Feeding our Future: Fraud trial in hands of jury for decision
The jury begins deliberations at 9am Wednesday.
Full day of closing arguments on Tuesday, a little more than five weeks after opening statements.
Aimee Bock is described as "at the top" of the $250 million fraud scheme, with Salim Said working with her "every step of the way and they both got rich doing it."
MINNEAPOLIS (FOX 9) - In closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney Harry Jacobs told jurors that Aimee Bock and co-defendant Salim Said "committed a fraud of epic proportions" as the trial over an alleged $250 million fraud heads to jury deliberations.
Prosecution's case
Jacobs spent more than two hours refreshing jurors on everything they'd heard and seen since opening statements on Feb. 10.
"None of this would have been possible without Aimee Bock and Feeding Our Future," he said. She was the gatekeeper for enrolling each site. No site got approved, no claim got paid without Aimee Bock."
Bock, the founder and executive director of Feeding Our Future, was the only person who submitted documents to the state. She was the only person authorized to write checks to participants once the USDA reimbursements came back in.
The forms include a portion that attests that the information is accurate and that fraudulent submissions could lead to criminal charges.
Bock is charged with wire fraud for the submissions and bribery for the alleged kickbacks, which prosecutors say was evident in money that flowed back to her in the form of handbook payments and the sale of a non-operating daycare business.
"Kickbacks were the grease that made the wheels turn at Feeding Our Future," said Jacobs, telling jurors that all Bock's employees took these payments. "In exchange for what? Getting these fake, ridiculous claims submitted and paid month after month."
Dig deeper
Kenneth Udoibok, Aimee Bock's attorney, told jurors the whole case is about the meal counts, massive claims of serving thousands of meals every day.
He argued that Bock didn't review these - her staff did. She submitted them, trusting that they'd been verified.
"You cannot hold Ms. Bock responsible for someone else's actions," he said.
He alleged that site operators and food vendors all developed complex systems to make verifying claims very difficult in order to trick her.
He also blamed the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) for approving the claims and paying the reimbursements, leading Bock to believe there was nothing suspicious.
The MDE actually tried to halt approvals just months into the program due to suspicions, but Bock fought them on the grounds they had no legal authority, which a judge agreed they did not.
Said defended as 'scapegoat'
Said's defense
Adrian LaFavor-Montez, attorney for Salim Said, likewise painted his client as doing nothing wrong while others in the meal program, including his own partners, committed the fraud.
"What the government has done is they've shown you examples of blatant fraud," he said, "and they've created a narrative from that."
He showed the jury images of food being cooked and packaged at Said's Safari Restaurant, arguing they did actually serve thousands of meals a day.
The FBI surveillance video shows little to no activity outside Safari: He says that was because the bulk of the meals were delivered, not picked up.
Listing the multiple people who've pled guilty to food fraud already, he argued the evidence shows "that other individuals in this case took Salim Said's legitimate business model at Safari Restaurant and corrupted it."
The government rebuttal showed the jury, again, the bank records of Said's various companies that showed millions of dollars coming in, but just 2 to 4% of that paid out on actual food expenses.
What's next
The jury begins deliberations Wednesday morning.
They have a lot to consider: 23 total criminal counts, some of them against both Bock and Said, and some against them individually.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
Two Dozen Signs Of AI Acceleration
Right now, lots of people are obsessed with diagnosing the state of AI. How far have we come in our exploration of large language models? We know that things are changing quickly. People are grasping for numbers showing not only how AI is doing in a market and enterprise context, but how experts are predicting its deployment over the next two quarters, until we ring in 2026. First, there's this set of numbers that I heard coming out of a recent episode of AI Daily Brief where Nathaniel Whittemore collected no less than 15 charts to go over the nuts and bolts of AI adoption. You might be forgiven for thinking that a podcast is a strange environment for charts, since your audience can't actually see what you're looking at, but I just wanted to showcase some of the numbers as an example: That's one general overview of what's going on in the AI world. Clearly, we're in a time of great change. Notes from IEEE The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers is a big name in technological analysis. With some 460,000 members in 190 countries, the trade group gets attention from those trying to read the tea leaves on tech development. I was looking at an article by Eliza Strickland providing more data points on AI. One thing that the IEEE resource went into was the cost of inference dropping, where the number was cut in half over a few months. Among other findings: that Chinese models are catching up to American ones, that corporations are getting on board with AI investment, and that LLMs are becoming more adept at clinical diagnosis. The Last One? Another item that the IEEE piece covered was AI's performance on something called Humanity's Last Exam, which sounds ominous in kind of a doomsday clock way. HLE is a profound crowdsourcing of benchmarking material, from 1,000 subject expert contributors and 500 institutions across 50 countries. Here's how the project is introduced on its own web site: 'Benchmarks are important tools for tracking the rapid advancements in large language model (LLM) capabilities. However, benchmarks are not keeping pace in difficulty: LLMs now achieve over 90% accuracy on popular benchmarks like MMLU, limiting informed measurement of state-of-the-art LLM capabilities. In response, we introduce Humanity's Last Exam, a multi-modal benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge, designed to be the final closed-ended academic benchmark of its kind with broad subject coverage. The dataset consists of 2,500 challenging questions across over a hundred subjects. We publicly release these questions, while maintaining a private test set of held out questions to assess model overfitting.' So basically, leaders in AI analysis are trying to create stronger, more difficult benchmarking tasks, because AI is doing so well on the existing ones. What the IEEE found, in terms of HLE, is that even top models like OpenAI's o1 are still in the single digits when it comes to getting the answers right, which, experts point out, is a good sign for the utility of the challenge. Is Grok Ahead? I also wanted to include one more data set, this time from Epoch AI, where presenters ranked individual models according to their capacities in teraflops. One stood out: take a look at the positioning of the Grok 3 model, so far removed from the scattershot. And then think about this: as of July 9, Grok 4 is already out. In coverage July 10 at AI Gyani, Shikha Singare tells us about how Grok sits AB the ARC-AGI-2 leaderboard. 'Grok 4 … (delivers) ~18% accuracy, clearly ahead of Claude Opus 4 (~10%) and GPT-4.5 or o3 variants,' Singare writes. 'While Grok 4 is more expensive per task, it leads in raw performance—a compelling choice when task accuracy is mission-critical.' Singare also brings up something called Vending-Bench, a dynamic market simulation, where the model did exceedingly well. 'Grok 4 achieved a stunning mean net worth of $4694.15, far ahead of Claude Opus 4 ($2077.41) and even human participants ($844.05),' Singare adds. 'It also sold the highest number of units on average: 4569, indicating strong demand-generation capabilities.' Was that a couple of dozen insights? Not all of them were in bullet points. I think that if you put all of this together, and connect the dots, you get a compelling picture of how AI is going to accelerate through the latter half of this year, and into the next.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
It's Election Day for Minnesotans, but did voters know that?
The Brief Tuesday was Election Day for tens of thousands of people in Minnesota, but voter turnout was very low. People in Minnesota House District 34B had the chance to pick the DFL candidate who would be expected to win assassinated Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman's seat in November. One voter told us he forgot today was the day of the primary. Election officials expected about 10% turnout. The state's turnout in November 2024 was 76%. BROOKLYN PARK, Minn. (FOX 9) - Election Day came Tuesday for tens of thousands of people in Minnesota today, but voters hit the polls in small numbers. Empty election Do they know? Even the race to replace assassinated DFL leader and Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman didn't draw a big 9 checked St. Paul, where there's an actual city council election, and in Brooklyn Park at the spot where the Hortmans would've voted, and every polling place was steady and slow. But election officials say that's more or less the expectation for an August election. 'Important' election To vote or not to vote Voters 100 and 101 of the day at the Riverview Early Childhood Center are former neighbors of the woman whose seat they're voting to fill. "We thought it was important to vote to fill Melissa's seat," said Brooklyn Park resident Bob Anderson. He and his wife were fairly lonely at the polls and, just a couple of miles away, a potential voter may have revealed why. "I'm a Melissa Hortman fan and a strong Democrat, so I know who I would vote for regardless of which of the three," Vukmanich said. Slow trickle Typical for August Election officials expect around 10% voter turnout for the primary and maybe twice as much in November. It was just a little busier in the race to elect a new St. Paul city council member for Ward 4. "It's really been steady," said Clara Rainer, a head election judge in Ramsey County. "Almost the whole day we've had at least a couple voters in." The slow trickle of voters is normal for an August election. Brooklyn Park city clerk Damon Montero said they had a 7.3% turnout in their last August primary. But it's a stark contrast from nine months ago when 76% of Minnesota's eligible voters cast ballots in the presidential race. "The last election we were here in November and where we're standing right now there were lines basically out the door," said Raineri. Solve the daily Crossword
CBS News
4 days ago
- CBS News
Minnesota's legislative auditor set for more investigations after funding boost
Minnesota is ramping up its response to fraud amid dozens of convictions in the Feeding our Future scandal, and the investigation into a "massive scheme" to rip off the state's Housing Stabilization Services. Judy Randall, the state's independent, non-partisan legislative auditor, says her office will be conducting more audits of how taxpayer funds are being spent. "There's just been really an increased demand for that type of work, and so we are trying to do our best to meet that demand," Randall said. She says her office is also increasing contact with legislators at the Capitol. "We're going from one set of meetings to select topics," she said. "A set of meetings once a year to two sets of meetings every year.." The Legislature approved an additional $1.24 million for the legislative auditor this year for more staff and resources. Republican state Rep. Patti Anderson says the public wants answers on how their money is being spent. "Where are the dollars going? Why is there so much fraud?" Anderson said. "Minnesota used to have clean government and we want to get that back." The legislative audit commission gave the green light to seven new audits, including ones for Nursing home licensing; agricultural water quality certification; new voter registration systems; and the Board of Animal Health Oversight of Companion Animals. WCCO asked Democratic state Sen. Scott Dibble if he believes the auditor's office can get the government back on track. "Yes, I mean that's the exact purpose we have for something like the legislative auditor," Dibble said. Legislators say they expect to get the results of the audits discussed in time for the start of the next legislative session that's set for January 2026. The office of legislative auditor also accepts suggestions for audits from the public.
