Labour needs to ‘pick things up' after ‘tough' first year in power, Khan says
After taking Labour into power at Downing Street for the first time since 2010, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has seen his party's popularity slump in the polls, amid criticism over issues such as welfare reforms.
'It's been a tough first year,' Sir Sadiq conceded.
Speaking at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, he insisted that Labour supporters 'need to have the humility to recognise' that 'otherwise we are being delusional'.
The London Mayor, who was one of the most powerful Labour politicians until Sir Keir became Prime Minister, added: 'Those people that say it has been a great first year… I think they are letting the party down.
'It hasn't been a great first year. There have been great things that have happened in this first year, around the rights for renters, around the rights for workers, around energy security, and I could go on.
'But as first years go, it has not been a great first year.'
However, he said the 'good news' is his party has 'got another four years to make sure we turn this around'.
The London Mayor – who is a Liverpool FC supporter – said if Labour was in a football match, they would be 'two-nil down'
But continuing his analogy, he said that only 15 or 20 minutes of the match had gone, with minutes still to play and to 'win this game'.
He said: 'It is really important now we really pick things up because I think we are two-nil down.
'But the great news is we have turned it round before, we have won games before where we're two nil down, we can do it again.'
His comments came as he said that many people who backed the party last year had 'lent us their vote'.
Sir Sadiq said: 'They didn't sprint toward Labour at the ballot box, they lent us their vote, gave us the benefit of the doubt.'
After over a decade out of power at Westminster, he also said that the party had 'lost the memory of running things'.
Sir Sadiq said: 'It has taken some time for the Labour Party, the Labour Government, to understand how the machinery of government works.'
But he added: 'There are some really, really good people in the cabinet, there is a good back office team as well. So I have got confidence we will turn it round.'
He added: 'With Keir and the team we've got in Number 10, and across Whitehall, Westminster, we've got a great team.
'They are not performing to the level I know they can perform at. I'm not being critical of them, I think they themselves would admit they can do much more.
'So I am hoping the next three, four years you will really see the best of this government.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Labour will regret its attack on nature
Environmentalists always feared that Brexit would lead to a weakening of environmental protections, but who would have guessed that it would be a Labour government which would take a bulldozer to legislation acquired through the EU Habitats Directive? Rachel Reeves is reported to be contemplating a second planning bill which would make it far harder for conservationists to hold up infrastructure projects. Reeves has already paved the way – if that is not an unfortunate expression in this context – by saying last month that she cared more about young families getting on the housing ladder than 'protecting some snails'. The ability to use judicial reviews to block projects will be curtailed and the list of creatures offered protection will be shrunk. Reeves is giving these idealistic voters an even bigger incentive to jump from the Labour ship Reeves is right that habitat rules are excessive – even if her party was among the first to scream green murder whenever the Conservative government wanted to build an infrastructure project. Where were she and her colleagues when fracking companies were trying to develop a UK shale gas industry which, by now, could have been producing cheaper energy for UK households? The £100 million 'bat tunnel' on HS2 which so offended Keir Starmer seems to have come as a moment of realisation for the government – that we are becoming a country where it is impossible to build any infrastructure project at reasonable expense thanks to the ability of the green lobby to frustrate and delay. Under existing law even common creatures are granted sacred status. But Labour's about-turn on nature and development is likely to have serious political consequences for the party. The trouble for the party is that many of its voters are already tempted by the Green party, not just for environmental reasons but because it also offers totemic left-wing policies such as a wealth tax, which Reeves and Starmer seem to have ruled out. Now, Reeves is giving these idealistic voters an even bigger incentive to jump from the Labour ship. Nor are Reeves's planning reforms on their own likely to do much to boost the economy. It might help speed up a few infrastructure projects, but they are unlikely to counter the anti-growth effects of other government policies, such as the rise in employers' National Insurance contributions and the Employment Rights Bill. Moreover, Britain, like many countries, has a history of infrastructure projects which are conceived less to boost economic growth than to fulfil some political need. HS2 is a prime example. Its economic case always was weak, based on the false assumption that business people cannot work on trains and therefore would be more productive if they could be sped to their offices a few minutes quicker. The bats in that case would have been better left undisturbed. Does anyone really think that the government will come up with better infrastructure just because Reeves has made it easier for them? It is bound to mean yet more wind farms, solar farms – with their intermittent energy helping to further inflate UK energy prices – more roads and bridges to nowhere. There are many infrastructure projects which will remain difficult to enact even with deregulated laws on habitats. It isn't bats and newts, for example, which have stymied a third runway at Heathrow – it is the government's net zero commitments, which Reeves is unlikely to do anything about. It was carbon emissions on which environmental groups chose to fight to project – successfully arguing in court that the third runway was inconsistent with the government's commitments under the Paris agreement (although that was later overturned in the Supreme Court). The issue of climate change has already steamrollered other environmental concerns. The current government looks likely to take this process further.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Labour 2-0 down but has time to turn things around, says Sadiq Khan
Labour would be 2-0 down were its time in government a football match, one of the party's most senior figures has said, as he admitted its first year in office has been difficult. But Sadiq Khan stressed Labour still had plenty of time to win round the public. Speaking at the Edinburgh festival fringe, the London mayor said Labour supporters would be 'delusional' if they did not recognise the difficulties the party had had since winning power in July 2024. 'It is really important now we really pick things up because I think we are 2-0 down.' Continuing his analogy, he said only 15 or 20 minutes of the match had gone, adding: 'The great news is we have turned it round before; we have won games before where we're 2-0 down, we can do it again.' After taking Labour into Downing Street for the first time since 2010, the party's popularity has slumped in the polls, amid criticism over issues such as changes to welfare. Khan said: 'It hasn't been a great first year. There have been great things that have happened in this first year, around the rights for renters, around the rights for workers, around energy security, and I could go on. But as first years go, it has not been a great first year.' But he said his party had 'another four years to make sure we turn this around'. Speaking at the same event, Khan said he would be 'more than happy' to meet Donald Trump – despite warning that the US president could be 'inadvertently radicalising people' and is 'not a force for good'. He dismissed jibes Trump made against him on a recent visit to Scotland, where the president claimed the London mayor was 'a nasty person' who has 'done a terrible job'. The Labour politician said such remarks were 'water off a duck's back'. But he told the audience it sometimes felt as if he was nine years old again and 'in the school playground'. And Khan hit back at Trump, saying: 'Somebody who has views like he does about black people, about women, about gays, about Muslims, about Mexicans, thinks I'm nasty. Really. He is the leader of the free world, arguably the most powerful man in the world, and really.' He said records showed that, from the date Trump started his term in January up to July, 'there have never been more Americans applying for British citizenship and living in London. So I think Americans have got good taste by and large'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion He added that he hoped the president would come to London during his state visit to the UK next month, with Khan stressing the diversity of the capital was a 'strength, not a weakness' that made the city 'richer not poorer'. He said: that, 'when President Trump says some of the things he does, it brings from the periphery to the mainstream, views that are potentially dangerous'. Khan added: 'He inadvertently – I'm not going to suggest he does it deliberately – he inadvertently could be radicalising people with views that could lead to them doing things that are dangerous.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Labour needs to ‘pick things up' after a ‘tough' first year, says Sadiq Khan
Update: Date: 2025-08-18T07:57:03.000Z Title: Labour needs to 'pick things up' after 'tough' first year in power, Sadiq Khan warns Content: Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of UK politics. Despite winning a huge majority at last year's general election, Labour knew it had a lot of work to do to regain voters trust and show government could work for ordinary people. The task was made more difficult as the party inherited a weak economy and crumbling public services underinvested in by previous Conservative administrations. So far, the prime minister, Keir Starmer, has failed to win popularity with voters, according to many polls, with a seeming lack of political direction and constant moves to appease Reform voters while Labour's base quietly slips away. Starmer's proposed cuts to winter fuel payments, his sluggishness over adopting a firmer stance on Israel's war on Gaza and his controversial welfare reforms were out of line with much of the public's attitudes. London's mayor, Sadiq Khan, told an audience at the Edinburgh festival fringe last night that Labour needs to 'really pick things up' after a 'tough' first year in government. Khan, who has been critical over the government before, notably over disability benefit cuts and ministers' plans for a third runway at Heathrow, said there was a feeling that people 'lent' Labout their vote last summer (in a bid to get the Conservatives out). He said: Those people that say it has been a great first year … I think they are letting the party down. It hasn't been a great first year. There have been great things that have happened in this first year, around the rights for renters, around the rights for workers, around energy security, and I could go on. But as first years go, it has not been a great first year. Khan said Labour could still turn around as it has another four years and are equipped with a 'great team' in No 10 led by Starmer, who he insisted he was not being critical of, although he conceded that the prime minister and those around him could be performing better. Khan – who is a Liverpool FC supporter – said if Labour was in a football match, they would be 'two-nil down'. But continuing his analogy, he said that only 15 or 20 minutes of the match had gone, with minutes still to play and to 'win this game'. He explained: It is really important now we really pick things up because I think we are two-nil down. But the great news is we have turned it round before, we have won games before where we're two nil down, we can do it again. After over a decade out of power at Westminster, Khan also said that the party had 'lost the memory of running things'. 'It has taken some time for the Labour party, the Labour government, to understand how the machinery of government works,' he said.
