I'm worried the roots of my neighbour's roses will damage the foundation of my side wall. What can I do?
I understand roses can have deep root systems. My house was built in 1850 and has foundation walls only. I am concerned that the root system of this rose bush is going to damage the wall foundation right beside it. I would prefer to
– excuse the pun
– 'nip things in the bud' rather than wait for foundation problems, presumably subsidence, to develop. While I appreciate that my neighbours have the right to plant whatever they choose, what are my rights when it comes to their planting right beside my house's side wall/foundation?
You have a right to protect your property, but demonstrating that the rose bush is a risk may be necessary. As the root system is not accessible for inspection, the potential damage, if any, is unknown. In addition to exerting pressure on the foundation, the growing root system would absorb moisture and cause shrinkage in a clay type soil, thereby weakening the underlying support to the foundation.
To deal with it, I suggest you consider a three-stage approach.
The first stage is to have an amicable conversation with your neighbour, outline your concerns, including the nature of the foundation and the possible risk of damage from growing roots. Your objective should be to bring the issue to their attention and assess their reaction. You may suggest relocation of the rose bush.
[
Surely our neighbours are responsible for maintaining their old and dangerous oak tree?
Opens in new window
]
If you believe your neighbours will co-operate and remove the rose bush, you should monitor the situation and have follow-up conversations if necessary. However, if you detect reluctance to co-operate, you can assume that the issue is likely to become adversarial.
Patrick Shine, chartered geomatics surveyor and chartered civil engineer
The second stage involves building your case. There may not be any obvious indications of damage by the roots, but it is advisable to engage a chartered building surveyor to carry out an inspection and give you a written assessment. The foundation will be a key factor in the assessment. As you do not have access to it at the location of the roots, you should, if possible, excavate an opening in the ground at the external rear wall of your house close to the boundary to facilitate an inspection of the depth and condition of the foundation by your surveyor. This will enable the surveyor to form an opinion on the nature and depth of the foundation at the location of the roots.
Your surveyor will also inspect and photograph the internal surface of the wall at which the rose bush is located to ascertain if cracks or dampness are evident. If your surveyor's assessment states that there is evidence of damage and that the roots are the likely cause, this will give you a strong case against your neighbour. If there is no evidence of damage, it will be necessary for your surveyor to monitor the situation periodically over several months, or more if necessary. Without evidence, you are dependent on your neighbour's goodwill and co-operation to deal with the issue.
[
I'm worried about our home being devalued because our neighbour's trees block light. What can we do?
Opens in new window
]
However, if there is evidence of damage, or if damage becomes obvious during subsequent monitoring, you should engage again with your neighbour and offer them a copy of your surveyor's report and ask them to co-operate in resolving the issue. If your neighbour continues to refuse, you should tell them that you have little choice but to consider getting legal advice on how to protect your property.
If there is still no positive response, the third stage will require a consultation with your solicitor who will consider various options. The first option may be to write to your neighbour requesting them to co-operate. Alternatively, your solicitor may consider if your neighbour is liable under nuisance law.
If the damage is significant, or in the opinion of your surveyor, is potentially significant, your solicitor may apply to the District Court for a Works Order which is provided for under Sections 43 to 47 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009. This legal provision covers a wide range of boundary-related issues that need to be rectified, and provides for access to adjoining property if necessary.
The details contained in your surveyor's report will be essential for your solicitor to assess your case and advise if it is sufficient to persuade the court to grant a works order. Provided a sufficiently strong case is made, the District Court will grant a works order if an adjoining property owner refuses consent to grant access for inspections or necessary maintenance work, on or close to the boundary between the respective properties, to protect the applicant's property.
Hopefully, by means of persuasion and patience on your behalf, and goodwill and co-operation on your neighbour's behalf, you will resolve the issue without getting to the third stage and thereby maintain good neighbourly relations.
Patrick Shine is a chartered geomatics surveyor, a chartered civil engineer and a member of the
Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland.
Do you have a query? Email
propertyquestions@irishtimes.com
This column is a readers' service. The content of the Property Clinic is provided for general information only. It is not intended as advice on which readers should rely. Professional or specialist advice should be obtained before persons take or refrain from any action on the basis of the content. The Irish Times and it contributors will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on any content
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Firefighters tackle blaze near IFSC in Dublin city centre
Dublin Fire Brigade has responded to a fire near the International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) in Dublin city centre. The fire broke out on Tuesday evening. Three fire engines along with senior officers were at the scene at George's Dock in the north inner city. Three fire engines along with senior officers are on scene at a fire at George's Dock near the IFSC. Firefighters are using 70mm hose to control the fire and cool adjacent exposures. We've requested — Dublin Fire Brigade (@DubFireBrigade) Firefighters have been using a 70mm hose to control the blaze. READ MORE Dublin Fire Brigade also requested that Gas Networks Ireland attend the scene, a statement said. Footage of the blaze has been posted on social media. The cause is not yet clear.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Anglers fear up to 46,000 fish dead after ‘devastating' kill on Blackwater in Co Cork
Anglers in north Co Cork believe up to 46,000 fish may have died in a 'devastating' kill on a section of the river Blackwater. Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI) is investigating the cause of the kill, saying that present indications suggest between 8,000 and 10,000 wild fish mortalities occurred on a 30km stretch of the river between Lombardstown and Killavullen as well as tributaries such as the Clyde and Awbeg. The State agency is basing the estimate on its observations and data submitted by local stakeholders. However, angling clubs say the numbers are much higher, at up to 46,000, and impact on every species present in the river including trout, salmon, stickleback, dace and fresh water eel. READ MORE Dan Dennehy, club secretary of Kanturk and District Trout Anglers, described the fish kill as 'devastating' and 'off the scale'. 'Salmon, eels, trout – thousands and thousands of them. We don't know the extent of it or what is causing it,' he said. He said it was one of the biggest fish kills he was aware of in the State. 'There is a load of unanswered questions in relation to it,' he added. Mr Dennehy said Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture Timmy Dooley and Cork North-West TD and Minister of State Michael Moynihan visited the river and met local anglers. 'I presume they will bring in experts to regenerate the river,' he said. 'It is desperate to see. If you see the glory of the trout in the river and then you see them dead there is no comparison. The numbers are just savage.' An alliance of game angling federations described the fish kill as a 'wipeout of the river'. Seán Long, director of IFI's South-Western river Basin District, said the Marine Institute conducted diagnostic sampling of affected fish at Mallow on August 14th. He said a report was expected within three weeks. 'Disease outbreaks can occur in wild fish populations and are influenced by numerous factors including environmental change,' he said. 'No evidence of a polluting or harmful discharge has been detected to date in the river.' He previously said it appeared that many of the dead fish had a fungal infection, though it was not clear if this was the primary cause of their deaths. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said 'preliminary sample results indicate no causal link between the fish kill and discharges' from sites it has licensed. IFI is consulting with Uisce Éireann , the EPA, Cork County Council and the Marine Institute on the matter. The institute's fish health unit has advised that the removal of dead fish from the water is not necessary.
Irish Times
15 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ireland's camino walks: St Finbarr's Way
The Curran family from Ballyfermot, whose home was destroyed by a firebomb, have moved back in following the help of a local builder. Video: Sarah Burns
