Ban on Medicaid paying for gender-affirming care added to conversion therapy bill
Rep. David Hale amended his bill to ban Kentucky Medicaid from paying for some gender-affirming care. (Kentucky Lantern photo by Liam Niemeyer)
This story mentions suicide. If you or someone you know is contemplating suicide, please call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 988.
An advancing bill seeking to cancel Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear's restrictions on conversion therapy would now also prohibit Medicaid from paying for some forms of gender-affirming medical care.
A lobbyist for a conservative policy group argued the additions to House Bill 495 were to ensure the government isn't paying for elective care for transgender people. A coalition of advocates representing the LGBTQ community and professional associations for social workers and psychologists denounced the additions as attacks on health care for transgender Kentuckians.
HB 495 sponsor Rep. David Hale, R-Wellington, agreed to changes in the bill by the Senate Health Services Committee that restrict the Department for Medicaid Services and Medicaid managed care organizations from issuing payments for:
Cross-sex hormones in amounts greater than would normally be produced endogenously in a healthy person of the same age and sex.
Gender reassignment surgery to alter or remove physical or anatomical characteristics or features that are typical for and characteristic of a person's biological sex.
Almost 1 in 3 Kentuckians are covered by the federal-state Medicaid program.
The bill's original provisions remained in the legislation, seeking to cancel an executive order issued by Beshear last year restricting the controversial practice of conversion therapy. Hale on the House floor had previously said he believed Beshear's executive order infringed on the First Amendment rights of parents to seek whatever therapy they felt appropriate for their children.
The amended HB 495 advanced from the Senate committee by a 6-3 vote with Sen. Danny Carroll, R-Paducah, joining the two Democrats on the committee in opposition. The amended bill still needs passage by the Senate. The House would need to concur with the changes before it would be sent to Beshear's desk for his consideration.
Hale didn't address the additions in the bill in testimony before the committee. Nick Spencer, the director of policy at the conservative group The Family Foundation, told lawmakers when asked about the provisions that 'the government has no business spending tax dollars on elective surgeries and elective procedures for people with transgender feelings.'
'There are many medical procedures that the government does not cover, and the government has no business covering those services,' Spencer said. 'Now, if someone who is an adult wants to pursue that course of treatment on their own dime, I would disagree with that course of action, but that is their right to do so.'
A coalition of advocates representing the Kentucky Psychological Association, the Kentucky chapter of the National Association of Social Workers and the LGBTQ rights advocacy group The Fairness Campaign all spoke strongly against the new provisions in the bill. The groups were also opposed to the original version of HB 495, a bill that's changed twice moving through the legislature.
'Language is being inserted into this bill denying health care to transgender people. It's hard for me to put into words how much access to hormone therapy has helped me,' said Serenity Johnson, a transgender Kentuckian living in Hardin County.
Johnson said the prohibition on Medicaid paying gender-affirming hormonal therapy or surgery wouldn't directly impact her because she has insurance through her employment. But for Kentuckians with Medicaid seeking such treatment, she said, refusing them 'necessary health care' is a 'cruel denial.'
Chris Hartman, the executive director of the Fairness Campaign, condemned the additions to the bill as a 'sneak attack on our transgender community.'
Sen. Stephen Meredith, R-Leitchfield, at one point during Hartman's testimony threatened to have Hartman removed from the testimony table for 'inflammatory remarks' directed at the committee.
'This is a disrespectful subversion of the legislative process,' Hartman said. 'You will cost lives.'
Gender-affirming care covered by Medicaid varies from state to state, according to a survey published in 2022 by the health policy nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation.
A Cabinet for Health and Family Services spokesperson Kendra Steele in an email said Kentucky Medicaid covers services that are deemed 'medically necessary' for a person by a provider unless specifically prohibited by law. Steele referenced current state law that bans gender-affirming care for minors.
Other advocates spoke out against other provisions of HB 495 seeking to cancel Beshear's executive order restricting conversion therapy. Conversion therapy attempts to alter a young person's gender expression or sexual attractions.
The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP) is among the medical and psychological organizations that have condemned conversion therapy. AACAP has stated conversion therapies 'lack scientific credibility and clinical utility' and that there is 'evidence that such interventions are harmful.'
The American Psychological Association has stated people who have undergone 'sexual orientation change efforts' are significantly more likely to be depressed and suicidal. The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is 988.
Former Republican State Sen. Alice Forgy Kerr told lawmakers she considered conversion therapy to be not only ineffective but 'very, very dangerous.' She spoke to lawmakers while her son, who she said was gay, sat in the audience.
'That's not just my opinion as a mother. That's the overwhelming consensus of medical experts, mental health professionals and those who have survived the trauma of conversion therapy — or torture, as I call it. The science is clear,' Kerr said.
Spencer, the policy director for the conservative group, told lawmakers counselors who physically abuse or expose sexually explicit material to minors should be held accountable. But he considered talk therapy to be 'morally permissible.'
'From my perspective, those who counsel against homosexual and transgender feelings are expressing love for an individual,' Spencer said.
Democrats on the committee in voting against the legislation echoed concerns from the groups who spoke against the bill.
Berg, speaking to Hale, said she appreciated the lengths the bill sponsor has gone to work on the original provisions of the bill. But she took issue with the new additions.
'You added the second part of this bill where literally adults who know who they are, whose medical treatment — contrary to your lobbyist back there — almost exclusively, is either a shot or a pill, and we're going to deny them that,' Berg said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
11 minutes ago
- Politico
Ukrainian delegation to brief senators amid Russia sanctions push
A Ukrainian delegation is set to brief U.S. senators Wednesday as lawmakers weigh a sweeping sanctions bill targeting Russia and its biggest energy customers, China and India. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who told POLITICO he organized the meeting with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said all 100 senators were invited to attend the closed-door session. 'It's a pivotal moment in Ukraine — and crunch time for the Senate on this bill,' said Blumenthal, noting that the legislation now has 82 co-sponsors, evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. The visiting delegation, he told POLITICO, includes Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine's deputy defense minister, Serhii Boyev, is traveling with Yermack. The sanctions package from Blumenthal and Graham is designed to increase pressure on Russia's wartime economy by targeting countries that buy oil and gas — a move Blumenthal said could be a 'game changer.' He also pointed to recent long-range drone attacks deep inside Russia — dubbed 'Operation Spiderweb' — as evidence of Ukraine's agility and resolve. Those strikes, he said, counter 'a false narrative that Ukraine is losing the war,' and could shift momentum in Washington in favor of increasing aid for Ukraine.'They can strike air bases 4,000 miles from Ukraine; They can hit anywhere,' Blumenthal said. 'Just in the skill and audacity of these attacks, it will rank with the United States raid on Osama bin Laden and the Israeli pager operation as one of the great military achievements in recent years.' Blumenthal said the White House remains hesitant to support the sanctions bill, but the battlefield momentum could sway President Donald Trump and skeptical lawmakers. 'Events will move the White House — and maybe some of the president's friends here,' he said, referring to Graham. 'Congress can … move ahead. [Trump] doesn't have to support it.'


CNBC
11 minutes ago
- CNBC
New Elizabeth Warren report chronicles '130 days of Elon Musk'
Sen. Elizabeth Warren's office issued a report Tuesday chronicling Elon Musk's "130 days" in President Donald Trump's administration, accusing the billionaire of using his government perch to enrich himself and his businesses. "Musk and individuals acting on his behalf have been involved in dozens of questionable actions that raise questions about corruption, ethics and conflicts of interest," says the report by the Massachusetts Democrat's office. The 14-page report outlines more than 100 times that Warren's team believes Musk abused his role as a "special government employee" to benefit his private interests. It accuses Musk of violating "norms at an astonishing pace," actions that it calls "scandalous behavior regardless of whether it subjects him to criminal prosecution." The White House did not respond to CNBC's request for comment on the report. CNBC also reached out for comment to Musk, Quinn Emanuel partner Alex Spiro and Omead Afshar, a Tesla vice president. They did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk last week wrapped up his official government service leading DOGE, or Department of Government Efficiency," which is engaged in a broad effort to slash federal government spending. His four months leading DOGE as a special government employee were marked by unprecedented upheaval to the federal workforce and government agencies. Warren's team accuses Musk of using the federal government to promote his businesses. Musk, who is the world's richest person, is CEO of Tesla, SpaceX and artificial intelligence startup xAI. For instance, it highlights the time the White House lawn was turned into a temporary Tesla showroom. It also outlines more than two dozen instances where the Trump administration or government agencies "have entered or explored new lucrative contracts" with Musk's companies, such as Customs and Border Protection exploring using Starlink technology in surveillance towers. The report also outlines six times that the Trump administration or federal agencies halted enforcement actions against any of Musk's companies, or the times that DOGE targeted government agencies investigating the companies. For instance, it says that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration closed an investigation into Tesla for "allegedly violating workplace safety rules." "Musk's companies have received or are being considered for large contracts with the federal government, with foreign governments, and with other private sector companies," the report says. The report is not the first time that Musk has come under fire for alleged conflicts of interest during his DOGE tenure. Three Democratic senators, including Warren, sent a letter last week urging the Justice Department and other authorities to probe whether DOGE employees broke conflict-of-interest laws by owning stocks in companies that may have benefited from their government-cutting work.


San Francisco Chronicle
18 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump formally asks Congress to claw back approved spending targeted by DOGE
WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House on Tuesday officially asked Congress to claw back $9.4 billion in already approved spending, taking funding away from programs targeted by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. It's a process known as 'rescission,' which requires President Donald Trump to get approval from Congress to return money that had previously been appropriated. Trump's aides say the funding cuts target programs that promote liberal ideologies. The request, if it passes the House and Senate, would formally enshrine many of the spending cuts and freezes sought by DOGE. It comes at a time when Musk is extremely unhappy with the tax cut and spending plan making its way through Congress, calling it on Tuesday a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the federal deficit. White House budget director Russ Vought said more rescission packages and other efforts to cut spending could follow if the current effort succeeds. 'We are certainly willing and able to send up additional packages if the congressional will is there,' Vought told reporters. Here's what to know about the rescissions request: Will the rescissions make a dent in the national debt? The request to Congress is unlikely to meaningfully change the troublesome increase in the U.S. national debt. Tax revenues have been insufficient to cover the growing costs of Social Security, Medicare and other programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the government is on track to spend roughly $7 trillion this year, with the rescission request equaling just 0.1% of that total. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at Tuesday's briefing that Vought — a 'well-respected fiscal hawk,' she called him — would continue to cut spending, hinting that there could be additional efforts to return funds. 'He has tools at his disposal to produce even more savings,' Leavitt said. Vought said he can send up additional rescissions at the end of the fiscal year in September 'and if Congress does not act on it, that funding expires.' 'It's one of the reasons why we are not putting all of our expectations in a typical rescissions process,' he added. What programs are targeted by the rescissions? A spokesperson for the White House Office of Management and Budget, speaking on condition of anonymity to preview some of the items that would lose funding, said that $8.3 billion was being cut from the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. NPR and PBS would also lose federal funding, as would the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, also known as PEPFAR. The spokesperson listed specific programs that the Trump administration considered wasteful, including $750,000 to reduce xenophobia in Venezuela, $67,000 for feeding insect powder to children in Madagascar and $3 million for circumcision, vasectomies and condoms in Zambia. Is the rescissions package likely to get passed? House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., complimented the planned cuts and pledged to pass them. 'This rescissions package reflects many of DOGE's findings and is one of the many legislative tools Republicans are using to restore fiscal sanity,' Johnson said. 'Congress will continue working closely with the White House to codify these recommendations, and the House will bring the package to the floor as quickly as possible.' Members of the House Freedom Caucus, among the chamber's most conservative lawmakers, said they would like to see additional rescission packages from the administration. 'We will support as many more rescissions packages the White House can send us in the coming weeks and months,' the group said in a press release. 'Passing this rescissions package will be an important demonstration of Congress's willingness to deliver on DOGE and the Trump agenda.' Sen. Susan Collins, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, gave the package a less optimistic greeting. 'Despite this fast track, the Senate Appropriations Committee will carefully review the rescissions package and examine the potential consequences of these rescissions on global health, national security, emergency communications in rural communities, and public radio and television stations,' the Maine lawmaker said in a statement. Why does the administration need Congress' approval? The White House's request to return appropriated funds is meant to comply with the 1974 Impoundment Control Act. That law created the process by which the president can formally disclose to Congress the appropriated money it intends to not spend. Congress generally has 45 days to review and approve the request, but Vought is arguing that the end of the fiscal year would enable the administration to bypass a vote. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a fiscal watchdog group, said in a 2018 backgrounder that the Senate can pass rescission packages with a simple majority, instead of the 60 votes needed to overcome a possible filibuster. Between 1974 and 2000, presidents requested $76 billion worth of rescissions and Congress approved $25 billion. Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank, said in an emailed statement that the Trump administration was already 'illegally impounding additional funds,' as withholding money has 'always been illegal without explicit Congressional approval.' On CNN on Sunday, Vought insisted that the Trump administration was complying with the law, but it simply had a different view of the law relative to some Democrats. 'We're not breaking the law,' Vought said. 'Every part of the federal government, each branch, has to look at the Constitution themselves and uphold it, and there's tension between the branches.'