logo
This VE Day, I want you to remember these faces

This VE Day, I want you to remember these faces

Metro08-05-2025

I've been colourising photos professionally since 2015.
From Lenin to Winston Churchill; from the Titanic leaving port in 1912 to the Battle of Verdun. I have covered hundreds of years and added colour to iconic photos and to those in which the subjects will forever remain anonymous.
But it was colourising the photo of Czeslawa Kwoka in 2016 that had the biggest impact.
Czeslawa (pictured above) was a 14-year-old girl who was killed in Auschwitz. She was a Polish Roman Catholic and was murdered one month after the death of her mother.
The photo went viral in a matter of minutes. The reaction was absolutely incredible and shocking. I was contacted by TV channels, newspapers, and magazines from all over the world wanting to know more about the photo and about Czeslawa.
More importantly though, I received messages from teachers asking if they could use the photo in their classes and a 12-year-old girl wrote a poem inspired by the photograph and sent it to me.
That's when I realised how much people still had to learn about the Holocaust and the potential of something so simple as a colourised photo in helping to educate. Today, on the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day (VE Day), this is more important than ever.
It's important to share individuals' stories and photos because it's very easy to get lost in the sheer scale of the Holocaust.
Six million Jewish lives and more than 3million non-Jewish people's lives were taken and that is a huge number.
But when we break down this number and transform it into an individual – pairing a picture of their face when we can – people can begin to understand the impact that the Holocaust had, and still has.
They had everything taken away from them due to pure bigotry and hate.
In the same week as the photo went viral, I asked the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum permission to colourise more photographs. They gave me access to their archives, where almost 40,000 concentration camp registration photos are stored.
The photographs were taken between February 1941 and January 1945. The preserved photos – 31,969 of men and 6,947 of women – constitute only a fraction of a vast Nazi archive destroyed during the camp evacuation in January 1945.
The ones that remained were safe thanks to the heroic efforts of Wilhelm Brasse, the photographer, who was also a prisoner, and his colleagues.
They were ordered to burn the entire photo collection during the evacuation of Auschwitz, but instead they covered the furnace with wet photographic paper before adding a great number of photos and negatives.
This prevented the smoke from escaping and made the fire go out quickly. When the SS guard who was supervising left the laboratory, Brasse and his colleagues retrieved the undestroyed photographs from the furnace.
You can find out more about Faces of Auschwitz here, and Marina's work here.
After getting permission from the museum to colourise the photos that Brasse saved, I put together a team of volunteers who helped me create Faces of Auschwitz, a platform where we not only colourise these photos, but tell the stories of those in them.
I know that when I am colourising them that this is probably the last photograph ever taken of this person.
Staring at each face for two to three hours is hard, especially since I need to read their death certificates before I start to colourise. I spend the process wondering what was going through their minds while they were being photographed.
It is emotionally draining work but it is important because I cannot forget what they represent and what happened to them. This is something that really sunk in after I visited Auschwitz and the room in which the photos were taken. More Trending
This VE Day, I want people to remember the faces of individuals like Czeslawa Kwoka. It's 80 years since one of the worst atrocities in modern history and it's important for their stories to continue to be told.
When families of those we have colourised approach us to share the photos of their relatives, it adds to the huge responsibility of our undertaking, but also proves that we are on the right path.
Ultimately, I hope that our project and documentary reaches a broader audience and we can continue to share the stories and faces of those who so tragically had their lives taken away by hatred.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Royals arrive at VE Day 2025 service at Westminster Abbey
MORE: EastEnders' special VE Day episode has very poignant ending
MORE: I ate like a WWII Land Girl for a week to celebrate the 80th anniversary of VE Day

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two years after Titan disaster, OceanGate advisor reflects on how Stockton Rush swerved ‘every single rule'
Two years after Titan disaster, OceanGate advisor reflects on how Stockton Rush swerved ‘every single rule'

The Independent

time3 days ago

  • The Independent

Two years after Titan disaster, OceanGate advisor reflects on how Stockton Rush swerved ‘every single rule'

Before the traumatic OceanGate explosion that killed five people, submersibles expert Rob McCallum warned its CEO, Stockton Rush, of the dangerous risks. Now, two years on from the incident that killed Rush and his fellow adventurers, and in the wake of an appearance in the new Netflix documentary Titan: The OceanGate Disaster, McCallum reveals what he views as the operation's failures. "I have become increasingly amazed and maddened as the levels and many layers of incompetence and deception within OceanGate are exposed,' he told The Independent. 'The epic failure of OceanGate has done great harm to the reputation of legitimate and professional organizations, and set back progress many years,' he said. McCallum, founder, expedition leader, and divemaster of Eyos expeditions, a company which does similar work with submersibles, said there were plenty of 'little individual warning signs' ahead of the monumental failure of the Titan sub on June 18, 2023. The Titan, for example, was never certified or classed. The experimental submersible vanished on June 18, 2023, while on a tour of the Titanic wreckage in the North Atlantic Ocean. On board were Rush, 61, British explorer Hamish Harding, 58, veteran French diver Paul-Henri Nargeolet, 77, British-Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, 48, and his 19-year-old son, Suleman. The Titan imploded around 90 minutes into a descent, killing all five on board. Last month, a video showing the moment Wendy Rush first hears the sound of the implosion while watching on from the sub's support ship was released. "What was that bang?" she asks. The eerie video has been used as evidence in a wider ongoing investigation by the U.S. Coast Guard's Marine Board of Investigation, which has spent the last two years looking into the sub's cataclysmic failure. The final report, which McCallum suspects will be damning, is in its final stages according to the Coast Guard, who told The Independent the Marine Board of Investigation is 'pressing to release it by the end of the month.' McCallum believes Rush is going to be the one held responsible and he expects the report will reveal 'a concerted effort by a businessman to work around every single rule in the book to start a business and to make money.' He says that a decade before the tragedy, between 2009-16, OceanGate frequently sought his advice. 'They used to come down and talk to us about how you could establish a business, how you could buy a submarine, how you would maintain a submarine, and where you could find crew. They used to come and talk to us about getting themselves set up.' But Rush's timeline for the deployment of the Titan sub kept being pushed back. The sub's chief pilot, Dave Lochridge, was fired in 2018, days after submitting his report about the inefficiency of OceanGate's hull design and the company's testing methods. He was then sued by the company for breach of contract and revealing company secrets. He countersued for wrongful dismissal. 'There were always excuses,' McCallum said. 'But the net result is that the timeline kept shifting. He [Rush] would say 'we're going out there in 2020, wait, 2021. No, we're definitely going in 2022, then 2023'.' The divemaster said that his advisory services ceased 'as soon as they decided they were going to build an unclassed sub.' One of the biggest criticisms of OceanGate was the Titan's use of a carbon fibre hull, which is widely believed to be unsuitable for deep-sea diving. Typically, the main raw material used to construct modern submarines is steel. 'Senior staff and board members read Lochridge's report and knew that their chief of staff was telling them that this thing is a death trap,' McCallum said. 'People had read that report and still carried on, and are complicit in what happened next,' he said. The new documentary on the tragedy, released Wednesday, will 'illustrate where the blame lies, and who should be held accountable,' he said. McCallum stressed that the OceanGate disaster does not represent the submersibles industry as a whole. 'Professionally built submersibles have a perfect safety record that stretches back over 50 years,' he said. 'OceanGate has demonstrated the folly of experimental 'DIY' vehicles, and I expect there will now be incoming legislation to prevent others from building sub-standard vehicles.'

Commonwealth war graves in Ayrshire tidied up by volunteer
Commonwealth war graves in Ayrshire tidied up by volunteer

Daily Record

time3 days ago

  • Daily Record

Commonwealth war graves in Ayrshire tidied up by volunteer

Commonwealth war graves in Mauchline Cemetery had been taken over by a crop of daisies which are believed to have been planted by a well-intentioned member of the public Commonwealth war graves in Ayrshire have been tidied up by a community volunteer. Four graves at Mauchline Cemetery have been brought back life after an unruly crop of daisies took hold. ‌ A volunteer from the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) got to work recently to remove the flowers which are believed to have been planted by a well-intentioned member of the public. ‌ Although the CWGC welcomes a number of non-permanent acts of remembrance at gravesides such as fresh flowers and wreaths, they ask that nothing permanent be added as "it impacts our ability to maintain the graves and headstone borders". Commemorated by the graves are Rifleman Lindsay Maxwell, Lieutenant Reginald John Coombes, Able Seaman Lewis MacDonald of the Canadian Merchant Navy and Polish soldier Wladyslaw Dawidowski. The four men each served during World War 2 and died in service between 1941 and 1946. Rifleman Maxwell, a member of 13th Battalion Cameronians (Scottish Rifles), died February 20, 1941. His age is unknown. ‌ Able Seaman MacDonald was assigned to the SS St Malo of the Canadian Merchant Navy and died aged 24 on June 22, 1941. Lieutenant Coombes, Pioneer Corps, died aged 53 on June 22, 1943. ‌ Szeregowiec (Polish for Private) Dawidowski was on of many Polish soldiers who were stationed in Scotland during the war and died aged 21 on April 1, 1946. ‌ He is one of two Polish soldiers buried in Mauchline along with Porucznik (Polish for Lieutenant) Karol Dilling, A spokesperson for the Commonwealth War Graves Commission said: "We're grateful for this being brought to our attention. It shows people care about what we do and why we do it, in caring for graves of the fallen. "We inspected the cemetery last week and pruned some of the plant life. No further action is planned from us." Mauchline Cemetery is cared for by East Ayrshire Council but the memorial headstones and the war graves are maintained by the CWGC.

‘Absolutely shocking': Netflix documentary examines how the Titan sub disaster happened
‘Absolutely shocking': Netflix documentary examines how the Titan sub disaster happened

The Guardian

time4 days ago

  • The Guardian

‘Absolutely shocking': Netflix documentary examines how the Titan sub disaster happened

If you were sentient in the summer of 2023, you probably remember the feverish speculation, vicarious horror, snap consternation and armchair sleuthing after the disappearance of the submersible called Titan during a commercial voyage to the wreck of the Titanic. The Titan sub disaster was inescapable for weeks as the story evolved from critical rescue mission – the best-case scenario being a mechanical failure deep in the North Atlantic with 96 hours of oxygen for the five passengers, which you better believe became a countdown clock on cable news – to tragic recovery operation. The sub, it turned out, had imploded at 3,300 meters beneath the surface, 90 minutes into a dive that was supposed to reach 3,800 meters deep. All five passengers – British explorer Hamish Harding, British-Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood and his 19-year-old son Suleman, French diver Paul-Henri Nargeolet and submersible owner Stockton Rush – were killed instantly. Even as the search for the sub, whose wreckage was eventually returned to land, continued in earnest, concerning reports about the safety record at OceanGate, the company which operated the vehicle, began to emerge: that a whistleblower had declared implosion of the sub's trademark carbon fiber hull a mathematical certainty years earlier. That Rush, the company's founder and CEO, pursued commercial voyages anyway, eluding any type of third-party certification. For the majority of the public, the story ended along those lines: a preventable tragedy, another sin of human hubris at arguably the most famous shrine to the folly of human hubris in history. That is not wrong; according to the new Netflix documentary Titan: The OceanGate Disaster, the sub's implosion was virtually guaranteed by its design. 'I'm convinced, based on the research and the discussions that I've had, that the submersible Titan could have imploded at any time,' said the film's director, Mark Monroe. In fact, it was 'absolutely shocking' that Titan made as many successful dives – 80 attempts, 13 to Titanic depth, between 2021 and 2022 – as it did. But for those who either worked at OceanGate, were tasked with the investigation or loved someone lost on board, the story is much more complicated, and concerning, than a design flaw. Another film would proceed through an exact timeline of Titan's final mission on 18 June, 2023; include footage of the wreckage or diagrams of its descent coordinated to text messages sent to its surface-level team; play the audio of its implosion, recorded 900 miles away by a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration device; or allow viewers to see Rush's wife Wendy hear the implosion, whose sound reached its support ship, Polar Prince, before their last text message, allowing them to mistakenly assume the sub was fine. The Netflix film, made by the veteran production company Story Syndicate, doesn't do any of that, eschewing a Seconds from Disaster-type narrative and instead focusing on the nearly decade-long procession toward disaster, through numerous decisions prizing flashy ambition over safety. 'It's scarier, in a way, to understand the decision-making over the 10-year period that led to that moment,' said Monroe. 'I feel pretty strongly if the civilians' – the paying customers OceanGate called 'mission specialists' to skirt around commercial maritime safety regulations – 'had seen the decisions made along the way, they would have been a lot more reticent to get into that submersible. And I think that was not clear, or made clear, to the public.' With access to company footage, data, files and several former employees and whistleblowers, the 111-minute documentary paints a fuller picture of a company with idealistic ambition and plenty of scientific backing – at least at first. Founded outside Seattle in 2009 by Rush, an entrepreneur with a rich family and an engineering degree, OceanGate attracted talent from the fields of engineering, diving and marine exploration with its ambition to revolutionize deep sea travel for the masses. The question of how to make deep subs, usually made of very heavy titanium steel, lighter and nimbler – and thus commercially viable – was an appealing puzzle to an array of scientists, deep-sea divers and exploration enthusiasts. It's what drew David Lochridge, a highly experienced submersible pilot, to uproot his family and move to Everett, Washington, to become OceanGate's operations director. In the film, Lochridge explains that he didn't initially understand, on a technical level, OceanGate's answer to the lightweight, deep-sea sub conundrum: carbon fiber, a lightweight but high-strength composite material of tightly pack carbon threads cemented with resin, used in everything from sports cars to deluxe skis. But in time, the material's problems became clear. For one, carbon fiber had never been tested at extreme depths, and thus had no reliable safety record. And two, its integrity naturally degrades with repeated use. 'There is a fatigue aspect to carbon fiber – once you use it, it won't be as good the next time you use it, by increments,' Monroe explained. The documentary includes ample footage from OceanGate's years-long test phase, as various carbon fiber designs failed in experiments simulating high pressure. Nevertheless, Rush persisted, dismissing safety concerns from engineers on staff and continuing to insist to credulous media that commercial ventures to the Titanic were soon within reach. Lochridge and others attest to Rush's hardheaded approach, at times openly hostile to any intra-company dissent. He openly admired Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, expressing a desire to, as one employee recalled, be a 'big swinging dick'. In that vein, Rush claimed to be working with Boeing, Nasa and the University of Washington, though no formal partnerships existed. (In fact, a Boeing engineer involved in Titan's early designs emailed Rush in March 2012: 'We think you are at high risk of a significant failure at or before you reach 4,000 meters. We do not think you have any safety margin.') Rush also elected to withhold any OceanGate craft from third-party safety inspections, the industry standard for submersibles. That decision proved to be a breaking point for several employees; Lochridge was fired after he inspected Titan himself, and said in a written report to Rush that he had no confidence in the submersible. The documentary includes remarkable audio of a 2018 senior staff meeting in which Rush fires Lochridge and quashes his concerns as a discrepancy of vision – 'I don't want anybody in this company who is uncomfortable with what we're doing. We're doing weird shit here and I am definitely out of the mold. There's no question. I am doing things that are completely non-standard.' 'There is a danger in the kind of cult of personality, particularly the tech bro, 'move fast and break things,'' Monroe said. 'When other people's lives are in the balance, I think we should all take a step back and be careful about that. It's one thing to put unmanned spacecraft into space, but you're taking money to provide an expedition.' One has to wonder, given all the dissent, given the fact that the sub would produce loud cracking sounds with each descent (which Rush called, unscientifically, the carbon fiber 'seasoning' with use) – did the CEO actually believe it was safe? 'I'm not in Stockton's mind, so I don't know,' said Monroe. But he took into account Rush's public personality as a maverick, the media tailwinds in his favor. 'When you say you're going to go to Titanic in a new submersible that no one's ever done before, and the sound of your own voice resonates year after year while you're trying to figure out how to do it, I think there's a pressure that builds, that suggests 'I have to do this.'' What is clear, from numerous interviews, was that 'if you went against the boss, there were going to be repercussions.' Lochridge knows this well; after he filed a whistleblower complaint with the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Osha), OceanGate sued him for improperly disclosing confidential information to regulators. The legal costs, and Osha's protracted investigation, forced him to withdraw his complaint, ending what could have been the one regulatory oversight on the company. OceanGate continued apace; the film lingers only briefly on the dive in 2022 which seemed to damage the sub, even according to the company's own 'real-time monitoring system'. Titan imploded on its next dive to Titanic depths a year later, after several aborted attempts due to inclement weather. Though the 'delamination' of the carbon fiber hull is the presumed cause, the US Coast Guard's official written report, including recommendations for the prevention of a similar tragedy, has yet to be publicly released. 'I don't know what those recommendations could be,' said Monroe, 'but you would think they would have to do with how to run an experimental submersible when offering it to the public.' Such as, perhaps, oversight, or a healthier sense of skepticism when the only safety assurances come from the company itself. Rush 'believed in the ethos of move fast and break things. Rules don't apply when you want to change the way things work,' said Monroe. 'That's dangerous when other people's lives are at stake. There are certain rules that do apply, like the rules of physics, the rules of science – these rules do apply to all of us.' Titan: The OceanGate Disaster is now available on Netflix

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store