Bid to save Britain from more riots and ease community tensions launched by expert taskforce
POLITICIANS are joining forces to unite the country in the hope of avoiding more riots like those seen last summer.
Former Home Secretary Sir Sajid Javid says growing community tensions have been ignored by politicians for too long.
1
He said: 'Successive governments have treated community and cohesion as second-tier issues — responding only when tensions spill over and too often ignoring the root causes.'
Sir Sajid is co-chairman — with ex- Labour MP Jon Cruddas — of the cross-party Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion.
Sir Keir Starmer has warned of mounting 'cracks in our foundation', while Nigel Farage has warned of civil unrest because of anger over immigration.
The taskforce was set up following last summer's riots in Southport, Sunderland and across the UK and meets for the first time today.
It brings together 21 experts from politics, business, media and religion, including Reform -supporting commentator Tim Montgomerie, founder of Cobra beer Lord Bilimoria and former counter-extremism czar Dame Sara Khan.
Brendan Cox of Together, which assembled the commission, said: 'Declining community connection and growing division is an existential threat to democracy.
'It won't be solved by more of the same - or by a single party or government.
'We will only see progress if we can forge both a shared vision of where we are going, and an effective roadmap of how to get there.
'That's not an easy thing to do - especially not in the current climate - but it's an extraordinary group of people who have committed to helping try.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Welfare concessions being discussed with Labour rebels, Rayner suggests
Ministers are discussing the prospect of further concessions to win over Labour MPs preparing to rebel over plans to cut disability benefits, the Deputy Prime Minister has suggested. Angela Rayner insisted the Government was not expecting backbenchers to go against traditional party values amid a looming revolt over the welfare Bill set for a Commons vote next week. Some 120 Labour MPs have put their names to a bid to block the legislation in its tracks, arguing that disabled people have not been properly consulted about the plans and further scrutiny is required before making any changes. Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the Bill, Ms Rayner said 'discussions are ongoing'. 'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme. 'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.' She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them. 'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, who has already taken steps to soften the impact of the welfare Bill, has been locked in talks with backbenchers as she seeks to win over those opposed to the measures. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill faces its first Commons test on Tuesday. The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit, with the aim of getting more people back into work and saving up to £5 billion a year. Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition. But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains. Earlier on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer defended his leadership against accusations he had misjudged the mood in his party, insisting he is 'comfortable with reading the room'. At a press conference at the Nato summit in the Hague, he said: 'Is it tough going? Are there plenty of people and noises off? Yes, of course, there always are, there always have been, there always will be. 'But the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about.' Ms Rayner earlier told MPs in the Commons the vote will take place as planned despite the rebellion, saying: 'We will go ahead on Tuesday.' Social security minister Sir Stephen Timms said he was 'looking forward to the debate' next week. He told the Commons Work and Pensions Committee the changes need to be made urgently to cut the spiralling welfare bill. Committee chairwoman Debbie Abrahams, who is one of the Labour MPs to have signed the amendment to block the legislation, asked why the provisions within the Bill had not been consulted on. Sir Stephen said: 'Essentially because of the urgency of the changes needing to be made.' He said the cost of Pip had gone up from £12 billion before the pandemic to £22 billion last year 'and that is not a sustainable trajectory'. Setting out the impact of the reforms, he told the Committee 370,000 people getting Pip under the current system would not be receiving it by the end of the decade. Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have also publicly expressed their opposition to the plans. Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Goldsmiths apologises to Jewish students and staff over ‘culture' of antisemitism
Goldsmiths College in London has apologised to Jewish students and staff after an independent inquiry found it had allowed a 'culture' of antisemitism to build up on its campus over a number of years. The inquiry concluded that Jewish students were subjected to antisemitism during their studies at Goldsmiths and that the college's management failed to help Jewish students and potential applicants to 'feel welcome, included and safe from antisemitism'. The inquiry was commissioned by the university's council in 2023, to look at the experiences of Jewish students and staff since 2018. Mohinderpal Sethi KC, who led the inquiry, wrote: 'It appears to me that a culture has built up over the years at Goldsmiths that, at the very least, has resulted in Jewish students legitimately feeling significant discomfort on campus. It is apparent that from the evidence reported to me that Jewish students have likely been subjected to antisemitism. 'This is plainly not unique to Goldsmiths, but this inquiry relates to Goldsmiths and I consider that it has not done enough as an institution to ensure its Jewish students and staff feel safe and welcome.' Goldsmiths, part of the University of London, said it accepted the inquiry's findings and would adopt its recommendations, including better mechanisms to report and track antisemitism, improving support services and reforming the college's antiracism training to recognise antisemitism as racism. It will also set up a new advisory panel drawn from the Jewish community, students and staff. Prof Frances Corner, vice-chancellor of Goldsmiths said: 'The inquiry sets out a disturbing picture and I am sorry that our community and culture fell short of the behaviours we expect. 'The report rightly states that we owe it to former, current and future Jewish students and staff to learn from our mistakes. 'We share responsibility, as a community, to show Goldsmiths can be a place where Jewish students and staff feel valued, supported, and proud to be part of our university.' Corner added: 'Today, we commit to lasting cultural change with respect to Jewish students and staff, and for all religions and beliefs, drawing on our intellectual heritage and our longstanding belief in social justice.' Sethi's inquiry heard disturbing reports of far-right graffiti found in locations only accessible to Goldsmiths students or staff, while the college's Jewish society effectively disbanded last year due to safety concerns and protests. One Jewish student was forced to move out of their college residence because of hostility from other students, including the desecration of a mezuzah, a religious symbol at the entrance to a Jewish home. 'The evidence set out above from students about the antisemitism they experienced at the college was also bolstered by the evidence of an academic, who informed me of the antisemitic tropes and conspiracies they had read in their students' essays. For example, that 'Jews dominate media and culture and run New York and that's why they could get musicals on to Broadway' or that there are 'Jews all over the BBC',' the report states. Goldsmiths said it has appointed Prof Adam Dinham to lead a two-year antisemitism action plan. It said: 'This will build a culture of belonging for all Jewish students and staff, and for all religions and beliefs at the university, nurturing evidence-based dialogue, positive activism, and engagement.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Lucy Connolly has become a martyr to injustice
What on earth is going on in the case of Lucy Connolly? The Northampton childminder and mother was convicted after posting an incendiary tweet in the wake of the Southport murders last year and jailed for 31 months, a sentence designed to demonstrate society's abhorrence of whipping up the mob. That term was far too long for a single comment, however nasty, which was removed within hours. She is spending more time in prison than many offenders who have committed crimes of violence or sexual abuse. She has even been placed on a 23-hour lockdown, confined to her cell with no privileges for an offence that, given her good behaviour, could be dealt with in an open prison or with home detention. The Court of Appeal rejected a recent attempt to rule the sentence excessive and expedite Mrs Connolly's release. The punishment for a crime is deprivation of liberty. It has been a long time since prisoners were subjected to additional, condign privation. Yet Mrs Connolly seems to have been treated especially harshly. Last week, she was manhandled by half a dozen prison officers and moved to a wing that houses the most dangerous inmates. Richard Tice, the Reform MP, visited her in Peterborough jail and reported that bruises on her wrists from handcuffs were still apparent. If the judiciary and penal system are being recruited to treat a particular prisoner harshly to cover up the state's failings then that is unconscionable. Furthermore, if the aim is to discourage others from doing the same it is backfiring. Instead of being denounced for a crime she admitted she has become a martyr to injustice.
