I dropped Gemini for Bixby for a week, and I'm so glad that I did
When Samsung launched Bixby in 2017, it wasn't well received. The virtual assistant, intended to rival Google Assistant, wasn't nearly as mature or capable as it is now. Nevertheless, Samsung tried to push it onto users with a dedicated button well before it was ready. The voice assistant landscape has changed significantly since then. Google Gemini has replaced Assistant as my primary voice channel, but it hasn't been smooth sailing. I've encountered many problems with Google's next-gen assistant on various devices in recent months. So, as a last resort, I turned to Bixby again. It's something that I should've done much sooner.
What is your preferred voice assistant on Android?
0 votes
Google Assistant / Gemini
NaN %
Amazon Alexa
NaN %
Samsung Bixby
NaN %
ChatGPT
NaN %
Perplexity
NaN %
Microsoft Copilot
NaN %
Another voice assistant (mention which in the comments)
NaN %
I don't use a voice assistant.
NaN %
I'm not a fervent voice assistant user. Yes, I occasionally talk to my phone, but only in certain situations — when my hands aren't free, like when I'm driving, cooking, or in the middle of a game. I'll also use a voice assistant if a query is better suited to verbal instruction. As a result, I value understanding, quick execution, and quality of answers above all else.
As I mentioned in the intro, Bixby is now a capable virtual assistant for Samsung smartphone users. It can perform various complex tasks, from article summaries to live translations. It can also open apps, tell me what song is playing, answer questions on multiple topics, and handle everyday tasks like setting reminders or alarms.
Bixby is a mixed bag of thrills and spills
Andy Walker / Android Authority
As a Galaxy S24 FE user, I hadn't bothered setting up Bixby when I got the phone, but this was a mistake. It's far slicker, quicker, and more reliable than Gemini when performing some on-device tasks.
Bixby is far slicker, quicker, and more reliable than Gemini when performing some on-device tasks
Its real strength is demonstrated through on-device tasks to trigger the camera, call up a specific settings tree, or open a particular app. While I generally don't use voice assistants this way, I asked Bixby and Gemini to 'open the selfie camera.' Bixby launched my camera app much faster than Gemini, which had to call on its Utilities extension to accomplish the same. Even a simple 'open my home screen' command, which theoretically requires the phone to hit the virtual home button, sees Bixby with a comfortable win. Samsung's assistant's better integration with One UI and the phone's hardware gives it a massive advantage for these mundane tasks.
As I own a Galaxy Watch, Bixby is also on my wrist, so I get the same control over my wearable as my smartphone. This makes for predictable outcomes, even though the feature doesn't work when power-saving mode is active. I generally use Modes and Routines to automatically trigger this feature in the afternoons. You can see the problem. However, I have found that Gemini is glacial on my smartwatch, so I'd rather work around the limitations Bixby presents here.
Andy Walker / Android Authority
Regarding offline capabilities, Bixby remains quick and responsive even if its broader feature set isn't available. I switched off mobile data and asked the assistant, 'What's 55 plus 2?' It hit me with an 'I couldn't connect' message. I'm unsure why Samsung's assistant needs the internet to solve a simple math problem, but at least it tries to answer the question. When offline and asked the same question, Gemini hangs. Gemini will flat out refuse to work in any capacity when an internet connection isn't in view.
When that Wi-Fi or mobile connection is going strong, Bixby does fall slightly behind Gemini, in my opinion. Before it could give me a 'good butter chicken recipe,' Bixby wanted me first to install SmartThings and connect my Samsung and Samsung Food accounts. It wouldn't just offer a web result, as it does for other queries. Then, when I asked it again, it provided wildly unrelated recipes. 'Ultimate risotto primavera' and 'creamy tomato pasta sauce' sound delicious, but they aren't curries, are they?
Bixby offers select smarts when offline, but when the internet is available Gemini pulls ahead.
This performance seems to be query-dependent, though. For questions like 'How do I care for a Syngonium?' Bixby opens a Google Search on Samsung Internet. Even if it mishears me, it still understands the crux of my query. Perhaps it's ironic that the top result is usually an AI Overview. Nevertheless, opening a browser window is a nice way to start a broader browser-based information search.
Notably, while expected, Bixby will always prioritize Samsung apps for information or utility. 'Save a note on Google Keep' instead saved a note to Samsung Notes. Saying 'Open Google Keep' does indeed open Keep, but Bixby cannot create actual notes within the app. As someone deeply entrenched in Google's ecosystem, this is a problem for me.
Gemini is as slow as a sloth but reaches a little further
Andy Walker / Android Authority
In these moments, I was reminded of how often I take Gemini and its features for granted. Yes, it's as slow as molasses in the Arctic, but I was still tempted to drop this experiment altogether.
Bixby lacks core elements that make the Google product valuable beyond simply calling up information or commanding my phone. One example is Gemini Live. Google's live contextual voice assistant has become a de facto scratch pad for me. I'll often walk around my house, organizing my thoughts with the tool, and then exporting the refined version to a Keep note. That's something Bixby can't offer at this point in its development.
It's difficult living without Gemini Live, especially as it has become my de facto scratch pad.
I also mentioned that Bixby struggles to succinctly serve information from the internet, instead regularly relying on other Samsung apps or its web browser. Well, Gemini does a much better job presenting this information and contains the results of queries within its UI. Let's go back to my butter chicken query. Instead of giving me Italian dishes, it explains exactly what butter chicken entails, including the use of methi. Gold star! This makes it far easier to double-check information without all the fluff of a web page.
Gemini also outperforms Bixby in another core modern assistant task: generating new content. When asked to 'generate a birthday message,' Gemini creates a standard message filled with well wishes. Bixby asks me what the message should include. This is the starkest difference between the two products' feature sets.
There are other smaller reasons why I preferred Assistant and Gemini during this experiment. Its flawless integration with Google products is one, especially Tasks, Keep, and Docs. A Nest Mini in my kitchen, which doesn't support Bixby, also pushes me to use Google's products when I need to set a timer, convert units, or play my kitchen cleaning playlist.
Gemini and Bixby: better together?
Mishaal Rahman / Android Authority
Both assistants still fail to be genuinely helpful in every scenario, and I still long for more functionality across the board. Neither can I input text into a WhatsApp text box, for instance, and neither seems to recognize precisely what I'm saying all the time. What is a 'simbonium' Bixby? Sure, it's an accent thing, but I can't believe their performance in this regard is still so poor.
It's difficult to recommend a winner here, so I'll likely continue using both assistants going forward.
After returning to Samsung's assistant after all these years, I feel the relatively negative sentiment towards it is unjustified. Sure, it was a terrible experience when it first launched, but in 2025, it's a solid on-device tool that works well on the company's smartphones. It lacks Gemini's generative capabilities or information processing skills, but it's much faster than Google's product in many aspects. Conversely, Gemini is still the best product for those deeply invested in Google's ecosystem, while Live remains one of the best generative AI efforts I've ever used.
So, which is best? Well, a single-word answer is pretty complicated. In the future, I'll keep Bixby on call for on-device tasks, while Gemini will be there for more generative or informational purposes. Sure, using two voice assistants on one phone might be overkill, but that's the conundrum Google and Samsung have left users with.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Google Earnings: Alphabet Beats Q2 Revenue Estimates
Google parent Alphabet reported second-quarter earnings after market close Wednesday that surpassed Wall Street's expectations, as the company cited a boost from its cloud and search business ahead of a looming antitrust ruling that could force a sale of its Chrome browser. Economists forecasted double-digit increases for Alphabet's top and bottom lines. Getty Images Alphabet had $96.4 billion in revenue and $2.31 earnings per share through Q2, ahead of analyst forecasts of $94 billion and $2.18 EPS, according to FactSet. That accounts for a year-over-year increase of 14% for revenue and a 22% jump for EPS. The company reported $13.6 billion in revenue from its Google Cloud business, a year-over-year increase of 32%, well above expectations of up to 27% growth, and $54.1 billion in search revenue, slightly ahead of projections of up to $54 billion. Wednesday's report follows Alphabet's better-than-expected Q1 release earlier this year, in which the company reported year-over-year growth of 12% and 49% for its top and bottom lines, respectively, after Google's search unit generated more in sales than analysts projected. Alphabet will host its second-quarter earnings call through a livestream on YouTube starting at 4:30 p.m. EDT. Google's Antitrust Ruling Looms Over Investors A few economists have mixed expectations for Alphabet's stock, citing a federal judge's ruling next month about what steps Google must take after the company was found to have held an illegal monopoly in search. The Justice Department has requested Google be forced to sell its Chrome browser and make sweeping changes to how search works on its Android mobile operating system, though Google has criticized the DOJ's proposal as pursuing a 'radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America's global technology leadership.' Analysts from Cantor Fitzgerald maintained a 'neutral' rating for Alphabet's stock until they 'gain clarity' on Google's antitrust ruling. Bank of America raised its target for the stock from $200 to $210 in a note last week, adding the ruling is the 'question everyone would like to ask, but Google can't answer at this time.' Shares of Alphabet are nearly unchanged on the year after recovering from a sharp decline between February and April. The company has lagged behind other 'Magnificent Seven' stocks and the S&P 500, as investors expressed concerns about Google's competition in the search engine market. The company has rolled out several AI products through its second quarter, however, including a smart glasses partnership with Warby Parker, a venture fund to invest in AI startups and Google testing its 'AI Mode' for Google Search. OpenAI earlier this month added Google to its list of suppliers as the AI firm said it would use Google's cloud infrastructure for ChatGPT. Alphabet has also announced developments with its self-driving car unit Waymo, which the company said would soon expand to New York. What To Watch For Apple and Tesla, which also reported earnings after market close Wednesday, are the first stocks among the 'Magnificent Seven' to release Q2 reports. Meta and Microsoft will report second-quarter earnings on July 30, followed by Amazon and Apple on July 31 and Nvidia on Aug. 27. All of the firms were projected to post a combined earnings growth of 14% in the second quarter, according to FactSet. Further Reading Forbes Google Earnings: Stock Soars As Q1 Results Shatter Expectations By Derek Saul
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
More than 250 malicious apps are spreading info-stealing malware on Android and iOS — delete these right now
You can never be too careful when downloading a new app to your iPhone or Android phone as what may look harmless on the surface could actually be a malicious app designed to infect your device with malware. Case in point, the mobile security firm Zimperium has discovered a new malware campaign which targets users of the best iPhones and best Android phones with over 250 malicious apps spread via 80+ malicious domains. What sets this particular campaign apart is that in addition to posing as utility apps, many of the malicious apps used in it also posed as dating apps along with file sharing ones and car service platforms. Once installed on a vulnerable smartphone, the apps were then used to download a dangerous info-stealing malware capable of stealing all sorts of sensitive personal data including a victim's contacts and even their photos. The hackers behind this campaign then took things a step further, threatening to extort victims by leaking their private info and photos to their contacts or online if their demands weren't met. Here's everything you need to know about this new malware campaign along with some tips and tricks to help you stay safe from malicious apps and the dangers they pose to both your data and your devices. Before we go into the campaign itself and how it worked, you should first check your phone to make sure that you haven't installed any of the apps below. If you have, you're going to want to manually delete them from your devices: I've highlighted just a few of them above but you can see the full list here (Google Sheet). If you take a closer look at the names of these malicious apps, you'll notice that many of them are in Korean which makes sense given that this campaign mainly targeted users in South Korea. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Given that anyone could have shared a link to one of the malicious domains hosting these fake apps, iPhone and Android users worldwide could be impacted. Either way, it's always a good idea to take a closer look at all of the apps you have installed and to delete any you don't recognize or haven't used in a while. In a blog post detailing the inner workings of this new campaign dubbed SarangTrap, Zimperium's security researchers explain that potential victims are first tricked into visiting carefully crafted phishing sites. These are designed to impersonate popular brands and app stores which not only adds legitimacy to the campaign but may also entice users to download these bad apps. Once installed, these fake apps lure users in with slick user interfaces while requesting access to loads of unnecessary permissions with the caveat that they won't work without them. To make these apps seem more exclusive, especially the ones posing as dating apps, users are also prompted to enter a valid invitation code. After being entered, this invitation code is sent to a hacker-controlled server for validation after which, these malicious apps then request access to the sensitive permissions they'll use to infect a device with malware and steal personal info from it. Besides acting as a lure, this process allows the malware to remain undetected by the best antivirus software and other security solutions designed to stop malicious activity from bad apps. With the necessary permissions in hand, these fake apps reveal their true nature. While they look slick and polished at first, they contain no dating features or other functionality at all. Instead, they're just a facade used by the hackers behind this campaign to gain a foothold on vulnerable devices from which they can then steal all sorts of valuable sensitive data. When it comes to the types of data the malware spread by these fake apps is able to steal, it can download a victim's phone number and device identifiers along with all their photos and text messages. With all this info, the hackers behind this campaign can easily extort victims, though they could also bundle it altogether and sell this data to other cybercriminals to use in their own attacks. Surprisingly, in addition to malicious Android apps, this campaign also uses a deceptive mobile configuration profile to go after iPhone users. By installing this profile on an iPhone, the hackers are able to steal much of the same sensitive data on iOS including a victim's contacts and photos. Just like with new software on your computer, you always need to be careful when installing new apps on your phone, especially as we now have so much personal and even financial info on our mobile devices. For starters, you want to avoid sideloading apps or installing apps from unknown sources or websites. If you're taken to a site trying to get you to install an app instead of to an official app store like the Google Play Store or Apple's App Store, this is a major red flag and a great indication that you should avoid this particular app altogether. When you install a new app on your devices, you want to pay close attention to the types of permissions it requests the first time that you open it. While it makes sense for a messaging app to request access to your text messages, it definitely doesn't when a dating app does so. If any permissions seem odd or unnecessary, this is another red flag that something could be off with a particular app. Besides being extra careful when installing new apps, I highly recommend that you limit the number of apps on your phone overall. Having a lot of apps installed makes it difficult to find malicious ones and even good apps can go bad when injected with malicious code. The fewer apps you have, the less likely it is that one of them will be malicious or turn malicious later. If you're using an Android phone, you want to make sure that Google Play Protect is enabled as this pre-installed security solution scans all of the new apps you download as well as all of your existing apps for malware. For extra protection though, you may also want to consider running one of the best Android antivirus apps alongside it. While there isn't an iPhone equivalent of these apps due to Apple's own restrictions, the best Mac antivirus software from Intego can scan your iPhone or iPad for malware when plugged into your Mac via a USB cable. Given that downloading and installing a malicious app even accidentally can have very serious consequences, you may also want to invest in one of the best identity theft protection services. They can help you get your identity back after having it stolen as well as compensate you for any funds lost to fraud or a cyberattack. Malicious apps are the easiest way for hackers to establish a foothold on your devices and gain leverage over you and your data which is why they aren't going anywhere anytime soon. This is why it's up to you to be proactive as well as careful when it comes to which apps you download and where you download them from. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
WPC Ushers in Next Generation of Faster Wireless Charging
First Certified 25W Devices Announced WASHINGTON, July 23, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Technological advancements are enabling the Wireless Power Consortium (WPC) to launch a new, faster charging version of its Qi standard – Qi v2.2.1 – which will be branded as Qi2 25W. In addition to Apple iPhone, major Android smartphones will join the Qi2 ecosystem for the first time with this launch. Fourteen devices, receivers, and transmitters completed Qi2 25W certification testing in a limited launch last week. Full-scale certification testing is now open to several hundred devices waiting in the queue to be tested. "The momentum building behind the next stage in the evolution of the Qi standard is incredible," said Fady Mishriki, chair of the WPC's Board of Directors. "Consumers will be delighted when they experience Qi2 25W as it delivers nearly 70% more power than the original Qi2. The number of devices in the Qi2 25W certification queue for launch is unprecedented, as is the quality and breadth of our members' product designs." Faster wireless charging is the number one consumer-requested feature to improve wireless charging satisfaction, according to WPC market research. Qi2 was a big step in addressing consumer interest in faster charging when it was launched in November 2023 with 15 watts of charging power. Prior to Qi2, several smartphone manufacturers had developed their own proprietary fast charging protocols. However, devices using these protocols may lack interoperability and consistent charge times. Qi2 25W is the first standard to enable truly high-speed Qi Certified wireless charging. "When we launched Qi2, besides the immediate improvement in charging speed and energy efficiency, we promised that one of the benefits of Qi2's magnetic power protocol was that it would serve as a stepping stone for even faster and more efficient wireless charging in the future," said Paul Struhsaker, Executive Director of the WPC. "Qi2 25W's remarkably fast and efficient wireless charging will encourage increased penetration of wireless charging usage and accelerate the adoption of the new standard." The WPC introduced Qi2 nearly two years ago to certify a wide range of smartphones to provide enhanced speed, user experience, and convenience. Customers love the magnetic attach experience and the large ecosystem of compatible accessories they can use with their smartphones. Within a year of its introduction, there were over 1.5 billion certified Qi2 devices, transmitters and receivers in the market globally. About the Wireless Power Consortium The Wireless Power Consortium (WPC) is the prevailing standards organization for wireless power applications worldwide, representing more than 300 member companies. Since its founding in 2008, the WPC has provided consumers and manufacturers with a vision of wireless power that is convenient, safe, and efficient while ensuring standardized testing offers products that are certificated and interoperable. The Qi standard, with its current Qi2 and Qi2 25W versions, is the global standard for wireless charging of mobile, handheld electronic devices. The WPC is continuously developing new standards for wireless power applications including the Ki Cordless Kitchen standard for kitchen appliances. View source version on Contacts Paul +1 972-854-2616 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
