logo
'Why not an Islamic bomb?': How Israel planned and failed to stop Pakistan going nuclear

'Why not an Islamic bomb?': How Israel planned and failed to stop Pakistan going nuclear

Middle East Eye6 hours ago

Former CIA Director George Tenet thought him 'at least as dangerous as Osama bin Laden' and former Mossad Chief Shabtai Shavit regretted not killing him.
But to almost 250 million Pakistanis, Abdul Qadeer Khan - the godfather of Pakistan's nuclear programme - is a legend and national hero.
The nuclear scientist, who was born in 1936 and died in 2021 aged 85, was more responsible than anyone else for the South Asian nation developing a nuclear bomb.
He ran a sophisticated and clandestine international network assisting Iran, Libya and North Korea with their nuclear programmes.
One of those nations, North Korea, ended up getting the coveted military status symbol.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Israel - itself a nuclear power, although it has never admitted it - allegedly used assassination attempts and threats to try and stop Pakistan from going nuclear.
In the 1980s Israel even formulated a plan to bomb Pakistan's nuclear site with Indian assistance - a scheme that the Indian government eventually backed out of.
AQ Khan, as he is commonly remembered by Pakistanis, believed that by building a nuclear bomb he had saved his country from foreign threats, especially its nuclear-armed neighbour India.
Today many of his fellow citizens agree.
'Why not an Islamic bomb?'
Pakistan first decided to build a bomb after its larger neighbour had done so. On 18 May 1974 India tested its first nuclear weapon, which it codenamed Smiling Buddha.
Pakistani Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto immediately vowed to develop nuclear weapons for his own country.
"We will eat grass or leaves, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own," he said.
There was, he declared, 'a Christian bomb, a Jewish bomb and now a Hindu bomb.
'Why not an Islamic bomb?'
'We will eat grass or leaves, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own'
- Pakistani PM Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (from 1973 to 1977)
Born during British rule of the Indian subcontinent, AQ Khan completed a science degree at Karachi University in 1960 before studying metallurgical engineering in Berlin. He also went on to study in the Netherlands and Belgium.
By 1974 Khan was working for a subcontractor of a major nuclear fuel company, Urenco, in Amsterdam.
The company supplied enriched uranium nuclear fuel for European nuclear reactors.
Khan had access to top secret areas of the Urenco facility and blueprints of the world's best centrifuges, which enriched natural uranium and turned it into bomb fuel.
In January 1976 he made a sudden and mysterious departure from the Netherlands, saying he had been made 'an offer I can't refuse in Pakistan'.
Khan was later accused of having stolen a blueprint for uranium centrifuges, which can turn uranium into weapons-grade fuel, from the Netherlands.
That July he set up a research laboratory in Rawalpindi which produced enriched uranium for nuclear weapons.
For a few years the operation proceeded in secret. Dummy companies imported the components Khan needed to build an enrichment programme, the official story being that they were going towards a new textile mill.
While there is significant evidence indicating that Pakistan's military establishment was supporting Khan's work, civilian governments were generally kept in the dark, with the exception of Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (who had proposed the initiative).
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (R) and his wife Begum Nusrat Isphahani Bhutto at a dinner gala at the Georges V Hotel in France, on 26 July 1973 (AFP)
Even the late prime minister, Benazir Bhutto, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto's daughter, was not told a word about the programme by her generals.
She only found out about it in 1989 by accident - in Tehran.
Iranian President Rafsanjani asked her whether they could reaffirm the two countries' agreement on 'special defence matters'.
'What exactly are you talking about, Mr President?' asked Bhutto, confused.
'Nuclear technology, Madam Prime Minister, nuclear technology,' replied the Iranian president. Bhutto was stunned.
Assassination attempts and threats
In June 1979, the operation was exposed by the magazine 8 Days. There was an international uproar. Israel protested to the Dutch, who ordered an inquiry.
A Dutch court convicted Khan in 1983 for attempted espionage (the conviction was later overturned on a technicality). But work on the nuclear programme continued.
By 1986, Khan was confident Pakistan had the capability to produce nuclear weapons.
'Imperial whore': Top Pakistani official goes after son of overthrown shah of Iran Read More »
His motivation was in large part ideological: 'I want to question the holier-than-thou attitude of the Americans and British,' he said.
'Are these bastards God-appointed guardians of the world?'
There were serious efforts to sabotage the programme, including a series of assassination attempts widely understood to have been the work of Israel's intelligence agency, Mossad.
Executives at European companies doing business with Khan found themselves targeted. A letter bomb was sent to one in West Germany - he escaped but his dog was killed.
Another bombing targeted a senior executive of Swiss company Cora Engineering, which worked on Pakistan's nuclear programme.
Historians, including Adrian Levy, Catherine Scott-Clark and Adrian Hanni, have argued that the Mossad used threats and assassination attempts in a failed campaign to prevent Pakistan from building the bomb.
Siegfried Schertler, the owner of one company, told Swiss Federal Police that Mossad agents phoned him and his salesmen repeatedly.
He said he was approached by an employee of the Israeli embassy in Germany, a man named David, who told him to stop 'these businesses' regarding nuclear weapons.
The Israelis 'didn't want a Muslim country to have the bomb', according to Feroz Khan, a former official in Pakistan's nuclear weapons programme.
'Are these bastards God-appointed guardians of the world?'
- AQ Khan, Pakistani nuclear scientist
In the early 1980s Israel proposed to India that the two collaborate to bomb and destroy Pakistan's nuclear facility at Kahuta in Pakistan's Rawalpindi district.
Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi approved the strike.
A plan developed for Israeli F-16s and F-15s to take off from the Jamnagar airbase in India's Gujarat and launch strikes on the facility.
But Gandhi later backed out and the plan was shelved.
In 1987, when her son Rajiv Gandhi was prime minister, the Indian army chief Lieutenant General Krishnaswami Sundarji tried to start a war with Pakistan so India could bomb the nuclear facility at Kahuta.
He sent half a million troops to the Pakistani border for military drills, along with hundreds of tanks and armoured vehicles - an extraordinary provocation.
But this attempt at triggering hostilities failed after the Indian prime minister, who had not been properly briefed on Sundarji's plan, instigated a deescalation with Pakistan.
Imran Khan (L) walks with AQ Khan after a meeting at his residence in Islamabad on 7 February 2009 (AFP)
Despite Indian and Israeli opposition, both the US and China covertly helped Pakistan. China provided the Pakistanis with enriched uranium, tritium and even scientists.
Meanwhile, American support came because Pakistan was an important Cold War ally.
US President Jimmy Carter cut aid to Pakistan in April 1979 in response to Pakistan's programme being exposed, but then reversed the decision months later when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan: America would need the help of neighbouring Pakistan.
In the 1980s, the US covertly gave Pakistani nuclear scientists technical training and turned a blind eye to its programme.
But everything changed with the end of the Cold War.
In October 1990 the US halted economic and military aid to Pakistan in protest against the nuclear programme. Pakistan then said it would stop developing nuclear weapons.
AQ Khan later revealed, though, that the production of highly enriched uranium secretly continued.
The seventh nuclear power
On 11 May 1998 India tested its nuclear warheads. Pakistan then successfully tested its own in the Balochistan desert later that month. The US responded by sanctioning both India and Pakistan.
Pakistan had become the world's seventh nuclear power.
And Khan was a national hero. He was driven around in motorcades as large as the prime minister's and was guarded by army commandos.
What the Israel-Iran-US conflict taught Pakistan Read More »
Streets, schools and multiple cricket teams were named after him. He wasn't known for playing down his achievements.
'Who made the atom bomb? I made it,' Khan declared on national television. 'Who made the missiles? I made them for you.'
But Khan had also organised another, particularly daring, operation.
From the mid-1980s onwards, he ran an international nuclear network which sent technology and designs to Iran, North Korea and Libya.
He would order double the number of parts the Pakistani nuclear programme required and then secretly sell the excess on.
In the 1980s the Iranian government - despite Ayatollah Khomeini's opposition to the bomb on the grounds that it was Islamically prohibited - approached Pakistan's military dictator, General Zia-ul-Haq, for help.
Between 1986 and 2001, Pakistan gave Iran key components needed to make a bomb, although these tended to be secondhand - Khan kept the most advanced technology for Pakistan.
The Mossad had Khan under surveillance as he travelled around the Middle East in the 1980s and 1990s, but failed to work out what the scientist was doing.
Then-Mossad chief Shavit later said that if he had realised Khan's intentions, he would have considered ordering Khan to be assassinated to 'change the course of history'.
Gaddafi exposes the operation
In the end, Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi blew Khan's operation in 2003 while attempting to win support from the US.
Gaddafi disclosed to the CIA and MI6 that Khan was building nuclear sites for his government - some of which were disguised as chicken farms.
The CIA siezed machinery bound for Libya as it was being smuggled through the Suez Canal. Investigators found weapons blueprints in bags from an Islamabad dry cleaner.
When the operation was exposed, the Americans were horrified.
'It was an astounding transformation when you think about it, something we've never seen before," a senior American official told the New York Times.
"First, [Khan] exploits a fragmented market and develops a quite advanced nuclear arsenal.
'Then he throws the switch, reverses the flow and figures out how to sell the whole kit, right down to the bomb designs, to some of the world's worst governments."
In 2004 Khan confessed to running the nuclear proliferation network, saying he had provided Iran, Libya and North Korea with nuclear technology.
In February, he appeared on television and insisted he had acted alone, with no support from the Pakistani government, which then swiftly pardoned him.
President Musharraf called him 'my hero'. However, reportedly under US pressure, he placed Khan under effective house arrest in Islamabad until 2009.
Later AQ Khan said that he 'saved the country for the first time when I made Pakistan a nuclear nation and saved it again when I confessed and took the whole blame on myself'.
Soldiers carry the flag-draped coffin of AQ Khan during his funeral outside the Faisal Mosque following his death in Islamabad on 10 October 2021 (AFP)
He was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2006 but recovered after surgery.
Enormously wealthy, in his later years, Khan funded a community centre in Islamabad and spent his time feeding monkeys.
Those who knew him said Khan firmly believed what he had done was right.
He wanted to stand up to the west and give nuclear technology to non-western, particularly Muslim, nations.
'He also said that giving technology to a Muslim country was not a crime,' one anonymous acquaintance recalled.
When Khan died of Covid in 2021, he was hailed as a 'national icon' by then-Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan.
And that is how he is still widely remembered today in Pakistan.
'[The] nation should be rest assured Pakistan is a safe atomic power,' the nuclear scientist had declared in 2019.
'No one can cast an evil eye on it.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel's war on Gaza: Who are Palestine Action?
Israel's war on Gaza: Who are Palestine Action?

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Israel's war on Gaza: Who are Palestine Action?

The British government is set to ban the direct action group Palestine Action under anti-terror legislation after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton earlier this month and spray-painted two planes. The group said the airbase was targeted because flights leave there daily "for RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, a base used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East". The activists damaged Airbus Voyager aircraft, which carry military cargo and refuel fighter jets and military planes. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has said she will bring legislation to proscribe the group before Parliament on 30 June. If passed, it will designate Palestine Action as a proscribed terrorist organisation, making it illegal not only to be a member of the group but also to show support for it. It would mark the first time a direct action group has been proscribed in the UK, placing Palestine Action on a par with al-Qaeda and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria under British law. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Direct action involves tactics, including protests, boycotts, strikes and damage to property, rather than appealing to institutions and politicians. Examples include the Suffragettes, the American civil rights movement and ACTUP, a grass roots political group which fought to end the AIDS epidemic during the early 1980s. MEE looks at the group and whether it meets the criteria for proscription. Who are Palestine Action? Palestine Action was founded in 2020 after activists broke into and spray painted the London headquarters of Israel's largest arms firm, UK-based Elbit Systems. Its network of activists have subsequently used tactics, including direct action, to target what it says are the 'corporate enablers of the Israeli military-industrial complex', often breaking into offices and factories to spraypaint or damage equipment they say is used to commit war crimes in occupied Palestine. Elbit Systems is the group's primary target, prompting multiple companies to sever ties with the defence contractor, and costing the company 'billions' in lost contracts and divestments, according to Palestine Action. Barclays, which owned 16,000 shares in Elbit Systems, divested from the contractors in October, while the UK's Ministry of Defence cancelled £280m worth of contracts with the company. Many of its activists have previously been acquitted by juries, on the grounds of "defence of necessity", namely that the damage to property was justified as it was intended to prevent deaths. 'Repressive': UK government confirms Palestine Action terror proscription as hundreds rally Read More » But these defences have been systemically removed, using anti-protest legislation which has expanded police powers to crack down on peaceful protest, and impose increasingly severe sentences for those activists found guilty. This culminated with the unprecedented use of terror charges against a group of Palestine Action activists known as the Filton 18. In August last year, six activists drove a modified van into Elbit System's research and development hub in Filton, Bristol. The activists dismantled weapons, including quadcopter drone models deployed by Israel in its war on Gaza, causing £1m ($1.24m) in damage. The six activists were arrested at the scene for violent disorder and assault. A further 12 activists were rounded up in connection with the action by counter-terrorism police in two waves of raids. They were subsequently charged with non-terror related offences, including aggravated burglary and criminal damage. But because they were arrested for terrorism offences, the 18 have been held on remand under counter-terror powers until their trial in November. By then they will have been detained for more than a year - far longer than the usual six-month (182 days) detention limit for those facing trial. The move has been denounced by UN experts. The Crown Prosecution Service, which is prosecuting the case, has said that it intends to argue the offences they allege the Filton 18 committed have a 'terrorist connection', which could aggravate their sentence. Activists have also been arrested under anti-organised crime laws intended to target individuals on the periphery of criminal gangs, and tried on charges of conspiracy to blackmail. What is proscription? Proscription bans membership of, or support for, an organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000. Proscription offences can carry sentences of up to 14 years in prison. First, the government needs to consider whether a group has commited, encouraged or is 'otherwise concerned with terrorism'. The legislation defines 'terrorism' in this context as the use or threat of action which - involves serious violence against a person - involves serious damage to property - endangers a person's life - creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or section of the public or is designed seriously to interfere with or seriously to disrupt an electronic system. Then, the home secretary will consider whether to proscribe the organisation, based on a number of criteria, according to the Home Office - the nature and scale of an organisation's activities - the specific threat that it poses to the UK - the specific threat that it poses to British nationals overseas - the extent of the organisation's presence in the UK - the need to support other members of the international community in the global fight against terrorism. At time of writing, 81 organisations are proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000; and a further 14 organisations in Northern Ireland were proscribed under earlier legislation. Does Palestine Action meet the threshold for proscription? In assessing whether Palestine Action is eligible for proscription, the UK government appears to be focusing on what Cooper has described as the 'serious damage to property' it caused at Brize Norton on 20 June. In a written statement on 23 June, Cooper said the action was 'the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action' and that 'the UK's defence enterprise is vital to the nation's national security'. She said police estimated that Palestine Action operations had incurred 'millions of pounds' worth of damage since its launch in 2020. Kelly's Solicitors, which specialises in political and protest-related work, and represents Palestine Action, has argued in a letter to Cooper that a 'significant number' of the group's activities have employed 'entirely conventional campaigning methods such as marches, rallies and demos'. Laura O'Brien, head of the protest team at Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors, told MEE: 'Palestine Action isn't a membership organisation, really it's a campaign. And the people that become involved in what are generally expressive forms of protest have often never been in trouble before. 'Many of the actions carried out under the banner of Palestine Action don't include significant damage, some of them include damage which is low value, often as simple as throwing red paint which is washed away. 'When people are charged with criminal damage, and we go to court, a lot of those damages which are put forward aren't in fact criminal damage - they're consequential losses,' Simon Pook, a solicitor representing several of the Filton 18 activists, told MEE. 'The costs that are initially put forward when the case opens are subsequently substantially reduced." Cooper stated that the assessment of damage by the group's actions over the last five years had been based on 'a robust evidence-based process, by a wide range of experts from across government, the police and the security services'. But Charlie Falconer, who served as justice secretary under Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair, said that the Brize Norton action did not merit proscription 'so there must be something else that I don't know about'. How does the action at RAF Brize Norton compare to similar cases? Legal experts have highlighted that Palestine Action's methods are not unprecedented: protestors have targeted military facilities in the past and been acquitted. In its letter to Cooper, Kelly's pointed to the discrepancy between the government's response to Palestine Action and that of the Fairford Five, a group of activists who, in 2003, broke into an RAF airbase and sabotaged US bombers before they flew to Iraq during the US-led invasion. Josh Richards, one of three protesters, was defended by current UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who was a barrister at the time. Starmer argued that the actions of his client, who allegedly intended to set fire to a military jet with a mixture of petroleum and washing-up liquid, were a justified attempt to prevent war crimes. 'If you look at the guidance that Keir Starmer set out in that case, it seems to be a massive contradiction,' said Pook. 'People may be outraged about spraying red paint on military jets. In my view, that is far less serious than having a can of petrol." Can proscription be challenged or reversed? Under the Terrorism Act, an application can be made to the home secretary, requesting that they de-proscribe an organisation. If refused, then there is a right of appeal to the Proscribed Organisation Appeal Commission. According to the Home Office, the commission will permit the appeal "if it considers that the decision to refuse de-proscription was flawed, applying judicial review principles". The most recent was that of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, in November 2019. O'Brien said that few organisations have challenged proscription. 'But that's perhaps not surprising, because often the organisations that are being proscribed are so often identified as militant organisations who promote violence in order to bring about regime or political change. 'This is a different type of case, because a direct action group is the subject of the proscription. There is much more likely to be a challenge this time." Palestine Action have launched a fundraising campaign to challenge the ban.

Israeli military confirms killing of seven soldiers in Khan Younis
Israeli military confirms killing of seven soldiers in Khan Younis

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Israeli military confirms killing of seven soldiers in Khan Younis

The Israeli military announced the killing of seven Israeli soldiers, including a lieutenant, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, during an operation carried out by the armed wing of Hamas, the Qassam Brigades. The attack carried out by Palestinian fighters targeted an armoured personnel carrier (APC) on Tuesday afternoon with an explosive device attached to the military vehicle. According to the military, the soldiers killed in the explosion belonged to Battalion 605, which is part of the 188th Brigade Combat Team, whose troops have been operating on the ground in Khan Younis for the past few weeks. The army identified those killed as Matan Shai Yashinovsky, Alon Davidov, Niv Radie, Ronal Ben-Moshe, Shahar Manoav, Ronen Shapiro and Maayan Baruch Perlstein. "This is a difficult and painful morning for the entire Israeli people," a statement published early on Wednesday by the military read. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Meanwhile, a post released by the Qassam Brigades on Telegram confirmed carrying out a "complex ambush" on Israeli troops using a "Shawaz explosive device placed inside the cockpit" of the APC. The brigade said that another military vehicle was targeted near the Ali bin Abi Talib Mosque in Khan Younis, noting that Palestinian fighters "monitored the landing of a helicopter for evacuation, which lasted for several hours". The Israeli military indicated that rescue forces and helicopters attempted to save the fighters from the military vehicle set ablaze but "without success", adding that the "complex incident is still being investigated". The operation carried out by the Qassam Brigade highlights its capabilities on the ground despite Israel's nearly two-year war on Gaza. The ambush follows a statement made by the Israeli military's chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, announcing that the army's focus was on returning to Gaza to bring back the captives and to "dismantle Hamas' rule" after a ceasefire between Israel and Iran came into effect on Tuesday.

Abdullah bin Zayed receives Pakistani Deputy PM and FM
Abdullah bin Zayed receives Pakistani Deputy PM and FM

Sharjah 24

time2 hours ago

  • Sharjah 24

Abdullah bin Zayed receives Pakistani Deputy PM and FM

Focus on enhancing bilateral relations During the meeting, Sheikh Abdullah and Ishaq Dar discussed the strong bilateral ties between the UAE and Pakistan and explored ways to further strengthen cooperation in various fields to serve shared interests and promote the prosperity and well-being of both nations. Signing of key agreements Following their discussions, the two ministers signed the official minutes of the 12th session of the Joint Ministerial Commission. They also signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) regarding the mutual exemption of entry visa requirements for citizens of both countries. Additionally, they witnessed the signing of a MoU to establish a joint task force aimed at boosting UAE investments in strategic sectors within Pakistan. This MoU was signed by Mohamed Hassan Al Suwaidi, Minister of Investment, and Tariq Bajwa, Special Assistant to the Prime Minister of Pakistan. Another significant agreement was signed concerning cooperation in artificial intelligence and the digital economy. This agreement was signed by Mohamed Hassan Al Suwaidi and Zarar Hashim Khan, Federal Secretary at Pakistan's Ministry of Information Technology and Telecommunications. Senior officials in attendance The joint commission meeting saw the presence of several high-ranking officials, including Mohamed Hassan Al Suwaidi, Minister of Investment; Ahmed Ali Al Sayegh, Minister of State; Saeed Mubarak Al Hajeri, Assistant Foreign Minister for Economic and Trade Affairs; Omran Sharaf, Assistant Foreign Minister for Advanced Science and Technology; and Hamad Obaid Al Zaabi, UAE Ambassador to Pakistan. Ahmed Ali Al Sayegh led the UAE delegation, while Tariq Bajwa chaired the Pakistani side. Deepening strategic partnership In his remarks during the meeting, Ahmed Ali Al Sayegh stated that the Joint Ministerial Commission reflects the deeply rooted strategic partnership between the UAE and Pakistan, a relationship based on decades of cooperation and a shared vision. He expressed appreciation to Mohammad Ishaq Dar for his efforts to enhance bilateral relations and reiterated the UAE's commitment to strengthening collaboration across various sectors of mutual interest. A longstanding and evolving relationship Al Sayegh emphasised that Pakistan is a key partner for the UAE, with a distinguished relationship that dates back to the establishment of diplomatic ties in 1971. He noted that the two countries continue to foster strong ties, with non-oil trade reaching over US$8.6 billion in 2024. He concluded by highlighting the enduring partnership between the UAE and Pakistan, grounded in mutual trust and respect, and focused on building a prosperous, forward-looking future for both peoples.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store