logo
Hiroshima marks 80 years since atomic bombing

Hiroshima marks 80 years since atomic bombing

Hiroshima has marked the 80th anniversary of the US atomic bombing of the western Japanese city, with many aging survivors expressing frustration about growing support among global leaders for nuclear weapons possession for deterrence.
With the number of survivors rapidly declining and their average age now exceeding 86, Wednesday's anniversary is considered the last milestone event for many of them.
"We don't have much time left, while we face greater nuclear threat than ever," Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese grassroots organisation of survivors that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2024 for its pursuit of nuclear abolishment, said in a statement.
"Our biggest challenge now is to change nuclear weapons states that give us cold shoulders even just a little."
The bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, destroyed the city, killing 140,000 people. A second bomb dropped three days later on Nagasaki killed 70,000 more. Japan surrendered on August 15, ending World War II and Japan's nearly 50-year aggression in Asia.
The anniversary comes at a time that possession of nuclear weapons for deterrence is increasingly supported by the international community, including Japan.
US President Donald Trump 's remark justifying Washington's attack in June on Iran by comparing it to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the mild response from the Japanese government, disappointed the survivors.
"It's ridiculous," said Kosei Mito, a 79-year-old former high school teacher who was exposed to radiation in his mother's womb.
"I don't think we can get rid of nuclear weapons as long as it was justified by the assailant."
Japan's government has rejected the survivors' desperate request to sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons or attend its meeting as observers because it is under the protection of the US nuclear umbrella.
Past prime ministers have stressed Japan's status as the world's only country to have suffered nuclear attacks and have said Japan is determined to pursue peace, but survivors say it's a hollow promise.
The Japanese government has only paid compensation to war veterans and their families, even though survivors have sought redress for civilian victims. They have also sought acknowledgement by the US government of its responsibility for the civilian deaths.
Hiroshima has marked the 80th anniversary of the US atomic bombing of the western Japanese city, with many aging survivors expressing frustration about growing support among global leaders for nuclear weapons possession for deterrence.
With the number of survivors rapidly declining and their average age now exceeding 86, Wednesday's anniversary is considered the last milestone event for many of them.
"We don't have much time left, while we face greater nuclear threat than ever," Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese grassroots organisation of survivors that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2024 for its pursuit of nuclear abolishment, said in a statement.
"Our biggest challenge now is to change nuclear weapons states that give us cold shoulders even just a little."
The bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, destroyed the city, killing 140,000 people. A second bomb dropped three days later on Nagasaki killed 70,000 more. Japan surrendered on August 15, ending World War II and Japan's nearly 50-year aggression in Asia.
The anniversary comes at a time that possession of nuclear weapons for deterrence is increasingly supported by the international community, including Japan.
US President Donald Trump 's remark justifying Washington's attack in June on Iran by comparing it to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the mild response from the Japanese government, disappointed the survivors.
"It's ridiculous," said Kosei Mito, a 79-year-old former high school teacher who was exposed to radiation in his mother's womb.
"I don't think we can get rid of nuclear weapons as long as it was justified by the assailant."
Japan's government has rejected the survivors' desperate request to sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons or attend its meeting as observers because it is under the protection of the US nuclear umbrella.
Past prime ministers have stressed Japan's status as the world's only country to have suffered nuclear attacks and have said Japan is determined to pursue peace, but survivors say it's a hollow promise.
The Japanese government has only paid compensation to war veterans and their families, even though survivors have sought redress for civilian victims. They have also sought acknowledgement by the US government of its responsibility for the civilian deaths.
Hiroshima has marked the 80th anniversary of the US atomic bombing of the western Japanese city, with many aging survivors expressing frustration about growing support among global leaders for nuclear weapons possession for deterrence.
With the number of survivors rapidly declining and their average age now exceeding 86, Wednesday's anniversary is considered the last milestone event for many of them.
"We don't have much time left, while we face greater nuclear threat than ever," Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese grassroots organisation of survivors that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2024 for its pursuit of nuclear abolishment, said in a statement.
"Our biggest challenge now is to change nuclear weapons states that give us cold shoulders even just a little."
The bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, destroyed the city, killing 140,000 people. A second bomb dropped three days later on Nagasaki killed 70,000 more. Japan surrendered on August 15, ending World War II and Japan's nearly 50-year aggression in Asia.
The anniversary comes at a time that possession of nuclear weapons for deterrence is increasingly supported by the international community, including Japan.
US President Donald Trump 's remark justifying Washington's attack in June on Iran by comparing it to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the mild response from the Japanese government, disappointed the survivors.
"It's ridiculous," said Kosei Mito, a 79-year-old former high school teacher who was exposed to radiation in his mother's womb.
"I don't think we can get rid of nuclear weapons as long as it was justified by the assailant."
Japan's government has rejected the survivors' desperate request to sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons or attend its meeting as observers because it is under the protection of the US nuclear umbrella.
Past prime ministers have stressed Japan's status as the world's only country to have suffered nuclear attacks and have said Japan is determined to pursue peace, but survivors say it's a hollow promise.
The Japanese government has only paid compensation to war veterans and their families, even though survivors have sought redress for civilian victims. They have also sought acknowledgement by the US government of its responsibility for the civilian deaths.
Hiroshima has marked the 80th anniversary of the US atomic bombing of the western Japanese city, with many aging survivors expressing frustration about growing support among global leaders for nuclear weapons possession for deterrence.
With the number of survivors rapidly declining and their average age now exceeding 86, Wednesday's anniversary is considered the last milestone event for many of them.
"We don't have much time left, while we face greater nuclear threat than ever," Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese grassroots organisation of survivors that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2024 for its pursuit of nuclear abolishment, said in a statement.
"Our biggest challenge now is to change nuclear weapons states that give us cold shoulders even just a little."
The bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, destroyed the city, killing 140,000 people. A second bomb dropped three days later on Nagasaki killed 70,000 more. Japan surrendered on August 15, ending World War II and Japan's nearly 50-year aggression in Asia.
The anniversary comes at a time that possession of nuclear weapons for deterrence is increasingly supported by the international community, including Japan.
US President Donald Trump 's remark justifying Washington's attack in June on Iran by comparing it to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the mild response from the Japanese government, disappointed the survivors.
"It's ridiculous," said Kosei Mito, a 79-year-old former high school teacher who was exposed to radiation in his mother's womb.
"I don't think we can get rid of nuclear weapons as long as it was justified by the assailant."
Japan's government has rejected the survivors' desperate request to sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons or attend its meeting as observers because it is under the protection of the US nuclear umbrella.
Past prime ministers have stressed Japan's status as the world's only country to have suffered nuclear attacks and have said Japan is determined to pursue peace, but survivors say it's a hollow promise.
The Japanese government has only paid compensation to war veterans and their families, even though survivors have sought redress for civilian victims. They have also sought acknowledgement by the US government of its responsibility for the civilian deaths.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JD Vance is a favourite to be heir of ‘MAGA throne' for 2028 US presidency
JD Vance is a favourite to be heir of ‘MAGA throne' for 2028 US presidency

Sky News AU

time23 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

JD Vance is a favourite to be heir of ‘MAGA throne' for 2028 US presidency

Newsweek Senior Editor-at-Large Josh Hammer discusses US President Donald Trump saying US Vice President JD Vance is a 'favourite' to be the republican presidential candidate in 2028. 'This was half the purpose of Donald Trump selecting JD Vance … who is basically half his age,' Mr Hammer told Sky News Digital Presenter Gabriella Power. 'He made a very deliberate, conscious decision to put a serious thumb on a scale in terms of who the presumptuous successor to the MAGA throne would be.'

If the Modi-Trump bromance turns sour, what does that mean for India?
If the Modi-Trump bromance turns sour, what does that mean for India?

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

If the Modi-Trump bromance turns sour, what does that mean for India?

Relations between the United States and India have taken a turn for the worse over the past few months, culminating in US President Donald Trump announcing punitive tariffs on Delhi this week then upping the pain by effectively doubling them days later. But weren't they on friendly terms? It certainly looked like it. For years India's PM Narendra Modi and Mr Trump cultivated an image of being close — sharing hugs, praise and many ideological values. Mr Trump even hailed Mr Modi as one of "America's greatest, most devoted, and most loyal friends.' Donald Trump and Narendra Modi embrace after giving a joint statement in New Delhi in 2020. ( AP Photo: Manish Swarup ) What's changed? Mr Trump has launched a tariff war on the world and India was in his sights from the beginning. Now, Delhi's increased imports of Russian oil seem to have hit a nerve: "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are … selling it on the open market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine," Mr Trump said on social media. He initially announced tariffs of 25 per cent on India, higher than many of the US's allies in the region. Then, on Wednesday, he announced further tariffs of another 25 per cent as punishment for the Russian oil trade. A population of 1.4 billion people means India's energy demands are massive, and growing. ( Reuters: Rupak De Chowdhuri ) How did India respond to that? Not well. "The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable," a foreign ministry spokesperson said, adding that it will "take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security." What that looks like remains to be seen. Although it may not be a coincidence that Mr Modi is set to visit China for the first time in seven years at the end of August, a possible sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing. Also complicating matters is Washington's renewed embrace of India's sworn enemy and neighbour, Pakistan. Tell me more India and Pakistan came close to war earlier this year over Kashmir. Mr Trump claimed he brokered a peace deal, which is debatable. What's not debatable is that India didn't like him claiming credit. India expert Šumit Ganguly, from Stanford University, said Mr Trump's attempt to insert himself into the India-Pakistan crisis would have set off alarm bells in New Delhi. "[It would have] raised hackles in New Delhi owing to its long-standing aversion to external efforts to resolve its differences with Pakistan.'' After claiming he stopped a possible nuclear war, Mr Trump invited Pakistan's army chief to the White House and praised Islamabad's work on countering terrorism in the region. Sreeram Sundar Chaulia, from New Delhi's Jindal School of International Affairs, said this sudden admiration for Pakistan as a great partner in counterterrorism has "definitely soured" the mood in India. Pakistani armed forces chief Asim Munir has met with US President Donald Trump at the White House. ( Reuters: File ) "The best-case scenario is that this is just a passing Trump whim," he said but also warned that "if financial and energy deals are indeed being struck between the US and Pakistan, it will dent the US-India strategic partnership and lead to loss of confidence in the US in Indian eyes." So, what now? India needs to rethink its diplomacy, according to Ajay Darshan Behera from the Academy of International Studies at Jamia Millia Islamia in New Delhi. He said several factors can explain Washington's turn toward Pakistan. "For one, it reflects Trump's style of personalised diplomacy," he writes for 360info. "He took credit for the truce and publicly praised Pakistan's role in stabilising the region. In turn, Pakistan's military backed his narrative, with Munir even recommending that Trump deserved a Nobel Peace Prize. "This reset, however, isn't just about personalities. It reflects strategic needs. "With continuing tensions in West Asia and growing instability in Afghanistan, the US needs regional partners with deep networks in the region.'' Professor Behera said the fact Pakistan borders Iran, Afghanistan and China's Xinjiang region gives it a unique geopolitical leverage. He said the assumption that India could balance ties with the US, Russia and others without friction has begun to fray. A resident of Poonch, in Indian-controlled Kashmir along the Line of Control, inspects his house damaged by Pakistani artillery shelling. ( AP: Channi Anand ) "Washington's renewed engagement with Pakistan… reflects a willingness to work with India's rival when it suits US interests," he said. "In this fluid global order, India … will need to recalibrate its external messaging, refine its narrative on terrorism and build stronger, issue-based coalitions." This month Mr Modi will visit China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organisation that begins on August 31, his first trip there since June 2018. Since then, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in 2020. Mr Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia last October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbours are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two countries. ABC/AP/Reuters/360info

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store