Metal Detectorists Found a Jackpot Stash of Ancient Silver Treasure
The silver treasure included six ornamental pieces, all designed as fashion accessories.
Likely belonging to an elite member of the community, it's the first local find from an ancient people group known as the Dacian.
The discovery of a silver treasure hoard—this one unearthed by metal detectorists—has shed a sparkling light on just how richly adorned the Dacian elite once were.
What is now modern-day Romania was once ruled by a people group known as the Dacians, who were prominent from around 500 B.C. into the first century A.D. This spring (according to a translated statement from the Museum of Mures County posted by the Breaza Mures Municipality City Hall), metal detectorists Moldovan Dionisie-Aurel and Zahan Sebastian-Adrian scoured an area around the town of Breaza in central Romania, and uncovered a cache of six silver ornamental pieces that date to the Dacian people.
This is the first find of Dacian treasure in Breaza, and it doesn't disappoint.
The haul included a bracelet made of a circular silver bar with slightly widened ends and plant-like motif decorations, a matching pair of two knotted brooches without decoration (but with an elongated plate and a spring), a smaller brooch with four knobs, a neck chain with a looped link holding three nail-like pendants, a waist belt made up of oval plates attached alternately with a series of links, and a rectangular plate that likely attached to the belt, the last of which would likely have been decorated with a series of solar motifs showing the role the Sun played in ancient Dacian culture.
In total, the treasure weighs 19 ounces and 'represented an important symbol of the owner's social status,' museum archaeologist Daniel Cioata wrote. He added that the items would have been worn by a prominent member of the Dacian aristocracy on various special occasions, but it's 'difficult to say whether it was a man or a woman.' Either way, they would have shined in silver.
The buried silver didn't offer up many clues as to why it was placed where it was to begin with—as Cioata said, it could have been an offering to a deity, or simply never retrieved after the owner hid it away.
This find opens up the possibility for further Dacian discoveries in and around the town of Breaza. 'We hope that through field research in the coming period,' Cioata said, 'the Dacian settlement or even the fortification in the area will be identified.'
Plans are now in place to document and further study the silver hoard, which the Mures County Museum will exhibit.
'These historical artifacts,' the city said in a statement, 'remind us of the cultural heritage and importance of our region in the history of Dacia.'
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Victors of 6,000-year-old battle celebrated by cutting off arms of the invaders
The winners of major battles throughout history have celebrated their victories with parades, parties and fireworks. Today, car drivers are showered in champagne after their final lap and professional fighters are honored with a particularly large belt. But thousands of years ago, when groups went to battle for the survival of their culture and people, victory practices were a bit more gruesome. Analysis of 82 sets of human remains dating back to the Neolithic age found that when one group invaded another in northern France, the victors tortured and mutilated their invaders and used their body parts as trophies following their win, according to a study published Aug. 20 in the peer-reviewed journal Science Advances. Burial pits in the Upper Rhine Valley date to between 4295 and 4165 B.C. and were used for the 'haphazard deposition of the remains of a number of individuals,' according to the study. Some of the remains have evidence of 'unhealed trauma' and 'overkill,' meaning more physical force was used than was needed to kill the individual, as evidenced on their remains, researchers said. Other remains didn't have these marks or damage, so the research team set out to determine what made the two groups different. The bones and teeth were analyzed for various elemental isotopes, like carbon and nitrogen, to tell researchers where those people lived, what they ate and what their typical 'child-rearing practices' were in comparison to one another, according to the study. Researchers found that the individuals with more damaged remains were not local to the area, but those with relatively untouched remains had grown up in this region, according to the study. The disarticulated remains included many individuals who had their left arms and hands cut off, which were then tossed into the burial pits separately, according to the study. The 'lower limbs were [fractured] in order to prevent the victims from escaping, the entire body shows blunt force traumas and, what it is more, in some skeletons there are some marks — piercing holes — that may indicate that the bodies were placed on a structure for public exposure after being tortured and killed,' study author Teresa Fernández-Crespo told LiveScience. Researchers said the 'most likely scenario' is that foreign invaders came to this village for a raid in 'a war of conquest,' according to the study. These invaders lost, and their heads and upper limbs were taken as trophies by the victors, researchers said. 'An alternative explanation is that severed upper limbs were the results of mutilations intended to humiliate and physically impair enemies, such as those described in classical sources in the context of collective war-related sacrifices,' researchers said. 'In this scenario, all victims would have been brought alive to the site as captives from different locations and then treated (or punished) differently for unknown reasons (e.g., their origins). Survivors of such mutilations (if any) may have been retained as slaves or even adopted, perhaps by families who lost many members during conflict.' The taking of ritualistic body-part trophies may have also been part of a supernatural practice, according to the study. Many groups sought favor with ancestors or 'gods' when going into battle, and the trophies may have acted as an offering for their chosen deity after the battle was won. The site is located along the Rhine River, in northeastern France. The research team includes Fernández-Crespo, Christophe Snoeck, Javier Ordoño, Philippe Lefranc, Bertrand Perrin, Fanny Chenal, Hélène Barrand-Emam, Rick J. Schulting and Gwenaëlle Goude.
New York Post
3 days ago
- New York Post
Ancient Egyptian desert inscriptions may reveal oldest known reference to Moses, researcher says
A researcher may have uncovered the oldest written references to Moses, dating back 3,800 years and hidden in an Egyptian desert. The two etchings were found at Serabit el-Khadim, an ancient turquoise mining site in the Sinai Desert where Semitic laborers once worked during the Middle Bronze Age. Advertisement The Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions date back between 1800 and 1600 B.C. They were etched centuries before the earliest parts of the Bible were written, between the 10th and 7th centuries B.C. The two inscriptions, among many at the site, were first discovered in the early 1900s – but they're now being reanalyzed by an American-Israeli epigraphist named Michael S. Bar-Ron. The expert, who's also a graduate student at Ariel University, spoke with Fox News Digital about the discovery. Bar-Ron posits that the inscriptions read 'Zot M'Moshe' and 'Ne'um Moshe.' Advertisement The phrases may mean 'This is from Moses' and 'Declaration of Moses,' respectively. If verified, the inscriptions are the earliest written mention of Moses outside the Bible. The inscriptions also reference El, a deity associated with the Abrahamic God, while censuring the ancient pagan goddess Ba`alat. 4 The two etchings were found at Serabit el-Khadim, an ancient turquoise mining site in the Sinai Desert where Semitic laborers once worked during the Middle Bronze Age. Courtesy Michael S. Bar-Ron Advertisement Speaking to Fox News Digital, Bar-Ron noted that the Serabit el-Khadim site once housed a temple to Ba`alat. Some of the etchings, Bar-Ron says, seem to reflect resistance to the goddess's worship from Semitic workers. 'Rather than lauding Ba`alat … [the] readings curse out the Ba`alat cult, with words of warning and rebuke to its followers,' Bar-Ron said. He added, 'They include the terms 'BŠ' – 'for shame' or 'this is shameful' – and 'nimosh,' [which means] 'let us leave' [or] 'remove ourselves.'' Advertisement 4 The two inscriptions, among many at the site, were first discovered in the early 1900s – but they're now being reanalyzed by an American-Israeli epigraphist named Michael S. Bar-Ron. Courtesy Michael S. Bar-Ron The Herculean task of translating the ancient etchings took nearly a decade, Bar-Ron said. 'I spent eight years actively involved in the painstaking, oft-frustrating reconstruction of some 23 wordy Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions,' the epigraphist noted. 'That is, based on the principles of the foremost greats in the field, and informed by the work of my distinguished colleagues in the field.' He also believes the 'Moses' inscriptions may have a common author, pointing to certain 'stylistic points' such as word usage. Bar-Ron's larger graduate thesis explores 'a Mosaic-type leadership' in the region at the time. He described the latest revelations about the inscriptions as 'nonessential icing on the cake.' Advertisement 4 Some of the etchings, Bar-Ron says, seem to reflect resistance to the goddess's worship from Semitic workers. Courtesy Michael S. Bar-Ron 'The finding 'Zot M'Moshe' and 'Ne'um Moshe' were really last-minute discoveries and nonessential to that subpoint (possible Mosaic authorship), within a much more serious thesis,' he said. Bar-Ron also noted that his findings will be peer-reviewed in the future; his research has already been edited over 100 times. 'If we were drawing such conclusions on the basis of one or two inscriptions, it would be weak,' he observed. 'Rather, they are based on what is understood across the full set found at Serabit el-Khadim.' Advertisement 4 The phrases may mean 'This is from Moses' and 'Declaration of Moses,' respectively, according to reports. Courtesy Michael S. Bar-Ron 'I cannot emphasize enough how important it is for educated readers to actually read the proto-thesis itself.' Excavators have long searched for archaeological evidence of Moses, mostly without success. Advertisement Last summer, an ancient sword from the era of the Book of Exodus was uncovered in Egypt. More recently, a French expert identified ancient 'propaganda' praising Ramesses II, the Egyptian leader who may have challenged Moses.
Fox News
3 days ago
- Fox News
Oldest written reference to Moses may be revealed in ancient Egyptian desert inscriptions, researcher says
A researcher may have uncovered the oldest-ever written references to Moses, dating back 3,800 years and hidden in an Egyptian desert. The two etchings were found at Serabit el-Khadim, an ancient turquoise mining site in the Sinai desert where Semitic laborers once worked during the Middle Bronze Age. The Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions date back between 1800 and 1600 B.C. They were etched centuries before the earliest parts of the Bible were written between the 10th and 7th centuries B.C. The two inscriptions, among many at the site, were first discovered in the early 1900s – but they're now being reanalyzed by an American-Israeli epigraphist named Michael S. Bar-Ron. The expert, who's also a graduate student at Ariel University, spoke with Fox News Digital about the discovery. Bar-Ron posits that the inscriptions read "Zot M'Moshe" and "Ne'um Moshe." The phrases may mean "This is from Moses" and "Declaration of Moses," respectively. If verified, the inscriptions are the earliest written mention of Moses outside the Bible. The inscriptions also reference El, a deity associated with the Abrahamic God, while censuring the ancient pagan goddess Ba`alat. If verified, the inscriptions are the earliest written mention of Moses outside the Bible. Speaking to Fox News Digital, Bar-Ron noted that the Serabit el-Khadim site once housed a temple to Ba`alat. Some of the etchings, Bar-Ron says, seem to reflect resistance to the goddess's worship from Semitic workers. "[Ra]ather than lauding Ba`alat … [the] readings curse out the Ba`alat cult, with words of warning and rebuke to its followers," Bar-Ron said. He added, "They include the terms 'BŠ' – 'for shame' or 'this is shameful' – and 'nimosh,' [which means] 'let us leave' [or] 'remove ourselves.'" The Herculean task of translating the ancient etchings took nearly a decade, Bar-Ron said. "I spent eight years actively involved in the painstaking, oft-frustrating reconstruction of some 23 wordy Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions," the epigraphist noted. "That is, based on the principles of the foremost greats in the field, and informed by the work of my distinguished colleagues in the field." He also believes the "Moses" inscriptions may have a common author, pointing to certain "stylistic points" such as word usage. Bar-Ron's larger graduate thesis explores "a Mosaic-type leadership" in the region at the time. He described the latest revelations about the inscriptions as "non-essential icing on the cake." "The finding 'Zot M'Moshe' and 'Ne'um Moshe' were really last-minute discoveries and non-essential to that subpoint (possible Mosaic authorship), within a much more serious thesis," he said. Bar-Ron also noted that his findings will be peer-reviewed in the future; his research has already been edited over 100 times. "If we were drawing such conclusions on the basis of one or two inscriptions, it would be weak," he observed. "Rather, they are based on what is understood across the full set found at Serabit el-Khadim." "I cannot emphasize enough how important it is for educated readers to actually read the proto-thesis itself." Excavators have long searched for archaeological evidence of Moses, mostly without success. Last summer, an ancient sword from the era of the Book of Exodus was uncovered in Egypt. More recently, a French expert identified ancient "propaganda" praising Ramesses II, the Egyptian leader who may have challenged Moses.
