
Ban high-seas fishing, mining 'forever': Experts
PARIS: Governments should ban all mining and fishing in the high seas "forever" to protect ocean biodiversity, climate stability -- and humanity, climate and ocean experts said Wednesday.
In a commentary in the journal Nature, published ahead of a UN oceans summit in France, researchers and conservationists called on governments to act more decisively to protect marine habitats outside national jurisdiction.
They warned that exploitation of the high seas, including new proposals to mine the seabed and fish for species at greater depths, "risks doing irreversible damage" to life in the ocean, as well as undermining its crucial role in regulating the world's climate.
A landmark treaty to protect the high seas -- adopted in 2023 but still only halfway to ratification -- will be in the spotlight at the June 9 to 13
UN Ocean Conference
in Nice.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting
Luxeartisanship
Buy Now
Undo
It is seen as crucial to meeting the globally-agreed target of protecting 30 percent of oceans by 2030.
But the experts behind the Nature commentary, entitled "Why we should protect the high seas from all extraction, forever", say countries should go further.
Lead author Callum Roberts, Professor of Marine Conservation at Britain's University of Exeter, said the world should take as an example the global agreement to protect Antarctica as a "planetary commons that is really important for all life on Earth".
"(They should agree to) keep it intact and undisturbed, so we don't release these potentially catastrophic consequences from exploitation that we can't control," he told AFP.
The high seas cover nearly half of Earth's surface but less than one percent is currently protected, the authors said.
Exploitation of the open ocean goes back to the intensification of whaling in the 17th century, causing dramatic depletion of the global whale population.
Since then humans have turned to harvesting sharks, fish and squid.
But the Nature article authors stress that marine animals do not just provide food and other products for humans -- they also form part of the Earth's carbon cycle which is essential to the very air we breathe.
Some animals living in the "twilight zone", at depths between 200 and 1,000 metres (650 and 3,300 feet) swim up towards the surface to feed at night and dive back down, depositing carbon-rich faeces deep in the ocean.
This happens at such a huge scale that it affects the balance of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Roberts said that research suggests that without this process the world would already be up to three degrees hotter than the pre-industrial era. Global surface temperatures last year averaged just over 1.5C.
'Self interest'
Another process sees nutrients redistributed as dead plants, animals and excretions sink down from the surface, providing sustenance for more life which in turn takes up more CO2.
This natural cycle has already been slowed by centuries of intensive exploitation and is now further threatened by pressure to fish at greater depths, mainly to provide fishmeal and oil for aquaculture, the authors said.
This risks both reducing a key food source for tuna, sharks and dolphins, but also curbing the amount of carbon the ocean can take up.
High-seas fishing
is prone to by-catch that kills millions of sharks every year and thousands of turtles and seabirds. A total ban, the authors say, would enable species recovery that would significantly improve potential catches closer to shore.
Protecting these animals is not an "act of self sacrifice, but of self interest" said Roberts.
"The planet is in a very dangerous place in terms of the rapidity of
climate change
, and we need to pull all the levers that we can right now to slow the pace."
Another concern is
deep-sea mining
.
Would-be miners eager to extract mineral-rich nodules from the deepest ocean floor have so far been held back by efforts to regulate such potentially damaging exploration.
But US President Donald Trump recently sparked global outrage with an order to fast-track deep-sea mining in the open ocean outside American territorial waters.
Roberts said "the argument that we've got to go there to power the green transition is total nonsense".
He said that while governments may balk at a sweeping moratorium on exploitation of the high seas, they should understand that "things are much harder to stop when they've already begun".

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Why Pakistan monitoring Taliban in UNSC is a rogue on police duty
Pakistan as chair of the UNSC's 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee for 2025 may appear like a routine act in international diplomacy, but it's seemingly a deeply troubling irony. It will hold this position till December 31, 2025, while also serving as one of the vice-chairs of the 15-member UNSC's Counter-Terrorism accused of harbouring and aiding the Taliban, from its formation in 1994 to its resurgence in 2021, Pakistan is now tasked with overseeing punitive measures against it. Yet, there's a parallel truth to it — the Taliban, the very force Pakistan once nurtured, now appears increasingly estranged from it. The Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), an offshoot of the outfit, has unleashed waves of deadly violence across the country over the years. In 2024, nearly 15,000 Taliban fighters reportedly mobilised towards the Durand Line after Pakistani airstrikes targeted TTP positions inside signs of this estrangement are evident diplomatically too. The Taliban government in Afghanistan recently condemned the Pahalgam terror attack in India, stating that "such acts threaten regional security". This statement came during External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's first outreach to the "acting Afghan foreign minister", Amir Khan Muttaqi, on May 15, though India has not officially recognised the Taliban ARE SOME CONCERNS?Now, with Pakistan as the chair of the committee responsible for overseeing sanctions, including asset freezes, travel bans, and arms embargoes against individuals and entities associated with the Taliban that threaten peace and security in Afghanistan and the region, the concerns are PLATFORM TO PAK: Firstly, though Pakistan's appointment as the chair is as per UN norms, it gives the seemingly rogue nation a legitimate platform and undermines the credibility of the UN to combat terrorism. Moreover, Islamabad can use this position to deflect or downplay India's longstanding allegations of its support for terrorism and whitewash its case on an international diplomatic has consistently raised concerns about Pakistan hosting the world's largest number of UN-proscribed terrorists and terror entities. One of the biggest examples of this was al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden was found hiding in Abbottabad, about 1.5 kilometres from the Pakistani military's compounds, before being killed in a 2011 US is also the most persistently flagged country on the Financial Action Task Force List (FATF) grey list, as many as three times. India will reportedly send a dossier to the FATF before its plenary meeting in June to push for the re-inclusion of Pakistan in its grey list. The government will also reportedly oppose further World Bank funding to DISRUPT INDIA-TALIBAN DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS: Secondly, it is important to note that the Taliban administration and India have been intensifying ties since the outfit again came to power in Kabul on August 16, Pakistan chairing the sanctions committee against the Taliban, it may use the position to closely monitor or disrupt these diplomatic efforts, especially if it believes India's engagement with the Afghanistan government threatens Islamabad, mainly in the wake of the conflict on the Durand Line, and the Balochistan 2021, when the Baloch insurgency gained renewed momentum, Islamabad has repeatedly accused New Delhi of fomenting unrest in the it has also been alleged that Afghanistan provides a safe haven for Baloch insurgents, particularly in the border provinces of Nimroz and Kandahar. It is important to note that many Baloch tribes have straddled the Afghanistan-Pakistan border for centuries and share deep cultural and linguistic ties with communities in southern parallel dynamics — India's growing regional influence and the ethnic affinity between Balochs and Afghans — have long unsettled decisions in the UNSC committees are made by consensus, chairs have significant procedural influence, like meeting agendas and the framing of development has also triggered a political storm in India, with the Opposition Congress saying that Pakistan getting such positions in the UN shows that India's foreign policy has collapsed. The Congress urged that the Centre must take resolute diplomatic actions to de-hyphenate India and Pakistan on the global the Indian government has not officially responded, it remains to be seen how New Delhi's diplomatic machinery will counter Pakistan's use of international InMust Watch


Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
How dangerous is Russia's advance on Ukraine's Sumy region?
AI- Generated Image Russian troops are advancing their operations in the northern Ukrainian region of Sumy. Ukraine's regional military administration has confirmed that four settlements on the border have come under Russian control. Prior to this, the Ukrainian army had almost completely withdrawn from the parts of the Russian region of Kursk it had been occupying since August last year. Russia then intensified its shelling of Ukrainian border areas, with Ukrainian authorities ordering the evacuation of 11 villages as a result. In late May, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed that Russia was preparing an offensive in the Sumy region. He said that Moscow had concentrated its "largest, strongest forces" on the Kursk front, and that troops continued to amass near the border. He added that over 50,000 troops were already at the Sumy front, but that Russia did not have the capacity to establish any sort of "buffer zone" 10 kilometres (6.2 miles) into Ukrainian territory. Not the first time Putin announces a 'buffer zone' Mykhailo Samus, a military expert and director of the New Geopolitics Research Network, believes that the fears triggered by Russian President Vladimir Putin's recent statements on establishing a "buffer zone" in Ukraine are "exaggerated." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo He told DW it was not the first time that Russia had announced such intentions. "There are no buffer zones there, and there won't be any. There are repeated Russian attempts to attack Ukrainian territory," Samus said. "One year ago, they tried to attack the entire Kharkiv region. They penetrated six or seven kilometres deep into the area around the town of Vovchansk. A year later, we can see that [the troops' advance] stopped there." Ukraine and Russia trying to capture advantageous positions The expert pointed out that Ukraine's forces army had also made advances into the Russian regions of Belgorod and Kursk. "Both the Ukrainian and Russian armed forces are trying to capture the most advantageous positions in the border area, from which they can carry out shelling and maintain operational control," he explained. This was especially important for "the conduct of subsequent operations, that is, to occupy high ground, take advantage of geographical features, and prepare as effectively as possible for further developments. " According to his estimation, Russia does not currently have enough troops near the border to advance deep into unoccupied Ukrainian territory. He added that the occupation of parts of the region around Sumy did not yet give Moscow a tactical advantage. "[Russian forces] will try to move towards favourable heights," he said. "The Ukrainian army knows this, and will take action against them." Is Russia trying to capture Yunakivka ? According to Ruslan Mykula, the co-founder of the independent Ukrainian intelligence service DeepState UA, the current Russian territorial gains around Sumy are not yet a "great success" considering the superiority of their troops in terms of numbers. At the same time, he told DW, there is still a risk of further advances by Russian troops farther into the Sumy region, even if the Ukrainian defence forces "have already learned to fight against a superior enemy. " In his opinion, the Russians' main target is the strategically important village of Yunakivka. He said that this would clear the way into a large adjacent forest area. "If they advance into the forest, it will cause a lot of problems. Whoever has the larger infantry has a significant advantage here." He added that the occupation of Yunakivka would create new hazards for the civilian population, as Russia would then be able to launch First Person View (FPV) drone attacks on Sumy's city centre from there. "We could experience a situation such as in Kherson, Nikopol or Kostyantynivka, where the Russians have used such drones to hit buses and civilian trucks. That is why we must not allow the enemy to reach Yunakivka," Mykula warned.


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Morgan Stanley opens xAI books with Musk in Trump crosshairs
Even before Elon Musk and President Donald Trump 's public falling out, selling debt for the tech mogul's companies has always been tricky for Morgan Stanley . But xAI Corp. was supposed to be different. Beyond the frenzy around artificial intelligence in markets of late, internal numbers, which the bank revealed to a select group of investors Thursday, show a company that anticipates generating more than $13 billion of annual earnings by 2029, according to a person with knowledge of the figures. Yet the Musk-Trump feud, which has exploded into public view and degenerated into an ugly tit-for-tat for all to see, will now almost certainly make the bankers' task more complicated. Trump, as he's proven with Harvard and Columbia Universities, is willing to use unconventional tactics to punish those who challenge him, and all companies in Musk's empire, including xAI, could wind up in the crosshairs. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Una abuela sigue cayéndose de su silla de ruedas - Su hijo pone cámaras y ve la verdad Plays Star Undo It wasn't immediately clear how the debt sale effort had been affected by the clash. The price of a loan for social-media-platform X, another of Musk's companies that is attached to xAI in a broader enterprise, was down roughly 1.25 points on Thursday, as their arguments became more ferocious online. By late Thursday, Musk signaled he would move to cool tensions with Trump, while White House aides ahd scheduled a call between the two to avoid further escalation, Politico reported. Live Events A representative for Morgan Stanley declined to comment, while xAI didn't respond to a request for comment made after normal business hours. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories In meetings Thursday, investors who were willing to write checks of at least $50 million were allowed to view limited statistics about xAI, including revenue, earnings, cash flow and projections, said multiple people with knowledge of the situation, who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The figures showed xAI losing money and burning cash, which is typical for a startup in the AI industry. The company had $52 million in gross revenue during the first quarter and lost $341 million before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, according to material shared with investors. The company projects that figure — known as Ebitda in Wall Street parlance — will be $2.7 billion in 2027 and $13.1 billion in 2029, one of the people said. xAI anticipates $1 billion in gross revenue by the end of this year, which it predicts will grow to $14 billion by 2029, the person added. Its cash flow from operations was negative $220 million after spending $2.6 billion on capital expenditures, that person added. The company plans to spend $18 billion on investments in data centers going forward. The figures were not audited nor were they subject to the same accounting standards publicly traded companies follow, the people said.