New proposal calls for B.C. grizzly on Texada Island to be moved to Bute Inlet
The latest pitch would see the bear, now dubbed Tex, moved to Bute Inlet, about 100 kilometres northwest of the island.
'It's a pretty remote area of the province… there's hardly any humans there, so the bear will have lots of room to roam,' said Homalco First Nation Chief Darren Blaney.
'We have busy bear tours up there as well, and we have a salmon-enhancement facility up there and it creates a lot of food for the bears.'
2:18
First Nation group offers territory to move Texada grizzly bear
There have been several proposals to trap and move the bear, and Texada Islanders have even privately fundraised to cover the cost of relocating him.
Story continues below advertisement
The B.C. government, however, has resisted the idea, telling Global News that because the bear has already been moved twice the chances of a successful third move are low and it is no longer a candidate for relocation.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Nicholas Scapaillati, executive director of the Grizzly Bear Society, argues Tex just hasn't been given the right opportunity.
'This is a young male who is at that age where he's looking for a mate. He's looking for new territory and he's been driven out of his territory where he was born.. Part of that's genetic, it's his drive to leave and part of it's his mom,' he said.
'He was relocated to his home range in the past, and so now we're looking at something that's setting him up for success in a new territory.'
Both the Grizzly Bear Society and the First Nations whose territory are involved say the initiative is also an opportunity for the province to advance reconciliation by incorporating Indigenous knowledge into land management and conservation decisions.
'Reconciliation can't be just something you say on TV. It has to be some action to that,' Blaney said.
'Because you're respecting government, you're respecting culture and respecting food sovereignty and, you know, part of our culture is the bears in our territory.'
Story continues below advertisement
Blaney said there were plans to meet with the province on Monday, and again later in the week, and that he was hopeful they could reach an accommodation.
1:52
Texada Island residents hope for safe transportation of lone grizzly bear
In a statement, the Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship was non-committal.
'The Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship is aware of this plan, and there are ongoing conversations between First Nations and the Grizzly Bear Foundation,' it said.
In the meantime, conservation officers have visited Texada Island and are providing public safety and attractant management advice to residents.
It's the type of conversation Scapillati says will become increasingly necessary as bear habitat is destroyed or encroached on by humans.
'It's the responsibility of these communities to learn to coexist,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
'And Texada is doing a great job. They've got a community board set up, and the community's coming together and having that discussion — and that's really important, they're the ones that will determine the fate of Tex until the province and First Nations can come together with this new plan.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Africville descendants show support for longtime protester Eddie Carvery
Former Africville residents and their descendants are rallying behind longtime protester Eddie Carvery. Carvery's grandson, Eddie Carvery III, says watching his grandfather get threatened with eviction after living on the old Africville site for years is frustrating. 'I can't find the words to justify how I feel because I saw my grandfather and I've only seen him defeated like that one time before, and that's when his other protest site was demolished after he had a major heart attack,' he said. 'Why come for this man when he's at his lowest? It shouldn't be, right? It's heartbreaking.' The elder Carvery has been protesting on the site where the community used to stand since 1970, and has been issued various eviction notices during his time. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Most recently, he was issued a parking ticket on July 14 after the Africville Museum requested it be issued — saying his trailer has been on their property for four years. Story continues below advertisement Carvery III says it's really impacted his grandfather, especially given his recent medical diagnosis. 'That's very sad for somebody who spent 50 plus years by himself fighting for the people,' he said. 'It's like he was defeated.' While it's only a parking ticket, for the organizer of Monday's rally, there's more to it. 'Essentially, it is an eviction notice, although a lot of people will tell you that it's semantics,' said Stephanie Daye, an elder and land rights advocate. 'But I think that it was a very sneaky and underhanded way to address what they see as a problem.' As of Monday morning, the municipality cancelled the ticket and informed the museum it was working on letting Carvery know. A spokesperson for Halifax Regional Municipality told Global News that due to a lack of identification number and inspection sticker, the trailer could not legally be tied to Carvery. As for Carvery, he says he's determined to keep fighting for Africville. 'I'm here. I'm not going to quit,' he said, adding he's looking for reparations and the land of Africville to be returned to the community. Story continues below advertisement 'I'm not going away. And I'm not going to allow them to take my shell. Providing they do that, they're going to have to put me in jail.' The Africville Museum did not respond to Global News' request for comment by deadline. For more on this story, watch the video above.
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Pipelines won't unite Canada. Clean energy will
Canada doesn't need more fossil fuel infrastructure. In the wake of the Building Canada Act's adoption, pipelines and fossil fuel infrastructure are being proposed as national interest projects, even though they are costly, risky and out of step with public opinion, especially in Quebec. The province has long rejected fossil fuel supply projects and opted for a smarter future with renewable energy. Ironically enough, it is precisely here that yet another new project concept for an LNG plant is being touted. In a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney and government ministers, more than 100 organizations illustrated how an east-west electricity grid could serve national interests by prioritizing renewable energy and Indigenous rights. This united call is aligned with Quebecers' long-standing opposition to fossil fuel proposals running through the Saint Lawrence River and their communities. In May, hundreds of groups and individuals called on federal and Quebec politicians to oppose new pipelines. Earlier this year, in February, within a week of the media's renewed interest in fossil fuel projects, such as Energy East and GNL Quebec — and following US President Donald Trump's return to the White House — a coalition of 100 Quebec organizations and experts from environment, labour, student, urban planning and academia also issued an unequivocal statement reiterating that Quebec civil society wants to maintain its long-standing opposition to fossil fuel project expansion. A Leger survey showed that, when presented with a choice between investments in renewable energy or fossil fuels, three out of four Quebecers would choose the former, further indicating that pipelines are a challenge to so-called Canadian unity. This public consensus against fossil fuel development wasn't formed lightly but rather through decades of mobilization, culminating in 2022 when Quebec adopted legislation prohibiting oil and gas exploration. This secured the province an appointment as co-president of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, a global group of jurisdictions committed to phasing out fossil fuels and implementing policies to do so. Any new oil and gas pipeline or facility project will face a fundamental reality: the lack of market need. Europe's demand for natural gas may already have peaked, in part due to aggressive efforts to accelerate electrification and expand renewable resources. Even without taking into account the fact that an east-west pipeline would be useless for Asian markets, with the continent's energy needs being met by a mix of renewables, electrification, efficiency and nuclear energy; Canadian gas can't compete in the Asian market dominated by the United States and Qatar. Betting, once again, on the same fossil-fuel horse might be what keeps Canada from becoming the energy superpower it could be, write Andréanne Brazeau and Charles-Édouard Têtu Building massive infrastructure to carry fossil fuels is a mistake in the face of global market volatility. Fossil fuel expansion and profiteering are primary drivers of inflation and the cost-of-living crisis. New pipelines are an investment in yesterday's energy model while the world rapidly shifts to renewables. As the global energy transition accelerates, they could easily become costly 'stranded assets.' Federal financing of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion should serve as an example. Not only did the cost skyrocket from $4.5 billion to $34 billion to cover a fourth of the distance of a west-east project, but it is also still not achieving full capacity. Furthermore, fossil fuel pipelines are notorious for taking years before becoming operational. Trans Mountain was approved in 2019 and started transporting fuel in 2024. Projects such as Energy East and GNL Québec would not be different and aren't a 'quick fix' to uncertainty around trade. It's also important to note that even if Energy East were operational today, it could not close the capacity gap needed for full energy autonomy. Uncertain times require policy-makers to act fast, but that doesn't mean forgetting the basics of economics and business by wasting, yet again, public money in sectors that have no future. Canada should take inspiration from the European Union's response following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Launched in 2022, the REPowerEU initiative aims to stop the EU's dependence on Russian gas by investing in renewables and energy efficiency, which has already helped reduce demand for Russian gas by 18 per cent, with an aim of 26 per cent by 2030. Betting, once again, on the same fossil-fuel horse might be what keeps Canada from becoming the energy superpower it could be if it were to finally get serious about phasing out oil and gas and focus on solutions that will work in tomorrow's economy. Building a new deal of Canada's own to answer the crisis, while also answering the country's energy needs, will only work if public money supports projects aligned with our climate goals. As the US administration becomes more unpredictable in its climate and trade policies, Canada must invest in its resilience. A real nation-building project is a strong national grid that will increase our economic competitiveness, create lasting jobs, support our climate commitments and shield Canadian households from rising fossil fuel costs.
Global News
9 hours ago
- Global News
Metro Vancouver blasted for shelving review of sewage treatment plant debacle
The North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant is $3 billion over budget and will cost taxpayers for decades. Late Friday, Metro Vancouver directors held a secret vote and decided to shelve a review of the debacle. Metro Vancouver claims it's putting the review on hold because of ongoing litigation with the project's former contractor, Acciona. The trial isn't scheduled to start until 2027. 2:00 A tour of Metro Vancouver's controversial wastewater treatment plant 'Absolutely deplorable that they did this,' said New Westminster Councillor Daniel Fontaine. Story continues below advertisement 'Taxpayers are not going to get answers likely now until at least after the next civic election, which is completely unacceptable.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy BC Conservative MLA and municipal affairs critic Tony Luck also weighed in, saying, 'David Eby should be stepping in and asking for that review to continue. There's no reason for it to be shut down.' Over the past year, Eby has promised repeatedly to take action on Metro Vancouver's failures. On July 17, 2024, he said, 'It is high time for Metro Vancouver to bring in an auditor to have a look at that.' On July 24, 2024, he commented, 'If Metro Vancouver fails to meet those standards, the province will step in.' 1:59 Fired wastewater plant contractor fires back at Metro Vancouver On Sept. 10, 2024, Eby said, 'But if they fail to do it, the province will step in.' On Jan. 22, 2025, 'This review can't come a moment too soon.' And on July 25, 2025, Eby said, 'If they can',t then the province is prepared to step in.' Story continues below advertisement Monday morning, July 28th, he said, 'We'll have a look at the justification for the decision by Metro Vancouver and how to move forward. But the bottom line is that Metro Vancouver needs to ensure accountability for taxpayers and, we'll make sure that that happens.' For its part, Metro Vancouver refuses to say which directors voted to delay the review, and claims it 'has maintained a clear and consistent record of public disclosure.' Fontaine said Eby needs to call an inquiry through the Local Government Act or allow the auditor general to intervene.
