logo
Partner of Quebec man who received MAID after bedsores says hospital ignored her

Partner of Quebec man who received MAID after bedsores says hospital ignored her

Yahoo17-05-2025

MONTREAL — Sylvie Brosseau said she and her partner Normand Meunier dreamed of buying an adapted camper where, despite his quadriplegia, they could indulge their shared love of the outdoors, and spend time with their children and grandchildren.
All that changed after Meunier was left on a stretcher at a hospital north of Montreal for 96 hours and developed a severe pressure sore that never healed, Brosseau said Thursday outside the Montreal courtroom where a coroner is holding hearings into Meunier's death.
Meunier, who was 66, requested medical assistance in dying two months after developing the sore and died March 29, 2024.
"Despite his quadriplegia, he still had plans he wished to realize, he had lofty goals," Brosseau said. "But because of the incurable bedsore that appeared at the hospital, he had no more perspective on life."
Brosseau says she repeatedly asked hospital staff to give Meunier a special therapeutic mattress that prevents sores, but she says she felt ignored.
"They cared very little about me," she said prior to her testimony at the coroner's inquest.
She brought photos of the couple's life together, including one showing Meunier grinning broadly while surrounded by grandchildren. She said she wanted people to remember that side of him, and not only for graphic photos of the gaping wound on his buttock that one nurse would describe as the biggest she'd ever seen.
Coroner Dave Kimpton is presiding over the investigation into Meunier's death. The inquest, which began May 5, is also hearing from police, medical personnel, and experts who will offer recommendations.
In her testimony Thursday afternoon, Brosseau said bedsores were 'always a worry' because Meunier had developed them during previous hospital stays.
She testified that her partner had been taken to St-Jérôme hospital on Jan. 18, 2024, with respiratory issues. She said she had told the medical staff that he was prone to sores and advised them of the equipment he needed, including a therapeutic mattress.
However, she said Meunier remained on a stretcher for four days before he was taken to intensive care. After a two-day stay in intensive care, he was transferred to another unit on Jan. 26, where Brosseau said the proper equipment again wasn't provided.
When she questioned one of his doctors about a mattress, she was told, "you are lucky, I saved his life," she testified. He told her that securing a therapeutic mattress would be handled by others.
"For him, it was part of the decor," she said of the mattress.
Meunier was let out of hospital on Jan. 29. The next day, the medical staff who came to treat him at home saw the sore and was shocked, she said.
Brosseau became tearful when she described seeing the wound on Feb. 5, after her husband's caretakers convinced the family Meunier needed to return to hospital.
"I never saw something like that," she said. "It's unimaginable.'
Brosseau said that throughout her husband's multiple hospital stays, she continually had to fight for him to get the supplies he needed, including mattresses, sheets and bandages adapted to his needs. Meunier requested medical assistance in dying in early March, after his condition had continued to decline.
He died on March 29, surrounded by family and with his chosen music playing. "He left how he wanted," she said.
At the conclusion of her testimony, Kimpton told Brosseau he was "shaken" by her testimony, and praised her dedication to her partner. "He was lucky to have a warrior at his side," the coroner told her.
Brosseau's lawyer, Patrick Martin-Ménard, said outside the courtroom that Meunier's story shows that bedsores, and the care of those susceptible to them, remain a "blind spot" in the health system.
"What we saw throughout this inquest is that throughout Mr. Meunier's stay, there was very little awareness on the part of the professionals who should have been trained to be able to monitor this situation," he said.
Martin-Ménard said the testimony from hospital staff showed "little introspection" or willingness to take responsibility for what happened to Meunier. He said he hoped the inquest results in a stronger system that will proactively identify and address the needs of people at risk of bedsores at every step of their journey through the health network.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 15, 2025.
Morgan Lowrie, The Canadian Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Firing Of Vaccine And Cancer Advice Panels Raises Question, What Next?
Firing Of Vaccine And Cancer Advice Panels Raises Question, What Next?

Forbes

time5 hours ago

  • Forbes

Firing Of Vaccine And Cancer Advice Panels Raises Question, What Next?

WASHINGTON, DC: Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies before the ... More Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on Capitol Hill on May 20, 2025. Kennedy testified Department of HHS's proposed 2026 fiscal year budget.(Photo by) Earlier this year, the National Institutes of Health dismantled the National Cancer Institute's Board of Scientific Advisors, which had 28 members. And now Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr fired the entire 17-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices that provides recommendations on vaccines to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This raises the question, who's going to do the advising? With no replacement forthcoming, at NCI it would appear that the National Cancer Advisory Board will have to go it alone. At ACIP, it's likely Kennedy will appoint people to the advisory committee without a vaccine industry pedigree, including like-minded vaccine skeptics. The importance of having independent expert panels in the oncology and vaccine spaces is hard to overstate. Cancer is America's second-leading cause of death. NCI is the nation's premier funder of cancer research. And regarding vaccines, from smallpox inoculations—which began in the late 18th century and ended when the disease was eradicated in the 1970s—to mumps, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, polio, measles, hepatitis B, human papilloma virus, respiratory syncytial virus, pneumococcal and COVID-19 immunizations, vaccinations have saved millions of lives and prevented life-threatening illnesses from occurring. What happens next in terms of decisions by Kennedy and the various HHS agencies will matter considerably to public health. Kennedy seeks to radically reshape the vaccine policy landscape as he ousts CDC's ACIP, which advises the CDC director on which vaccines approved by the Food and Drug Administration should be used; for example, recommending which groups of people ought to be vaccinated, at what doses and when. For decades, ACIP's guidance has been based on an independent, non-politicized review of the peer-reviewed scientific research as well as debate among the committee experts. ACIP's guidance is not binding, though CDC almost always follows it and provides recommendations to the public on what is to be included in the United States adult and childhood immunization schedules. In a press release issued by the Department of HHS on June 9th, Kennedy says he's doing this in order to restore the public's trust in vaccine science in America. It's unknown who Kennedy will hire to replace committee members, but it's possible that at least some of the people he appoints will share his skeptical views of vaccines. The Department of HHS said ACIP will still meet June 25-27, but with new membership. This means that between now and then, presumably we'll know the list of new members. In determining who's to be on the ACIP committee, Kennedy says he wants to eliminate conflicts of interest that panel members may have with the industry. But Science describes an already existing process in place for vetting candidates and probing for potential conflicts of interest. Indeed, looking at the current ACIP members, conflicts of interest aren't readily apparent among the large number of academics, a chief medical officer of a community health center, a state public health official and the owner of a family medicine practice. But Kennedy seems to view them differently. Given that several members have prior to their ACIP membership pursued research funded in part by grants to universities from the pharmaceutical industry, while others have advocated for certain childhood vaccinations, in Kennedy's eyes they're probably seen as part of the vaccine establishment. The NIH dismissed all 28 members of the Board of Scientific Advisors to the National Cancer Institute in late April. This board had been reviewing NCI-funded extramural research and education projects for nearly three decades, often doing its work in conjunction with the National Cancer Advisory Board. In making the termination decision, the NIH director Jay Bhattacharya cited a presidential executive order calling for the culling of 'unnecessary' federal committees. This order also included an edict that the HHS Secretary end the Advisory Committee on Long COVID and that the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services discontinue the Health Equity Advisory Committee The NCI's Board of Scientific Advisors was made up of leading cancer scientists, mostly from academia, across a wide range of disease specialties. Board members did their work as a panel voluntarily, offering a deep level of expertise to the NCI, specifically around setting research priorities and giving the broader scientific community input into the NCI's extramural programs. Whether the still-existing National Cancer Advisory Board can pick up the slack and be as independent are unclear. The NIH didn't just get rid of the NCI's Board of Advisors. The NCI has also begun to face large numbers of staff terminations and closures of programs. As STAT News reported, NIH fired virtually the entire NCI communications team and a substantial number of employees in the Office of Advocacy Relations. The NCI Outstanding Investigator award program was also canceled. More cuts are expected, as the NCI has been ordered to 'significantly' reduce its contracts budget. This budget can cover, among other things, support for clinical trials, certain lab scientists, a cancer registry to collect, store and manage data on persons with cancer, scientific databases and a repair service for critical lab equipment. On top of this, the New York Times is tallying the full extent of the cuts in research grant funding across all parts of the NIH, including the NCI. Currently, at least 2,500 grants have been canceled or delayed, impacting many therapeutic areas such as cancer, but also vaccine development and research on how to improve vaccination outreach.

How RFK Jr.'s CDC Ousters Upend the Future of Vaccines
How RFK Jr.'s CDC Ousters Upend the Future of Vaccines

Bloomberg

time6 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

How RFK Jr.'s CDC Ousters Upend the Future of Vaccines

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., US secretary of health and human services, dismissed all 17 members that make up a key committee advising the US government on vaccine safety and policy, saying that removing the entire panel was the only way to restore public confidence in vaccine science. The move, announced in an opinion piece on June 9, added to the confusion about whether Americans would have access to vaccines for diseases from polio and measles to Covid and the flu. Here's what to know about Kennedy's decision and how it might affect future vaccine development and delivery.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store