
Kuwait pension fund's $1 billion corruption lawsuit begins in UK court
LONDON, March 17 (Reuters) - Kuwait's public pension fund accused asset manager Man Group, Swiss bank EFG and others of laundering bribes paid to its late director as a year-long $1 billion trial began at London's High Court on Monday.
The Public Institution for Social Security (PIFSS), which operates Kuwait's social security and pension scheme, is suing the estate of Fahad Al Rajaan, its director from 1984 to 2014.
Al Rajaan was in 2016 convicted in his absence of corruption and embezzling public money in Kuwait and died in London in 2022.
PIFSS alleges that, over the course of two decades, Al Rajaan and his associates received at least $970 million in bribes, described as commission payments which banks and investment companies did not need to pay.
It is suing Man Group (EMG.L), opens new tab seeking around $156 million, alleging the London-listed fund was involved in bribes paid to Al Rajaan to obtain PIFSS investment in Man products.
But Man – whose CEO Robyn Grew and her predecessors are due to give evidence – say there is no evidence for PIFSS' case, which a spokesperson said it is "robustly defending".
"PIFSS has not identified any evidence showing that Man or its current or former employees knew of any wrongdoing," the spokesperson said.
Its lawyers said in court filings that Man knew nothing about Al Rajaan's corruption "let alone (did it) intend for any bribery to occur".
EFG Bank [RIC:RIC:EFGNB.UL] is also fighting the case, in which PIFSS is seeking around $450 million for allegedly helping to launder corrupt payments.
"PIFSS' bid to recover $450 million from a bank which paid no bribes and was not to any extent unjustly enriched through its relevant dealings is opportunistic and ill-conceived," its lawyer Camilla Bingham said in court filings.
She added that the Kuwaiti state had already recovered around $600 million.
The trial is due to conclude in early 2026.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
40 minutes ago
- Sky News
Buyout firms circle corporate intelligence firm G3
A corporate intelligence firm which employs Sir John Sawers, the former head of MI6, is closing in on a deal to sell a big stake to a buyout firm. Sky News has learnt that G3, which was founded in 2004 and advises clients on a range of risks affecting their businesses, has been in detailed talks in recent weeks with private equity suitors including Oakley Capital and KKR. Precise details of a transaction were unclear on Sunday, although one source suggested that a deal was likely in the coming days, and could value the business at between £200m and £250m. They said that Oakley Capital - founded by the entrepreneur Peter Dubens - had emerged as the most likely investor, although a deal had yet to be agreed. Bridgepoint, another London-based private equity firm, had also expressed an interest in G3, the source added. G3 already has some external investment, having struck a deal with All Seas Capital in 2022, according to the latter's website. The firm - which files accounts under the name G3 Good Governance Group - advises companies, private equity firms, sovereign wealth funds and pension funds on areas of commercial risk such as cybersecurity, reported a 27% rise in revenue in 2023. During that year, the latest for which accounts are available, it recorded earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of nearly £9m. Sir John, who stepped down as the head of MI6 in 2014, was named chairman of G3's advisory board last year.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip
LONDON, June 8 (Reuters) - British finance minister Rachel Reeves will hold a meeting with Chinese vice premier He Lifeng during his visit to Britain this week for trade talks with the United States, a British government source said on Sunday. China's foreign ministry said He would be in Britain between June 8 and June 13 when there will be talks in London with three of U.S. President Donald Trump's top aides to try to resolve a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. The British government source said Reeves would host He for a bilateral meeting during the trip, although there were no details on when the talks would be held. The British finance minister met He during a visit to China in January, part of British attempts to improve ties with Beijing, one of the main policy goals of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government. However, many British lawmakers remain sceptical of China amid regular accusations of espionage by spies working for Beijing, and plans for a new large Chinese embassy in London remains a divisive subject, with the opposition Conservative Party saying it must be blocked. The Chinese government wants to build the embassy at Royal Mint Court, a historic site near the Tower of London, which would be its largest in Europe but its requests for planning permission have been rejected by the local council, and the government will make a final decision. The Sunday Times reported that a senior U.S. official had said Washington was "deeply concerned" about the plans, due to its proximity to London's financial hubs and three significant data centres, and approval could impact UK-U.S. trade talks. "These (security) issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process," British technology minister Peter Kyle told Sky News on Sunday.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
How Palace are fighting to keep European dream alive
Crystal Palace are anxiously waiting to hear whether their European dream is over before it even begins. Winning the FA Cup - the Eagles' first major trophy triumph - resulted in the south London club qualifying for the Europa League, the club's only qualification into continental football in their 164-year whether Palace can start planning for European football is in the hands of governing body Uefa, who must decide whether the Eagles have breached its rules on teams under one multi-club ownership structure competing in the same European final ruling will centre on American businessman John Textor, owner of Eagle Football - which holds a 43% stake in Football also owns a 77% stake in French side Lyon, who - like Palace - have qualified for next season's Europa BBC Sport outlines the details of Palace's defence as they fight for their European lives. Palace deny operating multi-club model Uefa's regulations are in place to prevent collusion between clubs. At the heart of Palace's argument is that their historic FA Cup win and consequential European qualification was an achievement accomplished entirely on their own are insisting they are an entity that operates entirely independently, and not within the structures of a multi-club with knowledge of the situation have told BBC Sport that Textor's personal share in the Selhurst Park side does not meet the 30% threshold - which is key in Uefa determining decisive influence - and that he has just 25% of the voting rules state that "no individual or legal entity" can hold a majority of shareholder voting rights at two clubs in the same European it is understood Palace have made clear they had no assistance in winning the FA Cup, in that they have not collaborated with Lyon since Textor's original investment into the club in August 2021 and will have no connection with the French side during next year's Europa Premier League side are believed to have pointed out that there have been no transfers between the clubs since Jake O'Brien, now at Everton, left Palace for Lyon in August also say there has been no employee, backroom staff or coach sharing, no dialogue, no collaborative strategy, no combined partnerships, sponsorships or commercial deals and no collective scouting, analysis or software is accepted, and been widely reported, that chairman Steve Parish and his leadership team make all final decisions in relation to the management and operations at working structure has existed for a decade and is supported by fellow shareholders Josh Harris and David Textor, who only has one vote, has publicly spoken about his lack of influence at Selhurst Park."As proud as we are to have been a part of the resurgence of Crystal Palace, it remains true that Crystal Palace is an independent club, run by a man with a steady hand, who has achieved a level of sustainability that is incredibly uncommon in today's Premier League," said Textor in May 2024."An integrated sporting model, such as ours at Eagle, is simply not a perfect fit for Crystal Palace."It has been pointed out to Uefa that Textor is an individual and minority shareholder and, when he first invested into Crystal Palace in 2021, he owned no other clubs and his investment into other teams followed takeover over Lyon was confirmed in 2022, 16 months after he secured a stake in Palace. Textor could resign as Palace director Under Article 5 of Uefa's rulebook, which relates to the integrity of the "competition/multi-club ownership", a club is required from March 1 2025 to have complied with the requirements necessary to prove they are not "simultaneously involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management, administration, and/or sporting performance of more than one club participating in a Uefa club competition".In the past clubs have sought to divest the stakes of key shareholders with a view to complying with Uefa's example, the City Group, Ineos, Red Bull group and most recently Nottingham Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis have adapted their shareholdings in clubs accordingly to ensure their teams can compete in the same European year Ineos, which owns Manchester United, put its shares in French club Nice into a blind trust to ensure both clubs could compete in the Europa League last made a similar move earlier this season by placing its ownership of Swiss club Lausanne-Sport into a blind trust, before a potential conflict in the 2025-26 rules regarding the March 1 deadline are clear - and clubs have sought to comply with the regulations and cut-offs. A template for Palace to follow is in Palace are understood to have made clear that Textor's position means he cannot be enforced by the club to place his shares into a blind trust, owing to a lack of legal authority, unlike previous precedents where a single entity owns multiple as has been well documented, effectively holds the deciding vote at Palace with the backing of Harris and Blitzer, so existing shareholder agreements would need to be altered to enforce a blind trust scenario - which is not within the club's power and infringes on Textor's property is also a sense that the chain of events that have left Palace's position in European football in jeopardy were unforeseen and is a factor towards why they failed to meet the deadline for ownership faced Millwall in the FA Cup fifth round on March 1. Since then they beat Champions League clubs Aston Villa and Manchester City en route to winning the side Strasbourg conceded a 90th-minute goal on the final day of the season to hand Lyon the final Europa Conference League spot, before Paris St-Germain later won the French Cup to elevate Lyon into the Europa Uefa rules that Lyon and Palace cannot both compete in the Europa League, regulations state that the French side will play in the competition because of their higher league that scenario Palace could play in the Europa Conference League, but even then there is the added complication that Danish club Brondby, who have qualified for the Conference League, are owned by Harris and missed the deadline, Palace have expressed to Uefa that they are prepared to take immediate steps to comply with their with knowledge of the situation have told BBC Sport that one of those measures includes the resignation of Textor as a director of Palace, which would mean he will have no influence in any capacity. 'Europa League ban is disproportionate' It is understood Palace are arguing that banning them from the Europa League would result in a disproportionate sanction and unfairly punish the club, players, staff, fans and local thoughts are that preventing the club from competing in the Europa League next season would result in an injustice, particularly given their breach is technical and that no competitive harm has is believed Palace also feel that refusing them a place would contradict the promotion of football's development that ensure that "sporting values always prevail", as per Article 2 of Uefa's sources are indicating that Palace believe a fine or temporary oversight measures - for example the monitoring of transfers - would appropriately punish a breach, without harming stakeholders who have no involvement in the ownership is expected to confirm its decision in the coming weeks.