
Menendez brothers resentenced by California judge to be eligible for parole
A
California
judge has given Erik and Lyle Menendez, who had been sentenced to life in prison for the murders of their parents in their Beverly Hills home, a chance at freedom after 35 years behind bars.
They were sentenced in 1996 to life in prison without the possibility of parole for murdering their father, Jose Menendez, and mother, Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills home in 1989.
Judge Michael Jesic shortened the brothers' sentences of life in prison without the possibility of parole to 50 years to life. They are now eligible for parole under California's youthful offender law because they committed the crime under the age of 26. They would still need approval from the state's parole board to be released.
Their lawyers say they are immediately eligible for parole; however they will remain incarcerated while their parole status is decided.
READ MORE
'I'm not saying they should be released; it's not for me to decide,' judge Jesic said. 'I do believe they've done enough in the past 35 years, that they should get that chance.'
Erik and Lyle Menendez, now 54 and 57 years old, did not show any apparent emotion during most of the testimony as they appeared via liveslive-streamo from prison in San Diego, but chuckled when one of their cousins, Diane Hernandez, told the court that Erik Menendez received A+ grades in all of his classes during his most recent semester in college.
The ruling capped a day-long hearing in which several relatives, a retired judge and a former fellow prisoner testified in support of defence efforts to shorten the brothers' sentence to time already served, or at least gaining their eligibility for parole.
The defence on Tuesday began by calling Anamaria Baralt, a cousin of Erik and Lyle, who testified that the brothers have repeatedly expressed remorse for their actions.
'We all, on both sides of the family, believe that 35 years is enough,' Ms Baralt said. 'They are universally forgiven by our family.'
Another cousin, Tamara Goodell, said she had recently taken her 13-year-old son to meet the brothers in prison, and that the brothers would contribute a lot of good to the world if released.
Their defence attorneys said they feared their parents were going to kill them to cover up years of sexual, psychological and physical abuse they had suffered. Prosecutors portrayed the brothers as rich young men eager for their multimillion-dollar inheritance. Over the years they repeatedly appealed their convictions without success.
But support for the brothers has grown significantly in recent years. Recently their chances for release appeared more hopeful than they had in decades as they sought freedom through multiple legal avenues, including by asking for a new trial in light of new evidence of their father's abuse, a petition for clemency from the governor, and the request for resentencing.
The brothers, who were 18 and 21 at the time of the murders, have long argued their innocence and have recently sought freedom through multiple legal avenues, including asking for a new trial in light of new evidence of their father's abuse, a petition for clemency from the governor, and a request for resentencing.
Their resentencing hearings have been delayed repeatedly since January amid the LA wildfires and disputes between the defence and prosecution.
Los Angeles county prosecutors were opposed to resentencing, saying the brothers have not taken complete responsibility for the crime.
'I killed my mom and dad. I make no excuses and also no justification,' Lyle said in a statement to the court on Tuesday. 'The impact of my violent actions on my family ... is unfathomable.'
George Gascón, the progressive former Los Angeles county district attorney, had recommended the brothers be resentenced, which would have opened the door to their release.
He said he believed the brothers were 'subjected to a tremendous amount' of dysfunction and molestation, and said his office would have handled the case differently due to modern understandings of sexual abuse. He also pointed to the brother's rehabilitation during their decades behind bars.
In prison, Erik and Lyle have earned college degrees and served as mentors and caregivers.
The current district attorney, Nathan Hochman, who succeeded Gascón, quickly reversed course and said he was opposed to the brothers' resentencing. He argued the brothers have not taken full responsibility and his office has said it does not believe they were abused.
With Hochman in position as DA, prosecutors attempted twice to withdraw their office's resentencing petition. Judge Jesic ruled both times that the resentencing hearings could continue despite their opposition.
Jonathan Colby, a former judge who said he considered himself tough on crime, told the court on Tuesday that he was impressed with the programmes the brothers started during their time in prison to provide aid and care for older and disabled prisoners. He got to know them over a series of prison visits.
'There's not many prisoners I meet like Erik and Lyle that have such concern for the elderly,' he said.
Former prisoner Anerae Brown cried as he testified about how the brothers helped him heal and get on the path to rehabilitation, leading to his release from prison.
He called the programmes they started 'Menendez University'.
'I have children now,' he said. 'Without Lyle and Erik I might still be sitting in there doing stupid things.' – Guardian, Associated Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
US state politician and husband killed in ‘targeted' attacks on two Democrats
US politician Melissa Hortman and her husband have been killed in a politically motivated assassination, according to a state governor. A second state politician, senator John Hoffman, and his wife were shot and wounded in the 'targeted' attack near Brooklyn Park, Minnesota on Saturday, said governor Tim Walz . 'We must all, in Minnesota and across the country, stand against all forms of political violence,' Mr Walz said at a press conference Saturday. 'Those responsible for this will be held accountable.' READ MORE Mr Hoffman, a Democrat , was first elected in 2012 and runs Hoffman Strategic Advisors, a consulting firm. He previously served as vice-chairman of the Anoka Hennepin School Board, which manages the largest school district in Minnesota. Mr Hoffman is married and has one daughter. Ms Hortman was the top house Democratic leader in the state legislature and a former house speaker. She was first elected in 2004. A police officer sets up a perimeter with police tape near the scene of the shooting. Photograph: Alex Kormann/ Star Tribune via AP Mr Hoffman and Ms Hortman represented districts located north of Minneapolis. Drew Evans, superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, said that authorities were actively searching for a suspect. Post-mortem examinations will be carried out to determine extent of injuries, but Ms Hortman and her spouse died from gunshot wounds, Mr Evans said. Public safety commissioner Bob Johnson said the suspect was posing as a law enforcement officer. He said: 'Suspect exploited the trust of our uniforms, what our uniforms are meant to represent. That betrayal is deeply disturbing to those of us who wear the badge with honour and responsibility.' Law enforcement officers including local police, sheriffs and the FBI at the scene. Photograph: Alex Kormann/ Star Tribune via AP The shootings happened at a time when political leaders nationwide have been attacked, harassed and intimidated during a time of deep political divisions. Giffords, the national gun violence prevention organisation led by former congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, released the following statement. 'I am horrified and heartbroken by last night's attack on two patriotic public servants,' Ms Giffords said. 'My family and I know the horror of a targeted shooting all too well. An attack against lawmakers is an attack on American democracy itself. 'Leaders must speak out and condemn the fomenting violent extremism that threatens everything this country stands for.' Ms Giffords was shot in the head in 2011 by a gunman who killed six people and injured 12 others. She stepped down from congress in January 2012 to focus on her recovery. —Associated Press


Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Los Angeles is only the beginning: Trump is normalising military enforcement of law and order
When a country's leader celebrates their birthday with a big military parade it doesn't look much like democracy. Today, as Donald Trump turns 79, that is precisely what will happen in Washington, DC. Yet as tanks roll down the city's wide avenues, a nationwide mass opposition movement is forming. Trump casts the use of the military as a necessary tool against growing disorder, while his opponents will try to frame it for what it is: a power grab that threatens the foundations of American democracy. Today's events will escalate the conflict that began in Los Angeles over the past several days – and ratchet up the battle to control the narrative. On June 6th, workplace raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) rounded up and imprisoned hundreds of people, many of whom have the legal right to live and work in the United States . Inevitably these raids sparked protests, which Trump used as justification to call in the national guard and the marines. He depicted LA as a city 'invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy' that 'would be burning' if he had not acted decisively. Armed forces have rarely been used to suppress civil unrest in the history of the US or any other democracy. One has to go back to the Rodney King riots of 1992 – also in Los Angeles – for precedent, and all the way back to the Selma marches of 1965 when they were deployed to protect a peaceful civil rights march, despite the objections of state and local authorities. READ MORE It is deeply ironic that Trump poses as a figure of law and order when a mob of his supporters led an insurrection at the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021 during which more than 150 police officers were injured. Trump called it a 'day of love' and pardoned all of the perpetrators on his first day in office. Now he also grossly misrepresents the real situation in Los Angeles. While there is sporadic violence, it is hardly on the scale of the King uprising or even, arguably, this week's rioting in Ballymena. Most protesting in LA has been non-violent, and it was entirely non-violent until June 7th, when Trump called in the national guard. His actions have provoked violence, not quelled it. Yet images of a few protesters burning self-driving cars or throwing rocks at the police, endlessly circulated on right-wing social media, give ostensible credence to his claims. Trump appears to have deliberately manufactured a crisis for political reasons. In the short term, he needed to rally his base behind him. His budgetary legislation – his so-called 'big, beautiful Bill' – is stalled in Congress. Because it would massively inflate the national debt, it has proved controversial among many of his own supporters, most notably Elon Musk, with whom Trump had a very public falling out earlier this month. But the spectacle of public disorder in a liberal city and state more friendly to undocumented migrants has united his supporters. Trump's actions also have a longer-term political goal: normalising the use of military forces in law enforcement. American law generally forbids the domestic deployment of the armed forces. Two of the exceptions are in cases of invasion or insurrection. It is hardly a coincidence that the US president and his supporters have consistently referred to the 'invasion' of migrants and labelled protesters exercising a basic democratic right as 'insurrectionists'. Yet Trump's actions do not come free of political risk. His show of force is actually an admission of weakness. After all, if the Maga movement could be sure of winning future elections, it wouldn't need to resort to military force. But it would likely lose fair and free contests in 2026 and 2028. A majority of Americans disapprove of Trump's performance as president. His economic policy – a main reason he was elected – will hurt ordinary voters. In addition to inflating the national debt, the 'big, beautiful Bill' would massively redistribute wealth upwards to the richest Americans, take away health insurance from millions of Americans and stoke inflation. Most Americans may approve of Trump's goal of deporting undocumented migrants but most disapprove of the draconian methods he is using. The deployment of armed forces to LA has not been popular. Trump needed to generate political unrest to act the strongman, but in so doing he has sparked the first massive protest movement against his rule. Protests have spread beyond Los Angeles to other big cities including Chicago, Houston, New York and San Francisco. The vast majority of protesters have been non-violent. The previously planned 'No kings' demonstrations – happening today to challenge Trump's military display and his authoritarianism – have been given new energy. More than 2,000 demonstrations are planned throughout the country. Trump has also unified the political opposition. The Democratic Party, which has been lost at sea for much of Trump's second term, now seems to understand its role. Democrats at all levels of government are voicing their support for peaceful protest and their opposition to Trump's use of the military and taking some personal risk in doing so. California governor Gavin Newsom has become a prominent spokesperson, a role that led Trump to threaten his arrest. Senator Alex Padilla from California was tackled and handcuffed by FBI and Secret Service agents just for trying to ask questions during a press conference by Kristi Noem, Trump's homeland security secretary. Much of what happened in the US these past several days was predictable, but it is unclear how things will play out from here. The potential for violent clashes is very high. So far, Trump's narrative of civil unrest is focused on the meme of protesters burning cars. The authoritarian danger of his use of the military remains abstract, as troops have not yet been used to suppress protests. The opposition may soon have its own defining image if a US soldier is recorded beating, clubbing or shooting a nonviolent protester. Trump's second term might well be defined by violent clashes on American streets and the reverberating battles of interpreting that unrest. Los Angeles is only the beginning.


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Kilmar Abrego Garcia pleads not guilty to migrant smuggling charges after wrongful deportation
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the migrant returned to the US last week after being wrongfully deported to his native El Salvador, pleaded not guilty on Friday to criminal charges of taking part in a conspiracy to smuggle migrants into the United States . Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyer, William Allensworth, entered the not guilty plea on his behalf at a hearing in Nashville, Tennessee, before US magistrate judge Barbara Holmes. At the hearing, Mr Abrego Garcia (29) is also expected to contest a bid by federal prosecutors to have him detained pending trial. US president Donald Trump's administration has portrayed the indictment of Mr Abrego Garcia as vindication of its aggressive crackdown on illegal immigration. Before Mr Abrego Garcia's indictment was unsealed on June 5th, officials alleged he was a member of the MS-13 gang and said they would not bring him back. The justice department's decision to return him to the US to face criminal charges is a potential off-ramp for the Trump administration from its escalating confrontation with the judiciary over whether it complied with a court order to facilitate Mr Abrego Garcia's return. READ MORE The Republican president's critics say his swift removal without a hearing showed the administration prioritised increased deportations over due process – the bedrock principle that people in the US, whether citizens or not, can contest governmental actions against them in the courts. 'You are presumed innocent, and it is the government's burden to prove at trial that you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,' Ms Holmes said, addressing Mr Abrego Garcia. The criminal proceeding will provide Mr Abrego Garcia with due process by giving him the right to contest the charges contained in a grand jury indictment returned in secret on May 21st. Still, his lawyers say his return to face criminal charges does not absolve the Trump administration of responsibility for wrongfully deporting him. In the indictment, Mr Abrego Garcia was charged with working with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the US illegally, then transport them from the US-Mexico border to destinations across the country. The indictment alleges that Mr Abrego Garcia often picked up migrants in Houston, making more than 100 trips between Texas and Maryland between 2016 and 2025. Mr Abrego Garcia is also accused of transporting firearms and drugs. Jennifer Vasquez Sura, wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, speaks to the media before a hearing for Mr Abrego Garcia in Nashville, Tennessee, on Friday. Photograph: EPA Prosecutors say Mr Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident whose wife and young child are US citizens, could face 10 years in prison for each migrant he smuggled. That means he could spend the rest of his life in jail if convicted, according to prosecutors. They are urging he be detained, saying the potentially hefty sentence means he may try to flee. They also say detention is warranted because he allegedly murdered a rival gang member's mother in El Salvador and solicited child pornography, though those accusations are not part of his indictment. Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyers have called the charges 'fantastical' and deny he is a flight risk. —Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025