Major real estate reform: Will Saudi Arabia implement a rent cap?
Saudi Arabia is considering implementing caps on the rents of both residential and commercial properties.
Read-
This initiative is part of an effort led by Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman to rebalance the real estate market in Riyadh, Al Hammad emphasized while speaking to Al Arabiya.
'The Crown Prince's directives focus on increasing supply by lifting development restrictions in the northern parts of the capital, releasing new plots, regulating lease agreements, and maintaining regular market oversight,' Al Hammad said.
The initiative also includes the finalisation of the new White Land Tax law, which aims to boost housing supply and curb the rise in property and rental prices.
Saudi authorities have also lifted the ban on transactions related to sales, purchases, subdivisions, and permits for 81 million square meters of land in northern Riyadh. This move is designed to ease supply constraints and encourage new residential development.
Increase in provision of residential plots
The Royal Commission for Riyadh City has also been tasked with providing between 10,000 and 40,000 planned and developed residential plots annually over the next five years, depending on demand.
Prices of the plots
The prices of these plots are capped at SR1,500 per square meter for eligible Saudi citizens, including married individuals and those over the age of 25, with specific conditions prohibiting resale or transfer for 10 years unless for financing construction.
Other reforms to be introduced include new regulations to govern landlord-tenant relations and ensure fair terms for both parties.
REGA and the Royal Commission will also be responsible for monitoring property prices and submitting regular reports to the concerned authorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
3 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Pakistan PM Sharif meets Saudi Crown Prince, wishes him on Eid
Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif met Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman during his official visit to the Kingdom on the occasion of Eid ul Adha. The two leaders discussed regional developments and ways to strengthen economic cooperation. The meeting took place at Mina Palace, where both sides emphasised the importance of deepening bilateral ties, particularly in trade, investment, and development aligned with Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 and Pakistan's economic goals. 'I was honoured to meet my dear brother, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, on this blessed occasion,' Sharif said in a post on X. 'I conveyed the heartiest Eid greetings on behalf of the people of Pakistan and expressed our deep appreciation for the Kingdom's positive and constructive role during the recent Pakistan-India crisis, which led to the ceasefire understanding,' he added. The Saudi Crown Prince praised Pakistan's role in supporting regional peace and also acknowledged efforts made during the Hajj season. 'We commend the continuous efforts made by you, those working across various government sectors, and the male and female volunteers in implementing the state's policies to enable pilgrims to complete their rituals in security and tranquility,' Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman said.
Arabian Post
2 days ago
- Arabian Post
Saudi Arabia Pushes for Larger OPEC+ Oil Output Increases
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai Saudi Arabia is advocating for accelerated increases in oil production within the OPEC+ coalition, aiming to reclaim market share lost during past output cuts. The kingdom is reportedly pressing the group to raise supplies by more than 400,000 barrels per day for August and possibly September, signalling a clear shift in strategy amid evolving global energy demands. The decision underscores Saudi Arabia's intent to capitalise on high seasonal demand in the northern hemisphere summer months. By scaling back production curbs more aggressively, Riyadh seeks to boost revenue and solidify its influence over global oil markets as supply dynamics shift. This approach reflects broader geopolitical and economic calculations, especially as global economies adjust to fluctuating energy needs and the ongoing transition to cleaner energy sources. ADVERTISEMENT OPEC+ has been managing oil supply carefully since 2020, following the severe demand shock caused by the pandemic and ensuing market volatility. Initial drastic cuts helped stabilise prices, but the alliance has gradually increased output to balance rising demand. Saudi Arabia, as the largest producer within OPEC+, holds substantial sway in determining the group's production policies and has been central to managing these supply adjustments. This move to hasten production hikes also coincides with concerns over emerging market demand and the possible impact of economic slowdowns in key economies such as China and Europe. Saudi officials appear confident that increased output will prevent rivals, including the US shale sector and other non-OPEC producers, from expanding their share amid tightening market conditions. Industry experts highlight that Saudi Arabia's push for faster supply growth may be aimed at pre-empting market share erosion by ensuring that OPEC+ remains the dominant supplier globally. Since mid-2022, the kingdom has carefully recalibrated its production to respond to volatile price trends and geopolitical uncertainties, including tensions in the Middle East and disruptions caused by sanctions on Russia. The timing of the proposed output rise is critical. Summer months traditionally bring peak consumption due to higher energy needs for cooling in developed markets, which can drive up prices. Saudi Arabia's intention to increase supply during this window suggests an effort to maximise returns while stabilising prices to avoid sharp fluctuations that could undermine consumer confidence and economic recovery. Global oil markets remain sensitive to a variety of factors including inflationary pressures, currency fluctuations, and shifting consumer behaviour. While demand for fossil fuels is under pressure from environmental policies and the accelerating transition to renewables, oil remains a crucial commodity in the global energy mix. Saudi Arabia's strategy to secure market share through supply management is thus seen as a pragmatic response to balancing short-term profitability with long-term market relevance. ADVERTISEMENT OPEC+ member countries have historically struggled to reach consensus on output levels, with diverse national interests shaping negotiations. Saudi Arabia's dominant position, reinforced by its vast production capacity and financial reserves, often allows it to influence group decisions. However, some members have expressed concerns about aggressive supply increases potentially undermining prices and fiscal stability. The broader geopolitical landscape also plays a role in shaping OPEC+ policies. Tensions involving key players such as Russia, which holds a significant share in the alliance, and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East add layers of complexity to supply decisions. Riyadh's leadership in pushing for larger hikes indicates confidence in managing these risks while maintaining its strategic goals. Market analysts note that US shale producers have responded to higher prices by increasing output, albeit with some operational constraints. Saudi Arabia's efforts to accelerate OPEC+ production are seen as a counterbalance to this trend, aiming to keep global supply within manageable limits and avoid price spikes that could trigger demand destruction or accelerate the shift to alternatives. Saudi Aramco, the kingdom's state-owned oil giant, plays a pivotal role in implementing the supply strategy. Its vast infrastructure, including refineries and export terminals, supports the planned output increases. Aramco's ability to ramp up production rapidly without incurring excessive costs provides Saudi Arabia with a competitive edge in the global energy market. Environmental considerations also influence production decisions. While the global push for net-zero emissions is intensifying, OPEC+ nations, led by Saudi Arabia, continue to argue for the essential role of oil in energy security and economic development. The kingdom is simultaneously investing in cleaner technologies and diversifying its economy to reduce dependence on hydrocarbons in the long term. The interaction between Saudi Arabia's production policy and global economic indicators remains closely monitored by investors and policymakers alike. Oil prices affect inflation rates, trade balances, and geopolitical stability, making OPEC+ decisions crucial beyond the energy sector. The kingdom's assertive stance on output could signal a more proactive approach to managing these broader economic impacts. Analysts emphasize that while Saudi Arabia seeks to regain market share, the volatility of global markets and uncertainties surrounding demand growth require cautious optimism. Supply increases must be balanced against potential oversupply risks, which could trigger price declines detrimental to all producers within OPEC+.
Middle East Eye
3 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Tiran and Sanafir: Red Sea islands are now a chokehold over Egypt's security
The Egyptian news website Mada Masr recently reported that Saudi Arabia was pushing to establish a US military base on the islands of Tiran and Sanafir, reigniting one of the most dangerous files in Egypt's abandonment of its sovereignty. While the Egyptian regime issued unofficial denials via its media mouthpieces, the government has not formally responded. This crisis reopens a wound that never fully healed: for the first time in modern Egyptian history, its president in 2017 openly ceded part of the country's territory, even claiming it was never Egyptian, while persecuting and jailing anyone who dared to oppose the move. Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi's declaration that Tiran and Sanafir were Saudi islands ignored historical, geographical and legal facts. It overlooked the fact that the islands were explicitly mentioned in the Camp David peace accords, raising a crucial question: if they were Saudi territory, why wasn't Saudi Arabia a party to that agreement? Beyond the legal debate, the heart of the issue lies in the islands' strategic location. Tiran and Sanafir are not merely isolated patches of land in the Red Sea; they are natural fortresses controlling the Strait of Tiran, the only maritime artery to the Gulf of Aqaba, directly linking Egypt's southern Sinai ports with Israel's Eilat and Jordan's Aqaba. Whoever controls these islands essentially holds Sinai's maritime lifeline by the throat. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Losing them represents not just a loss of land, but the collapse of Egypt's first line of defence in southern Sinai, creating a strategic isolation that weakens Egypt's ability to manoeuvre in any conflict. More profoundly, this step did not occur in a vacuum. The handover was part of a broader regional reconfiguration that redrew spheres of influence to serve a central goal: ensuring Israel's dominance over the region's land and sea, while sidelining Egypt as a central player in favour of a rising Gulf role in the Israeli-American security framework. Key maritime chokepoint Since the Abraham Accords were signed, Israel has entered a new phase of geopolitical empowerment. Granting Saudi Arabia sovereignty over Tiran and Sanafir, a deal approved by Israel in 2022, further shifted the regional centre of gravity from Egypt to the Gulf, placing Israel's hand on a key strategic maritime chokepoint now governed by open or implicit normalisation deals. Crucially, these arrangements limit Egypt's ability to play any significant role in the Palestinian file, especially with regards to major crises like the war on Gaza. Israel, backed by the US and the Gulf, now holds the keys to vital sea crossings. Any Egyptian move to support Gaza is thus tightly controlled and precisely calculated. Tiran and Sanafir are not just neglected islands; they are the gateway to Sinai's security and the key to Israel's dominance over the Red Sea For years, Israel has sought to build its strategic economic and military depth through the corridor connecting Eilat to the Mediterranean, in direct competition with the Suez Canal. The Red Sea - from Bab el-Mandeb to Tiran and Sanafir - has thus become a de facto Israeli sphere of influence, strangling Gaza, pressuring Egypt, and tying the Gulf to Israel with inseparable security bonds. Iran and Turkey also play key roles in this landscape. Iran, through its support of the Houthis in Yemen, aims to keep pressure on Israel and the US in the south, turning the Red Sea into a theatre of indirect confrontation with the West. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait has become a pressure point in the hands of the Houthis, who have not hesitated to threaten Israeli and western shipping. Turkey, meanwhile, aims to solidify its military and economic foothold in the Red Sea and East Africa, especially after strengthening its presence in Sudan and building soft military alliances in the Horn of Africa. Ankara views the Red Sea as part of its broader project to rebuild contemporary Ottoman influence, balancing competition with the Israeli-Gulf axis on one hand and rivalry with Iran on the other. Thus, the Tiran and Sanafir crisis cannot be viewed in isolation. Control over the islands gives Israel and its allies an edge in countering Iranian influence in the Red Sea, and blocks any Turkish attempt to expand its influence in Africa northwards. It also serves as an additional pressure point on Egypt, which now finds itself caught between regional powers clashing over an increasingly volatile Red Sea. Disastrous consequences Indeed, Tiran and Sanafir are no longer merely an Egyptian-Saudi issue. They are a central node in a complex security and economic network, deftly managed by Israel through normalisation, economic plans and military projects, as Turkey and Iran carefully attempt to counterbalance or challenge this hegemony. Keeping the Strait of Tiran permanently open under American and Israeli guarantees gives Tel Aviv an unobstructed gateway to the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, completing its regional dominance project that economically suffocates Egypt, militarily hampers its movements in Sinai, and politically sidelines it from the Palestinian issue. Tiran and Sanafir: Why are the Red Sea Islands strategic for Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Israel? Read More » Even domestically within Egypt, the consequences are disastrous. The Strait of Tiran is a lifeline for tourism and trade in southern Sinai. Any threat to it directly hits Nuweiba Port, and could choke tourism investments and undermine maritime trade, deepening Egypt's economic crisis. In this context, Tiran and Sanafir are not just neglected islands; they are the gateway to Sinai's security and the key to Israel's dominance over the Red Sea. Losing them, or having them used against Egypt's interests, could suffocate the south and isolate it strategically, keeping Egypt in a perpetual defensive posture. I vividly remember the day I went to the library in Berlin, researching the islands' history through maps and documents. I met the head of the library's maps department, an elderly man on the verge of retirement, who sat with me for a long time to discuss the islands. He told me something I'll never forget: 'Anyone who doesn't understand the geography of Tiran and Sanafir doesn't understand how this region is controlled.' Today, that statement is clearer than ever. We are witnessing a scenario where geography intersects with geopolitics, Israel's hegemony is fully manifested by land and sea, and the roles of Egypt, Sudan and Yemen are shrinking amid a growing Iranian-Turkish competition on an ever-more complex chessboard. This is all happening under the watchful eyes of Washington and Tel Aviv, with calculated Gulf approval. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
