DJ's death after festival prompts drug warning
A DJ died after taking a toxic mix of drugs during a popular music festival that he not only attended with his partner, but also played at.
Simon Lee Garside, known musically as Deep South Audio, died in 2023 after Splore, a three-day music and arts festival held at Tapapakanga Regional Park in Auckland.
Now, his death has drawn a fresh warning from Coroner Alison Mills about the dangers of drug-taking, especially when mixing different drugs, which can increase the risk of harm.
According to her findings, Garside, a 46-year-old father based in Golden Bay, often travelled to music festivals with his partner to DJ and sell vintage clothing.
Coroner Mills' findings stated that Garside occasionally used recreational drugs at music festivals and events, including MDMA and cocaine. The long weekend
His partner described his drug taking as being on the 'low side'.
In late February 2023, the couple travelled to Auckland to attend Splore.
His partner reported that during the festival, Garside took MDMA, cocaine and ketamine, sharing about a gram of cocaine over the weekend and taking a small amount of MDMA each day.
At least once during the long weekend, he experienced severe chest pain and had to stop and rest.
According to his partner, Garside had been experiencing chest pains and headaches for a month or two before his death.
Fearing it was a terminal illness, he was reluctant to see a doctor.
While Garside was not part of the official Splore line-up, he was part of the Lucky Star collective, an independent group that curates its own stage.
He performed a DJ set on that stage on the final day of the festival, February 26, and later that evening he and his partner checked into a hostel.
They had dinner at a restaurant, then took a gin and tonic back to their room and got into bed.
After some time, his partner noticed Garside had become unresponsive. He appeared stiff and his eyes were rolled backward.
She attempted to rouse him but received no response. Garside, who was put into the recovery position, vomited.
His partner gave him CPR and called emergency services.
Firefighters and paramedics attended but Garside could not be revived. He died just after midnight on February 27, 2023. A toxic combo of drugs
A subsequent pathologist's report found that fatal levels of cocaine, ketamine and MDMA caused Garside's death.
The coroner's report stated: 'The pathologist advised that the combined use of cocaine, benzoylecgonine, ecgonine, ketamine and MDMA is known to result in respiratory depression, somnolence, cardiac arrhythmia, coma and increases the risk for sudden death.'
Benzoylecgonine and ecgonine are metabolites of cocaine.
Coroner Mills agreed with the pathologist's findings.
'Cocaine and MDMA are both stimulants that increase the heart rate and blood pressure,' she said in her report.
'Mixing these drugs in combination can make you feel more stimulated but can also increase the risk of overstimulation. This can result in an increased heart rate, higher blood pressure, temperature, anxiety, panic, or overdose.
'Ketamine used in combination with stimulants (MDMA and cocaine) also increases the strain on a body.'
The coroner went on to warn that cocaine and ketamine combinations could be unpredictable.
She said the risk of experiencing harm was more likely if ketamine was used with another substance.
Coroner Mills made her comments in the findings in the hope of raising awareness, she said.
She encouraged people who chose to use recreational drugs to take steps to minimise the risk of harm by checking their drugs at drug testing facilities such as those offered by Know Your Stuff.
When looking at whether any other factors could have contributed to his death, the coroner noted that while he did not have a full autopsy, his post-mortem examination CT scan did not reveal any underlying heart condition or head injury.
'I note however that long-term use of cocaine is however associated with adverse cardiovascular consequences. In addition, mixing MDMA and cocaine places significant stress on the cardiovascular system.
'Therefore, if Simon had an underlying heart condition, he may have been more vulnerable to harm when mixing these two drugs.' 'Dearly remembered'
Fryderyk (Fred) Kublikowski, Splore's festival producer, said the festival community was devastated by Garside's death.
'Our sincere aroha and condolences are with his whānau and friends,' he told NZME in a statement.
'His contribution to the music scene of Aotearoa will be dearly remembered.'
Kublikowski said Splore has a comprehensive policy regarding drug use and testing, including a no-drugs policy for illicit drugs.
People were searched when entering the festival and amnesty bins were provided.
But the festival accepted that, despite legal prohibitions, individuals still engaged in recreational drug use.
As a result, the festival took several steps to keep people safe, including offering a free drug checking and advice service through Know Your Stuff.
Kublikowski said Splore remained committed to best-practice drug safety policies and harm reduction.
'We have read the coroner's report and are actively considering how to incorporate its recommendations and warnings into our drug safety protocols and communications,' Kublikowski said.
Know Your Stuff general manager Casey Spearin said the service was proud to have attended Splore for many years.
'Splore is a leader among festivals in Aotearoa for the amount of drug safety education and support services they offer,' Spearin told NZME.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Jetski tragedy: Vincent Cornell-Cooke died after giving lifejacket to brother, saying ‘I love you'
After his death, a Givealittle page was set up to raise support for Vincent's wife and children. In it 'Vinnie' was remembered as 'an amazing and loving husband and father, who poured his heart and soul into his family'. 'His generosity, courage, and devotion to his family and friends will forever leave a legacy of love and kindness,' the page read. Vincent "Vinnie" Cornell-Cooke died on Sunday, January 19, 2025 as a result of a jet ski incident on Lake Taupo. Photo / LinkedIn Now, a coroner's findings have been released outlining the circumstances of the tragic death, and providing safety recommendations for other jetski riders. A 30th birthday celebration On January 18, 2025, Vincent and his two brothers, Washington and Bronson, arrived in Taupō to celebrate Bronson's 30th birthday. They began celebrations with skydiving, followed by food and drinks at their hotel, before Vincent and Bronson went into town where they had 'a significant amount of alcohol', and then caught a taxi back to the hotel. The next day, the three brothers headed to the lake to use Bronson's jetski, taking it for a spin, one at a time. But about 12.30pm, Vincent and Bronson headed out on the jetski together, with Vincent driving and wearing the one lifejacket they had between them. Neither of them could swim. As the water became choppier, they were thrown without warning from the jetski. Vincent's lifejacket wasn't connected to the emergency safety engine cut-off switch, which meant the jetski circled before drifting away. Bronson told the coroner the men were 'freaking out', and he was struggling to stay afloat. Vincent took off the lifejacket, which Bronson reluctantly took. While Vincent struggled and eventually went under, Bronson managed to signal for help and people on the beach called emergency services. Police rescued Bronson about 1pm. A post-mortem listed Vincent's cause of death as drowning. A toxicology report did not detect any alcohol, but found methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) was present. The pathologist advised that 'MDMA is a stimulant that can contribute to impaired judgment, and it may have impacted [Vincent's] ability to safely operate the jetski'. However, the coroner noted the analysis did not indicate when this was ingested or in what quantities. Tragic, but 'highly preventable', says coroner Coroner Ian Telford began his recommendations by acknowledging Vincent's death was tragic. He said the circumstances around it were 'profoundly moving – an enduring example of someone making the ultimate sacrifice for their brother'. However, he also said that while he didn't wish to add to the family's pain, he had assessed that Vincent's death was 'highly preventable'. Telford said Vincent's consumption of alcohol and recent ingestion of MDMA may have impaired his condition and judgment, but also noted, 'while Vincent may not have been in optimal condition', it appears that the jetski capsizing was, fundamentally, 'an unforeseeable accident'. 'It could have been caused by random instability of the craft or roughness of the water. There is simply no way to determine the exact cause of the capsizing.' The main factors the coroner considered relevant were that Vincent ended up without a lifejacket and couldn't swim; and a cord was not attached to Vincent's wrist or lifejacket, so the engine cut-off switch wasn't activated. 'This prevented the brothers from being able to reboard the jetski, or at least use it to aid their flotation.' The coroner said Vincent's chances of survival would have been 'considerably higher' had he been wearing a lifejacket and properly using the emergency safety engine cut-off switch on the jetski. 'By bringing this finding to the public's attention, it is hoped that other jetski users will rediscover the lifesaving value of taking these small safety steps, and also recognise the potentially devastating consequences of neglecting them.' Telford also urged people to refer to Maritime New Zealand's website, and take note of its advice. Some of the key information he summarised was: Wear a lifejacket that is right for you and put it on before setting off Most accidents occur without warning, and there may be no time to grab a life jacket unless it is close to hand It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to put on a lifejacket once you are in the water Avoid alcohol [and drugs] Hannah Bartlett is a Tauranga-based Open Justice reporter at NZME. She previously covered court and local government for the Nelson Mail, and before that was a radio reporter at Newstalk ZB.
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Woman avoids conviction for on-sharing image of partly naked woman
By Tracy Neal, Open Justice multimedia journalist A woman ended up in court for on-sharing an image of a partly naked woman which had been sent to a social media chat group she was part of. The action of sharing the image resulted in the 52-year-old woman being charged, but ultimately she avoided a conviction because of her lesser involvement in the reposting 'equation'. For that reason her name was also permanently suppressed. 'She did little to add to a problem created by someone else,' a judge found. The charge of posting an intimate visual recording carried a maximum two-year prison term or a $50,000 fine. It was a 'salutary lesson' in how easy it was to end up facing criminal charges by sending digital material that could harm someone, police told NZME outside the Nelson District Court this week. 'This really was a perfect storm of factors that led to the offending,' defence lawyer Amanda Godwin said inside the court at the woman's hearing. The defendant was charged after the victim complained to the police. Judge Stephen Harrop said it was a serious charge, and the court recognised the serious harm caused to people by the posting of such material, but the defendant had since suffered 'serious abuse' online, making her a victim of harmful social media too. She had suffered other consequences, including the loss of a contract linked to her business. The court heard that in January this year, the defendant met on TikTok an Australian man, who had received the intimate image from the complainant via Snapchat. He shared the image to a Messenger group of about 13 people, to which the defendant belonged. Another member of the group 'doctored' the image to make it animated and shared it with the defendant, who sent it to the TikTok acquaintance to 'double check' that he had seen it. The person who doctored the image and shared it has been charged and will be sentenced in a South Island court next month. Judge Harrop said the 'real culprit' was the man who shared it initially, but he acknowledged that the victim was concerned about it having been reposted. He said the circumstances were 'very different' to someone surreptitiously taking an image and posting it, and that the woman who had taken the image and sent it was part of the equation. 'We have a situation where the victim put it out in the first place, which was intended for one person but was then published to a group of 13,' Judge Harrop said. 'It does mean the seriousness of the offending is less than what appeared.' He said the defendant had afterwards suffered a 'sustained campaign of harassment and abuse' online and that she too had become a victim. She had since been diagnosed with a mental health condition that was likely to make her act impulsively, which was recognised by a psychologist in the pre-sentence report writing process. The consequences of a conviction were therefore likely to be greater than they might be for someone more resilient, Judge Harrop said in granting a discharge without conviction. The defendant was ordered to make a $200 emotional harm payment to the victim. The judge also granted permanent name suppression. He said the public 'may well conclude' that the woman should have been convicted and that it was unfair to discharge her and then allow her name to be published, even though that did not automatically follow. 'I'm satisfied for the reasons you were granted interim name suppression, and a discharge without conviction, the test for final suppression has been met,' Judge Harrop said.
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
52-year-old in court for sharing image of partly naked woman
By Tracy Neal, Open Justice multimedia journalist A woman ended up in court for on-sharing an image of a partly naked woman which had been sent to a social media chat group she was part of. The action of sharing the image resulted in the 52-year-old woman being charged, but ultimately she avoided a conviction because of her lesser involvement in the reposting 'equation'. For that reason her name was also permanently suppressed. 'She did little to add to a problem created by someone else,' a judge found. The charge of posting an intimate visual recording carried a maximum two-year prison term or a $50,000 fine. It was a 'salutary lesson' in how easy it was to end up facing criminal charges by sending digital material that could harm someone, police told NZME outside the Nelson District Court this week. 'This really was a perfect storm of factors that led to the offending,' defence lawyer Amanda Godwin said inside the court at the woman's hearing. The defendant was charged after the victim complained to the police. Judge Stephen Harrop said it was a serious charge, and the court recognised the serious harm caused to people by the posting of such material, but the defendant had since suffered 'serious abuse' online, making her a victim of harmful social media too. She had suffered other consequences, including the loss of a contract linked to her business. The court heard that in January this year, the defendant met on TikTok an Australian man, who had received the intimate image from the complainant via Snapchat. He shared the image to a Messenger group of about 13 people, to which the defendant belonged. Another member of the group 'doctored' the image to make it animated and shared it with the defendant, who sent it to the TikTok acquaintance to 'double check' that he had seen it. The person who doctored the image and shared it has been charged and will be sentenced in a South Island court next month. Judge Harrop said the 'real culprit' was the man who shared it initially, but he acknowledged that the victim was concerned about it having been reposted. He said the circumstances were 'very different' to someone surreptitiously taking an image and posting it, and that the woman who had taken the image and sent it was part of the equation. 'We have a situation where the victim put it out in the first place, which was intended for one person but was then published to a group of 13,' Judge Harrop said. 'It does mean the seriousness of the offending is less than what appeared.' He said the defendant had afterwards suffered a 'sustained campaign of harassment and abuse' online and that she too had become a victim. She had since been diagnosed with a mental health condition that was likely to make her act impulsively, which was recognised by a psychologist in the pre-sentence report writing process. The consequences of a conviction were therefore likely to be greater than they might be for someone more resilient, Judge Harrop said in granting a discharge without conviction. The defendant was ordered to make a $200 emotional harm payment to the victim. The judge also granted permanent name suppression. He said the public 'may well conclude' that the woman should have been convicted and that it was unfair to discharge her and then allow her name to be published, even though that did not automatically follow. 'I'm satisfied for the reasons you were granted interim name suppression, and a discharge without conviction, the test for final suppression has been met,' Judge Harrop said.
