Glorious Twelfth: Grouse shooting season gets under way
The British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC) marked the Glorious Twelfth by warning that new muirburn licensing rules could 'jeopardise' effective moorland management.
From the start of next year, a licence will be required for all muirburn activities in Scotland following the passing of the Wildlife Management & Muirburn (Scotland) Act 2024.
The BASC has said that muirburn – the controlled burning of heather – actively enhances biodiversity, promotes fresh plant growth, supports species such as deer and grouse, and reduces wildfire risk by managing dry, combustible vegetation.
But it says the new system is overly-complex and could unintentionally hinder controlled burning.
'This, in turn, risks increasing fuel loads across moorlands and raising the threat of wildfires across Scotland's moorlands,' it said.
However, the Scottish Greens said there is 'nothing glorious about the mass killing of animals for entertainment' as it called on the Scottish Government to ensure all regulations are followed and that 'any new loopholes' are identified and closed.
It said the new rules for the 'cruel' sport were a step forward, but suggested hunters could find a way to evade them.
BASC is marking the start of Scotland's red grouse season by highlighting the sport's economic, social, and environmental contributions – and warning that new muirburn licensing rules could threaten effective moorland management.
Find out more ⬇️https://t.co/GIxJXl9AkF — BASC (@BASCnews) August 11, 2025
The BASC said shooting sustains thousands of jobs across rural Scotland and contributes £340m in GVA to the Scottish economy – including gamekeeping, hospitality, sporting tourism, and local services.
It said its latest figures showed the recreational value to those involved in grouse shooting was £9.2m, while the value to the public of managed landscapes is £1.2m.
Ahead of the 12th, the BASC is urging the Scottish Government to make changes to the 2024 Act to ensure that muirburn licensing does not hinder effective moorland management.
BASC Scotland director Peter Clark said: 'The start of the grouse season in Scotland is the culmination of months and years of hard work by gamekeepers and land managers.
'The figures speak for themselves; this is an integral part of the Scottish rural economy.
'Moorland management is an enormous part of protecting and enhancing Scotland's uplands, delivering both economic and environmental benefits.
'Yet the new muirburn licensing regime, in its current form, hinders moorland managers in their efforts to reduce wildfire risk and provide habitats for grouse.
'We have urged the Scottish Government not to risk these benefits with an overly complicated and unworkable muirburn licensing scheme.' PA Media Ariane Burgess condemned grouse shooting (Fraser Bremner/Scottish Daily Mail/PA)
Scottish Greens Communities spokesperson Ariane Burgess said: 'There is nothing glorious about the mass killing of animals for entertainment, but that is what was allowed to take place across our communities for far too long.
'The new protections have been a big step forward in curbing the cruel sport, but there are real concerns about loopholes in the licensing.
'We need to ensure that the system is as robust as possible. That means identifying any gaps in the legislation and ensuring that they are closed as soon as possible and that we do not undermine the intention of the Act that was passed.
'At heart this is a question about what kind of country we want to be.
'The Scottish Greens will always stand against bloodsports and the ritualistic killing of animals that goes with it. It has no place in a modern or compassionate Scotland.'
Burgess said there was a 'big opportunity' to invest in greener jobs that boost nature as she described those who worked in shooting estates as 'extremely skilled'.
She added: 'What we need is for them to be supported to take those skills and use them to work with nature in support of regeneration and restoration of our much degraded biodiversity.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Backlash grows against Fringe venue in free speech row over ban on Kate Forbes
The Edinburgh Fringe venue which plans to ban Kate Forbes faced a major backlash yesterday amid calls for its public funding to be withdrawn. Summerhall Arts faced criticism from across the political spectrum for indicating that the Deputy First Minister will not be allowed to appear in future due to her views on trans issues. The organisation, which received more than £600,000 of public cash from Creative Scotland earlier this year, said it was an 'oversight' that she was interviewed onstage at the venue last week and it would now draw up 'robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies' to ensure it doesn't happen again with future bookings. SNP Finance Secretary Shona Robison led the criticism yesterday, saying it 'doesn't send out the right signal around freedom of speech and intolerance', while the Scottish Government said it 'supports individuals' rights to freedom of expression'. But ministers were urged to go further and ensure that Summerhall and other venues which restrict freedom of speech do not get public cash. In a separate development, it emerged that the National Library of Scotland had removed a book about the fight against the SNP Government's gender self-ID crusade from a major exhibition following concerns by staff members. Murdo Fraser, culture spokesman for the Scottish Conservatives, said: 'There's a need across the public sector to understand that free speech needs to be upheld. 'Public bodies like the National Library of Scotland cannot be involved in censorship of public opinion because they want to protect militant activist groups in the workforce. The same has to apply to groups in receipt of public funds. 'Summerhall has received substantial grant funding from Creative Scotland and these grants need to be conditional on certain standard being met, including upholding free speech. 'The idea that anyone is terrified of Kate Forbes is laughable and it is ridiculous that one of the most powerful politicians in the country as Deputy First Minister is not going to be allowed to speak. No organisation taking that view should receive a penny of public funds.' Mr Fraser said he intends to raise the issue with Culture Secretary Angus Robertson and with Creative Scotland. Asked about the decision by LBC yesterday, Ms Robison said: 'I think we need to be tolerant of each other's views. 'She is the Deputy First Minister of Scotland and I just think it doesn't send out the right signal around freedom of speech and intolerance. 'I know Kate very well and I just don't think it sends out the right message.' Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry yesterday raised concerns about 'threats to freedom of speech in Scotland' from within her party and others. Appearing in a live version of Matt Forde's Political Party at the Edinburgh Fringe, Ms Cherry said: 'It is shocking that a venue in this city has effectively said that the Deputy First Minister is not welcome there, I presume because of her religious faith, and that staff are so coddled that they need to have a safe room provided for them when Kate comes to speak. 'I was at the event that Kate spoke at last week. With all due respect to Kate, it wasn't particularly exciting.' She said there is a 'real problem' across Scottish society, and added: 'This is a problem which has not grown up from the grassroots; it has been imposed from top down. 'It is only with political leadership that we can address these problems and I fear the political leadership isn't there. 'I hold Nicola Sturgeon responsible for a lot of this - a lot of this nonsense is part of her legacy. But I also hold the current First Minister responsible for not having the courage to speak against it. And I think Anas Sarwar is pretty much missing in action on this as well.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'While ministers have no role in booking or curation decisions taken by individual venues or institutions, the Scottish Government supports individuals' rights to freedom of expression and we are clear that there is no place for any form of discrimination in Scotland.' Summerhall Arts did not respond yesterday when asked if it would reverse its decision to prepare policies to prevent some artists and politicians like Ms Forbes appearing in future. A spokesman for Summerhall Arts said: 'The Fringe event referenced passed without incident. 'Forbes is not banned from the Summerhall building which encompasses a cafe, pub, arts venues, galleries and independent traders' offices and studios. Swinney, Curtice, Sarwar, Forbes all entered and exited the building the same way for the events over each day. 'The Herald Unspun events were a paid hire and programmed by The Herald newspaper.' Other acts to feature in the Summerhall Arts Fringe programme this year include a spoken word performance by Russian activist group Pussy Riot and a show called 'No Apologies', which reimagines the late Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain as a trans woman. The programe also includes a performance entitled 'Chat Sh**, Get Hit', which 'dives into women's anger: how it fuels, how it festers and how it is swallowed'.
Times
35 minutes ago
- Times
Whining about Scottish ‘austerity' is baseless, absurd and idiotic
Like Christmas and birthdays, the annual GERS festival seems to arrive sooner than you think. Has a year really passed since the last edition of the Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland figures was published? Why, yes it has. This year's numbers are remarkable, best accompanied by an indecently large dram of cask-strength liquor. For public spending in and for Scotland amounted to 52 per cent of Scottish GDP last year. That is lower than in France, Finland, Belgium and Austria but higher than in every other European country. Public spending in Sweden and Denmark, for instance, equals 48 per cent of GDP. In Norway, the figure is 46 per cent. Further afield, other countries with which the Scottish government sometimes likes to compare Scotland contrive to thrive with a much smaller public sector. Public spending in New Zealand is 42 per cent of GDP. This is the context in which to understand the claims made by Scottish government ministers that Scotland is once again enduring some form of 'austerity'. And the thing to understand about this whining is that it is baseless, absurd and idiotic. This is a country of Big Government. If government departments and other agencies struggle to meet their obligations despite this obvious largesse it is because they are inefficiently or incompetently run and because ministers lack the courage to say 'No' to demands for more and more spending. Mercifully, Scottish taxpayers are not required to pay for all of this. In 2024-25, £91.4 billion was raised in taxes in Scotland but government spending amounted to £117.6 billion. This is a notional deficit — notional because Scotland is part of the United Kingdom — of some £26.5 billion. That is equivalent to 11.7 per cent of GDP. John Swinney should pray to the ghost of the late Joel Barnett every night for it is his eponymous formula that grants Scotland its privileged place within the United Kingdom: a relatively wealthy part of the realm funded as though it were a poor one. By way of illustrating the scale of Scotland's deficit, it may be worthing noting that last year Zimbabwe ran a deficit equal to 10.4 per cent of GDP. Indeed, according to data compiled by the International Monetary Fund, the only independent countries running real deficits greater than Scotland's notional one are East Timor, Kiribati, the Maldives and Ukraine. At this point nationalists will customarily enter the chat to say that, look, GERS only tells us about Scotland's current fiscal position and of course an independent Scotland would do things differently. This is true. GERS offers a snapshot of the position from which an independent Scotland would begin life and GERS also makes it very clear that many things would have to be done very differently in an independent Scotland. To start with you would begin with something like £10 billion in tax increases and around another £10 billion in spending cuts. That would still leave Scotland running a deficit like most countries but it would be a manageable one of around 3 per cent of GDP. That, you will also recall, is the price of admission to the European Union. Every existing tax would doubtless be increased and new taxes created (on this front, if few others, Scotland's political class is endlessly resourceful). But to give an indication of the scale of tax hikes required, £10 billion is about half of total income tax receipts in Scotland last year. Swingeing tax increases of this sort would almost certainly encourage capital flight of a sort this country can ill afford. Just 5 per cent of Britain's top-rate tax-payers live in Scotland which is one reason why although Scotland has 8 per cent of the UK population it contributes just 6.8 per cent of income tax revenue. Tax increases of this sort, however, would only get the job half done. You would still need to cut £10 billion of public spending. That is roughly equivalent to 50 per cent of the NHS budget. Good luck winning an independence referendum on that manifesto. • The facts of life are demanding chiels. It is too often and too easily forgotten that in the years after the 2008 financial crisis Scotland's notional deficit was broadly the same as the UK's real one and, in some years and thanks to buoyant oil revenues, Scotland's relative fiscal position was marginally healthier than the UK's. This was unusual and atypical but it allowed Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon to sell independence as a financial opportunity, not, as it obviously is now, a giant leap into an enormous fiscal black hole. Even then, all lilies had to be gilded. As Sturgeon relates in her new memoir, oil prices were then high but Salmond 'spent a lot of time persuading the government economists to push their projections higher, raking them to the outer edges of credibility'. In other words, the Yes campaign suborned officials to present a fantastical vision of the riches an independent Scotland would enjoy. This is something worth remembering. The SNP are doubtless happy to win without lying but why take that risk when untruths may buttress the liberation cause? Economic self-interest does not always prevail and voters may cheerfully vote for their own impoverishment but, even so, this year's GERS festival is a reminder that the appeal of independence is for the time being strictly notional and hypothetical. That imaginary Scotland is a comfortable place to dwell but the nature of today's fiscal realities is such that even SNP politicians might be wary of asking the national question again. This is why, in the end, they are comfortable not asking it, for no amount of creative accountancy can make these sums add up.
Times
35 minutes ago
- Times
Public spending rise leaves economy with £26 billion black hole
Rising health and benefits spending as well as a decline in North Sea oil taxes have meant a widening of Scotland's fiscal deficit to more than £26 billion, official data has shown. The annual Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) report noted there had been a 'weakening' of public finances as spending grew more quickly than revenue. Shona Robison, the finance secretary, suggested the nation's finances are 'sustainable' although business groups described the update as 'disappointing'. The net fiscal deficit for the 12 months to March this year was £26.5 billion, equivalent to 11.7 per cent of GDP, compared to £21.4 billion, or 9.7 per cent of GDP, in the previous financial year. The UK deficit for 2024-25 was 5.1 per cent of GDP. Revenue from the public sector in Scotland increased by 1.5 per cent to £91.4 billion while spending grew 5.6 per cent to £117.6 billion. The report noted the spending rise reflected the larger amounts going to 'devolved social security programmes' while the weaker growth in revenue will have been affected by the SNP's council tax freeze under Humza Yousaf. Scotland's more generous welfare provisions, such as the Scottish child payment, are attempting to tackle poverty but many economists, including those from the Scottish Fiscal Commission which helps to inform Holyrood's budget setting, have raised concerns about the growing burden on the state at a time when public sector finances are strained. The burgeoning public sector pay bill in Scotland is another area about which economists have worries. The GERS document covers devolved and UK government revenue and spending as well as assigning Scotland portions of industries such as oil and gas and defence. The publication is produced by public sector statisticians without political interference. It shows spending per person in Scotland was equivalent to £21,192, up from £20,251. The UK figures were £18,523 for 2024-25 and £17,940 for the previous year. Ian Murray, the Scottish secretary, argued that shows the benefit of being in the UK as Scots get £2,669 more spent on them per person than the UK average. Murray acknowledged people will 'rightly expect to see better outcomes' given higher spending levels and said giving Holyrood ministers full fiscal autonomy would lead to 'turbo-charged austerity and economic chaos for Scotland'. He said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK.' Craig Hoy, from the Scottish Conservatives, said GERS showed the 'huge, and rising, union dividend' which Scots got from being part of the UK. He said: 'If we lost that, as we would if the SNP achieved their goal of Scottish independence, it would have a catastrophic impact on the nation's finances.' Robison pointed out GERS is calculated by assuming existing constitutional arrangements are in place so was not a measure of how the country might fare as an independent nation. She highlighted the recent success of Ireland as evidence of how small countries can thrive and stated GERS showed devolved revenue had grown 9.7 per cent in 2024-25 while spending was up 6.8 per cent. Robison said: 'The decisions we have taken here in Scotland are helping support sustainable public finances. 'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third-highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East. • 'Falling oil prices and a decrease in extraction present challenges going forward, but we are clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security.' The Fraser of Allander Institute at Strathclyde University said the reduction in North Sea oil and gas tax receipts assigned to Scotland, which went from £4.9 billion to £4.1 billion as energy prices and production dropped, had played a part in the deficit widening. Michelle Ferguson, the director of CBI Scotland, said: 'The fact that Scotland's fiscal deficit has widened again in the latest GERS figures will be disappointing news for firms and households alike. 'Healthy public finances are essential to delivering high-quality public services, which in turn support business confidence, investment, and the skills base Scotland needs to grow its economy. 'With economic growth now forecast to be weaker over the coming months and firms still facing a heavy cost burden from stubborn inflation, it is vital that both the Scottish and UK governments continue to back business through this difficult period.'
