Horst Mahler, a German Holocaust denier who was once a far-left militant, dies at 89
BERLIN (AP) — Horst Mahler, a founding member of the left-wing Red Army Faction militant group who later became a right-wing extremist and accumulated a series of convictions, including for Holocaust denial, has died, a lawyer who represented him said Monday. He was 89.
Mahler died on Sunday at a hospital in Berlin, Jan Dollwetzel, who represented Mahler at a trial in 2023, told German news agency dpa.
Mahler, born on Jan. 23, 1936, became a lawyer and in 1969 defended militants Andreas Baader and Gudrun Ensslin in a trial. Shortly afterward, he went on to found the Red Army Faction with them.
The group, which emerged from German student protests against the Vietnam War, killed 34 people and injured hundreds of others in a violent campaign against what members considered U.S. imperialism and capitalist oppression of workers. It declared itself disbanded in 1998.
In 1970, Mahler was arrested and sentenced to 14 years in prison over various bank robberies with a far-left motivation. He distanced himself from his extremist past while in custody and was released after 10 years. In 1987, he was readmitted to practice as a lawyer with the help of his then-defense attorney, Gerhard Schröder, who would later become German chancellor.
In the 1990s, Mahler switched to the opposite political extreme, becoming a member of the far-right National Democratic Party for a few years. He represented the party in 2001 in its case against an unsuccessful attempt by authorities to ban it.
Mahler racked up several convictions for denying the Holocaust, which earned him sentences totaling 10 years, and while in prison wrote a 200-page antisemitic screed that was put on the internet by unknown culprits.
In 2017, he fled to Hungary after being ordered to return to prison following a break from serving his sentence due to serious illness. Mahler said after he was arrested that he had requested asylum, but his claim was not confirmed by authorities. He was extradited to Germany and returned to prison.
Mahler was released in October 2020 and lived in Kleinmachnow, just outside Berlin. Another trial against him was shelved in April 2023 for health reasons and never resumed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sentebale war of words continues as charity calls for clarity on commission's probe into Prince Harry claims
The war of words over Sentebale is continuing, with the charity calling on the Charity Commission to provide clarity that its recent report did not specifically investigate claims of racism and misogyny against Prince Harry. Sources close to the Duke of Sussex claim they are "rehashing unsubstantiated allegations of bullying, misogyny and more", describing their latest move as not "just provocative, it's pitiful". A source at Sentebale has told Sky News: "We have written to The Charity Commission stating that the onus is on the commission to restate for the record that individual allegations of bullying have not been investigated or addressed in the commission's report." It comes after the Charity Commission report stated that "based on the evidence provided and reviewed by the commission, it found no evidence of: widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity". However, the commission added that it "acknowledged the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally". But sources at Sentebale believe the reporting around this statement - that Prince Harry has been cleared of bullying - has been inaccurate, as the charity watchdog did not specifically look at allegations made by the chair, Dr Sophie Chandauka, including during an exclusive interview on Sky News. A source close to Prince Harry and the former board of trustees has hit back, and said: "It's remarkable, just yesterday Ms Chanduaka was applauding the Charity Commission's findings, yet today, after a flurry of unflattering headlines, she's back on the warpath. "Issuing yet another media statement only reinforces the commission's criticism about using the press to air internal disputes. "Rehashing unsubstantiated allegations of bullying, misogyny and more, which the commission found no evidence of and dressing them up as veiled threats isn't just provocative, it's pitiful. "If Ms Chanduaka has genuine concerns, she should spell them out plainly or, better yet, redirect her energy toward something truly worthwhile, like raising money for the children Sentebale exists to support." It's understood Prince Harry and his supporters have also been left unsatisfied by the scope of the report, including their concerns about money spent on consultants that was authorised by Dr Chandauka. Read more from Sky News:Responding to Sky News, the Charity Commission said: "We have issued the charity with an action plan which sets out steps the current trustees need to take to improve governance weaknesses and rectify findings of mismanagement. "We now urge all involved to put their differences behind them and allow the charity to focus on its work and beneficiaries". Their report, released on Wednesday, was highly critical of all parties for allowing their disagreement to play out so publicly and allowing it to severely impact the charity's reputation.
Forbes
22 minutes ago
- Forbes
Swiss Shock - Can Switzerland Reverse The 39% Tariff?
The imposition of a 39% tariff on Swiss exports to the US has been greeted with shock, despair and much ire in Switzerland – the main newspaper NZZ greeting the move as 'absurd'. Considerable offense was taken by the fact that the announcement came on the Swiss National holiday (August 1st). Equally, local business leaders and economists have been perplexed by the fact that the tariffs have been calculated on the back of a trade deficit that was skewed by the export of gold – the deficit is now a surplus. Equally, many of the goods that Switzerland exports to the US, do not have competitors there (Swiss chocolate, watches and more importantly specialized industrial goods which are used by the likes of Boeing). Neither is the Swiss franc a weak currency. There is also a feeling in Switzerland that its role on the international stage, and facilitator of American diplomacy (the Swiss embassy in Tehran has traditionally acted 'for' the US), has gone un-noticed. Swiss politics is normally a very staid affair but this episode has led to infighting across the spectrum, and considerable blame has been focused on the President of the government Council, Karin Keller-Sutter. As a result, the Swiss negotiating team that will return to Washington this week will have representation from the conservative SVP, and more officials from the trade and finance divisions. The Swiss case highlights the flaws in the methodology of the White House approach. While its economy is extremely resilient, the Swiss will not be able to suffer a 39% tariff lightly. Our sense is that the counterargument will centre around a re-framing of the trade relationship between the two countries, a re-evaluation of how Swiss industry in particular helps US firms, and an undertaking for Swiss industry to invest in the US. The hope here is that Switzerland ends up with an EU style deal, of tariffs of 15%, and a somewhat empty promise to invest 'billions' into the US. From a diplomatic point of view, given that the Swiss had traditionally been so helpful to US interests, this is an own-goal by the White House. At the time of writing, there is no indication at all as to whether this episode pushes Switzerland closer to the EU (in terms of trade – there is no question of Switzerland joining the EU). For its part, the EU is still trying to get the White House to agree the wording of deal reached in Scotland – there is ongoing lobbying from the spirits industry in Europe, not to mention the auto manufacturers. The deal is not yet watertight and needs to be implemented by individual members. There is still uncertainty over the threats to place specific tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals firms based in Europe next week (Ireland in particular) and the USD 600bn that is supposed to be invested by European firms in the US. If sector specific tariffs are severe the backlash to the deal could grow and there is rising chance that it could fall apart.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What we know about Trump and Putin's Ukraine ceasefire face-to-face meeting
The US and Russian presidents are set to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine in a face-to-face meeting Donald Trump is set to meet with Vladimir Putin 'in the coming days' to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine, officials in Russia have said. News of a possible face-to-face meeting between the US and Russian presidents was first touted by Trump and the White House on Wednesday. The New York Times reported that Trump told European leaders during a call on Wednesday that he intended to meet with Putin and then follow up with a further meeting that would include Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump told reporters: 'There's a good chance that there will be a meeting very soon.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also said: 'The Russians expressed their desire to meet with president Trump, and the president is open to meeting with both president Putin and president Zelensky.' On Thursday, the Kremlin confirmed the meeting is planned for the next few days, marking the first summit between leaders of the two countries since 2021. But he did not comment on the possibility of another meeting including Zelensky. According to the Interfax news agency, Moscow's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said: 'At the suggestion of the American side, an agreement was essentially reached to hold a bilateral meeting at the highest level in the coming days, that is, a meeting between president Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. 'We are now beginning concrete preparations together with our American colleagues.' No details have been given as to where the summit would take place but a possible venue could be the United Arab Emirates, where Putin is due to fly to on Thursday for a meeting with its president. News of the meeting comes days before the deadline set by Trump for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions runs out. Trump has been increasingly frustrated with Putin over the lack of progress towards peace and has threatened to impose heavy tariffs on countries that buy Russian exports, including oil.
