Is Waytha Moorthy's civil suit to disqualify PMX's premiership a sheer publicity stunt?
Could this be the thinking behind the Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF)/Malaysian Advancement Party founder P. Waytha Moorthy's civil suit that seeks to disqualify the premiership of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim?
This is on grounds that the royal pardon granted to the PKR president in 2018 did not state that he was exempt from the five-year disqualification period for contesting an election after being released from prison.
For context, the former minister in Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's cabinet from 2018 to 2020 has wanted the High Court to declare PMX's election as Tambun MP on Nov 19, 2022 and his appointment as Prime Minister five days later null and void.
On X, governance advocate ksampoh@MyOwn Inc (@Ksampoh) gave a detailed explanation as to why Waytha's suit was doomed to fail, citing similar suits against disgraced former premiers Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Tun Dr Mahathir which were previously thrown out by the court.
Claiming that it was all just 'political theatre', the self-described true patriot confidently predicts that the suit will not succeed as 'the Federal Constitution, statutory time limits and past court decisions all make it clear that your case won't survive the first procedural hurdle'.
Dear Waytha Moorthy,
This lawsuit to 'disqualify' Anwar as Tambun Wakil Rakyat & Prime Minister is legally dead on arrival -& I say that based on the Constitution, the law, & precedent, not politics.
1- The Constitution doesn't back it
Articles 48 & 50 of the Federal…
— ksampoh@MyOwn Inc (@ksampoh) August 12, 2025
Commenters on the post were no less scathing with a few seeing right though the charade. One contended that the rakyat are tired of all the smokescreen acts 'by the same line-up of lawyers' that are mere diversionary tactics.
It was a calculated move to ride on the momentum of the Turun Anwar rally, claimed one commenter. Knowing full well that the suit is not valid, it was argued that the former unity minister during Dr Mahathir's second premiership stint was merely trying 'to score some points in the court of public opinion'.
As a person with a legal background, one commentator accused Waytha of manipulating the judicial system to spin conspiracy theories by claiming that the 'Madani (administration) controls the judiciary'. He would not be surprised if many citizens would believe Waytha.
A few condemned this being a waste of court time and resources. One commenter suggested that the suit be dismissed and the 59-year-old politician be left to shoulder all the cost of this frivolous action.
It was also claimed this was a part of a concerted attack on PMX by opposition groups to weaken his grip on power.
One commenter highlighted that this suit was only filed AFTER the lawyer had met with Bersatu representatives, an insinuation that this was calculated political manoeuvring.
More pertinently, the timing of the suit was questioned. Why not when PMX won in the Port Dickson by-election in 2018? Such gaps in reasoning caused one commenter to denounce 'this HINDRAF man is just good for nothing'.
Such spurious and superfluous suits to create mere political theatre are an abuse of the legal process.
As pointed out by one commenter, Malaysians are 'tired' of the constant wayang kulit (theatrics) in the jostle for power and influence. One commenter simply urged such individuals to stop wasting the rakyat's time. – Aug 15, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
13 of 29 MA63 demands resolved, says Fadillah
KUALA LUMPUR: Some 13 out of the 29 demands under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) have been resolved, says Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof. He said nine of the 13 were finalised during the Madani administration, while four were carried out through previous administrations. 'Efforts towards achieving the remaining 16 demands are ongoing. 'This includes education, health, petroleum and oil royalties,' sais the Energy Transition and Water Transformation Ministry when winding up debates for his ministry in the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (Aug 18). Stressing the government's commitment to resolving all matter under MA63, he said the time frame also depends on the legal proceedings involved. 'We respect the special position of Sabah and Sarawak as indicated in the Federal Constitution,' he added. He also said the federal government is always ready to resolve the demands in efforts to recognise the spirit of MA63.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Process to separate powers of AG and public prosecutor at final stage, says Azalina
KUALA LUMPUR: The process to separate the powers of the Attorney General and the Public Prosecutor is in its final stages, says Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) said that a complete study and proposed model on the separation of powers would be brought to Cabinet soon. "The initiative to separate the roles of the AG and the Public Prosecutor is now in its final phase. "The findings, along with a proposed separation model, will be brought to the Cabinet for consideration in the near future," said Azalina during her winding-up speech on the 13th Malaysian Plan (13MP) in the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (August 18). Azalina also said that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had said during Question Time that the Cabinet is expected to make a policy decision on the matter by the end of August, Azalina said the Parliamentary Services Act and the commitment to separate the powers of the AG and the Public Prosecutor represent the government's most significant reform to date. She said this would involve amendments to the Federal Constitution, requiring a two-thirds majority in Parliament. Meanwhile, to ensure all Malaysians have access to justice, the government is set to introduce mobile court services in rural areas under the "Justice on Wheels" initiative. She said the initiative had been implemented in Sabah and Sarawak but not in the peninsula. "This is an inclusive step to ensure that justice is not just in urban areas but also in rural areas and the interior," said Azalina. She said newly appointed Chief Justice Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh had also expressed support for the initiative. "We hope to have one mobile unit for each state. Mobile legal access will not just solve small cases but also assist in registering documents," she said.
Malaysian Reserve
9 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Sivarasa dismisses bid to nullify Anwar's election as baseless
by NURUL NAJMIN ABU BAKAR PKR'S R Sivarasa (picture) has rejected a legal challenge by former Federal Minister P Waytha Moorthy, seeking to disqualify Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as Tambun MP and prime minister (PM), as baseless. Waytha, who served in Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's Cabinet from 2018 to 2020, is asking the High Court to declare Anwar's Nov 19, 2022, election win in Tambun and his appointment as PM five days later null and void. He contends that the royal pardon granted to the PKR president in 2018 did not explicitly exempt him from the five-year disqualification period for contesting an election after release from prison. Sivarasa said such reasoning reflected a failure to understand the proper application of Article 48 of the Federal Constitution, which sets out the circumstances under which an MP can be disqualified. He said it was a matter of public record that Anwar received a full and free pardon in 2018 from the then King, who viewed the conviction as a miscarriage of justice. 'The inclusion of the words 'and who has not received a free pardon' in Article 48 makes clear that once a free pardon is granted, a prior conviction no longer serves as a disqualifying factor. 'It is a trite principle in law, which unfortunately Waytha Moorthy does not appear to appreciate, that the effect of a full and free pardon is to wipe away a conviction completely. It is as if the conviction and sentence never occurred at all,' he said in a statement. Sivarasa, who heads PKR's legal bureau, questioned why the issue had not been raised by Anwar's opponents during the Tambun campaign, nor when he was appointed as PM in November 2022. 'One wonders why he took two and three-quarter years to suddenly wake up one morning having dreamed up this fatuous point. Is this case really more about trying to stay politically relevant in any possible way?' he added. DAP's Syahredzan Johan also questioned whether Waytha's suit was connected to his recent meeting with Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia leaders. The Bangi MP said that while anyone had the right to file court proceedings, the suit appeared 'frivolous and vexatious' given that Anwar has been PM for nearly three years. Waytha, who is president of the Malaysian Advancement Party, was among several political leaders outside the government bloc who met Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin recently to discuss forming a united Opposition front. — TMR
