logo
Hamirpur MP flags off extended train service from Amb-Andaura to Haridwar

Hamirpur MP flags off extended train service from Amb-Andaura to Haridwar

Time of India19-07-2025
1
2
Shimla: Former Union minister and Hamirpur MP
Anurag Thakur
on Saturday flagged off a newly extended train service from Amb-Andaura railway station in Una district to Haridwar. Until now, the train operated only up to Una railway station.
"It is a matter of joy that the service of MEMU (Mainline Electric Multiple Unit) train number 64511/64512, which previously ran from Una to Haridwar, has now been extended to start from Amb-Andaura," said Thakur, adding that this long-standing demand has finally been fulfilled. Passengers from Amb-Andaura can now travel to Haridwar for just Rs 75. Thakur expressed heartfelt gratitude to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and railway minister Ashwini Vaishnaw for approving the extension of the route.
The train will pass through Nangal Dam, Anandpur Sahib, Ropar, Ambala Cantt, Yamunanagar, Saharanpur, Roorkee, and conclude its journey at Haridwar, offering a convenient and affordable travel option to pilgrims and daily commuters alike.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

J&K bans 25 books for promoting ‘false narratives and terrorism', including one by Arundhati Roy
J&K bans 25 books for promoting ‘false narratives and terrorism', including one by Arundhati Roy

Hindustan Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

J&K bans 25 books for promoting ‘false narratives and terrorism', including one by Arundhati Roy

The Jammu and Kashmir government has ordered a ban on 25 books including those for allegedly propagating 'false narrative and secessionism' in the Union Territory. Arundhati Roy's 'Azadi'; constitutional expert AG Noorani's 'The Kashmir Dispute 1947–2012'; political scientist Sumantra Bose's 'Kashmir at the Crossroads' and 'Contested Lands' are among the 25 banned books. The government has ordered the forfeiture of 25 books, along with their copies and related documents.(Representative Image) A notification of the Home Department in Jammu and Kashmir issued on Tuesday (August 5), signed by Principal Secretary Chandraker Bharti, said credible evidence shows that false narratives and secessionist literature often disguised as historical or political commentary have played a key role 'behind youth participation violence and terrorism.' 'This literature would deeply impact the psyche of youth by promoting culture of grievance, victimhood and terrorist heroism. Some of the means by which this literature has contributed to the radicalization of youth in J&K include distortion of historical facts, glorification of terrorists, vilification of security forces, religious radicalization, promotion of alienation, pathway to violence and terrorism,' the notification reads. The government has declared 25 books by various publishing houses including Routledge, Stanford University Press, Oxford University Press as 'forfeited' under Section 98 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023. The government said that these books have been 'found to excite secessionism and endangering sovereignty and integrity of India', thereby, attracting the provisions of sections 152, 196 & 197 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023. While section 98 of BNSS 2023 gives power to the government to declare certain publications forfeited, Sections 152, 196, and 197 of the BNS 2023 deal with assault without grave provocation, obstruction of public servants, and failure to assist them when legally bound, respectively. The government has ordered the forfeiture of 25 books, along with their copies and related documents. This has come at a time when the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear on Friday, August 8, an application seeking directions to the central government to restore the statehood of the Union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. Incidentally, on August 5, 2019, the Centre scrapped Jammu and Kashmir's special status and bifurcated the state into two Union territories.

SC allows use of Stalin's name in TN schemes, says other govts do it too
SC allows use of Stalin's name in TN schemes, says other govts do it too

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

SC allows use of Stalin's name in TN schemes, says other govts do it too

NEW DELHI: Supreme Court on Wednesday said naming of welfare schemes after political netas was all pervasive in states and at Centre and ruled that no exception could be taken to Tamil Nadu govt's 'Ungaludan Stalin' scheme, which translates into 'Your's Stalin'. Setting aside Madras HC's July 31 interim order restraining use of names of political personalities in any govt scheme in TN, which goes to polls in April-May next year, a bench of Chief Justice Bhushan R Gavai, and Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria penalised petitioner before the HC, AIADMK MP C Ve Shanmugam, with Rs 10 lakh. Dictating the order in open court after a more than hour-long hearing on appeals filed by DMK and TN govt, CJI Gavai said, "Launching of schemes in the name of political netas is a phenomenon practised throughout the country. The Tamil Nadu govt has submitted a list of 45 welfare schemes (launched by states and Union govt) named after various political netas. We do not wish to name the schemes in order to cause embarrassment to political parties. " While directing the AIADMK MP to deposit Rs 10 lakh within a week with the TN govt for utilisation in welfare schemes for the underprivileged, the CJI said, "Time and again we have observed that political battles are to be fought in the electoral arena. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brigade™ Insignia. 3, 4 & 5 BHK Starting at ₹3.39 Cr* Brigade Group Learn More Undo Courts are not the place to fight political battles." Interestingly, the CJI-led bench withdrew Shanmugam's writ petition before the HC to the SC and dismissed it terming it as "fully misconceived and an abuse of the process of law" for singling out the TN scheme and not challenging similar schemes prevalent in other states and at Centre. It allowed appeals of DMK and TN govt to set aside the HC order. DMK was represented by senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and P Wilson. Rohatgi said SC had permitted use of photographs of the President, PM, CM and cabinet ministers in public advertisements to generate awareness among citizens about welfare schemesand that no political party in office has been immune to this phenomenon. For TN, senior advocate A M Singhvi supported the contentions of the party and said the scheme was meant to set up camps in every nook and corner of the state to enable and facilitate people of TN to avail full benefits of existing welfare schemes. Wilson said the AIADMK MP had approached Election Commission with the same allegation on July 21 for action against DMK and three days later, moved the HC alleging that EC was not taking action. Senior advocate Maninder Singh, appearing for the AIADMK MP, attempted to convince the court that a conjoint reading of a series of orders passed by SC on the issue took one to the conclusion that no welfare scheme could be named after political netas. After imposing a cost of Rs 10 lakh on Shanmugam, the bench said if the amount was not paid by the MP within a week, he would be liable for contempt of court proceedings.

Boxing polls: Interim committee rejects Anurag Thakur's nomination
Boxing polls: Interim committee rejects Anurag Thakur's nomination

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Boxing polls: Interim committee rejects Anurag Thakur's nomination

New Delhi: A day after Himachal Pradesh Boxing Association (HPBA) nominated Anurag Thakur for the August 21 Boxing Federation of India (BFI) elections, the interim committee, headed by World Boxing representative, Fairuz Mohamed, the Singapore federation president, has rejected it. New Delhi, India - November 24, 2021: Union Cabinet Minister Anurag Singh Thakur addresses the media on Cabinet decisions at National Media Centre, in New Delhi, India, on Wednesday, November 24, 2021. (Photo by Sanjeev Verma/ Hindustan Times) (Sanjeev Verma/HT PHOTO) The new electoral college was prepared on Wednesday and has been handed over to the newly-appointed Returning Officer, Justice (retd) Rajesh Tandon, who was appointed on Monday. However, part of the electoral college are erstwhile BFI treasurer Digvijay Singh and secretary general Hemanta Kalita, who were removed by outgoing president Ajay Singh over charges of financial wrongdoing. Digvijay Singh has been nominated by the Madhya Pradesh unit and Kalita by Assam. Delhi Amateur Boxing Association's Rohit Jainendra Jain's nomination has also been rejected. Both Rohit and Thakur have been found in violation of Article 20 (iii) of BFI's constitution that mandates the candidates to be 'an elected member of the State/UT member association during the election AGM duly notified to BFI and in presence of BFI observer.' Thakur's nomination has also been found in violation of Article 20 (vii) that states the candidate 'shall not be a Government servant or hold a public office.' Thakur, a former union minister, is currently a Lok Sabha MP from Hamirpur in Himachal Pradesh. Out of the 34 state units of BFI, 30 have given support to the new constitution under which Thakur and Jain were disqualified from contesting, urging that the elections be held on schedule and as per the World Boxing-approved constitution. The dissenting state units — Himachal Pradesh, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat — have petitioned courts challenging these sections of the BFI statute. The pleas will come up for hearing in Himachal, Delhi and MP on Thursday. Each state unit is required to nominate two candidates for the elections. The rejection of Rohit's nomination means Neeraj Jain will be the sole candidate from Delhi while Rajesh Bhandari, vice-president in the previous body, remains the only nominee from Himachal Pradesh. Thakur's earlier exclusion had led to litigation. The hearing is scheduled for August 18. The Indian Olympic Association (IOA), in a letter to the union sports ministry on July 30 had recommended that the interim committee be dissolved and the elections be held under the supervision of IOA or an independent authority nominated by the high court or the ministry. The tenure of the previous set of BFI office-bearers ended on February 2. Elections were initially set for March 28, but were delayed due to litigations that led to the World Boxing setting up an interim committee with Ajay Singh as its head. The tenure of that panel ended on August 2 with Singh's resignation to contest for the president's post for a third term. World Boxing then designated Mohammed as the interim panel head till the new body takes over after elections.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store