logo
Tax crackdown on ‘wealthy' pockets £5bn for Reeves

Tax crackdown on ‘wealthy' pockets £5bn for Reeves

Telegraph16-05-2025

The tax office raked in an extra £5.2bn last year as part of a crackdown on wealthy individuals.
In recent years, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has zeroed in on high net worth individuals it suspects of underpaying tax.
HMRC defines a wealthy individual as someone earning more than £200,000 a year or with assets over £2m in any of the last three years.
There were 850,000 wealthy individuals in 2023-24 who together paid £119bn in personal taxes – a quarter of the nation's personal tax bill.
Since 2019-20, the amount of revenue HMRC has collected from wealthy individuals through investigations and other compliance work has shot up from £2.2bn to £5.2bn.
In a report out on Friday, the National Audit Office said the significant revenue increase suggested that levels of 'non-compliance' from wealthy individuals could be much higher than previously thought.
HMRC is under growing pressure to raise revenue for the Treasury with Rachel Reeves facing a £57bn black hole in the public finances.
The public spending watchdog urged the tax office to develop 'a clear strategic vision and plan' for tackling errors and avoidance among the wealthy in order to achieve the Government's aim of closing the tax gap.
However, Tim Stovold, of accountancy firm Moore Kingston Smith, said the pool of wealthy taxpayers was likely to have shrunk since the non-dom status was scrapped.
Wealth managers have already reported an increase in clients leaving the UK because of changes to the non-dom regime, which allowed foreigners to avoid paying tax on overseas income.
The Office for Budget Responsibility has projected the tax raid will bring in £33bn for the Treasury, however, it estimates only 12pc of non-doms will leave the UK.
A recent report by the Centre for Economics and Business Research warned that if the proportion exiting the country ends up higher than expected, the non-dom reforms could actually cost the Treasury billions.
Mr Stovold said: 'Now that so many wealthy individuals have indeed left for more benign tax regimes, the tax take due to be collected from this population will already have been severely reduced.'
He went on: 'The report recommending that HMRC develop a clear strategy for tackling non-compliance from the wealthy who remain here, is an approach that must be taken to protect tax revenues – but a balance has to be struck lest the UK is perceived as a hostile place for wealthy people.
'A reputation as a hostile nation will deter the successful and the wealth creators from choosing to make their home here in the future and will encourage more to leave with a corresponding dent in the nation's finances.'
In recent years, HMRC has shifted its focus to high-value investigations. Its 'wealthy team' – responsible for ensuring high net worth individuals pay the right amount of tax – closed almost 9,000 compliance investigations in 2023-24, bringing in £93,800 on average, whereas in 2018-19 it raised £34,000 on average from nearly 16,000 investigations.
Meanwhile, 25 wealthy individuals were prosecuted following a criminal investigation by HMRC, up from five in 2021-22, in a sign the tax office is taking a tougher stance against tax fraud.
The Government has given HMRC funding to recruit 5,500 extra compliance staff over the next five years in a tax crackdown.
Earlier this year, the tax office announced some steps to tackle offshore tax avoidance by the wealthy, including recruiting wealth management experts and deploying artificial intelligence.
The NAO reports on the financial accounts of HMRC every year. It also examines whether it is delivering value for money for the taxpayer.
In another report published earlier this year, it warned that Britain's 'increasingly complex' tax system was costing businesses £15.4bn annually.
HMRC said the report acknowledged the progress it had made to bring in additional revenues from the wealthy, and it would respond formally to the NAO's recommendations by the autumn.
An HMRC spokesman said: 'It is our duty to ensure everyone pays the right tax under the law, regardless of wealth or status. The government is delivering the most ambitious ever package to close the tax gap and bring in an extra £7.5bn for public services per year by 2029-30.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harlow housing block dubbed 'open prison' to be redeveloped
Harlow housing block dubbed 'open prison' to be redeveloped

BBC News

time11 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Harlow housing block dubbed 'open prison' to be redeveloped

Councillors have unanimously backed their authority buying a 14-storey building that was controversially converted from offices into temporary leader of Harlow Council in Essex, Dan Swords, said Terminus House had been "a massive postcard image of the decline of Harlow" and said the authority would redevelop the town centre leader, Labour's James Griggs, said he supported the plans, but his primary concern was what would happen to the 150 to 200 people living council said it would take ownership once the current owner has re-housed the residents. The owner, Caridon, said the building had helped hundreds of people avoid homelessness. 'An open prison' Glen Lane, 65, has lived in the tower block in one room with an en-suite since 2018. He described conditions as "the worst place I have ever lived in", saying it "feels like an open prison, probably worse than an open prison".Mr Lane was homeless and said he struggled to get on the local council housing list."It's depressing. It's got a reputation this property. It's embarrassing when I put my address down," he said."I feel quite ashamed about it as I haven't always lived like this. I used to have my own property and job but I lost all that." His room is only a few square metres in size. At the end of his double bed, the kitchen the last eight months he said the property had been plagued with insects. He had used insect powder but they were still "climbing on me at night when I'm sleeping". Crime rose by 20% in the area around Terminus House after it was turned into accommodation in 2018, according to police figures.A BBC East and Panorama documentary highlighted the cramped conditions. In 2021, the government imposed a minimum size of 37 sq m (398 sq ft) on new office to flat conversions. 'Housed out of Harlow' Harlow Council has become the largest landowner in the town centre, buying up buildings to regenerate them into new housing, leisure and retail authority's latest decision to buy Terminus House has brought uncertainty about the building's future. Conservative leader Dan Swords said plans were being finalised on whether it would be demolished or he said in any scenario it would look "completely different from that which it does now"."The existing tenants, which have largely nearly all come through temporary accommodation from London boroughs, will be housed outside of Harlow," he said. Labour's James Griggs argued that "sending them back somewhere else seems completely wrong".He told the BBC that some people had been living there for years. "There are families who now consider themselves Harlow families. They have children in Harlow schools, the parents are working in the town."The redeveloped site would likely include housing. The local authority has not disclosed how much it was paying for Batrick, a charity organiser who supports local families, said many people living in Terminus House would be "reeling at the news that their homes will be going"."There is a real concern about the human element of this," she said. Caridon, the company that owns Terminus House, said in a statement the building met "a pressing need for temporary accommodation at a time of limited options". "The building has since supported hundreds of individuals and families in avoiding homelessness and finding stability during difficult periods," it at his flat, Mr Lane welcomed Harlow Council's plans."I'm glad they are doing it. It definitely needs upgrading," he where he and others will end up living is not currently known. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Belfast City Hall: What do people think of new plans to charge £4 for exhibition?
Belfast City Hall: What do people think of new plans to charge £4 for exhibition?

BBC News

time11 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Belfast City Hall: What do people think of new plans to charge £4 for exhibition?

Should people be charged to tour a Belfast City Hall exhibition?On Monday, People Before Profit councillor Michael Collins proposed to drop Belfast City Council's plan to charge people £4 to visit the venue's ground floor exhibition, which is usually a vote TUV councillor Ron McDowell was the only politician to second the proposal while the other parties voted against scrapping plans for the new News NI went along to find out what tourists and locals thought about being charged £4 for self-guided tours in the future. What are people being charged for? In May, Belfast City Council agreed plans to charge people a £4 entrance fee to the city hall ground floor exhibition as part of its 'City Hall Income Generation Project'.It was decided that free tours should take place through community visits organised by councillors and that under 18s would be exempt from the new members of the public can turn up for a walk-in booking or book exhibition tickets for up to nine people by email at no cost. Collins said plans to raise revenue by increasing the prices of services was "worrying"."An exhibition that really was free, is now going to be charged. Where does this end? Will we start charging people to access the building itself?", he who seconded the proposal said that he felt Collins had a point, "considering this building is owned by the citizens of Belfast" that it would be charging them for something they "already own". The DUP, SDLP, UUP, Green Party, Sinn Féin, Alliance Party and one Independent councillor voted against the proposal to scrap the new News NI contacted the main parties. A spokesperson for the DUP group on Belfast City Council said that they have a "strategic plan" to deliver more benefit to the ratepayers of the city. "At present tourists to the city, mainly large groups from cruise ships, are accessing the exhibition for free and costs for staffing etc are being absorbed by ratepayers."The £4 charge means visitors can pay £10 to access both the exhibition and a tour of city hall."Provision has been made for residents of the city to still access these for free through civic dignitaries or councillors." What's free and what's not? It is currently free to visit the City Hall visitor exhibition. The exhibition opened in 2017 and is found on the east wing of the ground floor. If offers a self-guided journey from Belfast's past to present across six themed zones, stretching through 16 city hall offers a separate 45 minute guided tour for visitors which costs £6 for adults and is free for tour offers glimpses into areas not usually accessible to the public like the council chamber and some of the upstairs public has full access the toilets, coffee shop, gift shop and stained windows along the north west and north east corridors from the main reception. There are no plans to change this. What do members of the public think? Geraldine and Martin O'Hare, originally from Belfast, came from Melbourne to visit O'Hares have lost neither their accent nor their nostalgia for Belfast."If you come to Belfast, you have to see the City Hall. For Australians or anyone, the City Hall is Belfast. Not the docks. Not the parks."That's what it's all about", Martin told BBC News later, he was reunited with his aunt outside the iconic building that he said is a central part of Belfast for tourists and locals alike. Geraldine told BBC News NI that everything in the city hall should be free for those who live in Northern Ireland, instead of the free tours having to be booked through a councillor."A public building should be available for the public, the people of Northern Ireland and Belfast especially.""It's there for the public to use and even a bonus for the visitors of Belfast", she added. Visiting Belfast from Copenhagen, Henrick thought that £4 "isn't too bad". Fresh from doing the tour, he said it was a "great experience" where you can "read a lot about the history of Belfast and Northern Ireland"."I think you can make tourists pay for it and then the members of the city or community should be free of charge. That's a way you can do it", he added. Sahid Zaman and Zerin Salma weren't as enthusiastic about paying for the tour."It's very good but not worth the money. I think it should be open to all people so they don't need to pay that", Sahid message for councillors was clear: "I think it should be free – keep it as it is". "This is our own history so you shouldn't pay", Zerin added. Fionnuala McCarten and Ted Workman were visiting the city hall to register the birth of their four-week-old daughter Fiadh. Asked if they would pay for the exhibition, Fionnuala said if she was tourist she would but if you live here, "there's no point".Ted agreed: "As someone who lives here I wouldn't pay £4 but maybe as a tourist I actually would because if I was visiting a different country I probably would to go in and check out the history and stuff". Stockport Trefoil members Eva, Ashley and Jean are in Northern Ireland for the Trefoil national meeting in Belfast on Saturday. They popped into the exhibition before heading over to the the Titanic museum. Jean told BBC News NI that in Manchester "a lot of the tours you have to pay but they are free to local residents so maybe that is the way to go".Eva thinks that £4 is a reasonable amount for visitors but said because it was free, it was "more of a tempting offer". She said she felt "rates" that local people pay mean it should be free for them. No date has been set yet for the charges to come into action and the council has already decided they will be reviewed after one year.

Pictures reveal secrets of former RAF Neatishead Cold War base
Pictures reveal secrets of former RAF Neatishead Cold War base

BBC News

time16 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Pictures reveal secrets of former RAF Neatishead Cold War base

Pictures have revealed the interior of a former Cold War radar station believed to be the country's longest Neatishead in Norfolk was downgraded from an RAF station 20 years ago but is still a military air defence radar of the remaining site, including a nuclear bunker, was sold off to tech entrepreneur William Sachiti, who opened its doors to the media."I've owned this place for about three years, and no, I've actually not explored a lot of it," he admitted. "I think there's about 40% of the bunker I haven't seen yet but what I have done is made sure I've got in touch with people that used to work here to make sure the place is kept alive enough as we slowly refurbish it and bring it back to life."Originally a World War II base, the site was an important part of Britain's air defences during the Cold War. Mr Sachiti said he was using the site to develop technology aimed at covering mobile "notspots" - areas with poor or non-existent phone or data it has emerged that last month the defence secretary issued a High Court writ against Mr Sachiti and his company, Academy of details are not currently available, but Mr Sachiti said: "This is unrelated to any of our current or previous with the MOD, and unrelated to any radar tech which was recently announced."There was a minor dispute which was resolved but I cannot comment on the details."The Ministry of Defence has been asked for comment. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store