logo
Lyons 'needs to show he's minister for all sports'

Lyons 'needs to show he's minister for all sports'

Yahoo28-02-2025
Communities Minister Gordon Lyons needs to do more to show he is a minister for all sports, a senior member of Ulster GAA has said.
Lyons has been criticised by GAA president Jarlath Burns over his handling of the stalled redevelopment of Casement Park in west Belfast.
The minister said it was "very easy to blame a unionist minister" and insisted the hold-up was not his fault.
Speaking on The View on BBC One, Ulster GAA's head of stadium development Stephen McGeehan said the minster still needs to "demonstrate his bona fides in relation to the GAA community".
"I think it is probably unprecedented that a minister for sport more than one year in office has not been to a GAA fixture," he said, adding that since Lyons came into office only one meeting had taken place about Casement Park.
That meeting was held in October of last year, Mr McGeehan said.
"We are watching on as the minister has announced initiatives - which we welcome - in relation to the Northern Ireland Football Fund, to the progression of the IFA's national training centre and we want to see equity, we want to see a fair distribution of resources and it is time to move Casement Park on."
The GAA has enjoyed a "constructive and hard working" relationship with previous DUP sports ministers, Mr McGeehan added.
He said: "We want that again, it is not too late for that, but the minster needs to demonstrate good faith.
"Our membership are frustrated. They believe there is an equality issue. We are looking for parity of esteem. If the minister was to find the time to come to a GAA event, to put time into meeting with the GAA in relation to this strategic project, I think he can still do the right thing."
Casement Park represents the "single greatest investment in a GAA, in any stadium asset in Belfast and in Northern Ireland," he added, but as of yet, the minister "has not demonstrated to date his willingness, by his actions" to move it forward.
Earlier on Thursday, Lyons hit back at claims that he had helped to create a "hostile atmosphere" for the GAA.
He said that £17m had been spent preparing for the full redevelopment of the Casement site.
Last week, Burns pointed to a range of issues facing the GAA and added: "We are operating in a very hostile environment, there's no doubt about it, and it's disappointing to say that because of all the work we do reaching out."
At a meeting on Thursday of the communities committee at Stormont, this was put to Lyons by Sinn Féin MLA Nicola Brogan.
He responded: "I certainly wouldn't agree with that characterisation at all, that there is any way a hostile environment towards Jarlath or the GAA.
"I can understand his frustration. I can understand why after 14 years of no action being taken that he is frustrated but there is certainly not a hostile environment that I am presiding over within this department.
"When he has requested to meet with me, I have met with him. Officials engage regularly, at least once a month on this issue."
The minister added: "He may well be under pressure from within his organisation as well, and I understand that.
"I don't think it is right to say that there is a hostile environment.
"It can be very easy sometimes to blame politicians, very easy to blame a unionist minister but that simply doesn't match up with the reality of what we've been doing in the department."
Brogan responded by saying Lyons should be "pushing forward" the Casement redevelopment.
She said: "I can totally understand the frustration of both Jarlath and Gaels right across the north at delays to this, and I do think as communities minister, it is your job to carry on that executive flagship project and see this project actually delivered."
The Casement Park redevelopment is in limbo due to a lack of money.
The GAA estimates it would cost £260m to build a 34,500-capacity new stadium, but only around £120m is currently available.
Lyons has said he stands by a long-standing Stormont commitment to spend £62.5m on the project and has asked the Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn how much the London government is willing to contribute.
Once he receives an answer, he says he will meet again with the GAA.
It has offered £15m to the project, while the Irish government has pledged around £42m.
Plans to build the stadium in time to host matches at the Euro 2028 soccer tournament were scuppered last year by the funding gap.
Lyons has been criticised by nationalist politicians for not yet attending a senior GAA match during more than a year in office.
Stephen McGeehan, Casement Park project lead for Ulster GAA, will be speaking on The View on Thursday night at 22:40 GMT - watch on BBC One Northern Ireland or BBC iPlayer
Casement Park to cost 'significantly' less, says GAA president
What went wrong with the Casement Park project?
Government will not fund Casement for Euro 2028
Casement: The name on Belfast's controversial stadium
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alyssa Farah Griffin on Harris's Colbert appearance: ‘Everything that's wrong with Democrats'
Alyssa Farah Griffin on Harris's Colbert appearance: ‘Everything that's wrong with Democrats'

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

Alyssa Farah Griffin on Harris's Colbert appearance: ‘Everything that's wrong with Democrats'

Former White House aide and 'The View' co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin weighed in on former Vice President Kamala Harris's appearance on Stephen Colbert's 'The Late Show,' arguing the interview, her first since losing to President Trump in the 2024 election, represents everything that is 'wrong' with Democrats since the November presidential race. 'I was struck by, I'm going to try not be too harsh on this. This interview felt like a microcosm of everything that's wrong with Democrats post-election. I'm going to CBS and this sort of trying to make a point that they fired Stephen Colbert, which many on the left called an attack on democracy, a man who was making $20 million a year, someone I hold in high esteem, but the economics of his show were not working,' Farah Griffin said during her Saturday morning appearance on CNN. 'He was losing $40 million a year. He was in the Ed Sullivan Theater, which is expensive, to talk about the plight of democracy at CBS, a network that's having its own struggles right now, rather than talking about the economics of the situation and playing to something a shrinking audience that is network television, not realizing it's not where the American voters are,' 'The View' co-host said while on CNN's 'Table For Five.' CBS announced in mid-July that it is nixing 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,' ending its run in May 2026, arguing it was a 'financial decision.' Harris's appearance on the late-night show was her first interview since losing to Trump in the last Oval Office race, an appearance where she promoted her upcoming book '107 Days,' which will detail her short-lived presidential campaign. The former vice president, who announced on Wednesday that she will not jump into the 2026 California gubernatorial race, further elaborated on her decision. 'I don't want to go back into the system. I think it's broken. I want to travel the country. I want to listen to people, I want to talk with people. And I don't want it to be transactional, where I'm asking for their vote,' Harris told Colbert, who criticized CBS and its parent company, Paramount Global, for pulling the plug. When asked on the Thursday show who should be the leader of the Democratic Party, as it deals with plummeting approval numbers and looks to spark more enthusiasm, the vice president argued that it would be a mistake to put 'it on the shoulders of any one person.' 'It's really on all of our shoulders,' she said. Farah Griffin, who has been critical of Trump and said late last year that she voted for Harris during the 2024 election cycle, stated on CNN that 'It felt like if everyone who was advising her [Harris], told her this was a good idea, that is not where I would have made the grand come back … it's like announcing your exploratory committee on the sinking deck of The Titanic.'

Veteran federal judge T.S. Ellis III, who presided over trial of Trump aide Paul Manafort, has died
Veteran federal judge T.S. Ellis III, who presided over trial of Trump aide Paul Manafort, has died

San Francisco Chronicle​

timea day ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Veteran federal judge T.S. Ellis III, who presided over trial of Trump aide Paul Manafort, has died

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — Federal judge T.S. Ellis III, whose legal scholarship and commanding courtroom presence was evident in numerous high-profile trials, has died after a long illness. He was 85. Ellis oversaw the trials of former Donald Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and former U.S. Rep. William 'Dollar Bill' Jefferson as well as the plea deal of 'American Taliban' John Walker Lindh across a judicial career that lasted more than 35 years. His acerbic wit sometimes drew muted complaints at the courthouse in Alexandria, Virginia, where Ellis was based, but his legal reasoning was unquestioned. Ellis died Wednesday at his home in Keswick, according to the Cremation Society of Virginia. Thomas Selby Ellis III was born in Colombia in 1940 and frequently found ways in court to utilize his Spanish-language skills. He often told Spanish-speaking defendants who relied on interpreters to speak up as they pleaded for leniency, saying he wanted to hear their words for himself. He joined the Navy after receiving an undergraduate degree from Princeton, and completed graduate studies at Oxford. He received his law degree from Harvard, graduating magna cum laude. He was appointed to the federal bench by President Ronald Reagan in 1987. In a courthouse known as the 'Rocket Docket' for its speedy disposition of cases, Ellis' courtroom reflected his iconoclastic nature. Rarely did his hearings start on time, though when he presided over jury trials his punctuality improved as he zealously guarded jurors' time commitments. He frequently chastised lawyers to cut short long-winded arguments, in what he called 'a concession to the shortness of life.' But he was easily coaxed or diverted into telling stories from the bench recalling episodes from his long legal career. He snapped at lawyers who annoyed him, but would often adopt a more conciliatory tone later in the same hearing, and apologize for his short temper. His penchant for speaking freely drew raised eyebrows at what was arguably the highest-profile trial over which he presided: the prosecution of Manafort, on charges of tax and bank fraud related to his work advising pro-Russia Ukrainian politicians before managing Trump's campaign. Ellis ultimately delivered a 47-month sentence, and said as an aside that Manafort appeared to have lived 'an otherwise blameless life,' a phrase he often used at criminal sentencings. Critics who found much to blame in Manafort's long career working for clients including the tobacco industry and international despots were outraged by the comment. In 2009, Ellis sentenced Jefferson, a former Louisiana congressman, to 13 years in prison for taking bribes, including $90,000 found hidden in his freezer. The case threw multiple curveballs at Ellis, including a sexual relationship between a key witness and an investigating FBI agent. In 2017, Ellis reduced Jefferson's sentence to time served after a Supreme Court case changed the rules for what constitutes bribery of public officials. He made clear, though, that he believed Jefferson's actions were criminal, and called his conduct 'venal.' 'Public corruption is a cancer,' he said at the time of Jefferson's resentencing. 'It needs to be prosecuted and punished.' Ellis' sentencing hearings often followed a familiar script in which he invited defendants to explain themselves 'by way of extenuation, mitigation, or indeed anything at all' that they wanted to say on their behalf. He invariably told defendants before passing judgment that 'you write the pages to your own life story.'

Opinion - Kamala Harris should not run for president in 2028
Opinion - Kamala Harris should not run for president in 2028

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Kamala Harris should not run for president in 2028

The news that former Vice President Kamala Harris has decided to forgo running for governor of California next year is a clear sign that she is serious about a campaign for president in 2028. Harris would certainly go into the primary season with advantages. But she has proven to be notably tone-deaf in relation to the Democratic Party base, depressing rather than inspiring the kind of turnout needed for victory. As a national candidate, Harris has failed upward. In 2019, with polls in key states showing her in low single digits, her presidential campaign collapsed before a single primary vote had been cast. She made it onto the ticket not because of any appreciable support from voters but because Joe Biden chose her with an eye toward political balance. When Biden finally bowed out of the 2024 race last July, Harris was able to quickly consolidate support for replacing him in the top spot — not due to voter enthusiasm but because of swift backing from party power brokers and Biden himself. During the summer and fall, Harris was unable to sustain momentum, despite raising and spending $1.5 billion in less than four months. Deferring to conventional wisdom when it was least needed, by the time of the party's national convention in August she abandoned any hint of independence, sounding more like a timeworn politician than a fresh voice for change. When the Democratic Party needed to appeal to voters fed up with defenders of the existing order, Harris opted to emphatically represent the status quo. She gained instant and lasting scorn in early October when, appearing on 'The View,' she was asked, 'Would you have done something differently than President Biden during the past four years?' Harris replied, 'There is not a thing that comes to mind.' That response was much more than just a botched answer. It expressed a basic orientation that remains part of Harris's political persona. A Harris 2028 campaign would remind Democratic voters of her undue loyalty to Biden, whose brand is now badly tarnished in his own party at the grassroots. In March of this year, when a CNN poll asked Democratic voters 'which one person best reflects the core values of the Democratic Party,' only 1 percent chose Biden. Harris came in at 9 percent — behind Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) at 10 percent and just ahead of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) at 8 percent. Most Democrats and independents are looking for authenticity and serious reforms. It is hard for them to say whether Harris lacks the courage of her convictions, since it is so unclear what her convictions actually are. A little-noticed but significant sentence in the recent book 'Original Sin,' by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, spotlights how far Harris has been from a profile in courage. 'The issue that she truly and most strongly disagreed with the president on behind closed doors was Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza,' the book said. But, in public, Harris never expressed the slightest disagreement with the president, even as the death toll mounted among Palestinian civilians. Harris's unwavering public support for Biden's weapons shipments to Israel was politically damaging to her presidential bid. As pollsters learned, her stance seemed indefensible to many. By the start of last summer, polling was clear that most Americans wanted to stop arming Israel. A CBS News-YouGov poll in June 2024 found that Americans were against sending 'weapons and supplies to Israel,' 61 percent to 39 percent. Opposition to the arms shipments was even higher among young people. Yet Harris soldiered on, deploying standard talking points of the Biden administration and ignoring voter sentiment. In August, YouGov pollsters released findings in Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania, three swing states on a razor's edge between Harris and Donald Trump. In all three states, by a ratio of at least five-to-one, a greater number of respondents said they'd be more likely to vote for Harris if she were to support an arms embargo against Israel compared to those who said it would make them less likely to support her. But Harris kept doubling down, repeatedly insisting that there was no daylight between her and Biden on arming Israel. In the process, she put her loyalty to her patron in the Oval Office above what she reportedly believed. That is bound to come back to haunt Harris if she goes onto the presidential campaign trail again. Among Democrats, the polling is now more lopsided than ever. A new Gallup poll foreshadows that if Harris runs in 2028, she will be on the defensive with Democratic primary voters about her record of steadfast support for supplying Israel with vast quantities of weaponry to use in Gaza. Gallup found that only 8 percent of Democrats said they approved of Israel's military action in Gaza. The steady support that Harris has provided means she would be vulnerable to persistent challenges on the subject during a primary race. Overall, a Harris '28 campaign would be a stark reminder of what most Democrats would very much like to put behind them — an era when Harris dedicated herself to serving a deceptive White House that hid the realities of Biden's cognitive decline while maintaining support for Israel's actions in Gaza. Far more than any other prospective 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, Harris would drag attention back to a blameworthy past. She should not run. Norman Solomon is cofounder of RootsAction and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His book 'War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine' was published in 2023. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store