Hontiveros names instances when SC overturned its rulings
'The SC has reversed a unanimous decision in a lot of instances before,' Hontiveros said.
One of these was the case of the League of Cities of the Philippines vs. the Commission on Elections (Comelec), where the SC En Banc granted a motion for reconsideration and declared 16 Cityhood Laws as constitutional in 2010.
In 2008, the SC initially declared unconstitutional the creation of 16 new cities and ordered the Comelec against the holding of a plebiscite pursuant to cityhood laws in these municipalities.
The SC in December 2009 reversed the 2008 decision and ruled that the towns can be declared as cities. However, in 2010, it made a second reversal and reinstated its 2008 decision.
In its ruling in February 2011, the SC denied with finality that the 16 towns can be declared as cities.
Hontiveros also mentioned the case of the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications Inc. and others vs. Greenpeace Southeast Asia of the Philippines.
'Original decision, unanimous, December 8, 2015. Reversed unanimously on MR too, July 26, 2016,' Hontiveros said.
'Hindi lang po tulad nung sinabi ni minority leader na there's always a first time. It has happened before. So 'yung ganitong klaseng milagro na hinahanap, posibleng mangyari din po dito sa kasong pinag uusapan natin,' she added.
(It's not just like what the minority leader said, that there's always a first time. It has happened before. So this kind of miracle being sought is also possible in the case we are discussing.)
This came after Senator Rodante Marcoleta questioned whether even Supreme Court justice would overturn the ruling, considering that it was unanimous.
The SC had ruled unanimously that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution.
Meanwhile, with 19 votes, the Senate voted to transfer to the archives the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte.—LDF, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
42 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Makabayan files MR to reverse SC ruling on VP Sara impeachment case
The Koalisyong Makabayan sought to reverse the SC ruling on the VP Sara impeachment case. (Photo from the FB post of Koalisyong Makabayan) The progressive Koalisyong Makabayan on Friday filed a joint motion for reconsideration (MR) calling on the Supreme Court (SC) to reverse its decision junking the impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte. According to Manny Vargas' report over Super Radyo dzBB, the petitioners also filed a separate motion to intervene as they urged the SC to overturn its initial decision that declared the articles of impeachment against Duterte unsconstitutional. They also appealed for the Court to rule that House lawmakers did not commit grave abuse of discretion and that the filing of the articles of impeachment was not covered by the one-year ban on impeachment. Among the petitioners were ACT-Partylist Rep. Antonio Tinio, Kabataan Partylist Rep. Renee Co, Makabayan president Liza Masa, and BAYAN president Renato Reyes. The Senate on Wednesday voted to archive the impeachment case against Duterte following the SC decision. The Court earlier declared the articles of impeachment against the Vice President unconstitutional, stressing that it was barred by the one-year rule under the Constitution and that it violated her right to due process. It also said the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings because the articles of impeachment were void. The SC said it was not absolving Duterte of any of the charges against her and that any subsequent impeachment complaint may be filed starting February 6, 2026. The House then filed a motion for reconsideration, seeking to reverse the SC decision. The lower chamber argued it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case. Motions for reconsideration Three motions for reconsideration have been filed with the SC against its ruling. The first was filed by several individuals behind the first impeachment complaint against Duterte, followed by the motion for reconsideration filed by the House of Representatives. The third motion was filed by the 1Sambayan coalition, including Carpio-Morales and Carpio, previously filed a motion for reconsideration with the SC on its ruling. They asked the SC to issue a status quo ante order and to set the case for oral arguments.—Sundy Locus/LDF, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos: SC ruling on Sara impeachment raps not on merits of complaints
'We have to make very, very clear to everyone that the Supreme Court decision does not have any bearing on the rightness or wrongness of the merits of the impeachment case. They're not saying that there was no wrongdoing,'' Marcos said. President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. said Friday that the Supreme Court's decision declaring the articles of impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte unconstitutional did not have any bearing on the merits of the case. Marcos stated that the High Tribunal's move was based on a procedural question, rather than the merits of the case. 'We have to make very, very clear to everyone that the Supreme Court decision does not have any bearing on the rightness or wrongness of the merits of the impeachment case. They're not saying that there was no wrongdoing,'' Marcos said. "Neither are they saying there was wrongdoing. All they're saying is you did not handle it properly. That's it,'' he added. Marcos also maintained that he had no role in the impeachment process against the Vice President, who was his running mate in the 2022 national elections. He noted that he is also an impeachable official. ''I keep telling you, the Executive has no role in this. The President has no role. I'm an impeachable officer. I cannot involve myself in any of this. So, it's really the Supreme Court, the Senate, and the House,'' Marcos said. ''So, that's where the decisions were made on the issues between the House, the Senate, and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has decided, and like I've said, that's it. The Supreme Court has decided,'' he added. On Wednesday, the Senate voted to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Duterte, following the decision of the SC to declare her impeachment unconstitutional. The High Tribunal argued that it was barred by the one-year bar rule under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution. The SC also found that the articles violated Duterte's right to due process. For her part, Duterte urged respect for the decision made by the Senate. –NB, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
8 hours ago
- GMA Network
Carpio: Interventions on Duterte impeachment anchored on court rules
Retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio maintained Friday that due process has been observed in the way they are ''intervening'' in the impeachment case of Vice President Sara Duterte. In an interview on Super Radyo dzBB, Carpio was asked for comment on the tirades of Senate President Francis ''Chiz'' Escudero against retired SC justices who are critical of the high court's ruling on the impeachment of Duterte. ''We are following the process, there is still a motion for recon and kami sa 1Sambayan we intervened because this is a very important case, dahil before that we already filed a case on confidential funds and what is at issue here, in this case, are also confidential funds so we are intervening following the process under the Constitution, under the rules of court. Allowed naman 'yung MR, allowed naman 'yung intervention,'' Carpio explained. ''So we are not saying we are super Supreme Court, we are following the process laid out by the Supreme Court,'' he added. To recall, political coalition 1Sambayan and others had asked the High Tribunal to issue a status quo ante order that will pause the proceedings of the impeachment trial of the Vice President. The petitioners filed a motion to be allowed to intervene in the impeachment cases as well as to admit their motion for reconsideration, where they asked the SC to issue a status quo ante order and to set the case for oral arguments. On Wednesday, the Senate voted to transfer to the archives the articles of impeachment against Duterte, following the decision of the SC to declare her impeachment unconstitutional. For her part, Duterte urged respect for the ruling by the Senate. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
