
ACIP's June Meeting: Glaring Omissions and Shocking Addition
This edition of Medicine Matters addresses glaring omissions and a shocking addition at the CDC's June 2025 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting.
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kennedy's newly formed ACIP panel met in June 2025. The meeting was originally scheduled to occur over 3 days but was cut down to a day and a half. A highly anticipated discussion and vote on HPV vaccine did not occur. No vote was taken for COVID vaccines. The shocking addition was the inclusion of an inaccurate and outdated presentation about thimerosal that unscientifically affected the subsequent flu vaccine vote.
ACIP Vote for Clesrovimab
For respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), ACIP did vote 5 to 2 in favor of clesrovimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody for infants. This product was recently approved by the FDA and received a thumbs-up for inclusion in the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC). We already had nirsevimab, but now with clesrovimab, we have an additional way to protect these little ones.
New COVID Vaccine Formula and Newly Licensed Vaccines
COVID: It's still here, it's not going away, and a lot has been happening in the COVID vaccine space. The FDA announced the new 2025-2026 COVID vaccine formula— a monovalent JN.1 lineage, preferably using the LP 8.1 strain.
Two new COVID vaccine products have been fully licensed by the FDA: a protein-based vaccine, Nuvaxovid by Novavax, and Moderna's new lower-dose mRNA COVID vaccine, mNEXSPIKE. Both vaccines are approved for all adults 65 or older. However, among younger people aged 12-64 years, these vaccines are approved only for those who have at least one health condition that puts them at increased risk for COVID.
Mixed Messages About COVID Vaccination
Leading up to the meeting, there were a lot of mixed messages about COVID vaccination.
May 20, 2025
The FDA Commissioner, Martin Makary, MD, MPH, and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Director, Vinayak Prasad, MD, MPH, announced their new evidence-based approach to COVID vaccination during a CBER Town Hall and in a sounding board article published in The New England Journal of Medicine . They discussed requiring additional placebo-controlled trials using saline and said the FDA anticipates it will make favorable risk-benefit findings for vaccination among adults 65 or older and for those 6 months or older with one or more risk factors that put them at high risk for severe COVID outcomes. Both pregnancy and recent pregnancy were on their list of underlying medical conditions that increase a person's risk for severe COVID.
May 27, 2025
One week later, HHS Secretary Kennedy issued his own directive and unilaterally removed COVID vaccines from the immunization schedule for healthy children and for pregnant women. He made this announcement on social media. No new evidence was cited to support this decision. Absent from this announcement was any representative from the CDC or ACIP. This HHS directive triggered color-code changes to the child and adult schedule color tables. COVID vaccines for pregnancy were changed to gray to indicate no guidance/not applicable. COVID vaccines for children aged 6 months through 18 years were changed to blue to indicate shared clinical decision-making.
June 25, 2025
At the June ACIP meeting, the CDC staff gave updates on COVID epidemiology and vaccine safety and effectiveness. Here are some highlights:
Most pediatric hospitalizations (57%) occur in children less than 2 years of age. Most hospitalized children in this age group have no underlying medical conditions.
Rates of COVID-associated hospitalizations are highest among infants less than 6 months of age, followed by those aged 6-23 months. Rates of COVID-associated hospitalizations among infants less than 6 months of age are comparable to rates among adults aged 65-74 years. None of the COVID vaccine products are approved for infants under 6 months of age, so protection can only come from maternal antibodies.
The majority (89%) of children and adolescents hospitalized for COVID had not received a dose of the most recently recommended vaccine.
The vaccine effectiveness update demonstrated that COVID vaccines protect against emergency department and urgent care visits, hospitalization, and critical illness.
ACIP recommendations are supposed to be evidence-based. Another ACIP meeting is planned for August/September. Let's hope for a truly evidence-based vote on the new COVID vaccine formula.
Misleading Presentation About Thimerosal
Now, more about the shocking, inaccurate, and outdated presentation on thimerosal by Lyn Redwood— who was not part of the CDC. Her presentation slides that were originally posted on the ACIP website initially cited a study that didn't exist and did not accurately represent conclusions of other articles that do exist.
A CDC review of the evidence debunked thimerosal myths and refuted Redwood's claims. It clarified that all childhood vaccines licensed and recommended in the US have been thimerosal free since 2001, with the exception of some multidose formulations of flu vaccines. For flu vaccines, 96% are already thimerosal-free. Only 4% of flu vaccines — those that come in multidose vials — contain this preservative. Thimerosal is included to prevent growth of harmful bacteria and fungi introduced by multiple needle sticks into the vial.
The CDC review of evidence also clarified that thimerosal has been extensively studied over decades, with no evidence that it causes autism spectrum disorder or other neurodevelopmental disorders. This is consistent with the FDA's review of thimerosal in vaccines.
The review of the evidence was initially put up on the CDC's ACIP webpage but was then taken down.
Methylmercury vs Ethylmercury
Concerns about mercury are causing confusion. Thimerosal is 50% mercury by weight, but not all mercury is the same. There is methylmercury and there is ethylmercury. Methylmercury — the kind found in long-lived fish — can accumulate in the body and can be toxic and cause harm if consumed in high doses. But that is not what is in thimerosal. Thimerosal is quickly metabolized to ethylmercury, not methylmercury. Ethylmercury does not carry the same risk and is quickly metabolized and excreted by the body.
The panel heard Redwood's inaccurate presentation but there was no opportunity given for a presentation about CDC's updated review and no mention of the FDA's evidence-based assessment.
ACIP Vote on Thimerosal in Influenza Vaccinations
The new panel reaffirmed routine annual flu vaccination for everyone 6 months or older. But when it came to thimerosal, only one ACIP member followed the scientific evidence. The new panel voted to remove thimerosal from flu shots for children, pregnant women, and adults.
This vote could have unintended consequences. Manufacturers may now be forced to turn to other, less-studied preservatives to prevent contamination in multidose vials. This decision will also likely reduce the availability of multidose flu vaccine, which in turn may reduce flu vaccine access in some communities. This vote also increases vaccine hesitancy and concern.
Future ACIP Initiatives From This New Panel?
Comments from the new ACIP chair about future initiatives are very concerning. For starters, he plans to reevaluate the childhood immunization schedule, the birth dose of Hep B, and the use of MMR and varicella vaccines for young children.
If ACIP actually follows this course, it will likely upend the child and adult vaccine schedules and sow further mistrust in vaccines. One thing is clear: Mistrust causes vaccine hesitancy, and hesitancy brings more illness and death from vaccine-preventable diseases.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Zombie' rabbits with black horns and mouth tentacles are invading Colorado backyards
What the heck is that?! Rabbits in Colorado are causing alarm among residents and looking more like creatures from nightmares and not fuzzy and cuddly friends. Rabbits in Fort Collins, Colorado, are being spotted with eerie black-colored growths resembling tentacles or horns protruding from their heads. 9NEWS Northern Colorado reporter Amanda Gilbert captured a photo of one not-so-cute rabbit with the growth on its head, which resident Susan Mansfield said looked like 'black quills or black toothpicks sticking out all around his or her mouth.' 'I thought he would die off during the winter, but he didn't. He came back a second year, and it grew,' Mansfield added. Photos of another rabbit, whose growths have almost completely covered its face, have also gone viral on Reddit. Colorado Parks and Wildlife officials have identified the cause as shope papillomavirus, a rabbit-only virus with no cure that produces wart-like tumours known as papillomas, particularly around the face and head of cottontail rabbits, 9NEWS reports. The virus only spreads among rabbits, primarily by biting insects like fleas and ticks during warmer months. A relative of human papillomavirus, SPV is not harmful to humans, pets or other wildlife, and usually doesn't hurt the rabbit unless it affects the eyes or mouth, officials said. Officials advise residents to avoid approaching or touching affected rabbits. Most wild rabbits manage well, as the growths often disappear on their own. The rabbits' eerie look has gone viral, with comparisons to 'zombies,' 'aliens, and 'Frankenstein bunnies.' Their antler-like growths may have inspired the North American jackalope legend, some researchers and folklorists say. 'Wow, I kinda feel bad for them,' one person commented on an Instagram post of the affected animals. 'One time I need this to be AI,' another joked. 'Zombies are on the rise,' someone else added on Facebook. 'The rabbit escaped from 'Monty Python and The Holy Grail,'' another person referenced the cult-classic movie's killer rabbit.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Craig-Hallum Reiterates a Buy Rating on Bioventus (BVS), Sets a $15 PT
Bioventus Inc. (NASDAQ:BVS) is one of the . On August 7, Craig-Hallum analyst Chase Knickerbocker reiterated a Buy rating on Bioventus Inc. (NASDAQ:BVS) and set a price target of $15.00. A doctor repairing a foot and ankle injury using the latest sports medicine techniques. The analyst gave the rating after Bioventus Inc. (NASDAQ:BVS) reported its fiscal Q2 results on August 6, with reported revenue of $147.7 million declining 2.4% and organic revenue advancing 6.2%. Diluted earnings per share for Q2 was $0.11 compared to a diluted loss per share of $0.40 in the prior-year period. Bioventus Inc. (NASDAQ:BVS) also reported cash from operations of $25.9 million and non-GAAP earnings of $0.21 per share. Bioventus Inc. (NASDAQ:BVS) is a medical technology company that develops and commercializes proprietary orthobiologic products to treat musculoskeletal conditions. It operates through the following business segments: Active Healing Therapies-U.S, Active Healing Therapies-International, Surgical and BMP. While we acknowledge the potential of BVS as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
FDA may pull authorization for Pfizer COVID shot for kids under 5
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering revoking the authorization of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children under 5 years old, the company confirmed Wednesday. The move would add another barrier for parents who want to vaccinate healthy children, as shots from Moderna and Novavax were approved for more limited populations. In May, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children or pregnant women. The CDC then updated its immunization schedule to reflect that children with no underlying health condition 'may receive' COVID-19 vaccines after consulting with a health care provider — what's known as 'shared decision-making.' If FDA pulls its emergency use authorization, Pfizer's vaccine would no longer be available to any children younger than 5. Right now, Moderna and Novavax shots could be administered 'off label' to healthy children. 'We are currently in discussions with the agency on potential paths forward and have requested that the EUA for this age group remain in place for the 2025-2026 season,' a Pfizer spokesman told The Hill. 'It is important to note that these deliberations are not related to the safety and efficacy of the vaccine which continues to demonstrate a favorable profile,' the company added. The Guardian first reported on the FDA's potential move. In a statement to The Hill, HHS said it wouldn't comment on potential changes. 'The COVID-19 pandemic ended with the expiration of the federal public health emergency in May 2023. We do not comment on potential, future regulatory changes. Unless officially announced by HHS, discussion about future agency action should be regarded as pure speculation,' HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon said. Pfizer has had full FDA approval for its COVID-19 vaccine for individuals age 12 and older since 2022.