measures against Brazil have been framed in openly political terms, with the Republican President justifying the move by alleging Brasilia is conducting a "witch hunt" against his ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro. Mr. Bolsonaro is being tried for an alleged coup attempt against Lula in 2022, and the United States recently sanctioned the judge in the case, along with seven other Supreme Court magistrates. Mr. Lula has backed the Supreme Court and promises to defend "the sovereignty of the Brazilian people." His administration has also vowed to combat Mr. Trump's tariffs, including by lodging an appeal if necessary. India, Brazil partnership relevant to the entire world: PM Modi The levies, which affect several key exports from the largest economy in Latin America, sweep aside centuries-old trade ties and a surplus that Brasilia put at $284 million last year. In his message on X, Mr. Lula said he was giving an example of "planting food, and not planting violence, or planting hate." "I hope that someday we can talk, President Trump, so you can learn about the quality of the Brazilian people," he adds.
