Cooper defends live facial recognition expansion amid privacy row
Critics including Labour peer Baroness Shami Chakrabarti have attacked new plans to roll out 10 vans equipped with facial recognition technology across seven police forces in England as part of a Government overhaul of neighbourhood policing.
Yvette Cooper said the rollout would be 'targeted' at serious criminals (Jacob King/PA)
The former shadow attorney general said the expansion was a step towards a 'total surveillance society' in the UK.
Asked whether the rollout would infringe on people's privacy, Ms Cooper said: 'Well, the way this technology is being used is to identify people who are wanted by the court, who maybe should be returned to prison, or who have failed to appear before the court, or who have breached things like sexual harm prevention orders, so serious criminals.
'And I think being able to identify them, alongside having proper legal safeguards and a legal framework in place because there do have to be safeguards and protections, but we also need to be able to use the technology to catch dangerous criminals and to keep communities safe.'
In 2017, South Wales Police said facial recognition was being used to track suspects including ticket touts as the force prepared for the Champions League final in Cardiff.
Pressed on whether she was happy for the technology to be deployed in this way, she said: 'No, that's not how they've (police in South Wales) used it.
'They used it for targeting where there's serious organised crime, where there are criminal gangs, but in every case that they do use it, they need to obviously have safeguards in place and we need to make sure that we've got a new legal framework for it to be operating under, and also that it can be used to tackle serious crimes and keep communities safe.'
Ministers have said a new legal framework will be drawn up to support use of the technology following a consultation launching this autumn.
Checks would only be done against police watchlists of wanted criminals, suspects and those subject to bail or court order conditions such as sex offenders, the Home Office said.
The vans would be deployed across seven forces – Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley and Hampshire – in the coming weeks.
They would be manned by trained officers operating within College of Policing guidance.
But Lady Chakrabarti said the technology was 'incredibly intrusive' and had been 'developed pretty much completely outside the law'.
'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society – challenges to privacy, challenges to freedom of assembly and association, and problems with race and sex discrimination because of the higher likelihood of false matches in the context of certain groups,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
'It's particularly odd that this has all been developed pretty much completely outside the law.'
She welcomed plans to consult ahead of possible new legislation, but warned that to date, 'it's been a bit of a Wild West'.
Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson dismissed the claims, telling BBC Breakfast: 'With the greatest of respect, that's not what this is about.
Ministers said a new legal framework would be drawn up to support use of the technology following a consultation (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
'This is about giving the tools to our police officers to enable them to keep us safe.'
Forces already deploying live facial recognition had used it to arrest rape, domestic abuse, knife crime and robbery suspects as well as sex offenders breaching their conditions.
Meanwhile, the Home Office said every community across England and Wales had now been assigned a 'named, contactable' officer to handle reports of crimes such as anti-social behaviour.
Their details would be made available for residents on their local force's website, it is understood.
The pledge was made as part of the Government's previously announced Neighbourhood Policing Guarantee, under which forces have signed up to a commitment to respond to neighbourhood queries within 72 hours.
The Government said the move would help ensure 'the public will have consistent direct links to their local force, with dedicated anti-social behaviour leads and new visible patrols in town centres'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Reeves says rulings on tax must wait for Budget amid inheritance tax speculation
Rachel Reeves has said that decisions around taxes will have to wait for the autumn Budget, amid reports that the Treasury is looking to raise more money from inheritance tax. The Chancellor told reporters that decisions will be made 'in the round' and her priority 'is to get our economy firing off all cylinders'. Earlier this week, the Guardian reported that officials are examining whether tightening rules around the gifting of assets and money could help address the UK's multi-billion-pound fiscal shortfall. Government U-turns over winter fuel payments and welfare reform have left Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a multibillion-pound spending gap to about the reports on Thursday, Ms Reeves said: 'Any decision around taxation is a … decision for the Budget, and I'll make those announcements. 'We haven't even set the date yet for the Budget, but the key focus of the Budget is going to be to build on numbers that we've seen today to boost productivity and growth and prosperity all across the country. 'That is my number one priority as Chancellor, to get our economy firing off all cylinders so that working people in all parts of the country will feel the benefits of that economic growth.' Pushed on whether taxes will have to increase in the autumn, Ms Reeves added: 'We'll wait for the official forecast from the Office of Budget Responsibility, and we'll make those decisions in the round.' Among the reported inheritance tax measures under consideration is a potential cap on lifetime gifts, part of a broader review into how assets can be transferred before death to minimise inheritance tax liabilities. Under current UK rules, gifts made more than seven years before a person's death are exempt from inheritance tax. Gifts made between three and seven years prior are taxed on a sliding scale, depending on their value and the total estate. The Chancellor was speaking as new official figures show that the UK economy slowed in the second quarter of this year amid pressure from tariff uncertainty and tax increases. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 0.3% for the quarter after 0.7% growth in the first three months of the year. However, the figure was stronger than the 0.1% level widely expected by economists after an uptick in activity in June and revised data for earlier in the quarter.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Highlanders have the right to be angry over explosion of wind farms
Quite a result for a never previously convened group of volunteers sitting on powerless community councils. But was it a step back for the green transition, a step forward for local democracy or a bit of both? Five hundred people from 56 community councils – representing almost half the Highland population – gathered to highlight the 1305 wind-related infrastructure projects that are either built or going through planning in the Highlands. No-one's denying that's a small avalanche. The big questions are: who is the energy for? (probably not Scots); who benefits financially? (certainly not Scots); who gets to decide? (absolutely not Scots), and how much does net-exporting Scotland or the energy-hungry UK actually need? (Fa kens). READ MORE: Pro-Palestine protesters greet JD Vance as he lands in Scotland It seems Labour and the SNP are bodyswerving all these vital questions, and Highlanders, despite their reputation for feudal cap-doffing and learned silence, have finally snapped, got angry and got organised. So, are they just a bunch of climate-crisis-denying Nimbys? I've been making a film about this unprecedented revolt over the last week and visited folk in straths and glens from Strathdearn near Tomatin to the Dornoch Firth near Strath Oykel. I'm sure there are people who simply hate turbines and are opposed to net zero. I didn't meet any of them. I did meet people from glens with five, seven, or even 13 wind farms already in place who are being told to accept the same again. Without any say. Without any meaningful income. And without the highest energy bills in Europe getting one penny cheaper. They must also watch while those existing wind farms switch off in high wind because the grid can't take their energy. We pay for those constraint payments, and if they are common for existing turbines, how will the new wind farms deliver? (Image: Getty Images) Furthermore, wind farm applications go through planning piecemeal, with complex documents that take hours for community councillors to download and a lawyer's mind to dissect. So far, every application has been approved by the Scottish Government – despite occasional rejection by Highland Council and even a Scottish Government reporter. It feels like a total fait accompli and normally calm people have become stressed, angry, upset and determined not to let this pass. I'm sure some distant pointy heids thought wind farms accepted since 2007 meant Highlanders would be a soft touch. Au contraire. It's a case of once bitten twice, not just shy, but adamant – enough's enough. We met one veteran community councillor who wanted a conversation with the companies, SSEN and the Scottish Government about the totality of wind farms planned for each glen: 'We could negotiate and approve the ones that are completely uncontroversial and try to change or just veto the ones everyone opposes.' If something as reasonable as that isn't even thinkable, what are we saying about local democracy? If Scotland is to house practically all the wind infrastructure for the whole of Britain without any benefit in bills, what does that say about the supposed union of equals? And if all of this happens without opposition by the planning authority, the Scottish Government, we can only assume that they are 100% on side. Or that they worry more about denting the high levels of inward investment to Scotland by placing any restrictions on electricity infrastructure? Or that their green targets and position ahead of the UK will be dented? If so, well done. Every Tom, Dick and Harry (the spivs and speculators from Alex Salmond's era) has a wind company and land on the east coast of the Highlands – near the grid upgrades and the freeports – sitting pretty for the moment when the contracts for difference are awarded and the wind bonanza really begins. No wonder British Energy Minister Michael Shanks declined the invitation to attend the Inverness Convention along with Scottish Energy Minister Gillian Martin and SSEN – the private power company charged with deciding pylon routes and the location of turbines, battery plants and sub-stations. Labour's Western Isles MP Torcuil Crichton did attend and argued for councils to become co-developers of wind cash thereby making money for local services. If it can be done in Stornoway, he argued, why not on the mainland? But he also made no apologies for the huge wind energy targets his government will push through whether local communities like it or not. The audience was not amused. SNP MP Graham Leadbitter drew grumbles for sidestepping responsibility, saying planning is a Holyrood matter and the SNP don't run Westminster. True but unhelpful. SNP MSP Maree Todd prompted snorts of exasperation when she said she was furious about the size of local energy bills and fuel poverty. Fine – why did the SNP not support locational pricing then? And her MSP colleague Emma Roddick was almost shouted down after saying she felt as powerless as the audience and declared the main problem is pitifully low levels of community benefit. They certainly are inadequate – but local opposition has moved way beyond that. Tory MSP Edward Mountain received a roar of approval for saying: 'We in the Highlands are being sacrificed on the altar of net zero. And we need to stop energy companies trying to bribe local communities.' It's supremely ironic. THE Tories are getting ready to clean up in Highland seats in 2026, even though the current situation is almost 100% their fault. Who privatised the energy industry in the 1980s, placing strategic decisions in the hands of private companies like SSE and private operators (many of them the state-owned companies of our European neighbours) – the Tories. Who created a wind energy desert in England that will now be filled with Highland-produced energy – the Tories and their decade-long turbine moratorium south of the border. Who created a devolved settlement that handed energy to Westminster, not Holyrood, unlike every other devolved or federal system – Labour. Who created massive, remote councils like Highland, which has the biggest landmass in the world – the Tories. Who created toothless community councils as a sop to towns, villages and islands when their genuinely local councils were abolished – the Tories. And who's been the implacable opponents of 'Mugabe-style land raids' or for anyone else the overdue process of real land reform that would stop absentee millionaires owning land and taking land use decisions over the heads of local communities – be that for the green transition or any other 'worthy' cause. Yip – the Tories. They've produced chronic disempowerment. Labour have produced the 'ambitious' green energy targets – now set in law – driving the Highland windfarm expansion. And yet it's the SNP who are taking the pounding. Why? Because voters expected them to reverse the tide, stand up for communities, argue, wheedle, deal and protect – and they haven't. Doubtless, some will argue the Scotland Act means they can't. That answer may be right. It may be good law. Great accounting. Satisfactory box-ticking – but it's terrible politics. The Scottish Government believes it must rubber-stamp whatever energy demands the British Government makes of rural Scotland or ... what? If it's a fight where the Scottish Government backs Highland communities, starts a long-overdue process of decentralisation, produces and share an actual strategy and challenges Westminster to do the same and forces Keir Starmer to own an unreconstructed broken, Thatcherite energy market where Scots will never, ever get cheaper bills – then bring it on. Meantime, c'mon the communities.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP crackdown on benefit fraud as woman jailed for wrongly claiming £110,000
The UK Government has issued a stern warning that benefit fraud will be detected and prosecuted to the full extent of the law, following the sentencing of a Manchester woman to 20 months in prison Nearly 24 million people across Great Britain are currently receiving at least one benefit from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) with a record-breaking eight million people now claiming Universal Credit. However, the UK Government has delivered a stark warning that benefit fraud will be uncovered and prosecuted to the full extent of the law, following the sentencing of a Manchester woman to 20 months behind bars. The 51 year old woman was found guilty of stealing £110,000 in benefits she wasn't entitled to after failing to inform the DWP of changes to her living circumstances. Meanwhile, the Mirror reports of ' state pensioners could lose DWP payments after 'unfair' £10,000 rule '. The woman admitted guilt to four counts of benefit fraud at Manchester Magistrates Court on August 12, having dishonestly claimed Job Seeker's Allowance; Employment Support Allowance; Housing Benefit; and Council Tax Support between April 2013 and April 2023. The case emerged following an anonymous tip-off, which triggered a joint investigation by the DWP Pensions Regional Investigations team and Manchester City Council, reports the Express. Minister for Transformation, Andrew Western, stated: "Our social security system exists to support the most vulnerable in society and those genuinely in need". He added that they "will continue to take legal action to fight those trying to scam the system" and warned that "if anyone thinks they can get away with it, this case shows that they will be brought to justice". The minister stated: "Joint working between the DWP and local authorities will protect taxpayers' money while ensuring genuine claimants receive the money they are entitled to". Councillor Rabnawaz Akbar, Executive Member for Finances and Resource for Manchester City Council, shared: "We know that in Manchester there are a great number of people who are genuine beneficiaries of the benefit system and put their trust in it to deliver the support they need. For many it has been a lifeline through one of the most difficult economic climates in a generation". Akbar continued: "This case was an example of how the trust inherent in our benefits system was abused for personal gain". The councillor added his thanks to the "officers for their tireless work to detect this fraud, as well as colleagues in the DWP for ensuring a successful prosecution". The prosecution forms part of a wider pattern of successful court cases protecting public funds in recent months. One such example was made in June, where a couple from Port Talbot received suspended jail terms ranging from six months to two years after stealing £48,517 in Universal Credit whilst hiding their capital assets. During the same month, a woman from Swansea was convicted after submitting bogus childcare claims by uploading fake invoices to claim childcare costs she had never actually paid. She received a six-month prison sentence, which was suspended for 18 months, and was ordered to carry out unpaid work. Additionally, a couple from St Helens have each been handed two-year prison sentences after fraudulently claiming over £268,000 through offences, including false Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claims and a Local Authority Direct Payment. This was carried out using fake identities, as well as claiming Employment Support Allowance as a single person despite cohabiting. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has stated that these successful prosecutions come as the UK Government is strengthening its ability to fight fraud and identify genuine errors even sooner, through the Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill. This Bill is expected to save taxpayers £1.5 billion over the next five years.
