
Stocks are mixed and S&P 500 hovers near record high as Washington and Beijing discuss trade
US stocks were mixed on Monday and the S&P 500 approached an all-time high as trade talks between the US and China kicked off in London.
The Dow fell 75 points. The broader S&P 500 was flat and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite gained 0.15%. Stocks were relatively unchanged as investors monitored developments from the trade talks.
The S&P 500 on Friday hit its highest level since February and was less than 2.4% away from hitting a new record high.
The Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq are coming off of back-to-back weeks of gains. The US stock market has steadily rallied in the last two months as President Donald Trump has softened his initial plan for sweeping tariffs. After the S&P 500 tumbled to the precipice of a bear market in early April, the index has rallied more than 20%.
'Markets have moved higher on tariff postponement and the perception that they will be more moderate than initially announced,' said Richard Saperstein, chief investment officer at Treasury Partners. 'We expect markets to remain headline sensitive, as trade deals take time to negotiate and unsettling tariff news is likely to cause noticeable volatility.'
Wall Street last week rallied on optimistism about a potential thaw in trade tensions between the United States and China. The meeting on Monday between representatives from Washington and Beijing comes after Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke by phone on Thursday.
The S&P 500's ascent towards a record high comes after a year of wild swings. Wall Street this year has been shaken by historic levels of uncertainty and volatility as Trump has gone back and forth on tariffs.
The S&P 500 slumped in March and early April as Trump rolled out his plan for massive tariffs, hitting its lowest level of the year on April 8. The market then steadily regained ground since as Trump softened his approach and paused most tariffs.
Markets have also received a boost from relatively strong economic data that has soothed nerves about how the economy has been holding up during the early stages of Trump's tariff regime. Investors this week will be attuned to new inflation data for the month of May.
The S&P 500's record high of 6,144.15 was set on February 19. The benchmark index fell as low as 4,982.77 on April 8, about 18.9% below that high, before staging a remarkable recovery.
Wall Street banks this year have have slashed and then raised their year-end projections for the S&P 500 as shifts in trade policy and surprisingly strong economic data have changed the outlook for markets.
Goldman Sachs in May raised its year-end target for the S&P 500 to 6,100 after the bank had previously cut its target twice this year. UBS in May raised its target to 6,000 after similarly having cut it earlier in the year.
Other banks have taken note, too. Deutsche Bank last week raised its year-end target to 6,550 after also having cut it earlier. JPMorgan Chase on Thursday raised its year-end target to 6,000 after a previous cut. The S&P 500 is trading just above 6,000 as of Monday.
'The earnings outlook has been sensitive to policy decisions to an unprecedented degree, specifically on tariffs,' analysts at Deutsche Bank said in a June 2 note. 'We now see the tariff drag at only about one-third of what we previously penciled in.'
Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA Research, said in a Monday note that if the S&P 500 eclipses a new record high, it will officially end the correction that the index entered on March 13, when it had just fallen 10% from its February high. A correction is a Wall Street term for falling 10% from a record high.
Historically, the S&P 500 has risen an average of 10% over the next 127 days at the conclusion of a correction, according to Stovall. 'Meaningful, extended gains are not assured, however,' he said.
'Absent major policy surprises, the path of least resistance is to new highs,' analysts at JPMorgan Chase said in a Thursday note.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Big changes are being proposed for a US food aid program. Here's a breakdown by the numbers
TPresident Donald Trump's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food aid for lower-income people . The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ditched by Trump's EEOC, job applicant advances bias lawsuit against Sheetz
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. A Black job applicant who alleged that gas station chain Sheetz disproportionately screened out Black, Native American, Alaskan Native and multiracial applicants moved to continue his case June 5 after the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission abandoned it. EEOC filed a class-action lawsuit in April 2024 alleging that Sheetz maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for past criminal convictions and rejected those with such records. This practice violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, EEOC said in a press release, because it had a disparate impact on applicants of certain racial backgrounds. However, the agency moved to have the case dismissed last week because it determined that the disparate-impact claims would conflict with President Donald Trump's April 23 executive order directing agencies to cease enforcement of such claims. EEOC asked the court to defer dismissal of its claims by 60 days to allow the commission to notify class members so that they could obtain private representation. The legality of Trump's executive order on disparate-impact claims proved contentious, with one of EEOC's own administrative judges calling the order 'highly illegal.' But the June 5 filing in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania is one of the first examples in which the order has been put into practice. Trump said the end of disparate-impact liability enforcement was necessary because it inhibited businesses from hiring applicants on the basis of merit and skill. He also said that disparate-impact liability is unconstitutional and 'threatens the commitment to merit and equality of opportunity that forms the foundation of the American Dream.' The push to end disparate-impact liability is one of the goals stated by the conservative Heritage Foundation in its 'Project 2025' presidential transition document. The organization wrote that the concept should be thrown out because under disparate-impact theory, 'discriminatory motive or intent is irrelevant; the outcome is what matters. But all workplaces have disparities.' That logic has been met with resistance by former Democratic officials of the U.S. Department of Labor and EEOC, who said in May that disparate-impact liability is explicitly outlawed under Title VII and has been upheld by U.S. Supreme Court precedent. The former officials cautioned employers that they should avoid following Trump's executive order so they do not violate federal laws. 'Disparate impact liability is a necessary element of advancing equal opportunity for all, consistent with America's national commitment to equal justice,' the officials wrote. In a press release, plaintiff-side firm Outten & Golden, which is partly representing the job applicant in the Sheetz case, said EEOC had spent nearly a decade investigating the claims at issue and had found a basis to allege evidence of systemic discrimination. 'Our client has a right to be judged on his qualifications, and not to be denied a livelihood by policies that exclude people with stale convictions that are unrelated to the job,' said Ben Geffen, senior attorney at the Public Interest Law Center and a co-representative for the plaintiff, said in the press release. 'When the government steps back, we step in. We will not allow political interference to wipe out hard-won legal protections.' A similar dynamic played out following EEOC's abandonment of several lawsuits it filed on behalf of transgender workers alleging discrimination following an executive order from Trump. Advocacy groups have since filed to intervene on behalf of plaintiffs in those cases. Recommended Reading Shell Oil did not discriminate in hiring decision, 5th Cir. says
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Oklo Stock Is Powering Higher Today
Oklo is a nuclear energy upstart developing small modular reactors. Seaport Research upgraded Oklo stock to buy from neutral. The company is still in the pre-revenue phase of its development, making it a more speculative investment. 10 stocks we like better than Oklo › Bouncing back from the 4.6% decline that they suffered during the first week of June, shares of Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) are off to an auspicious start this week. After learning of an analyst's positive outlook on the nuclear power upstart, investors clearly felt motivated to click the buy button on shares of the company developing small modular reactors. As of 3:17 p.m. ET, shares of Oklo are up 6.4%. Upgrading it to buy from neutral, Seaport Research assigned a $71 price target on Oklo stock, according to The Fly. Based on Oklo's closing price of $50.29 on Friday, Seaport's price target implies upside of more than 41%. Seaport's more bullish opinion on Oklo is predicated on the fact that the company is now eligible for awards from the Defense Innovation Unit's Advanced Nuclear Power for Installations program, an encouraging sign that the company is more likely to win necessary approvals from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Oklo is developing small modular reactors that represent cleaner and more efficient nuclear energy solutions than traditional nuclear power plants. While Seaport Research sees an ample amount of upside to Oklo stock, investors should remember that the company is still not generating revenue. Sure, the company's technology is intriguing, and the fact that OpenAI founder Sam Altman was at the helm of Oklo as CEO from July 2021 to May 2024 is encouraging, but there's still a significant amount of risk tied to the stock. At this point, therefore, only those with significant risk tolerances should weigh a position in Oklo stock, while those who are committed to nuclear energy exposure but looking to mitigate risk will want to consider a more established company. Before you buy stock in Oklo, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Oklo wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Scott Levine has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Oklo Stock Is Powering Higher Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data