Iran's President visits those injured in port explosion that killed at least 28 people
Iran's President visited those injured on Sunday (April 27, 2025) in a huge explosion that rocked one of the Islamic Republic's main ports, a facility purportedly linked to an earlier delivery of a chemical ingredient used to make missile propellant.
The visit by President Masoud Pezeshkian came as the toll from Saturday's blast at the Shahid Rajaei port outside of Bandar Abbas in southern Iran's Hormozgan province rose to 28 killed and about 1,000 others injured.
While Iran's military sought to deny the delivery of ammonium perchlorate from China, new videos emerged showing an apocalyptic scene at the still-smoldering port. A crater that appeared metres deep sat surrounded by burning smoke so dangerous that authorities closed schools and businesses in the area.
Iranian State television described the fire as being under control, saying emergency workers hoped that it would be fully extinguished later Sunday. Overnight, helicopters and heavy cargo aircraft flew repeated sorties over the burning port, dumping seawater on the site.
Pir Hossein Kolivand, head of Iran's Red Crescent society offered the death toll and number of injured in a statement carried by an Iranian government website, saying that only 190 of the injured remained hospitalised on Sunday. The provincial governor declared three days of mourning.
Private security firm Ambrey says the port received missile fuel chemical in March. It was part of a shipment of ammonium perchlorate from China by two vessels to Iran, first reported in January by the Financial Times. The chemical used to make solid propellant for rockets was going to be used to replenish Iran's missile stocks, which had been depleted by its direct attacks on Israel during the war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
Ship-tracking data analysed by The Associated Press put one of the vessels believed to be carrying the chemical in the vicinity in March, as Ambrey said.
"The fire was reportedly the result of improper handling of a shipment of solid fuel intended for use in Iranian ballistic missiles," Ambrey said.
In a first reaction on Sunday, Iranian Defense Ministry spokesman General Reza Talaeinik denied that missile fuel had been imported through the port.
"No sort of imported and exporting consignment for fuel or military application was (or) is in the site of the port," he told state television by telephone. He called foreign reports on the missile fuel baseless — but offered no explanation for what material detonated with such incredible force at the site. Talaeinik promised authorities would offer more information later.
It's unclear why Iran wouldn't have moved the chemicals from the port, particularly after the Beirut port blast in 2020. That explosion, caused by the ignition of hundreds of tons of highly explosive ammonium nitrate, killed more than 200 people and injured more than 6,000 others. However, Israel did target Iranian missile sites where Tehran uses industrial mixers to create solid fuel — meaning potentially that it had no place to process the chemical.
Social media footage of the explosion on Saturday at Shahid Rajaei saw reddish-hued smoke rising from the fire just before the detonation. That suggests a chemical compound being involved in the blast, like in the Beirut explosion.
Meanwhile on Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin deployed several emergency aircraft to Bandar Abbas to provide assistance, Iran's state-run IRNA news agency reported.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
Barak Magen: What to know about Israel's new ‘Lightning Shield' against Iranian drones
In a significant milestone for Israeli naval defense, the Israeli Navy successfully intercepted eight unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) launched from Iran on June 15 using the 'Barak Magen' aerial defense system—marking its first operational use in live combat. The 'Barak Magen' interceptor, installed aboard the INS Sa'ar 6 missile ship, was deployed to neutralise aerial threats from Iran as part of Israel's ongoing defensive operations amid escalating regional hostilities. The advanced system is designed to counter a broad spectrum of threats, including: High-trajectory projectiles According to the Israeli military, the Navy's missile ship flotilla—operating under Flotilla 3—intercepted a total of eight UAVs overnight, bringing the total number of drone threats neutralized by the Navy since the beginning of the current conflict to approximately 25. These UAVs were assessed to be targeting civilian areas in Israel, underscoring the persistent threat posed by Iranian long-range drone operations. The naval response was closely coordinated with the Israeli Air Force, allowing for efficient real-time threat tracking and layered interception. Barak Magen integrates advanced radar with vertical missile launchers and multiple interceptor types: MRAD (short/medium range), LRAD (mid/long range), and ER (extended range). ER: potentially up to ~150 km Threats addressed: IP-capable against UAVs, cruise missiles, shore‑to‑sea missiles, high-trajectory munitions, and ballistic projectiles. Barak Magen complements Israel's existing systems (Iron Dome, David's Sling, Arrow, plus future laser Iron Beam), adding a powerful naval tier to national defense. The Israel-Iran conflict sharply escalated on Monday as Israeli airstrikes rocked central Tehran, prompting mass evacuations and cutting off state TV broadcasts. Israel said the strikes targeted Iran's nuclear and military infrastructure, claiming to have gained 'full aerial superiority' over Tehran. Over 330,000 residents were told to evacuate; bombs hit Iran's state-run TV station mid-broadcast, injuring staff. Israeli PM Netanyahu said the campaign has set back Iran's nuclear ambitions 'by a very, very long time.' US President Donald Trump called for Tehran's immediate evacuation, warning, 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' In retaliation, Iran launched over 370 missiles and hundreds of drones, killing 24 people and injuring over 500 in Israel. Major cities like Tel Aviv and Haifa were hit. Iran reported 224 deaths and 1,277 injuries, though rights groups estimate over 400 killed, including civilians. Flights across the region remain grounded, fueling fears of a wider regional war.
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Satellite images show damage to Iranian nuclear facilities after Israeli strikes
Since the June 13 strikes, Israel has targeted several nuclear and weapons facilities across Iran. In the past five days, several Iranian sites such as the Isfahan nuclear technology centre, Shiraz missile production facility, Tabriz north missile base as well as the the underground Natanz nuclear facility among many more. The strikes on nuclear facilities has raised alarms with the UN watchdog IAEA regarding potential contamination and leaks. Newly released satellite images show the exact damage Israeli strikes have caused to Iran and its nuclear programme. Israel also struck the Isfahan nuclear site in central Iran, which is the region's largest nuclear research complex, during its strikes against the region. Based on the assessment from the IAEA, four critical buildings at the site have been damaged due to Israel's attack. The Piranshahr facility lies near the Iraqi order in western Iran. As per reports, the facility serves as a military building. The Shiraz Missile facilities was another centre where Iran reportedly manufactured, repaired, and stored ballistic missiles. Along with the missile plant, Israeli forces also struck the electronics facility. Satellite images of the Tabriz north missile base depict the damage caused by Israeli strikes. The Tabiz centre is a key ballistic missile production unit for Iran. At the Natanz nuclear facility centre, which is Iran's biggest uranium enrichment centre, the International Atomic Energy Agency has reported that the Israeli strikes may have "severely damaged" the underground centrifuges, if not "destroyed altogether." Israel has also struck other key nuclear and military bases such as the Kermanshah missile facility, Bid Kaneh missile facility, Shahid Modarres Garrison rocket production facility. The IDF is yet to target the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and the Arak nuclear facility. The conflict between Israel and Iran continues to escalate for a fifth consecutive day. The tensions reached a new boiling point after Israel carried out several attacks across Iran, targeting military bases and nuclear facilities as part of its "Operation Rising Lion". Since then, Iran and Israel have exchanged regular missile and drone attack, killing over 220 people in Tehran and 24 in Israel. Both nations have promised to carry out the 'largest attacks' against each other as global allies call for an urgent de-escalation.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Israel's air game is strong but the final blow still needs US backup as Iran's biggest bomb risk Fordow lives on
Israel says it now controls the skies above Iran. On Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called this 'a game-changer.' National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi added that pilots could now strike 'countless more targets' over Tehran, thanks to the destruction of 'dozens and dozens' of Iranian air defence systems. Since launching strikes last week, Israeli warplanes have flown thousands of kilometres, targeting nuclear sites, missile stockpiles, military commanders and infrastructure. Yet despite its air dominance, experts say Israel lacks the firepower to deliver a fatal blow to Iran's nuclear programme without American help. 'Quite a lot of tactical successes' Andreas Krieg of King's College London said: 'Israel has achieved quite a lot of operational and tactical successes… But translating that into a strategic success will require more than what air power can deliver.' Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why CVS Hides This Cheap 87¢ ED Medication Health Alliance by Friday Plans Learn More Undo Even the United States' largest bunker-busting bombs may not be enough to penetrate Iran's most secure sites like Fordow, Krieg added. He suggested ground forces might be needed for any final blow. Despite that, he said, 'Israel can act with impunity now, and they can do that in the way they did in Lebanon.' Live Events Echoes of Lebanon, eyes on Tehran This campaign echoes Israel's blitz on Hezbollah in Lebanon last year, when it took out top leadership—including Hassan Nasrallah—within days. This time, Israel is openly warning residents of Tehran to evacuate specific areas, signalling imminent strikes. A regional intelligence source told Reuters that Israel had built a 'truly surprising' network of agents inside Iran, enabling it to strike with 'astonishing' accuracy. Two U.S. officials said that President Donald Trump recently vetoed an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Netanyahu did not deny the possibility, saying targeting Khamenei could 'end the conflict.' The standoff over Fordow Fordow, Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear site, remains untouched. Built under a mountain, it is far beyond the reach of Israeli missiles and can likely only be hit by specialised U.S. munitions. According to a senior Israeli official speaking anonymously to Reuters, Israel has avoided hitting Fordow so far. Instead, its campaign has focused on facilities at Natanz and Isfahan . The official said, 'If after the conflict ends Iran retained a residual uranium enrichment capability but not the people and facilities to do anything of concern with it, then this would be a major achievement.' US and Israeli intelligence divide While Israel insists Iran was racing toward a bomb, U.S. intelligence assessments contradict that. Four sources familiar with American briefings told CNN that Iran is not currently building a nuclear weapon and could be at least three years away from being able to deliver one. A U.S. official told CNN the Natanz strikes may have only set Iran's programme back by 'a matter of months.' Former U.S. Middle East envoy Brett McGurk said, 'Israel can hover over those nuclear facilities… but if you really want to dismantle them, it's either a U.S. military strike or a deal.' Diplomacy still in the shadows Speaking at the G7 Summit, President Donald Trump confirmed: 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved.' He urged both countries to enter talks 'before it's too late.' Yet a regional diplomat told CNN that Iran refuses to negotiate while under attack, despite attempts by mediators in Qatar and Oman. Reinforcements and rearmament Inside the Pentagon , preparations are under way. The USS Nimitz carrier group is moving toward the Middle East 'without delay.' Missile defence ships are expected in the eastern Mediterranean shortly. Back in April, Israeli media reported a large U.S. shipment of bombs—including bunker busters. That supply, delivered just weeks before the assault, may now be playing a vital role. Israeli officials also claimed Mossad operatives destroyed several Iranian anti-aircraft systems on the ground before the aerial campaign began. Iran retaliates, but struggles to block attacks Tehran has fired missiles into Israeli cities and claimed it shot down Israeli aircraft. Israel denies this. It says no aircraft or crew have been lost. A senior Western defence source told Reuters that Israeli jets have been refuelling over Syria, a country where Iranian influence has collapsed following the fall of Bashar al-Assad. The source added that Israel is now operating over Syrian airspace with 'near-total freedom.' Justin Bronk from the Royal United Services Institute said Iran has 'few technical answers' to Israel's combination of F-35s—equipped for electronic warfare—and F-15s and F-16s carrying precision-guided missiles. Emily Harding of the Center for Strategic and International Studies warned that Israel might have capabilities beyond what most assume. 'The ability to operate freely over the target allows for multiple sorties that could do a lot of damage,' she said. Still, if Fordow survives intact, the consequences could be severe. McGurk cautioned, 'You could actually have a worse problem… Iran more inclined to go to a nuclear weapon, and they have that infrastructure intact.' 'We'll continue' says Israeli Envoy in India Israel's Ambassador to India, Reuven Azar, told reporters in Delhi on Tuesday: 'We'll continue to do what is in our capabilities to degrade Iran's nuclear programme.' He stressed the military operation was meant to curb a 'threat' and said Israel and the U.S. were 'completely in sync.' Asked if he expected U.S. involvement, Azar replied, 'I feel the U.S. would support Israel's action.' He added that a diplomatic solution would still be preferable to extended conflict. For now, Israel controls Iran's skies. But Fordow remains underground, protected, and intact. Whether this aerial campaign can reshape Iran's nuclear trajectory—or simply provoke a harder backlash—will depend on what comes next. And whether the U.S. decides to enter the war.
