
Energy bills across Europe: What share of the cost is made up of tax?
Rising energy prices after Russia's invasion of Ukraine hit households hard, especially low-income families. Although prices have stabilised somewhat, energy bills are still a burden for many.
Taxes make up a large part of gas and electricity costs, and these vary widely across Europe. Some countries offer subsidies or allowances to support households. In those cases, taxes can even appear as negative values.
So, how much of your energy bill goes to taxes — including energy taxes, levies, and VAT? In which countries do people pay the most in total taxes? And where do governments step in with subsidies or support schemes?
The Household Energy Price Index (HEPI), compiled by Energie-Control Austria, MEKH, and VaasaETT, tracks residential electricity and gas prices in European capital cities. Besides energy and distribution costs, the breakdown shows energy taxes and VAT.
As of April 2024, the average share of total taxes in household electricity prices across EU capitals was 22% — made up of 8% energy taxes and 14% VAT. This share ranged from -26% in Amsterdam to 49% in Copenhagen, followed by 41% in Stockholm. The average for EU capitals stands at 22%.
In Amsterdam, energy taxes stood at -43%, while VAT was 17%, resulting in a significant negative overall tax share. Excluding this effect, VAT accounts for 17% of the price breakdown.
According to the HEPI report, since January 2020, a typical consumer in Amsterdam pays zero energy tax due to the increased amount of tax credit, which exceeds the indicated energy tax amount. On the contrary, they receive a refund on the exceeding tax credit amount. The goal is to encourage electrification and a shift away from gas heating and appliances.
A similar case is seen in Luxembourg City, where energy tax is -13% and VAT is 7%. The policy there aims to stabilise prices at 2022 levels.
In Valletta, Nicosia, and Dublin, the share of taxes in electricity bills is also relatively low — 11% or less.
Besides the two Nordic capitals, the share of total taxes exceeds 30% in several other cities, including Brussels (37%), Berlin (34%), Oslo (33%), and both Madrid and Helsinki (32%).
For residential end-user gas prices, the average share of taxes across EU capitals is 28%, which is higher than for electricity. It ranges 5% in Zagreb to 49% in Amsterdam.
In the Dutch capital, energy tax for a residential natural gas user makes up around 32% of the end-user price.
Residents in Berlin (40%), Vienna (32%), Rome and Stockholm (both 31%), and Paris (30%) face the highest total gas taxes, after Amsterdam.
In contrast, following the Croatian capital, Athens (9%), Belgrade (9%), and London (11%) recorded the lowest overall tax shares in residential gas prices.
In Vilnius, a typical household receives a tax refund on energy, resulting in a negative energy tax share of -5%.
'Energy taxes depend on national policies, environmental plans and different market structures in general,' Rafaila Grigoriou, HEPI project manager & head of VaasaETT's Greek office, and Ioannis Korras, senior energy market analyst at VaasaETT, told Euronews Business.
For example, they noted that Denmark has utilised high energy taxes as a tool for the green energy transition, subsidising renewable energy systems (RES) investment and promoting energy efficiency, making the country a leader in wind energy.
The role of national policies in energy taxation is especially clear in some cases. Grigoriou and Korras emphasised that consumers in Amsterdam pay the highest taxes on natural gas in Europe, driven by a national climate policy aimed at reducing gas consumption. On the contrary, households receive a significant tax rebate on their electricity bills.
'This is intended to incentivise a shift away from gas heating and promote electrification,' they added.
When comparing cities or countries, it's important to distinguish between the share of taxes in energy bills and the actual amount paid. These are different indicators, as the total tax amount depends on the underlying energy price.
For example, the tax share for electricity is 21% in both Rome and Budapest. However, this doesn't mean consumers pay the same in absolute terms. In Budapest, 21% equals 1.92 c€/kWh, while in Rome, it amounts to 6.8 c€/kWh — a significant difference.
Household end-user electricity and gas prices differ significantly across Europe.
According to HEPI, in April 2025, electricity prices ranged from 9.1 c€/kWh in Budapest to 40.4 c€/kWh in Berlin. The gas prices varied from 2.5c€/kWh in Budapest to 34.1 c€/kWh in Stockholm.
When comparing energy prices, it's also important to consider purchasing power standards (PPS). Our article, "Electricity and Gas Prices Across Europe," takes a closer look at prices both in nominal terms and PPS-adjusted values, and explains why these can differ significantly across countries.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Europe's troubled waters: Does EU Ocean Pact meet the challenge?
Europe 12:04 Issued on: From the show Europe is trying to put itself at the forefront of the global ocean agenda, releasing its Ocean Pact ahead of a United Nations Oceans Conference in the French coastal city of Nice. More than 90 percent of EU marine waters are overexploited by industrial fishing, seabed mining and growing offshore infrastructure, according to Seas At Risk, an association of environmental organisations from across Europe. And yet, healthy oceans are the precondition for breathing healthy air, ensuring sustainable food supplies and securing energy independence – as more of our electricity is set to come from the sea. With oceans being so interconnected with so much else in our lives, it's not surprising that MEPs are saying the EU should give its ocean policy higher priority, and lead by example at UNOC in Nice. We discuss what's at stake with two MEPs.


France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
EU backs 'cornerstone of international justice' after US sanctions ICC judges
The EU gave its backing on Friday to the International Criminal Court after Washington imposed sanctions on four ICC judges, and EU member Slovenia said it would push Brussels to use its power to ensure the US sanctions could not be enforced in Europe. EU member France also said it was renewing its call on the US to withdraw all sanctions against the court. 'The ICC holds perpetrators of the world's gravest crimes to account and gives victims a voice. It must be free to act without pressure,' European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen said on social media platform X. Antonio Costa, president of the European Council, which represents national governments of the 27 member states, called the court 'a cornerstone of international justice' and said its independence and integrity must be protected. US President Donald Trump 's administration imposed sanctions on four judges at the ICC in retaliation for the war tribunal's issuance of an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a past decision to open a case into alleged war crimes by US troops in Afghanistan. The US order names Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin and Beti Hohler of Slovenia. The US sanctions mean the judges are now on a list of specially designated sanctioned individuals. Any US assets they have will be blocked and they are put on an automated screening service used by not only American banks but many banks worldwide, making it very difficult for sanctioned persons to hold or open bank accounts or transfer money. Trump's initial order announcing sanctions on the ICC also said that US citizens who provide services for the benefit of sanctioned individuals could face civil and criminal penalties. France said on Friday it backed the International Criminal Court after Washington imposed sanctions on four ICC judges, and said it was renewing its call on the United States to withdraw all its sanctions against the court. "France expresses its solidarity with the judges targeted by this decision, and reaffirms its unwavering support for the ICC and its staff, whose role is essential in the fight against impunity," the French Foreign Ministry said in a statement. Slovenia urges EU to block sanctions Slovenia urged the EU to use its blocking statute, which lets the EU ban European companies from complying with US sanctions that Brussels deems unlawful. The power has been used in the past to prevent Washington from banning European trade with Cuba and Iran. 'Due to the inclusion of a citizen of an EU member state on the sanctions list, Slovenia will propose the immediate activation of the blocking act,' Slovenia's foreign ministry said in a post on social media site X late on Thursday. ICC president Judge Tomoko Akane had urged the EU already in March this year to bring the ICC into the scope of the blocking statute. The new sanctions have been imposed at a difficult time for the ICC, which is already reeling from earlier US sanctions against its chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, who last month stepped aside temporarily amid a United Nations investigation into alleged sexual misconduct. The court's governing body, which represents its 125 member states, on Friday condemned the US government's decision to retaliate against judges. 'These ... are regrettable attempts to impede the Court and its personnel in the exercise of their independent judicial functions,' the Presidency of the Assembly of States Parties said.


France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
EU states look to trim compensation for flight delays
At present, passengers in Europe have a right to between 250 and 600 euros ($285-685) in compensation, depending on flight distance, for delays of three hours or more. But airlines complain that leaves them a hefty bill, and often leads them to cancel flights rather than run them with a long delay, due to knock-on effects on flight schedules. A majority of EU states agreed late Thursday to change the rules, overcoming opposition from Germany in particular, following hours of painstaking negotiations in Luxembourg. Under the new system, the compensation threshold would increase to four hours for flights of up to 3,500 kilometres (2,175 miles), or connecting cities inside the European Union, with its amount set at 300 euros. For longer flights, the right to compensation of 500 euros would kick in after a six-hour delay. The European Consumer Organisation BEUC slammed the plan, saying the "new eligibility thresholds will deprive the majority of passengers from their compensation rights", as most delays are between two and four hours. It urged European lawmakers -- who have yet to approve the text -- to uphold passengers' rights. The compromise did not satisfy airlines either, with the umbrella group Airlines for Europe (A4E) -- which includes Air France-KLM, Lufthansa, Ryanair and easyJet -- complaining that it "introduced even more complexity" than the initial European Commission plan. But a spokesperson for the French aviation industry federation called it a "step forward" for consumers. The rules changes "clarify the law and will avoid many recurrent court disputes," said the spokesperson, Laurent Timset. Poland's infrastructure minister Dariusz Klimczak, whose country currently holds the EU presidency, meanwhile cheered the creation of "over 30 new rights" for passengers, in a statement announcing the deal. Those include a "right to be rerouted" at the earliest opportunity, including through flights operated by other carriers or alternative transport modes. The plan also creates a system for passengers to be automatically compensated for flights cancelled within 14 days of departure. And it spells out the right to assistance -- refreshments, food, accommodation -- when travel is disrupted. France's transport minister Philippe Tabarot declared himself satisfied with the compromise.